Several reports have compared the consequence of repetitive contractions at long and short lengths, with the goal of gaining an understanding of factors causing muscle fatigue: metabolic vs ion distribution. This is traditionally done calculating active force as peak force - passive force. Alternatively, it has recently been shown that during contraction of whole muscle, fascicle length shortens, and it would be more appropriate to subtract the passive force associated with the fascicle length at the peak of the contraction. These two approaches will give different results, for contractions at long length. Contractions of the rat medial gastrocnemius muscle were obtained at 0.3Hz (trains of 50 Hz, 400 ms duration) at a length either 3.6mm shorter or 3.6mm longer than the reference length. During the repetitive contractions, muscle length was changed periodically to the other length to observe 1-2 contractions, then returned to the test length. Initial active force was 2.53±0.4 (mean ± SD) and 6.26±1.2 N at short and long lengths respectively. Active force at the long length would be similar to that of the short length if active force was calculated in the traditional manner. Active force decreased to 1.90±0.5 and 1.8±1.0 N at the short and long lengths respectively. During repetitive contractions at the short length, active force was 3.6±1.1 N, when measured at the long length. During repetitive contractions at the long length, active force was 0.67±0.4 N, when measured at the short length. Clearly, the long length resulted in substantially greater fatigue than the short length. There would be no explanation for this if active force was calculated in the traditional manner. The higher real active force and therefore metabolic demand of contractions at the long length can explain the greater fatigue.