Iatrogenic Nerve Injury Research Articles

Incidence of Traumatic Sciatic Nerve Injury in Association with Acetabular Fracture: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study.

PurposeTraumatic sciatic nerve injury is one of the most serious consequences of acetabular fracture. However, reports on this type of injury are rare. In this study, we investigated the demographics of acetabular fracture with traumatic sciatic nerve injury, the clinical characteristics of patients with these injuries, and potential risk factors.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed to have acetabular fracture at our trauma center between January 2014 and June 2021. Data on patient demographics, characteristics of the acetabular fracture, whether or not sciatic nerve injury occurred, types of sciatic nerve injury, and risk factors were analyzed.ResultsA total of 195 patients met the diagnostic criteria for acetabular fractures. The average Injury Severity Score was 25.9 and the average Abbreviated Injury Scale score was 12.4. Road traffic accidents and falls from height were the main causes. Chest injuries and lower extremity fractures were the most common associated injuries. Posterior wall fractures were the most common fracture type. After exclusion of spinal cord and iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries, 18 patients with acetabular fractures had traumatic sciatic nerve injury. Four of the 19 sides with traumatic sciatic nerve injury involved the common peroneal nerve division and 15 involved both the common peroneal and tibial nerve divisions. Logistic regression analysis identified a higher AIS score, posterior column fracture, and posterior hip dislocation to be predictors of traumatic sciatic nerve injury.ConclusionAcetabular fractures were mostly high-energy injuries. Posterior wall fractures were the most common acetabular fracture types. Most patients sustained injury to the sciatic nerve as well as injury to the common peroneal and tibial nerve divisions. A higher AIS score, posterior column fracture, and posterior hip dislocation were predictors of acetabular fracture combined with traumatic sciatic nerve injury.

Risk factors for screw breach and iatrogenic nerve injury in percutaneous posterior pelvic ring fixation

BackgroundPercutaneous screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring is technically demanding and can result in cortical breach. The purpose of this study was to examine risk factors for screw breach and iatrogenic nerve injury. MethodsA retrospective review at a single level-one trauma center identified 245 patients treated with 249 screws for pelvic ring injuries with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Cortical screw breach, iatrogenic nerve injury, and associated risk factors were evaluated. ResultsThere were 86 (35%) breached screws. The breach rate was similar between screw types (33% S1-iliosacral (S1-IS), 44% S1-transsacral (S1-TS), 31% S2-IS, and 30% S2-TS) and was not associated with patient characteristics, Tile C injuries, or corridor size or angle. The overall rate of screw revision for screw malpositioning was 1.2% (3/249). Iatrogenic nerve injuries occurred in 8 (3.2%) of the 249 screws. Screws that caused iatrogenic nerve injuries had greater screw breach distances (5.4 vs. 0 mm, MD 5, CI 2.3 to 8.7, p < 0.0001), were more likely to be S1-IS screws (88% vs. 47%, PD 40%, CI 7 to 58%, p = 0.006), more likely to be placed in Tile C injuries (75% vs. 44%, PD 31%, CI -3 to 55%, p = 0.04), and there was a trend for having a screw corridor size <10 mm (75% vs. 47%, PD 28, CI -6 to 52%, p = 0.06). Of the 7 iatrogenic nerve injuries adjacent to screw breaches, two nerve injuries recovered after screw removal, three recovered with screw retention, and two did not recover with screw retention. ConclusionScrew breaches were common and iatrogenic nerve injuries were more likely with S1-IS screws. Surgeons should maintain a high degree of caution when placing these screws and consider removal of any breached screw associated with nerve injury.

68. Female sex and supine proximal lumbar lordosis is associated with the size of the LLIF ‘safe zone’ at L4-5

68. Female sex and supine proximal lumbar lordosis is associated with the size of the LLIF ‘safe zone’ at L4-5

201 Compliance to New BOAST's Guidelines for Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures in the Middle of COVID Pandemic

Abstract Aim Amid COVID pressures, standards of surgical practices need constant reviewing to maintain patient safety and streamline care pathways. Newly published BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics) guidelines for paediatric supracondylar fractures became a benchmark against which a restructured DGH trauma unit's performance can be appraised. Method Theatre records were analysed between April-2020 and September-2020. Data were collected to reveal time to theatre, operative techniques, documentations of ulnar nerve protection, complications, follow-up plans, time to first post-op radiograph and to wire removal. Results 90% of patients underwent operations within 24–48 hour. Although there was no incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury, documentation of ulnar nerve protection was not identified in 45% of crossed wire fixations. Wire size was not mentioned in 14%. 33% did not have first follow-up with radiograph within 4–10 days, and 43% of patients did not have the wires removed till 4 weeks post op. Conclusion This re-audit highlights the need to improve in documentation for ulnar nerve protection and to identify the delays in follow-up appointments. Although BOAST no longer recommends a fixed timeframe for follow-up plan, first radiograph within 4–10 days and wire removal within 4 weeks are still reasonable locally.

Assessment of the prevalence and length of the anterior and caudal loops of the mental nerve as anatomical variants of exiting the mandible at the mental foramen using cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review aimed to identify the studies that performed cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the prevalence and length of the anterior loop (AL) and caudal loop (CL) of the mental nerve. An electronic database search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. Original studies reporting the frequency and length of the AL and CL were selected. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were then conducted to assess the prevalence and length of the AL and CL and their associations with age, gender, sides, and dentition status. A total of 21 studies were included in this review. The pooled prevalence of the AL (95% confidence interval) of the mental nerve at the patient and side level was 51% (31-71%) and 53% (37-69%) while the mean anterior loop length was 2.08 (1.46-2.70) mm. The pooled prevalence of the CL and mean caudal loop length were 100% and 4.73 (3.44-6.01) mm. No significant associations were found between the prevalence and length of the AL and CL and age, gender, sides, and dentition status. Overall, the pooled prevalence and mean length of AL of the mental nerve varied among different populations while CL seems to be a constant anatomical landmark with a longer CL than AL. Surgeons performing inter-foraminal oral surgeries like dental implant placement and genioplasty should be aware of the possible distance of the AL and CL to avoid iatrogenic mental nerve injury.

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The two techniques most utilized in the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures are open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). Although there have been multiple comparative clinical studies comparing outcomes for these two treatments, studies have not suggested one approach to be superior to the other. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with either ORIF or intramedullary nail. We conducted this meta-analysis utilizing stricter inclusion and broader exclusion criteria to examine these two common approaches. We examined those articles which have compared first-time, closed fractures of the humeral diaphysis in adults in fracture patterns that could be treated equivalently by intramedullary nail or plate fixation. The primary outcome of interest was nonunion, and studies that did not report nonunion rates were excluded. There were a total of 1,926 abstracts reviewed and a total of three articles were included in the final analysis after screening. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nonunion between plating (2/111, 1.8%) and nailing (4/104, 3.9%) (P>0.05). The mean difference in average time to union for plated fractures and nailed fractures was 1.11 weeks (95% CI 0.82 to 1.40) which was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidence of radial nerve palsy (12/111, 10.8%) for plating compared to nailing (0/104, 0%) (P=0.0004). There was no difference in incidence of post-operative infection between the two groups intramedullary nailing (P>0.05). The results of this analysis demonstrate an increased risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, and a significantly shorter time to union when treating humeral shaft fractures with plating as compared to intramedullary nailing. There was no difference in the rates of nonunion or delayed union. Based on the evidence, both plating and nailing can achieve a similar treatment effect on humeral shaft fractures.

Comparison of Lateral and Crossed K-wires for Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BackgroundSupracondylar elbow fractures occur most frequently in children aged five to seven years and have equal incidence in both genders. They are classified as flexion or extension type injuries with extension type being more common. We aimed to ascertain radiological stability with lateral and crossed wires in this study. We also identified any complications after operative management of these injuries.MethodsAs part of this retrospective cohort study, we identified all patients who presented with this injury from January 1, 2020, until February 28, 2022. Basic demographic data and type of operation were noted. Baumann angle (BA) and lateral capitellohumeral angle (LCHA) were measured intra-operatively and x-rays were done at the final clinic appointment. The mean of these angles in lateral and crossed wire groups was compared using paired sample t-test. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the means of both groups with normal values for these angles based on previous studies (BA=71.5±6.2 degrees, LCHA= 50.8±6 degrees).ResultsFifty patients were admitted during this period. Thirty-three patients had lateral wires and 17 had crossed wires for fixation. No significant change was noted in the mean BA and mean LCHA in both groups on x-rays done intra-operatively and final clinic follow-up (no loss of reduction). No significant difference was noted between BA and LCHA noted for both groups at the final clinic follow-up with previous studies outlining normal values for these angles. No cases of iatrogenic neurovascular injury were identified. Four patients (8%) were referred to physiotherapy due to stiffness.ConclusionBoth lateral and crossed wire configurations led to achievement of good radiological stability with BA and LCHA within normal limits. No loss of reduction was noted with both techniques and no risk of iatrogenic nerve injuries was noted in experienced hands.

Multimodal Neuroelectrophysiological Monitoring Combined with Robot-Assisted Placement of a Transiliac-Transsacral Screw for the Treatment of Transforaminal Sacral Fractures.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the fixation of transforaminal sacral fractures using TiRobot-assisted transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screws under multimodal neuroelectrophysiological monitoring (MNM). Methods From January 2019 to May 2021, 22 patients (17 male and 5 female patients) with transforaminal sacral fractures who were treated with closed reduction and placement of TiRobot-assisted TITS screws under MNM were retrospectively evaluated. The average age of the patients was 43.32 ± 11.40 years (range: 19–63). The patients received MNM, including somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and electromyographic monitoring (EMG), prior to surgery, during closed reduction and the placement of the guidewire and TITS screw, and at the end of surgery. The operation was adjusted according to the MNM results. Results Overall, 22 TITS screws were inserted in 22 patients, including 5 TITS screws in the S1 body and 17 TITS screws in the S2 body. The average time needed for screw placement was 27.95 ± 6.84 mins, and the average frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy exposures was 31.00 ± 5.56 for each patient. Anterior ring fixation was performed in 4 patients using an external fixator, in 5 patients using cannulated screws, and in 13 patients using reconstruction plates. The mean follow-up time was 14.46 ± 2.46 months (12–20 months). Tornetta and Matta radiographic outcomes were excellent in 10 patients, good in 9 patients, fair in 2 patients, and poor in 1 patient. The proportion of excellent and good ratings was 86.36%. At the final follow-up, the average Majeed score was 82.18 ± 14.52, with clinical outcomes that were excellent in 9 patients, good in 9 patients, fair in 1 patient, and poor in 3 patients. The proportion of excellent and good ratings was 82.82%. Preoperatively, the amplitude of the SEP on the injured side was lower than that on the contralateral side before reduction in 9 patients (>50%). In this study, no screw was mistakenly inserted into the sacral canal, and no surgical site infection occurred. Conclusion MNM combined with TiRobot assistance can safely implant TITS screws and can effectively identify the neurological function of patients under anesthesia and reduce iatrogenic nerve injury.

Dorsal Fixation of Coronal Hamate and Fifth Metacarpal Base Fractures: An Anatomic Evaluation of the Ulnar Nerve

Traumatic drill overshoot during dorsal fixation of coronal hamate and fifth metacarpal base fractures risks iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. This study describes the anatomic relationships between exiting volar drill tips and ulnar nerve branches. Dorsal drilling of hamate bones and fifth metacarpal bases was performed on cadavers. Dorsal hamate bodies were subdivided into 4 quadrants: (1) distal-ulnar, (2) distal-radial, (3) proximal-ulnar, and (4) proximal-radial. Screws measuring 5 mm more than the dorsal-to-volar bone depths were placed in each quadrant to represent drill exit trajectories with consistent overshoot. A single screw was similarly placed 5 mm distal to the midline articular surface of the dorsal fifth metacarpal base. Distances between estimated drill tips and ulnar nerve branches were measured. Ten cadaver hands were examined. The fifth metacarpal base screw tips directly abutted the ulnar motor branch in 6 hands, and were within 1 mm in 4 hands (mean, 0.4 ± 0.5 mm). Distances from the tips to the ulnar motor and sensory branches were largest in the distal-radial quadrant (11.8 ± 0.8 mm and 9.2 ± 1.9 mm, respectively) and smallest in the proximal-ulnar quadrant (7.3 ± 1.5 mm and 4.3 ± 1.1 mm, respectively). Distances to the ulnar motor and sensory branches were similar between the proximal-ulnar and distal-ulnar quadrants, and between the proximal-radial and distal-radial quadrants. Dorsal drilling of coronal hamate fractures appears to be safe, as volar drill tips are well away from ulnar nerve motor and sensory branches. Distances to ulnar nerve branches are largest, and theoretically safest, with dorsal drilling in the distal-radial hamate. Dorsal drilling of fifth metacarpal base fractures appears to carry a high risk for potential ulnar motor nerve injury. These findings may help minimize potential risks for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with dorsal drilling of hamate and fifth metacarpal base fractures.

Internal rotation of the shoulder in the beach chair position may increase the risk of iatrogenic suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch during surgical treatment for shoulder instability.

Suprascapular nerve (SN) at the spinoglenoid notch is a mobile structure which is vulnerable to iatrogenic injury from screw or guidewire penetration during shoulder surgery such as Latarjet procedure or SLAP/Bankart repairs. The primary objective is to identify the distance between posterior glenoid and SN in different shoulder abduction and rotation. The secondary objective is to identify the distance in standard lateral decubitus position. Nineteen shoulders from 10 Thiel embalmed soft cadavers were used in this study. The dissection of posterior shoulder was done to identify the SN at spinoglenoid notch. The distance between the posterior glenoid rim and the SN was measured. In beach chair position, the SN distance from six combinations of shoulder position was obtained: adduction/90° internal rotation (ADIR), adduction/neutral rotation (ADN), adduction/90° external rotation (ADER), 45° abduction/90° internal rotation (ABIR), 45° abduction/neutral rotation (ABN), 45° abduction/90° external rotation (ABER). Subsequently, the suprascapular nerve distance was measured in standard lateral decubitus position with 10lbs. longitudinal traction. In the beach chair position with the shoulder in adduction, the mean distances between the glenoid and the SN in ADIR, ADN and ADER were 15.0 ± 3.3, 19.3 ± 2.6 and 19.5 ± 3.1mm, respectively. During shoulder abduction, the mean distances when the shoulder was in ABIR, ABN and ABER were 15.2 ± 3.4, 19.4 ± 3.0 and 19.3 ± 2.6mm, respectively. The mean distance for the lateral decubitus position was 19.3 ± 2.4mm. The distance between the glenoid and SN was significantly shorter when the shoulder was positioned in internal rotation than in neutral (p < 0.001) or external rotation (p < 0.001) when compared to the same shoulder abduction position. The lateral decubitus position had comparable SN distance with the shoulder position of abduction/neutral rotation in beach chair position. The SN was closest to posterior glenoid rim if the shoulder was in internal rotation. Therefore, shoulder internal rotation must be avoided during guidewire and cannulated screw placement in the Latarjet procedure and drill bit insertion during anchor placement in SLAP/Bankart repair.

Facial Nerve Repair following Acute Nerve Injury.

Background Acute facial nerve iatrogenic or traumatic injury warrants rapid management with the goal of reestablishing nerve continuity within 72 hours. However, reconstructive efforts should be performed up to 12 months from the time of injury since facial musculature may still be viable and thus facial tone and function may be salvaged. Methods Data of all patients who underwent facial nerve repair following iatrogenic or traumatic injury were retrospectively collected and assessed. Paralysis etiology, demographics, operative data, postoperative course, and outcome were examined. Results Twenty patients underwent facial nerve repair during the years 2004 to 2019. Data were available for 16 of them. Iatrogenic injury was the common category ( n = 13, 81%) with parotidectomy due to primary parotid gland malignancy being the common surgery ( n = 7, 44%). Nerve repair was most commonly performed during the first 72 hours of injury ( n = 12, 75%) and most of the patients underwent nerve graft repair ( n = 15, 94%). Outcome was available for 12 patients, all of which remained with some degree of facial paresis. Six patients suffered from complete facial paralysis (50%) and three underwent secondary facial reanimation (25%). There were no major operative or postoperative complications. Conclusion Iatrogenic and traumatic facial nerve injuries are common etiologies of acquired facial paralysis. In such cases, immediate repair should be performed. For patients presenting with facial paralysis following previous surgery or trauma, nerve repair should be considered up to at least 6 months of injury. Longstanding paralysis is best treated with standard facial reanimation procedures.

Nerve morbidity at the radial forearm donor site following gender-affirming phalloplasty

In the radial forearm phalloplasty multiple nerves are harvested to provide phallic sensation, resulting in iatrogenic nerve injuries. Despite this, nerve morbidity following this procedure has been minimally assessed. The purpose of this study was to assess donor site nerve morbidity following radial forearm phalloplasty. Patients who underwent gender-affirming phalloplasty at our institution between 2016-2020 using the radial forearm were included. Pain characteristics were assessed with a modified Mackinnon Pain questionnaire consisting of 33 items, including visual analog scales (VAS) for reporting of pain and impact on aspects of quality of life (QoL), as well as 20 descriptive pain adjectives and a 21-item questionnaire to capture overall pain experience. A total of 37 patients were included. 31 had minimal-mild pain (VAS scores 0-3), and 6 patients had moderate-severe pain (VAS scores 4-10). The mild pain group reported a mean 2.74 (0-7) pain descriptors and reported minimal impact on QoL metrics. The moderate-severe pain group reported mean 6.33 (2-15) pain descriptors and reported significant impacts on QoL metrics. Significant differences were observed with decreased QoL (p=0.018), increased sadness (p=0.009), increased frustration (p=0.030), increased anger (p=0.0496), and decreased hopefulness (p=0.0496) in the moderate-severe pain group along with interference of pain with sleep (p=0.002). In a cross-sectional analysis of 37 patients who underwent gender-affirming radial forearm phalloplasty, the majority (31) experienced a minimal degree of donor site nerve pain. Six patients suffered from more significant nerve pain that was associated with a decreased QoL. Treatment and prevention of this nerve pain represent important areas for future exploration.

Iatrogenic nerve injury and foot drop: Surgical results in 28 patients

Background: Most peroneal nerve injuries resulting in foot drop are secondary to trauma or iatrogenic. Foot drop can occur due to potential complications from the hip, lumbosacral spine, and knee surgeries, which are critical to diagnose and manage.Methods: We reviewed our foot drop patients’ data to determine the incidence and iatrogenic causes of the injury and managed surgically by neurolysis of the peroneal nerve and transfer of functional fascicles of either the superficial peroneal or the tibial nerve to the deep peroneal nerve.Results: We found 28 iatrogenic foot drop patients who have had surgery and postoperative follow-up evaluations with us. Before the onset of foot drop, all except one (27 of 28) patient have had surgeries in other clinics before presenting to our institution. Foot drop in one patient was due to infection and hip wound after he was intubated and stayed in ICU for 4 weeks. Thirteen of the 28 patients have had lumbosacral (L3-4, L4-L5, and L5-S1) fusion or laminectomy, eight have had hip surgery, and five have had knee surgery. One patient had a fasciotomy due to compartment syndrome and another patient had two previous surgeries for posterior tibial entrapment and tarsal tunnel syndrome at other institutions. NCS and EMG reports showed that these patients had injuries to the peroneal or tibial nerve after their prior surgeries. One patient had a femoral nerve injury. Preoperatively, 10 patients had severe foot drop with muscle weakness and a functional grade of 0/5; 16 patients had grades ranging from 1 to 2/5; and two patients had 3/5. Overall, 23 of the 28 patients (83%) had improvement in their ankle dorsiflexion with anti-gravity and regained a healthier gait after the decompression, neurolysis, and nerve transfer at our clinic.Conclusion: Twenty-three of the 28 (83%) iatrogenic foot drop patients in this report regained a healthier gait with improved ankle dorsiflexion and anti-gravity after the neurolysis, and nerve transfer of the peroneal or tibial nerve and transfer of functional fascicles of either the superficial peroneal or the tibial nerve to the deep peroneal nerve at our clinic.

Risk of Radial Nerve Injury in Anterolateral Humeral Shaft Plating.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury between arm positionings of 45° and 60° abduction in anterolateral humeral plating using a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate. Fifty-six humeri of cadavers in the supine position with 45° of arm abduction were exposed through the anterolateral approach. A hypothetical fracture line was marked at the middle of the humerus, and a precontoured ten-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate was applied and fixed to the anterolateral surface. After the fixation, the radial nerve was exposed through a triceps-splitting approach. Screws in contact with or which had penetrated the radial nerve were deemed to be injuries. Then, the screws and plate were removed, the arm changed to the 60° arm abduction position, and the steps of applying the plate and inserting the screws were followed as in the 45° arm abduction step. The screws which could potentially injure the radial nerve were those of the second to sixth screw holes in both the 45° and 60° of arm abduction positions. The incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve injury of the second to sixth screw holes in the 45° position were 5.36%, 39.29%, 80.36%, 60.71%, and 10.71%, respectively, and at the 60° position were 5.36%, 53.57%, 83.93%, 60.71%, and 7.14%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in risk of injury between the two positions in all screw holes (all P-values > 0.05). In anterolateral humeral shaft fixation, arm abduction position did not affect the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, with the main risk from certain screw holes. The surgeon should be careful in screw insertion, especially at the fourth and fifth screw holes. IV; cadaveric study.

Minimalinvasive Chevron- und Akinostetomie: Muss man jetzt umsteigen?

Percutaneous osteotomies for the treatment of forefoot deformities have become increasingly popular in recent years. The main advantage is less soft tissue damage and aesthetic benefits. The disadvantage is the lack of visualization of the surgical field. Therefore, a precise anatomical knowledge and understanding of these techniques are required.The initial procedures of percutaneous hallux valgus surgery had a high complication rate due to limited technical capabilities, designs of osteotomies, and osteosyntheses used. The combination of established procedures, indications, and percutaneous techniques has been able to significantly advance the techniques. Even severe deformities can be corrected by the modified osteosynthesis of minimally invasive Chevron- and Akinosteotomy while preserving the soft tissue mantle. MethodAfter implementation of minimally invasive Chevron and Akinosteotomy, we evaluated the first 93 patients from the first 12 months with regard to operation time, radiation exposure and complication rate and compared them with conventional scarf and akinosteotomy. ResultsWhile a learning curve cannot be avoided, this relates particularly to operative times and radiation exposure. It was shown that the modified screw osteosynthesis and less the percutaneous osteotomy is the real challenge. With appropriate courses and training on the cadaver, complications can be avoided. SummaryFears of increased iatrogenic tendon, nerve, and vascular injuries during the learning curve have not been confirmed. In the meantime, the minimally invasive chevron and akinosteotomy (MICA) could develop into the standard procedure for the correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformities in our clinic. It is a safe and reproducible procedure.

Prevalence, management, and outcomes of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty: a case-control study and review of the literature

Neurologic injury is a rare and potentially devastating complication of shoulder arthroplasty. Patients typically present with a mixed plexopathy or mononeuropathy, most commonly affecting the axillary and radial nerves. Given the paucity of studies available on the topic, our goal was to elucidate the prevalence of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty and to describe the treatment course and outcomes of neurologic injuries. This is a retrospective case-control study performed at a single, urban, academic institution. Consecutive patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020 were reviewed, and patients with a documented nerve injury were identified. A control group of patients without nerve injury were selected in a 2:1 ratio controlling for age and procedure type (TSA vs. RSA; primary vs. revision). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities as per the Charlson Comorbidity Index, radiographic evaluations, surgical and implant details, patient-reported outcome measures, and perioperative complications. Of 923 patients, 33 (3.6%) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury: 10 (2.1%) after TSA, 23 (5.0%) after RSA, and 3 (7.8%) after revision arthroplasty. Axillary mononeuropathy was most common (42%), followed by brachial plexopathies (18%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, race, body mass index, and preoperative diagnoses between groups. Patients with nerve injury had fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index <3, 33 vs. 65%, P<.001). Patients with nerve injury had higher rates of cervical spine pathology (15 vs. 6%; P= .15) and increased postoperative lateralization (8.9 mm [7.2] vs. 5.5 mm [7.3]; P<.06). The majority (91%) were managed with observation alone. Three (9%) underwent an additional procedure: carpal tunnel release (1, 3%), ulnar nerve decompression (1, 3%), and ulnar nerve transposition (1, 3%) for peripheral compressive neuropathies. At the final follow-up, 19 (57%) nerves fully recovered, and 14 (43%) showed mild residual sensorimotor dysfunction. The mean time to first sign of recovery and ultimate recovery were 11 (7.2) and 36 (23.5) weeks, respectively. At the final follow-up, patients with nerve injury performed worse on patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog score pain (2.2 vs. 1.0, P<.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (67.8 vs. 84.8, P<.001), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (62 vs. 77, P= .009). Nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty is rare, occurring in 3.6% of our patient population. Axillary mononeuropathy and brachial plexopathies are the most common. Most patients can be managed expectantly with observation and will recover at least partial nerve function, although clinical outcomes remain inferior to those without nerve complication.

Evaluation of the Iatrogenic Sciatic Nerve Injury following Double Pelvic Osteotomy Performed with Piezoelectric Cutting Tool in Dogs.

(1) Background: The double pelvic osteotomy (DPO) is a prophylactic surgical procedure associated with 0.4% incidence of sciatic nerve injury. The piezoelectric cutting tool is a surgical device able to involve only mineralized tissue avoiding neurovascular tissue and other soft tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the sciatic nerve injury observed in dogs underwent iliac osteotomy performed using the piezoelectric cutting tool. (2) Methods: Dogs underwent DPO performed with piezoelectric cutting tool were included. Neurological assessment was performed 6 and 24 h after surgery and then repeated 12 days, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. Temporary and or permanent sciatic nerve injury were recorded. (3) Results: 84 DPOs performed in fifty dogs were included. No temporary/permanent neurological disease associated with iatrogenic damage of the sciatic nerve were observed. (4) Conclusions: The iliac osteotomy performed with piezoelectric cutting tool was not associated to iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury.

Abstract No. 382 Intraoperative provocative neuromonitoring minimizes the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during peripheral arteriovenous malformation embolization

This study evaluates the efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) with a pre-embolization lidocaine injection challenge (“provocative testing”) to minimize iatrogenic, irreversible nerve injury during embolization of peripheral AVMs.

How to treat proximal and middle one-third humeral shaft fractures: the role of helical plates.

To evaluate the outcomes of patients affected by proximal and middle one-third humeral shaft fractures treated with humeral helical plates. From October 2016 to June 2020, twenty-four (twenty women, four men) underwent humeral reduction and fixation with humeral helical plates (A.L.P.S.® Proximal Humeral Plating System, Zimmer Biomet) that preserve deltoid muscle insertion and reduce the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury. At one and six months after surgery, standard antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained, and at last follow-up (eighteen months on average), clinical evaluation was performed through range of motion assessment, Constant score and DASH score questionnaires. Only descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. At six months, all fractures have healed. At last follow-up (average eighteen months, 13-28) mean Constant score was 71 (range 33-96), mean Dash score was 19.2 (range 1.7-63). The average range of motion was calculated as follows: flexion 137.8° (range 90-180); abduction 125.8° (range 85-180°); external rotation 55° (range 20-80°), internal rotation at L3 (range between scapulae-trochanter). Three patients experienced temporary radial nerve palsy from injury, while in one case, a temporary iatrogenic palsy occurred. In our opinion, the helical plate may be an effective surgical tool for management of proximal and middle one-third diaphyseal humeral fractures. The humeral helical plate allows stable fixation avoiding the deltoid tuberosity proximally and radial nerve distally, thus increasing the possibility of rapid functional recovery after surgery.

Anatomical Variations of the Iliohypogastric Nerve: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Several anatomical variations of the iliohypogastric nerve branches have been observed in earlier studies. Knowledge of these variations is useful for the improvement of peripheral nerve blocks and avoidance of iatrogenic nerve injuries during surgeries. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature about the anatomical topography and variations of the iliohypogastric nerve. An extensive search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases was conducted by the first author in November 2021, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Anatomical or cadaveric studies about the origin, the course, and the distribution of the iliohypogastric nerve were included in this review. Thirty cadaveric studies were included for qualitative analysis. Several anatomical variations of the iliohypogastric nerve were depicted including its general properties, its origin, its branching patterns, its course, its relation to anatomical landmarks, and its termination. Among them, the absence of the iliohypogastric nerve ranged from 0 to 34%, its origin from L1 ranged from 62.5 to 96.5%, and its isolated emergence from psoas major ranged from 47 to 94.5%. Numerous anatomical variations of the iliohypogastric nerve exist but are not commonly cited in classic anatomical textbooks. The branches of the iliohypogastric nerve may be damaged during spinal anesthesia and surgical procedures in the lower abdominal region. Therefore, a better understanding of the regional anatomy and its variations is of vital importance for the prevention of iliohypogastric nerve injuries.