IB-IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Two cycles versus three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (neoSCORE): A randomized, single center, two-arm phase II trial.

8500 Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have a promising efficacy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the period of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is undetermined. This phase II study compared the efficacy and safety of two cycles with three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Methods: This randomized, open-label phase II trial recruited patients aged 18 or older with histologically confirmed, treatment-naïve, American Joint Committee on Cancer-defined stage IB-IIIA, resectable NSCLC. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two or three cycles of neoadjuvant treatment with intravenous sintilimab (200 mg) plus carboplatin (area under curve 5) and nab-paclitaxel (260mg/m2, for squamous) or pemetrexed (500mg/m2, for non-squamous) on day 1 of three-week cycle. After surgical resection, patients received totally four doses of perioperative immunochemotherapy, followed by one-year sintilimab maintenance under patient decision. Randomisation was stratified by tumor PD-L1 expression (≥1% vs < 1%). The primary endpoint was MPR rate. Secondary endpoints included complete pathology response (pCR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT04459611. Results: From 6/2020 to 9/2021, 60 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant treatment. The patient characteristics of both arms were well balanced. Among 55 patients with successful R0 resection, we observed a higher MPR rate (41.4%, 12/29) in three-cycle group compared with two-cycle group (26.9%, 7/26) (p = 0.260), meanwhile, pCR rate achieved 24.1% (7/29) and 19.2% (5/26) respectively (p = 0.660). Patients of squamous subtype generally achieved a statistically higher MPR rate (51.6%, 16/31) compared with the non-squamous subtype (12.5%, 3/24) (p = 0.002). In squamous subgroup, three cycles neoadjuvant treatment induced a MPR rate of 60% compared with 43.8% after two cycles treatment (p = 0.366).In the meantime, the MPR rate was 21.4% versus 0% in non-squamous subgroup, respectively (p = 0.239). The ORR showed no statistical difference between three-cycle group (55.2%, 16/29) and two-cycle (50%, 13/26) (p = 0.701). Patients were well-tolerated in both groups and 5% (3/60) experienced grade 3 immune related adverse events. Conclusions: It is the first randomized study comparing different treatment periods of immuno-chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Three cycles neoadjuvant treatment achieved a numerically higher MPR rate compared with two cycles. Patients with squamous lung cancer obtained a better MPR rate compared with non-squamous subtype. Clinical trial information: NCT04459611.

Clinical-Molecular Prospective Cohort Study in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (PROMOLE study): A Comprehensive Approach to Identify New Predictive Markers of Pharmacological Response

Lung cancers account for over 90% of thoracic malignancies and the rapid development of specific cytotoxic drugs and molecular therapies requires a detailed identification of the different histologies, gene drivers or immune microenvironment biomarkers. Nevertheless, the heterogeneous clonal evolution, the emergency of drug-induced resistance and the limited occurrence of genetic alterations claim the need of a deep integration of the tumor's and the patient's biological features.The aim of the present study is to generate a tecnological platform for precision medicine in order to set predictive personalized algorithms for patient diagnosis and therapy.All resectable patients having histologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer will be enrolled for tissue sampling. A large biobank of lung cancer samples and the corresponding healthy tissues and biological components (ie, blood, stools, etc.) with complete clinical, pathological and molecular information will be collected. The platform will include: a) digital patient data collection; b) whole NGS molecular analyses (exome, transcriptome, methylome) for tumor characterization; c) exploitation and collection of organoids from tissue patients; d) Surface Amplified Raman Spectroscopy; e) microfluidic-based technological drug screening; f) preclinical in vivo models based on patient-derived xenografts; g) generation of specific predictive algorithms taking into account all collected multiparameters.The project will lay the basis of a knowledge hub and qualified technology aimed not only at answering the medical and scientific community's questions, but also meant to be useful to individual patients by predicting the response to adjuvant and second-line drugs in case of relapse of the disease.

Deconstructing ADAURA. It is Not Yet Time to Forgo Platinum-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Early Stage (IB-IIIA) EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Recently, the ADAURA study demonstrated statistically significant improved disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant osimertinib in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. A consistent improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) was shown, regardless of whether or not patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Given benefit seen with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, some clinicians may be tempted to forgo chemotherapy and only offer osimertinib post surgical resection. Would this approach be appropriate? Here we carefully dissect data from the ADAURA trial and review how this may fit into the existing evidence on the treatment of early stage NSCLC by discussing five themes, the study design of ADAURA, attempts on adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors, prior studies to support adjuvant chemotherapy, how adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in ADAURA and consideration of toxicities.

Management of Patients With Resectable and Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

For patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as those with metastatic disease, there have been significant recent advances in therapies. In patients with resectable disease, new evidence supports use of neoadjuvant nivolumab + chemotherapy for eligible patients with resectable stage II–IIIA NSCLC. Separate data lead to the recommendation for adjuvant atezolizumab (after adjuvant chemotherapy) for eligible patients with completely resected stage II–IIIA NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Adjuvant osimertinib (± adjuvant chemotherapy) is an alternative for eligible patients with completely resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC and EGFR mutations (exon 19 del or L858R). For patients with metastatic NSCLC, molecular testing is recommended for EGFR and BRAF mutations; MET exon skipping 14 alterations; ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 gene arrangements; and KRAS G12C mutations. First-line targeted therapies are available for many of these targets and, in the second-line setting, there are new targeted agents for KRAS G12C mutations and EGFR exon 20 insertions.

89P Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following complete resection

To understand adjuvant therapy use and clinical burden in patients (pts) with completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC, this study described adjuvant therapy treatment pattern, OS, and DFS following surgery in the early-stage NSCLC population.

Deconstructing ADAURA: It is Time to Forgo Adjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Resected IB-IIIA EGFR+ NSCLC (Except with RB Alterations?) When Adopting Adjuvant Osimertinib.

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for resected stage IB (tumor ≥ 4m)–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The ADAURA trial is a randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trial that demonstrated statistically significant improved disease-free survival (DFS) with the use of 3-years of adjuvant osimertinib in resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) del 19 or L858R mutations. Subgroup analysis revealed that the DFS improvement with adjuvant osimertinib is independent of adjuvant chemotherapy in the primary analysis. A recent follow-up report suggested that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided no additional 2-year DFS improvement on top of adjuvant osimertinib regardless of stage (IB, II, or IIIA) and minimal numerical DFS benefit in stage II or IIIA resected EGFR+ NSCLC for those patients who did not receive adjuvant osimertinib. Here, we argue that if clinicians adopt the use of 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib in resected early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC, there is no role for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was balanced between the osimertinib and the placebo arms by stage even though adjuvant chemotherapy was not one of the three stratification factors (del 19 vs L858R; Stage IA vs II vs III; Asians versus non-Asian) in ADAURA. There may be a potential role of adjuvant cisplatin/vinorelbine in a small subgroup of EGFR+ NSCLC patients whose tumor harbors retinoblastoma (RB) gene alterations but requires further investigation.

ADAURA: The Splash of Osimertinib in Adjuvant EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations revolutionized the diagnostic and treatment algorithm of this subset of patients almost two decades ago. Since then, a number of trials have evaluated the role of TKI therapy in early-stage disease, with encouraging disease-free survival (DFS) results but lack of a survival advantage. ADAURA, a phase III trial evaluating 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo in patients harbouring EGFR mutations with completely resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC, recently reported a profound DFS benefit (hazard ratio 0.21), favourable quality of life and reduction in the risk of brain metastases. These results led to osimertinib’s fast track approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, with this drug thus becoming the first EGFR-TKI approved for the treatment of early-stage disease. However, the key endpoint of overall survival remains immature and questions around indication (i.e. stage, need for adjuvant chemotherapy), optimal treatment duration, biomarkers of response and cost-effectiveness remain to be answered. In this article, we critically appraise the findings of ADAURA and discuss future challenges.

Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Osimertinib for Patients with Resected EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib was recently approved for resected EGFR-mutant stages IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer due to improved disease-free survival (DFS) in this population compared with placebo. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of this strategy. We constructed a Markov model using post-resection health state transitions with digitized DFS data from the ADAURA trial to compare cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo over a 10-year time horizon. An overall survival (OS) benefit of 5% was assumed. Costs and utility values were derived from Medicare reimbursement data and literature. A CE threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product per capita was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for adjuvant osimertinib was $317119 per QALY-gained versus placebo. Initial costs of osimertinib are higher in years 1-3. Costs due to progressive disease (PD) are higher in the placebo group through the first 6.5 years. Average pre-PD, post-PD, and total costs were $2388, $379047, and $502937, respectively, in the placebo group, and $505775, $255638, and $800697, respectively, in the osimertinib group. Sensitivity analysis of OS gains reaches CE with an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70-0.75 benefit of osimertinib over placebo. A 50% discount to osimertinib drug cost yielded an ICER of $115419. Three-years of adjuvant osimertinib is CE if one is willing to pay $317119 more per QALY-gained. Considerable OS benefit over placebo or other economic interventions will be needed to reach CE.

Circulating tumor DNA predicts neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and recurrence-free survival in surgical non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BackgroundThere is currently a lack of effective biomarkers to evaluate efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been investigated as a non-invasive tool for the assessment of tumor burden and minimal residual disease (MRD). The utility of ctDNA profiling in reflecting NAT efficacy, however, has not been confirmed. This study explored the association of ctDNA change with treatment response to NAT and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery.MethodsEligible patients with stage IB–IIIA NSCLC were retrospectively included if they had received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO+Chemo), dual immunotherapy (IO+IO), or chemotherapy alone (Chemo). We conducted ctDNA profiling before and after NAT, after surgery, and during follow-ups using an ultra-deep lung cancer-specific MRD (LC-MRD) sequencing panel.ResultsA total of 22 patients who received NAT followed by surgery between August 2018 and July 2019 were included in this study. The major pathological response (MPR) rates were 58.33% (7/12) in the IO+Chemo group, 25.00% (1/4) in the IO+IO group, and 16.67% (1/6) in the Chemo group. The ctDNA dynamics during NAT were highly concordant with pathologic response, demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity, for an overall accuracy of 91.67%. Pre-surgery detectable ctDNA (after NAT) trended to correlate with inferior RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 7.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91–60.22, log-rank P=0.03]. At 3-8 days after surgery, ctDNA was detectable in 31.8% of patients and was an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR, 5.37; 95% CI: 1.27–22.67; log-rank P=0.01). The presence of ctDNA at 3 months after surgery showed 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity for predicting relapse (C-index, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62–0.95). During disease monitoring after surgery, molecular recurrence by means of ctDNA preceded radiographic relapse, with a median time of 6.83 months.ConclusionsThis study investigated the potential of ctDNA in evaluating NAT efficacy in NSCLC, implying the high concordance between ctDNA and pathological response. We also set out the prognostic value of perioperative ctDNA in predicting recurrence.

Clinical outcome of Brazilian patients with non-small cell lung cancer in early stage harboring rare mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor.

The common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, such as the L858R point mutation in exon 21 and the in-frame deletional mutation in exon 19, have been definitively associated with response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the clinical outcome and response to treatment for many other rarer mutations are still unclear. In this study, we report the results of Brazilian patients in stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following complete resection with minimal residual disease and EGFR mutations treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or EGFR-TKIs. The frequency of EGFR mutations was investigated in 70 cases of early stage NSCLC. Mutations in exons 18 and 20, uncommon mutations in exons 19 and 21, as well as in exons 3, 7, 14, 16, 22, 27, and 28, and/or the presence of different mutations in a single tumor (complex mutations) are considered rare. EGFR mutations were detected in 23 tumors (32.9%). Fourteen cases carried rare mutations and were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and two cases were treated with erlotinib. The clinical outcome is described case by case with references to the literature. Notably, we found two rare EGFR mutations and one of them with an unknown response to chemotherapy and/or EGFR-TKIs. We have provided complementary information concerning the clinical outcome and treatment of patients with early stage NSCLC for several rare EGFR mutations not previously or only rarely reported. Description of cases harboring rare mutations can support the decision-making process in this subset of patients.

A Support Vector Machine Based on Liquid Immune Profiling Predicts Major Pathological Response to Chemotherapy Plus Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as a Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The biomarkers for the pathological response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus anti-programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) (CAPD) are unclear in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eleven patients with stage Ib-IIIa NSCLC undergoing CAPD prior to surgical resection were enrolled, and 11 immune cell subsets in peripheral blood were prospectively analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry. Immune cell subtypes were selected by recursive feature elimination and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods. The support vector machine (SVM) was used to build a model. Multivariate analysis for major pathological response (MPR) was also performed. Finally, five immune cell subtypes were identified and an SVM based on liquid immune profiling (LIP-SVM) was developed. The LIP-SVM model achieved high accuracies in discovery and validation sets (AUC = 0.886, 95% CI: 0.823–0.949, P < 0.001; AUC = 0.874, 95% CI: 0.791–0.958, P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, radiological response, and LIP-SVM were independent factors for MPR in the two sets (each P < 0.05). The integration of LIP-SVM, clinical factors, and radiological response showed significantly high accuracies for predicting MPR in discovery and validation sets (AUC = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.916–0.986, P < 0.001; AUC = 0.943, 95% CI: 0.912–0.993, P < 0.001, respectively). Based on immune cell profiling of peripheral blood, our study developed a predictive model for the MPR of patients with NSCLC undergoing CAPD treatment that can potentially guide clinical therapy.

Abstract LBA035: Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: CANOPY-N Trial

Abstract Background: Complete surgical resection is the standard treatment for patients with stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five-year survival rates in this population range from 19% to 50%, with most patients dying from distant recurrence. As neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy yields a modest 5% absolute overall survival benefit for these patients with NSCLC, new treatment options are needed. Preliminary data with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have shown major pathologic responses (MPRs) or pathologic complete responses in patients with resectable NSCLC. In the CANTOS study, reduced incidence of NSCLC and decreased lung cancer–related mortality were observed in a dose-dependent manner in patients with atherosclerosis who received canakinumab (interleukin 1β inhibitor) versus those who received placebo. In preclinical NSCLC humanized models, treatment with canakinumab ± anti–PD-1 inhibitor has shown promising activity, and a synergistic effect was observed with this combination, which may enhance the efficacy of PD-1 inhibition by modulating pro-tumor inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. In this context, the CANOPY-N study was designed to evaluate the effect of canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable NSCLC. Methods: CANOPY-N (NCT03968419) is a Phase II, randomized, open-label study evaluating the effect of canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable NSCLC. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA NSCLC (excluding N2 and T4 tumors), no prior systemic therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and eligibility for surgery with a planned resection in approximately 4-6 weeks after first dose of study treatment are eligible to participate. An archival (if obtained up to 6 months before first day of treatment) or new biopsy is required. Approximately 110 patients will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio (stratified by histology [squamous/nonsquamous]) to receive a total of 2 doses (200 mg every 3 weeks) of canakinumab alone (n=44) or in combination with pembrolizumab (n=44) or pembrolizumab alone (n=22), with safety follow-up up to 130 days from last study-drug dose. The primary endpoint is MPR rate (≤10% of residual viable tumor cells at time of surgery), and secondary endpoints include overall response rate per RECIST 1.1, MPR rate based on local assessment, surgical feasibility rates, safety, incidence of antidrug antibodies, pharmacokinetic parameters, and assessment of the relationship between blood- or tissue-based biomarkers and MPR. As of May 27, 2021, there are 44 active study locations. Citation Format: Jay M. Lee, Jean-Louis Pujol, Pilar Garrido, Edward S. Kim, Masahiro Tsuboi, Rafael Caparica Bitton, Jiawei Duan, Cecile Blin, Alexander Savchenko, Tony Mok. Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: CANOPY-N Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA035.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NANE-LC): a study protocol of prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study.

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in patients with stage IB–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly improved the major pathological response (MPR) and the pathological complete response (pCR) rates. However, high-level evidence-based medical data confirming this effect are still lacking. In addition, there is an urgent need to develop an appropriate strategy to predict the benefit for patients receiving ICIs. In this study, we describe an ongoing study on the effect of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin on stage IB–IIIA NSCLC patients. The aim of this study is to establish a multiomics artificial intelligence system for predicting neoadjuvant therapy efficacy and assisting decision-making.MethodsThis prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial will enroll a total of 40 patients who will undergo surgery after three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin. The MPR rate is the primary endpoint, while the rates of pCR, complete resection, objective response, disease-free survival (DFS), adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) are secondary endpoints. Exploratory endpoints will serve to establish a multiomics artificial intelligence system for neoadjuvant therapy effect prediction and decision-making assistance based on radiomics, metabolism, genetic, and clinic-pathological characteristics and to explore the mechanisms of drug resistance.DiscussionThe efficacy of ICIs is influenced by many factors, including patient’s driver genes and smoking status. Thus, further subgroup analysis is needed. This study will indicate if our new multiomics artificial intelligence system constitutes a valid strategy for neoadjuvant therapy effect prediction and decision-making assistance in the context of neoadjuvant camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin treatment for patients with stage IB–IIIA NSCLC.Trial RegistrationThis trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identification number: NCT04541251).

The result of adjuvant Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin in completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer at Hanoi Medical Unoversity Hospital

Background: Assess clinical, subclinical characteristics of stage IB-IIIA non - small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC). Evaluating the result of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin in completely resected stage IB - IIIA NSCLC. Methods: Descriptive study of 70 patients completely resected stage IB - IIIA non - small cell lung cancer were received adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin chemotherapy at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from 01/2016 to 6/2020. Results: The mean age of 56.94 years old, male: female ratio was 2.9:1. 23 (32.8%) patients had postoperative stage IB disease, 24 (34.3%) had stage IIA disease, 13 (18.6%) had stage IIB disease and 10 (14.3%) had stage IIIA disease. The major histological type was adenocarcinoma (78.6%). Median disease free survival was 29.10 ± 1.63 months, and 3 - year survival was 41%. Chemotherapy caused hematologic side effects in 66.67% of patients including neutropenia in 61.4% and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 28.1%. Non - hematologic toxic effects of chemotherapy were reported at low rates and almost mild (grade 1/2). Conclusions: The vinorelbine - cisplatin regimen is an effective regimen in the adjuvant treatment of non - small cell lung cancer, the study showed that the results in disease - free survival and overall survival were comparable to those of other studies in the world. The most common side effect was neutropenia, the other side effects were reported at low rate and usually mild.

FP01.03 Prevalence, Treatment Patterns and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with EGFR Positive Resected Stage IB-IIIA NSCLC

The phase III ADAURA trial showed a significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo in resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this analysis was to estimate EGFR mutation prevalence, treatment patterns and long-term outcomes in early stage (IB-IIIA) resected NSCLC patients in a real-world setting.

Prospective Clinical Study of Postoperative Individualized Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Based on mRNA Expression of the Molecular Markers RRM1, TUBB3, and ERCC1

Objective To investigate the clinical significance of the mRNA expression of RRM1, TUBB3, and ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues for the selection of adjuvant/postoperative chemotherapy regimens. Methods Patients diagnosed with stage Ib-IIIa NSCLC were enrolled and randomly divided into a control group (undetected group) and an experimental group (detected group) after radical operation. The control group randomly received chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin or paclitaxel plus cisplatin. The mRNA expression of RRM1, TUBB3, and ERCC1 was detected in the experimental group before chemotherapy, and based on the detected expression, the chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin plus gemcitabine or cisplatin plus paclitaxel was chosen. The disease-free survival (DFS) of the control group and experimental group was compared. Results Pathological type, stage, gene expression detection, and treatment method were not significantly correlated with DFS (P > 0.05). In the subgroups treated with gemcitabine, the median DFS was 17 months in the detected group and 10.5 months in the undetected group (hazard ratio = 0.2147, 95% confidence interval: 0.07909–0.5827, P=0.0025). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to analyse whether gene expression detection was independently correlated with DFS in the subgroups treated with gemcitabine (P=0.025). In the detected group, the prognosis of patients with low expression of RRM1 was better than that of patients with high expression of RRM1 after paclitaxel treatment (P=0.0039). Conclusions The selection of chemotherapy regimen based on mRNA expression of the RRM1, TUBB3, and ERCC1 genes may improve selection of candidate patients to receive clinical chemotherapy. However, large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed for in-depth investigation.

Surgical perspective in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer.

BackgroundThere are many studies on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Expert consensus recommends neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with resectable stage IB–IIIA NSCLC. However, there are few clinical studies or cases to verify this.MethodsData were collected from all NSCLC patients who underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Xuzhou Central Hospital between September 2020 and April 2021. Data collected included patient information, relevant examination results, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, pathological changes, and 90‐day mortality.ResultsIn total, 25 patients achieved R0 resection. Eleven (44%) patients completed surgery by thoracotomy, and three (12%) procedures were changed from minimally invasive procedures due to dense adhesions of hilar lymph nodes, which rendered it difficult to dissect the blood vessels. Thirteen (52%) patients achieved a major pathological response (MPR) with eight (32%) of these patients having a pathological complete response (pCR). Twenty‐two (88%) patients showed radiological regression, and three (12%) patients had stable disease. The median drainage time was 8.50 (3–27) days. Thirteen (52%) postoperative complications were observed, but none were above grade 3.ConclusionsIn this study, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was found to reduce tumor volume, cause pathological downstaging, and raise the surgical resection rate of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and achieve a 100% R0 resection rate. There was an acceptable rate of postoperative complications. Thus, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is safe and practical.

Abstract CT237: Canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer: CANOPY-N trial

Abstract Background: Complete surgical resection is the standard treatment for patients with stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five-year survival rates range from 19% to 50%, with most patients dying from distant recurrence. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) by only 5% in patients with NSCLC, and new treatment options are needed. Preliminary data for PD1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have shown major pathologic responses (MPRs) or pathologic complete responses (pCRs) in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The CANTOS study demonstrated reduced incidence of NSCLC and decreased lung cancer-related mortality with canakinumab (interleukin 1β inhibitor) versus placebo, in a dose-dependent manner for patients with atherosclerosis. In preclinical NSCLC humanized models, treatment with canakinumab ± anti-PD-1 inhibitor could lead to antitumor activity. Combination of canakinumab and pembrolizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy of PD-1 inhibition by inhibiting dysregulated inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Based on available evidence, the CANOPY-N study was designed to evaluate the effect of canakinumab and pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable NSCLC. Methods: CANOPY-N (NCT03968419) is a Phase II, randomized, open-label study evaluating the effect of canakinumab and pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable NSCLC. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA NSCLC (excluding N2 and T4 tumors), no prior systemic therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and eligibility for surgery and with a planned surgical resection in approximately 4-6 weeks (after first dose of study treatment) are eligible to participate. An archival (if obtained up to 6 months before first day of treatment) or new biopsy is required. Approximately 110 patients will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio (stratified by histology [squamous/nonsquamous]) to one of the treatment arms to receive a total of 2 doses (200 mg every 3 weeks) of canakinumab alone (n=44) or in combination with pembrolizumab (n=44) or pembrolizumab alone (n=22), with safety follow-up up to 130 days from last study drug dose. The primary endpoint is MPR rate (≤10% of residual viable tumor cells at time of surgery), and secondary endpoints include determination of overall response rate, MPR rate based on local review, surgical feasibility rates, incidence of antidrug antibodies, and pharmacokinetic parameters. As of October 19, 2020, there are 36 active study locations. Citation Format: Jay M. Lee, Tony Mok, Pilar Garrido, Edward S. Kim, Çağatay Arslan, Masahiro Tsuboi, Tuochuan Dong, Cecile Blin, Vanessa Rodrik-Outmezguine, Bijoyesh Mookerjee, Vanessa Passos, Jean-Louis Pujol. Canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer: CANOPY-N trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT237.

IMpower010: Primary results of a phase III global study of atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8500 Background: Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) provides only a modest 5-year survival benefit in fully resected, high-risk early-stage NSCLC. We report the primary disease-free survival (DFS) results from the pre-planned interim analysis of IMpower010, a randomized phase 3 open-label trial of adjuvant atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) vs best supportive care (BSC) after adjuvant chemo in patients (pts) with early-stage resected NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had completely resected (4-12 weeks prior to enrollment) Stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (AJCC/UICC v7) and ECOG PS 0-1. A total of 1280 pts were enrolled, and 1269 pts received up to four 21-day cycles of cisplatin-based chemo (plus pemetrexed, docetaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine). Of these pts (n=1269), 1005 were subsequently randomized 1:1 to 16 cycles of atezo 1200 mg Q3W or BSC. The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed DFS and secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) were tested hierarchically: first DFS in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% (SP263) subgroup with Stage II-IIIA disease, then DFS in all randomized pts with Stage II-IIIA disease, then DFS in the ITT population (Stage IB-IIIA) and finally OS in the ITT population. Efficacy assessments were based on randomized pts. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population, defined as pts who received ≥1 dose of atezo or who had ≥1 post-baseline safety assessment if randomized to the BSC arm. Results: At data cutoff (January 21, 2021), median follow-up was 32.2 months in the ITT population. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Atezo showed statistically significant DFS benefit vs BSC in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% Stage II-IIIA and all randomized Stage II-IIIA populations; the significance boundary was not crossed for DFS in the ITT population (Table). OS data were immature and not formally tested. Pts in the atezo arm received a median of 16 (range, 1-16) atezo doses. Any-grade AEs occurred in 92.7% (atezo) and 70.7% (BSC); events were Grade 3/4 in 21.8% and 11.5%, respectively. Grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 0.8% of pts in the atezo arm. AEs leading to atezo discontinuation occurred in 18.2% of atezo-treated pts. Conclusions: IMpower010 met its primary endpoint, showing DFS benefit with adjuvant atezo vs BSC after adjuvant chemo in pts with resected Stage II-IIIA NSCLC, with pronounced benefit in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% subgroup. The safety profile of atezo was consistent with prior experience of atezo monotherapy across indications and lines of therapy. Funding: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT02486718. [Table: see text]

The role of EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant therapy in EGFR mutation-positive early-stage NSCLC: A meta-analysis.

BackgroundThe role of adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) is not clear in early‐stage nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This meta‐analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of EGFR‐TKIs as adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or placebo in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations.Patients and MethodsPubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. The hazard ratio (HR) of disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as the risk ratio (RR) of severe adverse events were merged.ResultsSeven articles from five studies from 1843 records, a total of 1227 patients, were included in the analysis. The HR for DFS was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.63), in favor of EGFR‐TKIs. However, no significant benefit of OS was seen (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.31–1.22). Treatment benefit was more pronounced in patients with advanced disease stage and longer duration of medication, EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation, and treatment with third‐generation EGFR‐TKIs. Adjuvant targeted therapy may cause few adverse events compared with chemotherapy (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.09–0.94). The possibility of severe adverse events for the first‐generation drugs was significantly lower than for third‐generation drugs.ConclusionIn EGFR mutation‐positive patients with stage IB–IIIA NSCLC, compared with adjuvant chemotherapy or placebo, adjuvant EGFR‐TKIs should effectively improve the patient's DFS, but not effectively improve OS. Disease stage, treatment duration, mutation types, and therapeutic drugs could affect the degree of benefit. Adjuvant EGFR‐TKIs had more favorable tolerability than chemotherapy, especially with the usage of first‐generation drugs.