Intensive Care Unit Length Of Stay Research Articles

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 cases admitted to adult intensive care units during the pandemic: A single center experience

BackgroundCOVID-19 is the largest recorded pandemic in history. It causes several complications such as shock, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and organ failure. The objective was to determine COVID-19 outcomes and risk factors in the intensive care (ICU) setting. MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted. Adult patients with a positive RT-PCR test for COVID-19 admitted to ICUs of a tertiary care hospital between 2020 and 2022 were included. Patients who had severe complex trauma were excluded. The outcomes examined included ventilation use and duration, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. ResultsA total of 964 patients were included. The mean ( ± standard deviation, SD) age was 63.7 ± 16.9 years. The majority of the patients were males (59.0 %) and Saudi (75.7 %). Ventilation use was documented in 443 (57.1 %) patients, with a mean ( ± SD) ventilation duration of 9.7 ± 8.4 days. Death occurred in 361 (37.4 %) patients after a mean ( ± SD) of 33.3 ± 44.5 days from infection. The mean ( ± SD) LOS was 30.6 ± 54.1 days in hospital and 5.2 ± 5.4 days in ICU. Ventilation use was associated with older age, males, longer ICU LOS, mortality, and admission to medical-surgical ICU. Crude mortality use was associated with older age, longer ICU LOS, use of ventilator, shorter ventilation duration, and admission to medical-surgical or respiratory ICUs. ConclusionsCOVID-19 patients admitted to adult ICUs are at high risk of death and mechanical ventilation. The crude risks of both outcomes are higher in older age and longer ICU LOS and are very variable by ICU type.

Association of antibiotics with the outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia patients with elevated PCT levels

ObjectiveTo assess antibiotics impact on outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia patients with varying procalcitonin (PCT) levels. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 3665 COVID-19 pneumonia patients hospitalized at five Mayo Clinic sites (March 2020 to June 2022). PCT levels were measured at admission. Patients’ antibiotics use and outcomes were collected via the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) registry. Patients were stratified into high and low PCT groups based on the first available PCT result. The distinction between high and low PCT was demarcated at both 0.25 ng/ml and 0.50 ng/ml. ResultsOur cohort consisted of 3665 patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia. The population was predominantly male, Caucasian and non-Hispanic. With the PCT cut-off of 0.25 ng/ml, 2375 (64.8 %) patients had a PCT level <0.25 ng/mL, and 1290 (35.2 %) had PCT ≥0.25 ng/ml. While when the PCT cut off of 0.50 ng/ml was used we observed 2934 (80.05 %) patients with a PCT <0.50 ng/ml while 731(19.94 %) patients had a PCT ≥0.50 ng/ml. Patients with higher PCT levels exhibited significantly higher rates of bacterial infections (0.25 ng/ml cut-off: 4.2 % vs 7.9 %; 0.50 ng/ml cut-off: 4.6 % vs 9.2 %).Antibiotics were used in 66.0 % of the cohort. Regardless of the PCT cutoffs, the antibiotics group showed increased hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, and mortality. However, early de-escalation (<24 h) of antibiotics correlated with reduced hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. These results were consistent even after adjusting for confounders. ConclusionOur study shows a substantial number of COVID-19 pneumonia patients received antibiotics despite a low incidence of bacterial infections. Therefore, antibiotics use in COVID pneumonia patients with PCT <0.5 in the absence of clinical evidence of bacterial infection has no beneficial effect.

Back to the future: the novel art of digital auscultation applied in a prospective observational study of critically ill Covid-19 patients

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic has caused immense pressure on Intensive Care Units (ICU). In patients with severe ARDS due to Covid-19, respiratory mechanics are important for determining the severity of lung damage. Lung auscultation could not be used during the pandemic despite its merit. The main objective of this study was to investigate associations between lung auscultatory sound features and lung mechanical properties, length of stay (LOS) and survival, in adults with severe Covid-19 ARDS.MethodsConsecutive patients admitted to a large ICU between 2020 and 2021 (n = 173) were included. Digital stethoscopes obtained auscultatory sounds and stored them in an on-line database for replay and further processing using advanced AI techniques. Correlation and regression analysis explored relationships between digital auscultation findings and lung mechanics or the ICU outcome. The resulting annotated lung sounds database is also publicly available as supplementary material.ResultsThe presence of squawks was associated with the ICU LOS, outcome and 90-day mortality. Other features (age, SOFA score & oxygenation index upon admission, minimum crackle entropy) had significant impact on outcome. Additional features affecting the 90-d survival were age and mean crackle entropy. Multivariate logistic regression showed that survival was affected by age, baseline SOFA, baseline oxygenation index and minimum crackle entropy.ConclusionsRespiratory mechanics were associated with various adventitious sounds, whereas the lung sound analytics and the presence of certain adventitious sounds correlated with the ICU outcome and the 90-d survival. Spectral features of crackles sounds can serve as prognostic factors for survival, highlighting the importance of digital auscultation.

Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the association between refeeding syndrome (RFS) risk and intensive care unit (ICU)/in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and ICU readmission in critically ill patients. MethodsThis secondary analysis of a cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at ICU 24 h before data collection. We evaluated RFS risk based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), stratifying it into four categories (no, low, high, and very-high risk). SettingFive adult ICUs in Brazil. Main outcome measuresICU/in-hospital mortality and LOS and ICU readmission data were obtained from electronic medical records analysis, following patients until discharge (alive or not). ResultsThe study involved 447 patients, categorized into no (19.2 %), low (28.6 %), high (48.8 %), and very-high (3.4 %) RFS risk groups. No significant differences emerged between the two groups (at RFS risk and no RFS risk) regarding the ICU death ratio (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) and LOS (5 versus 4 days), respectively. In contrast, patients at RFS risk experienced higher in-hospital mortality rates (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) prolonged hospital LOS (21 days versus 17 days), and increased ICU readmission rates (15 % versus 8.4 %) than patients without RFS risk. After adjusting for age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, we found no association between RFS risk and increased mortality in the ICU or hospital. Also, there was no significant association between RFS risk and prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital setting. However, patients identified as at risk of RFS showed nearly double the odds of ICU readmission (Odds ratio, 1.90; 95 % CI 1.02–3.43). ConclusionsThis study found no significant association between RFS risk and increased mortality in both the ICU and hospital settings, nor was there a significant association with prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital among critically ill patients. However, patients at risk of RFS exhibited nearly double the odds of ICU readmission. Implications for Clinical PracticeOur findings may contribute to understanding risks associated with ICU readmissions, highlighting the complexity of discharge decision-making through comprehensive assessments.

Using machine learning for targeted advance care planning (ACP) conversations in patients with cancer: A quality improvement initiative.

1552 Background: Despite improvements, patients with advanced cancer often do not receive goal-concordant care at the end of life (EOL). Challenges with prognostication contribute to delays ACP conversations and result in more aggressive care, gaps in symptom management, and hospice underuse. Early identification of patients at high risk for mortality provides an avenue to implement targeted ACP conversations. Methods: We used a validated machine learning model that integrates demographics, lab values, vital signs, and medications to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 6-month mortality risk for patients with a solid malignancy admitted from the emergency department (ED) to a dedicated solid malignancy oncology unit at Duke University Hospital. This unit includes one oncology and one palliative care attending physician, advance practice providers, and nurse coordinators. Providers received an email when a patient was identified as high risk for mortality. A pre-post study design compared ACP documentation and other EOL healthcare utilization before and after the notification intervention. The pre-intervention cohort included patients hospitalized from 1/7/2019 to 10/25/2019 and the post-intervention cohort from 9/19/2020 to 8/31/2021. We excluded patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the first 24 hours. We used chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables; we stratified comparisons of categorical variables by physician division using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Results: The pre-intervention cohort comprised 105 hospitalizations and 88 unique patients. Mean (SD) age was 64.9 (11.4); 60.0% (n=63) were White, 3.8% (4) Hispanic/Latino, and 65.7% (69) married. The post-intervention cohort comprised 84 hospitalizations and 77 patients. Mean (SD) age was 66.0 (12.2); 52.4% (44) were White, 2.4% (2) Hispanic/Latino, and 60.7% (51) married. Considering index hospitalizations, an ACP note was written for 2.3% (2) of hospitalizations pre-intervention vs. 80.5% (62) post-intervention (p &lt;0.0001). This relationship held even if the physician was in palliative care (4.1% [2] vs. 84.6% [33]) or oncology (0% [0] vs. 76.3% [29]) (p &lt;0.0001). Inpatient length of stay (LOS), hospice referral, code status change, ICU admission rate or LOS, 30-day readmissions, 30-day ED visits, and inpatient and 30-day deaths did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: Identification of hospitalized cancer patients with high mortality risk via machine learning led to a substantial increase in documented ACP conversations but did not impact EOL healthcare utilization. Further integration of the model in clinical practice is ongoing. Our intervention showed promise in changing clinician behavior, and additional work is needed to evaluate downstream impacts.

Epicardial placement of human placental membrane allografts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation: a pilot study for a future multi-center randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPost-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in up to 40% of patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and is associated with a higher risk of stroke and mortality. This study investigates how POAF may be mitigated by epicardial placement of aseptically processed human placental membrane allografts (HPMAs) before pericardial closure in CABG surgery. This study was conducted as a pilot feasibility study to collect preliminary for a forthcoming multi-center randomized controlled trial.MethodsThis retrospective observational study of patients undergoing CABG surgery excluded patients with pre-operative heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or a history of atrial fibrillation. The “treatment” group (n = 24) had three HPMAs placed epicardially following cardiopulmonary bypass decannulation but before partial pericardial approximation and chest closure. The only difference in clinical protocol for the control group (n = 54) was that they did not receive HPMA.ResultsHPMA-treated patients saw a significant, greater than four-fold reduction in POAF incidence compared to controls (35.2–8.3%, p = 0.0136). Univariate analysis demonstrated that HPMA treatment was associated with an 83% reduction in POAF (OR = 0.17, p = 0.0248). Multivariable analysis yielded similar results (OR = 0.07, p = 0.0156) after controlling for other covariates. Overall length of stay (LOS) between groups was similar, but ICU LOS trended lower with HPMA treatment (p = 0.0677). Post-operative inotrope and vasopressor requirements were similar among groups. There was no new-onset post-operative heart failure, stroke, or death reported up to thirty days in either group.ConclusionsEpicardial HPMA placement can be a simple intervention at the end of CABG surgery that may provide a new approach to reduce post-operative atrial fibrillation by modulating local inflammation, possibly reducing ICU and hospital stay, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Effect of Admission Day and Time on Patient Outcome: An Observational Study in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

The current study aimed to assess any association between intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital outcomes with ICU admission timings of critically ill patients. Retrospective observational single-center study involving all adult admissions. Each patient admission was categorized in "after-hours" (08:00 p.m.-07:59 a.m.), or "normal-hours" (08:00 a.m.-07:59 p.m.), "Weekday" (Monday-Saturday), or "Weekend" (Sunday), "Same day" (admission directly to ICU) or "other day admission" (admission to ICU after a hospital stay of ≥24 hours). Intensive care unit and hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and ICU readmission were assessed for any association with different admission timings. Among 3,029 patients, 54.2% (1,668) were male, with mean age 66.49 (SD ± 15.69) years, mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-IV (APACHE-IV) score 55.5 (SD ± 26.3). Around 86.1% of admission occurred during weekdays, 13.9% on weekends, 57.4% normal-hours, 42.6% after-hours, 66.3% same day and 33.7% other day admission. Intensive care unit and hospital mortality were 10.8 and 14.2% respectively. Neither ICU nor hospital mortality were significantly different among patients admitted normal vs after-hours (p = 0.32, 0.23), and weekdays vs weekends (p = 0.09, 0.93), nor was ICU LOS (p = 0.21, 0.74). Intensive care unit and hospital mortality (p = 0.001), DORB (p = 0.001), hospital LOS (p = 0.001), and readmission to ICU (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the other day admission group compared to same-day admission. In a multivariate regression analysis age, APACHE IV score along with other day admission to ICU did have a significant effect on both ICU and hospital mortality. Intensive care unit and hospital mortality and LOS did not differ significantly with hours or days of ICU admission though they were significantly higher in other day admission groups. Bhattacharyya M, Todi SK. Effect of Admission Day and Time on Patient Outcome: An Observational Study in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Hospital in India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):436-441.

Adoption of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Increases Cost of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Does not Improve Outcomes.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS) and complications. The impact of ERAS protocols on the cost of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has not been studied. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC from 2016-2022 at a single quaternary center. Propensity score matching was used to create pre-and post-ERAS cohorts. Cost, overall and serious complications, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) between the two cohorts were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. Our final matched cohort consisted of 100 patients, with 50 patients in both the pre- and post-ERAS groups. After adjusting for patient complexity and inflation, the median total cost [$75,932 ($67,166-102,645) versus $92,992 ($80,720-116,710), p = 0.02] and operating room cost [$26,817 ($23,378-33,121) versus $34,434 ($28,085-$41,379), p < 0.001] were significantly higher in the post-ERAS cohort. Overall morbidity (n = 22, 44% versus n = 17, 34%, p = 0.40) and ICU length of stay [2 days (IQR 1-3) versus 2 days (IQR 1-4), p = 0.70] were similar between the two cohorts. A total cost increase of $22,393 [SE $13,047, 95% CI (-$3178 to $47,965), p = 0.086] was estimated after implementation of ERAS, with operating room cost significantly contributing to this increase [$8419, SE $1628, 95% CI ($5228-11,609), p < 0.001]. CRS-HIPEC ERAS protocols were associated with higher total costs due to increased operating room costs at a single institution. There was no significant difference in ICU LOS and complications after the implementation of the ERAS protocol.

National Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Cirrhotic Blunt Trauma Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy Versus Non-operative Management: A Propensity Case-Matched Analysis.

This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes among severely injured trauma patients presenting with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries with a pre-diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing emergency laparotomy vs nonoperative management (NOM). This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP-PUF) dataset from 2017 to 2021. Adults (≥18years) with a pre-existing diagnosis of LC who presented with severe blunt (ISS ≥ 16) isolated solid organ abdominal injuries and underwent laparotomy or NOM were included. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and in-hospital complications such as acute renal failure and deep vein thrombosis. 929 patients were included in this analysis, with 355 undergoing laparotomy and 574 managed nonoperatively. Laparotomy patients suffered greater in-hospital mortality (n = 186, 52.3% vs n = 115, 20.0%; P < .01), required significantly more blood within 4hours (8.9 units vs 4.3 units, P < .01), and had a significantly longer ICU-LOS (10.2days vs 6.7days, P < .01). In the 1:1 propensity score matched analysis of 556 matched patients, in-hospital mortality was greater for laparotomy patients (52.3% vs 20.0%, P < .01). Laparotomy was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched trauma patients, longer ICU-LOS, and more blood products given at 4hours compared to NOM. These findings illustrate that NOM may be a safe approach in managing severely injured trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries and a pre-diagnosis of LC.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Trauma Patients.

Introduction: Central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) is a hospital-acquired infection (HAI) associated with increased morbidity and mortality among the general patient population. However, few studies have evaluated the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for CLABSI in trauma patients. This study aimed to identify the rate of positive (+)CLABSI in trauma patients and risk factors associated with (+)CLABSI. Methods: The 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for trauma patients aged ≥18 years undergoing central-line placement. We compared patients with (+)CLABSI vs. (-)CLABSI patients. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: From 175,538 patients undergoing central-line placement, 469 (<0.1%) developed CLABSI. The (+)CLABSI patients had higher rates of cirrhosis (3.9% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.003) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (4.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.02). The (+)CLABSI group had increased injury severity score (median: 25 vs. 13, p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) (median 33.5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), intensive care unit LOS (median 21 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001), and mortality (23.7% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.03). Independent associated risk factors for (+)CLABSI included catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) (odds ratio [OR] = 5.52, confidence interval [CI] = 3.81-8.01), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (OR = 4.43, CI = 3.42-5.75), surgical site infection (SSI) (OR = 3.66, CI = 2.55-5.25), small intestine injury (OR = 1.91, CI = 1.29-2.84), CKD (OR = 2.08, CI = 1.25-3.47), and cirrhosis (OR = 1.81, CI = 1.08-3.02) (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although CLABSI occurs in <0.1% of trauma patients with central-lines, it significantly impacts LOS and morbidity/mortality. The strongest associated risk factors for (+)CLABSI included HAIs (CAUTI/VAP/SSI), specific injuries (small intestine), and comorbidities. Providers should be aware of these risk factors with efforts made to prevent CLABSI in these patients.

Four-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate During Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is a plasma product that contains factors II, VII, IX, X, protein C, and protein S. PCC can be used off-label to treat coagulopathy during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, its use comes with safety concerns regarding thrombosis. The purpose of our study is to determine the safety of PCC in OLT. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received 4-factor PCC during OLT at our institution from January 1, 2018, to May 1, 2022, with a 1:1 match of 83 patients who received PCC and 83 patients who did not. We evaluated 30-d mortality, 1-y mortality, prevalence of thrombotic complications (portal vein thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolus), and postoperative intensive care (ICU) length of stay (LOS). There was no significant difference in 30-d mortality (odds ratio [OR] 5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-42.8; P = 0.14), 1-y mortality (OR 3; 95% CI, 0.61-14.86; P = 0.18), or ICU LOS (OR -13.8; 95% CI, -39.2 to 11.6; P = 0.29). There was no increased incidence of thrombotic complications among patients receiving PCC 90 d after surgery, including portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 0.42-5.32; P = 0.53), pulmonary embolus (OR 1; 95% CI, 0.14-7.1; P = 0.99), deep venous thrombosis (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-3.99; P = 0.66), and myocardial infarction (OR 1.67; 95% CI, 0.4-6.97; P = 0.48). Although there was a statistically insignificant increase in mortality after PCC administration during OLT, we did not see a significant increase in perioperative complications, including thrombotic events and increased ICU LOS.

Nutritional support team intervention in surgical ICUs and its effect on nutrition delivery and quality in critically ill patients

RationalCritically ill surgical patients pose one of the greatest challenges in achieving nutritional goals. Several published papers have demonstrated clear benefits when nutrition support (NS) is managed by a multidisciplinary nutrition support team (NST). We hypothesized that implementing a NST in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) would increase the number of patients achieving their nutritional goals. Material and methodMulticenter “BEFORE & AFTER” study. In the BEFORE phase, an audit of the previous state of NS was conducted in three ICUs without a NST. InterventionImplementation of a NST and protocol. In the AFTER phase, a new audit of NS was conducted. Continuous variables (presented as mean ± SD or median Q1–Q3) were tested using the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables (presented as frequencies and percentages) were assessed using the chi-square test. A binomial logistic regression model was performed, with independent variables introduced using a stepwise forward method. A difference was considered to be significant with a two-sided P-value <0.05. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM-SPSS 26. ResultsA total of 83 patients were included in the BEFORE phase, and 85 in the AFTER phase. The latter group showed a higher frequency of nutritional risk and malnutrition (SGA B+C odds ratio 2.314, 95% CI 1.164–4.600). Laparoscopy was more frequently utilized as a surgical technique in the AFTER phase. No differences were observed in ICU and hospital LOS or 90 days’ survival rates. Two variables remained independent factors to predict NS achievement: NST implementation (odds ratio 3.582, 95% CI 1.733–7.404), and surgical technique (odds ratio 3.231, 95% CI 1.312–7.959). ConclusionNST positively impacts the chance of achieving NS goals in critically ill surgical patients.

Epidemiology of Intimate Partner and Domestic Violence-Related Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States, 2018 to 2021: A National Trauma Data Bank Cohort Analysis of 3891 Patients.

Despite profound medico-socio-legal consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI) from intimate partner violence and domestic violence (IPV/DV), the incidence and acute outcomes of concurrent IPV/DV-TBI are not well understood. We examined US IPV/DV patients with/without TBI (IPV/DV-TBI; non-TBI) using the National Trauma Data Bank. We hypothesized IPV/DV-TBI would be associated with elevated morbidity. National Trauma Data Bank Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use Files years 2018 to 2021 were queried for patients aged ≥18 years with IPV/DV using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision external cause codes. TBI/non-TBI was defined using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes. TBI severity was defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale (severe = 3-8, moderate = 9-12, and mild = 13-15). Outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and discharge home. Multivariable regressions examined associations between TBI and outcomes, controlling for sociodemographic and injury severity variables. Of 3891 IPV/DV-related cases, 31.1% were IPV/DV-TBI. Cranial injuries included skull fracture (30.2%), subdural (19.8%), subarachnoid (13.4%), and epidural (1.1%) hemorrhage, contusion (8.1%), and cerebral edema (3.3%). In IPV/DV-TBI, mild/moderate/severe TBI proportions were 87.4%/4.3%/8.3%, with mean LOS 11.5 ± 10.9/14.4 ± 27.3/5.0 ± 7.7-days and mortality 0.9%/22.5%/28.6%, respectively. Compared with non-TBI, IPV/DV-TBI had more female (77.2%/64.6%, P < .001) and fewer Black patients (28.9%/36.6%, P < .001), more ICU admissions (20.9%/7.5%, P < .001) and mortality (4.1%/1.8%, P < .001), longer LOS (5.3 ± 9.5/4.5 ± 6.4-days, P = .008), and decreased discharge home (79.8%/83.8%, P = .005). Multivariable regressions confirmed the associations between TBI and ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.29, 95% CI [3.46-5.33]), mortality (aOR = 3.20 [1.99-5.15]), LOS (adjusted mean difference = +1.22 [0.68-1.76]), and inability to discharge home (aOR = 0.57 [0.46-0.71]). One-third of US IPV/DV-related trauma cases have TBI, comprising predominantly female patients. Black patients with IPV/DV-related trauma were overrepresented compared with US census estimates. IPV/DV-TBI had increased ICU admissions, LOS, in-hospital mortality, and inability to discharge home compared with non-TBI. Investigating morbidity risk factors and providing sociomedical resources during acute care are critically needed in this vulnerable population.

Early physical rehabilitation dosage in the IntensiveCare Unit predicts hospital outcomes after criticalCOVID-19.

to examine the relationship between physical rehabilitation parameters including a novel approach to quantifying dosage with hospital outcomes for patients with critical COVID-19. Retrospective practice analysis from March 5, 2020, to April 15, 2021. Intensive care units (ICU) at four medical institutions. n = 3,780 adults with ICU admission and diagnosis of COVID-19. We measured the physical rehabilitation treatment delivered in ICU and patient outcomes: 1) mortality; 2) discharge disposition; and 3) physical function at hospital discharge measured by the Activity Measure-Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" (6-24, 24=greater functional independence). Physical rehabilitation dosage was defined as the average mobility level scores in the first three sessions (a surrogate measure of intensity) multiplied by the rehabilitation frequency (PT + OT frequency in hospital). The cohort was a mean 64 ± 16 years old, 41% female, mean BMI of 32 ± 9 kg/m2 and 46% (n=1739) required mechanical ventilation. For 2191 patients with complete data, rehabilitation dosage and AM-PAC at discharge were moderately, positively associated (Spearman's rho [r] = 0.484, p < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression (model adjusted R2= 0.68, p <0.001) demonstrates mechanical ventilation (β = -0.86, p = 0.001), average mobility score in first three sessions (β = 2.6, p <0.001) and physical rehabilitation dosage (β = 0.22, p = 0.001) were predictive of AM-PAC scores at discharge when controlling for age, sex, BMI, and ICU LOS. Greater physical rehabilitation exposure early in the ICU is associated with physical function at hospital discharge.

Effect of Continuous Lateral Rotation Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults.

This Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes-guided systematic review assesses continuous lateral rotation therapy versus conventional position changes in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults, evaluating mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS as primary outcomes and respiratory function, mechanical ventilation duration, pulmonary complications, and adverse events as secondary outcomes. This systematic review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022384258). Searches spanned databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science, without language or publication year restrictions. Inclusion criteria involved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials, comparing continuous lateral rotation therapy (intervention) with conventional position changes (control). Risk of bias and quality of evidence for RCTs were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tools. For the quasi-randomized trials, the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions tool was used. In 18 studies with 1,466 participants (intervention, n = 700, 47.7%; control, n = 766, 52.2%), continuous lateral rotation therapy was predominantly used for prophylactic purposes, with protocols varying from 10-24 h/d. Meta-analysis (16 RCTs) favored continuous lateral rotation therapy for reduced mechanical ventilation duration (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.17 [CI -0.29 to -0.04] d, P = .008) and lower nosocomial pneumonia incidence (odds ratio 0.39 [CI 0.29-0.52], P < .001). Continuous lateral rotation therapy showed no significant impact on mortality (odds ratio 1.04 [CI 0.80-1.34], P = .77), ICU LOS (SMD -0.11 [CI -0.25 to 0.02] d, P = .11), hospital LOS (SMD -0.10 [CI -0.31 to 0.11] d, P = .33), and incidence of pressure ulcers (odds ratio 0.73 [CI 0.34-1.60], P = .44). Continuous lateral rotation therapy showed no significant difference in primary outcomes (mortality, ICU and hospital LOS) but revealed significant differences in secondary outcomes (consistently reduced nosocomial pneumonia, with a minor effect on mechanical ventilation duration), supported by moderate certainty. Very low certainty for other outcomes highlights the need for current studies in diverse clinical settings and protocols to assess continuous lateral rotation therapy effectiveness.

Cortisol Levels During First Admission Day Are Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Critically Ill Patients.

To explore the correlation between cortisol levels during first admission day and clinical outcomes. Although most patients exhibit a surge in cortisol levels in response to stress, some suffer from critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI). Literature remains inconclusive as to which of these patients are at greater risk of poor outcomes. A retrospective study. A surgical ICU (SICU) in a tertiary medical center. Critically ill patients admitted to the SICU who were not treated with steroids. Levels of cortisol taken within 24 hours of admission (day 1 [D1] cortisol) in 1412 eligible patients were collected and analyzed. Results were categorized into four groups: low (0-10 µg/dL), normal (10-25 µg/dL), high (25-50 µg/dL), and very high (above 50 µg/dL) cortisol levels. Primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the need for organ support (use of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation [MV]), ICU length of stay (LOS), and duration of MV. The majority of patients (63%) had high or very high D1 cortisol levels, whereas 7.6% had low levels and thus could be diagnosed with CIRCI. There were statistically significant differences in 90-day mortality between the four groups and very high levels were found to be an independent risk factor for mortality, primarily in patients with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) less than or equal to 3 or SOFA greater than or equal to 7. Higher cortisol levels were associated with all secondary endpoints. CIRCI was associated with favorable outcomes. In critically ill surgical patients D1 cortisol levels above 50 mcg/dL were associated with mortality, need for organ support, longer ICU LOS, and duration of MV, whereas low levels correlated with good clinical outcomes even though untreated. D1 cortisol level greater than 50 mcg/dL can help discriminate nonsurvivors from survivors when SOFA less than or equal to 3 or SOFA greater than or equal to 7.

Assessing glycemic variability in critically ill patients: A prospective cohort study comparing insulin infusion therapy with insulin sliding scale

Glycemic variability (GV) has been associated with an increased mortality rate among critically ill patients. The clinical outcomes of having less GV even with slight hyperglycemia are better than those having tight glycemic control but higher GV. Insulin infusion remains the preferred method to control stress hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. However, its impacts on GV and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients still need further investigation. This study intended to evaluate the impact of insulin infusion therapy (IIT) compared to the insulin sliding scale (ISS) on the extent of GV and explore its impact on the clinical outcomes for critically ill patients. A prospective, single-center observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital in Saudi Arabia between March 2021 and November 2021. The study included adult patients admitted to ICUs who received insulin for stress hyperglycemia management. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the regimen of insulin therapy during ICU stay (IIT versus ISS). The primary outcome was the GV between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, the incidence of hypoglycemia, and ICU length of stay (LOS). A total of 381 patients were screened; out of them, eighty patients met the eligibility criteria. The distribution of patients having diabetes and a history of insulin use was similar between the two groups. The GV was lower in the IIT group compared to the ISS group using CONGA (− 0.65, 95% CI [− 1.16, − 0.14], p-value = 0.01). Compared with ISS, patients who received IIT had a lower incidence of hypoglycemia that required correction (6.8% vs 2.77%; p-value = 0.38). In contrast, there were no significant differences in ICU LOS and ICU mortality between the two groups. Our study demonstrated that the IIT is associated with decreased GV significantly in critically ill patients without increasing the incidence of severe hypoglycemia. There is no survival benefit with the use of the IIT. Further studies with larger sample size are required to confirm our findings and elaborate on IIT's potential effect in reducing ICU complications in critically ill patients.

Immunonutrition with Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Severe TBI: Retrospective Analysis of Patient Characteristics and Outcomes.

Early evidence-based medical interventions to improve patient outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are lacking. In patients admitted to the ICU after TBI, optimization of nutrition is an emerging field of interest. Specialized enteral nutrition (EN) formulas that include immunonutrition containing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been developed and are used for their proposed anti-inflammatory and proimmune properties; however, their use has not been rigorously studied in human TBI populations. A single-center, retrospective, descriptive observational study was conducted at the LAC + USC Medical Center. Patients with severe TBI (sTBI, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8) who remained in the ICU for ≥2 weeks and received EN were identified between 2017 and 2022 using the institutional trauma registry. Those who received immunonutrition formulas containing n-3 PUFAs were compared with those who received standard, polymeric EN with regard to baseline characteristics, clinical markers of inflammation and immune function, and short-term clinical outcomes. A total of 151 patients with sTBI were analyzed. Those who received immunonutrition with n-3 PUFA supplementation were more likely to be male, younger, Hispanic/Latinx, and have polytrauma needing non-central nervous system surgery. No differences in clinical markers of inflammation or infection rate were found. In multivariate regression analysis, immunonutrition was associated with reduced hospital length of stay (LOS). ICU LOS was also reduced in the subgroup of patients with polytrauma and TBI. This study identifies important differences in patient characteristics and outcomes associated with the EN formula prescribed. Study results can directly inform a prospective pragmatic study of immunonutrition with n-3 PUFA supplementation aimed to confirm the biomechanistic and clinical benefits of the intervention.

Prognostic Implications of Delirium After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Retrospective Study

IntroductionIn critically ill patients, delirium is a prognostic indicator of morbidity and mortality. This study investigates the impact of a delirium diagnosis on outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. MethodsThis retrospective study included all adult patients who received LVADs at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. We compared pre-implantation characteristics between the two groups, with and without a diagnosis of delirium, and compared their outcomes, including 1-month, 6-month, and in-hospital mortality, as well as re-intubation rate, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and readmission rates. ResultsIn total, 361 patients (26.7% women, 75.8% African American) received durable LVADs. Ninety-four patients (26.1%) were diagnosed with delirium during the index admission. Pre-implantation demographic characteristics, past medical and psychiatric conditions, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Profile, and laboratory values did not differ between the two groups with and without a diagnosis of delirium; older age (59 vs 56; P=0.03) was associated with delirium. Delirium diagnosis was associated with higher 1-month (P=0.007), 6-month (P=0.004), and in-hospital mortality (P<0.001), unplanned re-intubations (P<0.001), and a lower likelihood of discharge home (P = 0.03). Total hospital and ICU LOS were higher in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, though these results were not statistically significant. Readmission to hospital after index admission was quicker in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, but this result was not statistically significant. ConclusionsIn this study, a diagnosis of delirium during the LVAD implantation admission was associated with higher mortality, adverse post-surgical outcomes, and unfavorable discharge dispositions. Future prospective research is needed to validate the prognostic implications of delirium in both the short and long term. Additionally, there is a need to identify modifiable risk factors associated with delirium to promote early diagnosis and implement evidence-based management strategies to enhance outcomes within this population.

Level III Trauma Centers Achieve Comparable Outcomes in Blunt Splenic Injury as Level I Centers.

Identifying patients who can be safely managed in lower-level trauma centers is critical to avoid overburdening level I centers. This study examines the transfer patterns and outcomes of blunt splenic injury (BSI) patients cared for at 2 regional level III trauma centers as compared to an associated level I center. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all trauma patients with BSI admitted to 2 level III trauma centers (TC3) and a level I center (TC1) between 2012 and 2022. Patients were broken into 3 categories: TC1, TC3, and transfer patients (transferred from TC3 to TC1). A total of 1480 patients were admitted to TC1, 208 patients to TC3, and 128 were transferred. 22.7% of transfer patients were children. No difference in splenic injury grade was seen between patients managed at TC1 and TC3. Patients presenting to TC1 had more severe concomitant injuries. Patients underwent urgent splenectomy at similar rates at TC1 and TC3 (15.1 vs 18.7%, P = .1). Successful nonoperative management was achieved at similar rates (81.3 vs 75.5%, P = .1). When controlling for ISS and ED disposition, there was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and inpatient mortality between TC1 and TC3. Level III centers effectively managed BSI achieving comparable outcomes to the level 1 center. Transfers commonly occurred in pediatric and multisystem trauma patients, though high-grade splenic injuries were not predictive of transfer. High-grade BSI can be safely managed at level III centers without need for transfer.