AUSTRIAN STUDIES, II, 2OO3 217 Take, for example, education. Gay's arresting chapter, 'Alibis forAggression', includes a well-differentiated analysis of institutionalized aggression, tracing the debates underlying the gradual decline in corporal punishment. But as a social institution, schools are only brieflymentioned, university and technical education virtually ignored. Did education really play somuch less significant a role in the making ofmiddle-class culture than neurosis? Maybe to the individual. But hardly to the societywhich it so changed. Similarly, although the (popular) press receives some attention, there is littleattempt to convey how the communications revolution changed human perceptions. Part of the problem lies in the difficulty of using Schnitzler's witness tomediate theflavour of generational difference. Schnitzler isa great synchronie, but not a diachronic medium. And he isquintessentially a figure of the lateVictorian bourgeoisie, not of theEuropean orAmerican bourgeoisie per se.He simply lacks that 'representative' quality which thatgreat scholar ofVictorian England, G. M. Young, saw invested in those diverse 'exemplary' figures and texts which could allow his 200-page Portrait of an Age (1936) to distinguish so acutely between early-, mid- or late-Victorian Britain. 'Middle-class culture' as described here excludes many of the achievements and contradictions of the 'bourgeois century'. The problem lies not in the book, but in its subtitle. 'Schnitzler's Century' is a searching and original study of the human being and writer Arthur Schnitzler and of the insightswhich each can offer the student of later-nineteenth-century bourgeois culture. Trinity College Dublin Eda Sagarra ?sterreich-Konzeptionen und j?disches Selbstverst?ndnis. Identit?ts-Transfigurationen imig. und 20. Jahrhundert. Ed. byHanni Mittelmann and Armin A. Wallas. (Conditio Judaica 35). T?bingen: Niemeyer. 2001. 329 pp. 56,00. isbn 3-484-65135-0. Why was the situation of theJews inAustria, inparticular the loyaltyof theJews to theHabsburg Empire, so markedly different from their situation inGermany? Perhaps because there the so-called Jewish Question' was only one of a number of 'national' questions in a multi-national framework, and the severity of any antagonism thus became somewhat diffused; perhaps because the Habsburg authorities favoured Jews as a Germanizing influence, possibly the only true Staatsvolk of the eastern crownlands. Such questions and hypothetical answers informthedeliberations in thepresent volume. The diversity and mixture of cultural and linguistic orientations were immensely rich in theHabsburg Empire before 1918, and in this respect underscore the great attraction of intercultural visions; at the same time, however, theAustrian experience also highlights the resistance to interculturality and itscollapse (cf. 'Introduction', pp. 7-8.). Appropriately, thevolume opens with two informative and considered articles on the liberal era and the patterns ofJewish assimilation in themultinational context of the time. If thischaracterized thepolitical background to a potentially productive symbiosis, then 'Vienna 1900' certainly saw an unleashing of creativity which stretched from the literary and artistic, the scientific and psychoanalytical, to the musical and to aspects of popular culture (with its subtle subtexts thematizing the Austrian conditiojudaica, which Stephen Beller graphically adumbrates as the 'triumph of Jewish modernity' [p. 50] in his discussion of the 'Brautkleid mit 2l8 Reviews Rei?verschlu?' in the operetta Im wei?enR??t). Some of thefigures discussed in the various contributions on this defining period are Beer-Hofmann, Freud, Schiele, Schoenberg and Mahler. In subsequent articles the focus turns to Prague and the positions ofMauthner, Werfel, Brod and others in the nationality struggles of the Bohemian capital; then the perspective shifts to three figures ofMoravian-Jewish extraction; thence to Stefan Zweig and Joseph Roth, as promoters of the so-called Habsburg myth, and to the revolutionary counter-myths ofHugo Sonnenschein and Albert Ehrenstein. The subsequent three contributions address various aspects ofAustrian culture during theNazi period and itsremembrance, be it theportrayal of Mauthausen inpost-war literature,Austria-related poetry before and after 1945, or the attitude of an individual likeJosefWeinheber towards Austria and theReich. Articles on the 'Reconstruction of theVienna Jewish Community after 1945' and on the theatre landscape inpost-war Austria as a source fora re-emerging Austrian identityduring thatperiod extend the scope of thevolume firmlyinto thepost-1945 period. Here, the rapid politicization of theatreprogramming seems tohave delayed the chances of using thedramatic medium fora progressive and reflective departure by quite some decades. Of the...
Read full abstract