Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation Research Articles

Partial breast irradiation versus whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

Breast-conserving therapy for women with breast cancer consists of local excision of the tumour (achieving clear margins) followed by radiotherapy (RT). Most true recurrences occur in the same quadrant as the original tumour. Whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) may not protect against the development of a new primary cancer developing in other quadrants of the breast. In this Cochrane Review, we investigated the delivery of radiation to a limited volume of the breast around the tumour bed (partial breast irradiation (PBI)) sometimes with a shortened treatment duration (accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)). To determine whether PBI/APBI is equivalent to or better than conventional or hypofractionated WBRT after breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. On 27 August 2020, we searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and three trial databases. We searched for grey literature: OpenGrey (September 2020), reference lists of articles, conference proceedings and published abstracts, and applied no language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) without confounding, that evaluated conservative surgery plus PBI/APBI versus conservative surgery plus WBRT. Published and unpublished trials were eligible. Two review authors (BH and ML) performed data extraction, used Cochrane's risk of bias tool and resolved any disagreements through discussion, and assessed the certainty of the evidence for main outcomes using GRADE. Main outcomes were local recurrence-free survival, cosmesis, overall survival, toxicity (subcutaneous fibrosis), cause-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival and subsequent mastectomy. We entered data into Review Manager 5 for analysis. We included nine RCTs that enrolled 15,187 women who had invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in-situ (6.3%) with T1-2N0-1M0 Grade I or II unifocal tumours (less than 2 cm or 3 cm or less) treated with breast-conserving therapy with negative margins. This is the second update of the review and includes two new studies and 4432 more participants. Local recurrence-free survival is probably slightly reduced (by 3/1000, 95% CI 6 fewer to 0 fewer) with the use of PBI/APBI compared to WBRT (hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.42; 8 studies, 13,168 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Cosmesis (physician/nurse-reported) is probably worse (by 63/1000, 95% CI 35 more to 92 more) with the use of PBI/APBI (odds ratio (OR) 1.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.87; 6 studies, 3652 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Overall survival is similar (0/1000 fewer, 95% CI 6 fewer to 6 more) with PBI/APBI and WBRT (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12; 8 studies, 13,175 participants; high-certainty evidence). Late radiation toxicity (subcutaneous fibrosis) is probably increased (by 14/1000 more, 95% CI 102 more to 188 more) with PBI/APBI (OR 5.07, 95% CI 3.81 to 6.74; 2 studies, 3011 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The use of PBI/APBI probably makes little difference (1/1000 less, 95% CI 6 fewer to 3 more) to cause-specific survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.36; 7 studies, 9865 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We found the use of PBI/APBI compared with WBRT probably makes little or no difference (1/1000 fewer (95% CI 4 fewer to 6 more)) to distant metastasis-free survival (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.13; 7 studies, 11,033 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We found the use of PBI/APBI in comparison with WBRT makes little or no difference (2/1000 fewer, 95% CI 20 fewer to 20 more) to mastectomy rates (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23; 3 studies, 3740 participants, high-certainty evidence). It appeared that local recurrence-free survival is probably worse with PBI/APBI; however, the difference was small and nearly all women remain free of local recurrence. Overall survival is similar with PBI/APBI and WBRT, and we found little to no difference in other oncological outcomes. Some late effects (subcutaneous fibrosis) may be worse with PBI/APBI and its use is probably associated with worse cosmetic outcomes. The limitations of the data currently available mean that we cannot make definitive conclusions about the efficacy and safety or ways to deliver PBI/APBI. We await completion of ongoing trials.

Has Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiation Therapy Become the Standard of Care in the United States? An Updated Report from National Cancer Database

Introduction/BackgroundWe aimed to update the previous evaluation of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use over time in the United States and factors related to its adoption for patients undergoing a lumpectomy from 2004 to 2016. Materials and MethodsAmong the patients who underwent a lumpectomy, we identified 688,079 patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer and 248,218 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. We defined HF-WBI as 2.5 to 3.33 Gy/fraction to the breast and conventional fractionated whole-breast irradiation as 1.8 to 2.0 Gy/fraction. We evaluated the trend of HF-WBI use and examined factors associated with HF-WBI use using logistic regression models. ResultsAmong invasive cancer patients, the use of HF-WBI increased exponentially from 0.7% in 2004 to 15.6% in 2013 and then to 38.1% in 2016. Among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, the use of HF-WBI has increased significantly from 0.42% in 2004 to 13.4% in 2013 and then to 34.3% in 2016. Factors found to be associated with HF-WBI use included age, patient geographical location, race/ethnicity, tumor stage, grade, treating facility type, and volume. ConclusionHF-WBI use in the United States has more than doubled from 2013 to 2016. Although its use is close to that of conventional fractionated whole-breast irradiation, HF-WBI is still far from the preferred standard of care in the United States. We identified several patient and facility factors that can impact the uptake of HF-WBI treatment.MicroabstractUsing the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016, we evaluated the trend of hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy use and factors associated with use. Use in the United States has more than doubled from 2013 to 2016, but it has not become the standard of care. We identified several patient and facility factors that impact the uptake of hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy treatment.

Abstract GS2-04: A randomized phase III study of radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01)

Abstract Background: Wholebreast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery for DCIS reduces therisk of local recurrence including invasive recurrence. The objective of BIG3-07/TROG 07.01 is to test radiation dose escalation to the tumor bed (tumorbed boost) and fractionation sensitivity of whole breast irradiation (WBI) inpatients with non-low risk DCIS treated with breast conserving therapy. Methods: BIG3-07/TROG 07.01 is an international, multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial. Eligible women were ≥18 years ofage with completely resected non-low risk DCIS defined as age <50 years orage ≥50 years plus at least one of the risk factors for local recurrence (palpable tumor,multifocal disease, tumor size ≥ 1.5cm, intermediate or high nuclear grade, central necrosis, comedo histologyand/or surgical margin <10 mm). Patients were randomized to have tumor bedboost (16 Gy in 8 daily fractions) or no boost following conventional WBI (50Gy in 25 daily fractions) or hypofractionated WBI (42.5 Gy in 16 dailyfractions) in one of three randomization categories selected by centers priorto study activation. Randomization A was a 4-arm randomization of no boost vs. boostfollowing conventional WBI vs. hypofractionated WBI. Patients in RandomizationB and Randomization C were assigned no boost or boost following conventional WBIand hypofractionated WBI, respectively. The primary endpoint was time to localrecurrence, analyzed by intention to treat. The trial was designed to detect a3% difference in 5-year free-from- local recurrence rates between the no boostand boost groups (93% vs 96%; hazard ratio, 0.56) with 90% power and 2-sidedalpha level of 5%. The primary effect of boost was assessed on all randomizedpatients. The secondary effect of WBI dose-fractionation and the interactionbetween boost and WBI dose-fractionation were assessed on patients in RandomizationA and additionally on all patients. Results: BetweenJune 2007 and June 2014, 1608 patients were randomized to have no boost (805patients) or boost (803 patients) after WBI. Conventional WBI was given in 831 patients(no boost in 416 patients; boost in 415 patients). Hypofractionated WBI wasgiven in 777 patients (no boost in 389 patients; boost in 388 patients). Adjuvantendocrine therapy was planned in 106 patients (13%) in the no boost group and105 patients (13%) in the boost group. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. The 5-yearfree-from- local recurrence rates were 93% in the no boost group and 97% in theboost group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.72;P<0.001). Forty-four percent and 45% of LRs were invasive in the no boostgroup and boost group, respectively. The effect of boost did not vary significantlyby age, tumor size, nuclear grade, surgical margin or endocrine therapy. Therewere no significant differences in the 5-year free-from- local recurrence ratesbetween the conventional WBI group and hypofractionated WBI group inRandomization A (94% vs. 94%, P=0.84) and in all randomized patients (95% vs.95%, P=0.89). The test for interaction between boost and dose-fractionation wasnot significant in Randomization A or in all randomized patients (both P=0.89).The rates of grade ≥2 breastpain (12% vs. 16%, P=0.84) and skin and subcutaneous tissue fibrosis (6% vs.15%, P=0.14) did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: Inwomen with non-low risk DCIS treatedwith breast conserving surgery, the addition of tumor bed boost followingconventional or hypofractionated WBI reduced local recurrence rates. There wasno difference in local recurrence rates between conventional WBI andhypofractionated WBI. (Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00470236.) Citation Format: Boon Hui Chua, Emma Link, Ian Kunkler, Ivo Olivotto, Antonia Helen Westenberg, Timothy Whelan, Guenther Gruber, Breast International Group (BIG)-aisbl, Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Cancer Trials Ireland. A randomized phase III study of radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-04.

Comparing hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation: a propensity score-matched analysis from a national multicenter cohort (COBCG-02 study).

Randomized trials confirmed the efficacy and the safety of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, the role of HF-WBI in patients with DCIS after breast conserving surgery has not yet been clearly established in prospective randomized trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate if HF-WBI can be considered comparable to conventionally fractionated (CF)-WBI in DCIS patients. The analysis included DCIS patients from four Italian centers treated with CF-WBI 50Gy/25 fractions or HFRT 40.5Gy/15 fractions, without tumor bed boost. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed using a logistic regression that considered age, grading, presence of necrosis, resection margin status and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Five hundred twenty-seven patients was included (367 in the CF-WBI-group and 160 in the HR-WBI group). After 1:1 matching, 101 patients were allocated to the CF-WBI-group and 104 to the HF-WBI group. No correlation was observed between the type of RT schedule and LRFS (HR 1.68, 95% CI 0.82-3.45; p = 0.152). After PSM, no statistical difference was observed between the two RT group (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.40-3.04; p = 0.833), with 3- and 5-years LRFS rates of 100% and 97.9% for CF-WBI and 95.6% and 94% for HF-WBI. A short course of radiation therapy seems to be comparable to CF-WBI in terms of clinical outcomes. These data support the use of hypofractionated schedules in DCIS patients, but considering the remaining uncertainties.

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiotherapy for breast cancer

Purpose: This study aims to compare the dosimetric differences in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using pencil beam scanning technology and intensity-modulated photon-based radiotherapy (IMRT) in hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) and find out the more beneficial technique. Methods and Materials: Eight breast cancer (BC) patients with pathological stage T1 ~ 2N0M0 were immobilized and underwent 4D-CT scanning used deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technology. The IMPT and IMRT plans were designed for each patient. The IMPT plans used two en-face beam angles. IMRT plans were designed using the field in field technique. The optimization constraints of the two types of plans were identical. Prescription dose and regimen was 40.05 Gy (relative biological effect [RBE])/15 fx with a 10 Gy (RBE)/5 fx boost, five fractions a week. A dose of 95% of the target volume should not be less than the prescribed dose. The target coverage was evaluated using D1, D2, D50, D95, D98, and D99. The target dose distribution and conformity were evaluated using the Conformity index (CI) and the homogeneity index (HI). The Organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated using mean dose (Dmean) and maximum dose (Dmax). Ipsilateral Lung and Contralateral Lung were evaluated additionally using V5, V10, V20, V30. Results: The mean dose (Dmean) of the Heart (P = 0.012), Ipsilateral Lung (P = 0.036), Contralateral Lung (P = 0.012), and Spinal Cord (P = 0.012) were significantly reduced in IMPT plans. The IMPT also showed a tendency to reduce the V20 (P = 0.05) and V30 (P = 0.05) of the Ipsilateral Lung. But there was no significant difference in target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity between the IMRT and IMPT plans. Conclusion: Compared to IMRT, the IMPT using pencil beam scanning technology can spare OARs without compromising target coverage in BC patients undergoing HF-WBI, which potentially reduce the incidence of radiation-related adverse effects and thus may positively impact long-term survival.

Assessment of non-inferiority with meta-analysis: example of hypofractionated radiation therapy in breast and prostate cancer

The aim of this study was to propose a methodology for the assessment of non-inferiority with meta-analysis. Assessment of hypofractionated RT in prostate and breast cancers is used as an illustrative example. Non-inferiority assessment of an experimental treatment versus an active comparator should rely on two elements: (1) an estimation of experimental treatment’s effect versus the active comparator based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and (2) the value of an objective non-inferiority margin. This margin can be defined using the reported effect of active comparator and the percentage of the active comparator’s effect that is desired to be preserved. Non-inferiority can then be assessed by comparing the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of experimental treatment’s effect to the value of the objective non-inferiority margin. Application to hypofractionated RT in breast cancer showed that hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) appeared to be non-inferior to conventionally fractionated RT for local recurrence. This was not the case for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Concerning overall survival, non-inferiority could not be claimed for either HWBI or APBI. For prostate cancer, the lack of demonstrated significant superiority of conventional RT versus no RT precluded any conclusion regarding non-inferiority of hypofractionated RT.

Preliminary Results of a Randomized Study on Postmenopausal Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation Versus Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (HYPAB Trial)

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to report preliminary data of a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Material and MethodsThe HYPAB trial enrolled postmenopausal women with biopsy-proven infiltrating breast cancer, clinically negative axilla, single T1 to T2 tumors, who were treated with breast-conserving surgery. Patients were randomized 1:1 after surgery to HWBI (40.5 Gy whole breast, 48.0 Gy to surgical bed, 15 fractions over 3 weeks) or APBI (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions of 6 Gy given on alternate days on the surgical bed). Cosmetic outcome was the primary end point of the study. ResultsA total of 172 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 5 local failures and 3 locoregional failures were recorded, with no difference between the 2 treatment arms. Use of HWBI as compared with APBI was significantly correlated with increased incidence of overall (62% vs. 14%; P < .001) and grade 2 (18% vs. 1%; P < .001) acute skin toxicity. APBI was correlated with a lower incidence of overall late toxicity as compared with HWBI (18% vs. 41%; P = .001), but no significant difference was found in term of occurrence of grade 2 events (1% vs. 4%; P = NS). At comparative assessment between baseline and post-radiotherapy evaluation, impairment in cosmetic outcome was reported in 19 (11%) patients. Owing to premature closure of the study, no per-protocol comparison between the treatment arms was performed. ConclusionAPBI with the VMAT technique is safe and feasible, with lower acute toxicity when compared with HWBI.

Use of a Radiation Tumor Bed Boost After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Whole-Breast Irradiation: Time Trends and Correlates

We sought to evaluate time trends and correlates of the use of a radiation tumor bed boost (TBB) after breast-conserving surgery and either conventional or hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (CWBI or HWBI) for patients with early stage breast cancer. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. We evaluated the utilization of TBB before and after publication of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology margin guidelines in relation to sociodemographic variables, treatment facility, tumor characteristics, and whole-breast fractionation. The population included 380,387 patients, of whom 76.7% received a TBB. Utilization of TBB decreased over time (2012-2013: 79.2%; 2014: 76.6%; 2015-2016: 74.7%; P < .001); this was seen for most subgroups evaluated. Rates of TBB differed by facility type and region. There was a decrease in TBB use in patients treated with CWBI over time (2012-2013: 84.9%; 2014: 83.5%; 2015-2016: 82.3%; P < .001) but an increase among patients treated with HWBI (2012-2013: 55.5%; 2014: 60.7%; 2015-2016: 65.1%; P < .001); this was also seen for low-risk patients (age >70 years, negative margins). Among patients undergoing HWBI, TBB was more frequently used when 15 fractions were used compared with 16 fractions (76.8% vs 59.1%; P < .001). The use of TBB decreased over time, coinciding with the publication of new margin guidelines, for patients receiving CWBI and those with negative margins, but TBB use increased for patients treated with HWBI. Hence, fractionation regimen is a critical variable in analyzing changes over time in the practice patterns of TBB.

Ipsilateral breast tumor control following hypofractionated and conventional fractionated whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer: a long-term follow-up.

Long-term follow-up of Japanese women with breast cancer who underwent hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) has not been well documented. Therefore, we compared the treatment results of HF-WBI and conventional fractionated (CF)-WBI. Patients with stage 0-II breast cancer receiving partial mastectomy were eligible for this prospective observational study. The HF-WBI consisted of 43.2Gy in 16 fractions to the whole breast, with an additional tumor-bed boost of 8.1Gy in three fractions for patients with positive or less than 5mm surgical margins. A total of 615 patients (400: HF-WBI and 215: CF-WBI) who were treated between 2006 and 2008 were investigated. Propensity score matching was conducted based on age, tumor grade, and margin status, and 372 matched cases were investigated for examining factors relating to intrabreast tumor recurrence (IBTR). With a median follow-up period of 9.4years, age and margin status were independent factors associated with IBTR occurrence (P = 0.006 and 0.016, respectively). The 10-year ipsilateral breast tumor control (IBTC) rates after HF-WBI and CF-WBI were 96.5% and 95.3%, respectively (P = 0.606). The 10-year IBTC rates according to margin status were 88.0% with positive margins, 94.9% with 5mm margins, and 98.0% with negative margins (P = 0.014). There was no difference in IBTC between CF-WBI and HF-WBI in our patients. Positive surgical margin was a risk factor independently associated with IBTC rates after CF-WBI and HF-WBI. Further investigation is required to establish adequate treatment strategies for patients with positive surgical margins.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer; ARandomized Phase III Clinical Trial

To compare the cosmetic outcome and acute cutaneous, cardiac, and pulmonary toxicity profile of accelerated hypofractionated and conventional whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT).This was a blocked randomized, clinical trial on women with early-stage node-negative invasive breast cancer after breast conservation surgery (BCS) with clear margins randomly assigned to receive WBRT either at a conventional dose of 50.0 grays (Gy) in 25 fractions (the conventional group) or at a dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions (the hypofractionated group). Boost irradiation was permitted in both groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS V21.0 using Mann–Whitney U, independent-samples t- and Chi-Square/Fisher's exact tests at the level of P≤0.05.The median follows up was 16 months. Forty-one patients in the conventional WBRT arm and 45 patients in the hypofractionated WBRT group were enrolled. No significant difference was observed in terms of left and right ventricle systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunction. Pulmonary function tests after 6 and 12 months follow up, were comparable in both groups (P=0.2). Skin toxicity during and after treatment was acceptable in both groups. Breast size change in the conventional and the hypofractionated WBRT groups was 14.3% and 7.1%, respectively (P=0.6). Excellent or good cosmetic outcome was similar in both groups.The results of our study support the use of accelerated hypofractionated WBRT in women with invasive breast cancer less than five cm and node-negative after breast-conserving surgery, which provides a more convenient shorter course of radiotherapy with a comparable cosmetic outcome and cutaneous, cardiac, and pulmonary toxicity profile.

Fatigue following radiotherapy of low-risk early breast cancer \u2013 a randomized controlled trial of intraoperative electron radiotherapy versus standard hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy: the COSMOPOLITAN trial (NCT03838419)

BackgroundFatigue is one of the most common and distressing side-effects of breast cancer radiotherapy. According to current guidelines, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may be considered as an alternative treatment option for women with early-stage low-risk breast cancer. One method for APBI is single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) applied directly to the tumor bed during breast conserving surgery (BCS). The COSMOPOLITAN trial therefore aims to analyze the intensity of fatigue following single-shot IORT with electrons (IOERT) compared to conventional hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI) in low risk early breast cancer patients.MethodsThis trial is conducted as a multicenter, prospective, randomized, two-arm phase II study comparing the intensity of fatigue in early-stage breast cancer (cT1cN0cM0, tumor size < 2,5 cm, ER pos. Her2neu neg., age > 50 years) treated either with WBI or APBI after BCS. Secondary outcomes investigated are tumor control, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), acute and chronic toxicity, quality of life (QoL) and cosmesis. A total of 202 patients will be randomized into two arms: Patients in arm A will receive WBI (40.05 Gy, 15 fractions) after surgical resection, while patients in arm B will receive IOERT (21 Gy to the 90%-isodose) during BCS. Fatigue will be assessed 12 weeks post surgery with the help of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale.DiscussionThe present trial aims to evaluate treatment response to compare single-shot intraoperative electron APBI to conventional WBI following BCS in early-stage low risk breast cancer patients. Fatigue is selected as the primary, patient-reported endpoint due its major clinical relevance.Trial registrationThe study is prospectively registered on February 12th, 2019: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03838419. “Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy for Low-risk Early Breast Cancer (COSMOPOLITAN)”.Study statusOngoing study. Start of recruitment was December 2019.

Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after IORT treatment: evaluation of acute toxicity and cosmesis.

Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) is the current standard of treatment after breast conservative surgery (BCS). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) must be associated to WBI in patients showing high-risk factors of local recurrence in the definitive pathology report. The aim of this trial was to evaluate, for the first time, the acute toxicity and cosmesis of HWBI after photon-IORT. Twenty-six luminal breast cancer patients treated by BCS and IORT(20Gy) were included between February and December 2019, in this prospective trial, of adjuvant HWBI (40.5Gy/2.67Gy/15 fractions). Acute toxicity (CTCAEv5.0) and cosmesis (Harvard scale), were assessed 3months after treatment. All patients completed their treatment without interruptions. All cases were evaluable 3months after treatment showing no toxicity ≥ G3 and excellent/good cosmesis assessment in 88% of the patients. HWBI seems to have similar acute toxicity and cosmesis results than conventionally fractionated WBI in combination to photon-IORT after BCS.

Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Following Breast Conservative Surgery for Early Breast Cancer

Background: Hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (HFWBRT) showed comparable efficacy and safety to conventional fractionated radiotherapy. Dose and fractionation of the tumor bed boost to be integrated during HF-WBRT schedules is still to be determined. Aim: to investigate the clinical feasibility of HF-WBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), in early breast cancer patients who underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: This single arm prospective study included 40 female patients with pathologically proven stage I-II breast cancer following BCS with high risk factors. Patients received 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) with field in field (FIF) technique. The whole breast received a dose of 40 gray (Gy) over 15 fractions for 3 weeks with an additional SIB dose of 8 Gy over 15 fractions to be give daily during WBRT. Radiation toxicities were graded using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) scale version 4.03. Cosmetic outcome was assessed using Harvard cosmetic score. Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate the 3- year disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age at presentation was 48 years (range 33-68). No reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Grade 1 and 2 radiation dermatitis affected 80% of the patients, breast pain was observed in 62.5% of the patients while 25% had radiation pneumonitis. Most of the patients (95%) had excellent and good cosmetic outcomes. At 3 years the estimated DFS was 95% and OS was 97.5 %. Conclusion: WBRT-SIB using 3DCRT with FIF technique is clinically feasible for early stage breast cancer patients.

Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for Correction of Residual Dynamic Supination of Clubfoot Treated with Ponseti Technique

Background: Hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (HF-WBRT) showed comparable efficacy and safety to conventional fractionated radiotherapy. Dose and fractionation of the tumor bed boost to be integrated during HF-WBRT schedules is still to be determined. Aim: to investigate the clinical feasibility of HF-WBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), in early breast cancer patients who underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: This single arm prospective study included 40 female patients with pathologically proven stage I-II breast cancer following BCS with high risk factors. Patients received 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) with field in field (FIF) technique. The whole breast received a dose of 40 gray (Gy) over 15 fractions for 3 weeks with an additional SIB dose of 8 Gy over 15 fractions to be give daily during WBRT. Radiation toxicities were graded using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) scale version 4.03. Cosmetic outcome was assessed using Harvard cosmetic score. Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate the 3- year disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age at presentation was 48 years (range 33-68). No reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Grade 1 and 2 radiation dermatitis affected 80% of the patients, breast pain was observed in 62.5% of the patients while 25% had radiation pneumonitis. Most of the patients (95%) had excellent and good cosmetic outcomes. At 3 years the estimated DFS was 95% and OS was 97.5 %. Conclusion: WBRT-SIB using 3DCRT with FIF technique is clinically feasible for early stage breast cancer patients.

Automated Hypofractionated IMRT treatment planning for early-stage breast Cancer

BackgroundHypofractionated whole-breast irradiation is a standard adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. This study evaluates the plan quality and efficacy of an in-house-developed automated radiotherapy treatment planning algorithm for hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy.MethodsA cohort of 99 node-negative left-sided breast cancer patients completed hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation with six-field IMRT for 42.56 Gy in 16 daily fractions from year 2016 to 2018 at a tertiary center were re-planned with an in-house-developed algorithm. The automated plan-generating C#-based program is developed in a Varian ESAPI research mode. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) and other dosimetric parameters of the automated and manual plans were directly compared.ResultsThe average time for generating an autoplan was 5 to 6 min, while the manual planning time ranged from 1 to 1.5 h. There was only a small difference in both the gantry angles and the collimator angles between the autoplans and the manual plans (ranging from 2.2 to 5.3 degrees). Autoplans and manual plans performed similarly well in hotspot volume and PTV coverage, with the autoplans performing slightly better in the ipsilateral-lung-sparing dose parameters but were inferior in contralateral-breast-sparing. The autoplan dosimetric quality did not vary with different breast sizes, but for manual plans, there was worse ipsilateral-lung-sparing (V4Gy) in larger or medium-sized breasts than in smaller breasts. Autoplans were generally superior than manual plans in CI (1.24 ± 0.06 vs. 1.30 ± 0.09, p < 0.01) and MU (1010 ± 46 vs. 1205 ± 187, p < 0.01).ConclusionsOur study presents a well-designed standardized fully automated planning algorithm for optimized whole-breast radiotherapy treatment plan generation. A large cohort of 99 patients were re-planned and retrospectively analyzed. The automated plans demonstrated similar or even better dosimetric quality and efficacy in comparison with the manual plans. Our result suggested that the autoplanning algorithm has great clinical applicability potential.

Acute radiation-induced skin toxicity in hypofractionated vs. conventional whole-breast irradiation: An objective, randomized multicenter assessment using spectrophotometry

PurposeRadiation dermatitis represents one of the most frequent side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Whether hypofractionated WBI induces comparable or less acute radiation-induced skin reactions than conventional WBI is still not fully clarified, as randomized evidence and objective assessments are limited. The aim of this study was to objectively determine frequency and severity of acute radiation-induced skin reactions during hypofractionated vs. conventionally fractionated adjuvant WBI. MethodsIn this randomized multicenter study, a total of 140 breast cancer patients underwent either hypofractionated or conventional WBI following breast-preserving surgery. Maximum radiation dermatitis severity was assessed at completion and during follow-up by physician-assessed CTCAE v4.03 and the patient-reported RISRAS scale. Additionally, photospectrometric skin readings were performed to objectify skin color differences between both treatment arms. ResultsRadiation dermatitis severity was significantly lower in patients receiving hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation (mean 1.05 vs. 1.43, p = .024). Grade 0 radiation dermatitis occurred in 21.43% vs. 4.28%, grade ≥2 in 27.14% vs. 42.91% and grade ≥3 in 0% vs. 4.34% of patients following hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. Objective photospectrometric measurements (n = 4200) showed both decreased erythema severity (p = .008) and hyperpigmentation (p = .002) in the hypofractionation arm. Patients allocated to hypofractionated WBI also reported less pain (p = .006), less hyperpigmentation (p = <0.001) and less limitations of day-to-day activities (p = <0.001). ConclusionPhysician and patient-assessed toxicity scorings as well as objective photospectrometric skin measurements revealed that hypofractionated WBI yielded lower rates and severity of acute radiation-induced skin toxicity.

Toxicity and cosmetic outcome after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation and boost-IOERT in early stage breast cancer (HIOB): First results of a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459)

Background and purposeTo assess the role of intraoperative radiation with electrons (IOERT) as tumor bed boost followed by hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) of patients with low to intermediate risk breast cancer focusing on acute/late toxicity and cosmetic outcome. Material and methodsIn 2011, a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459) was started. Treatment consisted of BCS, IOERT (11.1 Gy) and HWBI (40.5 Gy in 15 fractions). In a single-arm design, 5-year IBR-rates are benchmarked by a sequential ratio test (SQRT) against best published evidences in 3 age groups (35–40 y, 41–50 y, >50 y). Acute/late toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated by validated scorings systems. ResultsOf 627 eligible patients, 44 were excluded, leaving 583 to analyze. After a median follow-up (FUP) of 45 months (range 0–74), for acute effects CTCAE-score 0/1 was noted in 91% (end of HWBI) and 92% (4 weeks later), respectively. Late toxicity Grading 0/1 (mean values, ranges) by LENT-SOMA criteria were observed in 92.7% (89–97.3) at 4/5 months, rising to 96.5% (91–100) at 6 years post HWBI. Baseline cosmesis after wound healing prior to HWBI was scored as excellent/good in 86% of cases by subjective (patient) and in 74% by objective (doctor) assessment with no impairment thereafter. ConclusionsAcute and late treatment tolerance of a combined Boost-IOERT/HWBI regimen is excellent in short/mid-term assessment. Postoperative cosmetic appearance is not impaired after 3 years FUP.

Hybrid planning techniques for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation using flattening filter-free beams.

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for left-sided whole-breast radiation therapy with aboost volume (RT) using ahypofractionated dose regimen. RT plans of 25patients with left-sided early-stage breast cancer were created with H‑IMRT and H‑VMAT techniques under breath-hold conditions using 6‑MV FFF beams. In hybrid techniques, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans were kept as base-dose plans for the VMAT and IMRT plans. In addition, H‑IMRT in step-and-shoot mode was also calculated to assess its achievability with FFF beams. All hybrid plans achieved the expected target coverage. H‑VMAT showed better coverage and homogeneity index results for the boost target (p < 0.002), while H‑IMRT presented better results for the whole-breast target (p < 0.001). Mean doses to normal tissues were comparable between both plans, while H‑IMRT reduced the low-dose levels to heart and ipsilateral lung (p < 0.05). H‑VMAT revealed significantly better results with regard to monitor units (MU) and treatment time (p < 0.001). The 6‑MV FFF beam technique is feasible for large-field 3DCRT-based hybrid planning in whole-breast and boost planning target volume irradiation. For breath-hold patients, the H‑VMAT plan is superior to H‑IMRT for hypofractionated dose regimens, with reduced MU and treatment delivery time.

The evolution of adjuvant radiation therapy for early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer.

Adjuvant radiation therapy is often delivered after breast cancer surgery, both in the post-lumpectomy and post-mastectomy settings. Standard fractionation whole breast irradiation (SF-WBI), which is typically delivered over 5-7weeks, was previously considered the standard of care. More recent data has helped to establish hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI), which consists of a 3-4week regimen, as a new standard of care. This article provides an overview of the major randomized trials that support the routine use of HF-WBI for the majority of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Newer data on the use of a hypofractionated approach in the post-mastectomy setting, as well as ongoing randomized trials addressing this topic, are also discussed.

Hydrofilm Polyurethane Films Reduce Radiation Dermatitis Severity in Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: An Objective, Intra-Patient Randomized Dual-Center Assessment.

Radiation-induced skin injury represents the most frequent side effect in breast cancer patients undergoing whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Numerous clinical studies on systemic and topical treatments for radiation dermatitis have failed to provide sustainable treatment strategies. While protective skin products such as dressings are undoubtedly the standard of care in wound care management, their utilization as preventive treatment in radiotherapy has been somewhat neglected in recent years. In this prospective, intra-patient randomized observational study, Hydrofilm polyurethane films were prophylactically applied to either the medial or lateral breast-half of 74 patients with breast cancer undergoing hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation following breast-preserving surgery. Maximum radiation dermatitis severity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 toxicity scores, photospectrometric erythema and pigmentation measurements and patient-assessed modified Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) scale. Phantom studies revealed a clinically negligible dose build-up of less than 0.1% with Hydrofilm. Compared to the control compartments physician-assessed radiation dermatitis severity was reduced in the hydrofilm compartments (mean 0.54 vs. 1.34; p = < 0.001). Objective photospectrometric skin measurements showed decreased erythema (p = 0.0001) and hyperpigmentation (p = 0.002) underneath Hydrofilm. Hydrofilm also completely prevented moist desquamation, and significantly reduced patients’ treatment-related symptoms of itching, burning, pain, and limitations of day-to-day-activities. Significant beneficial effects were observed in terms of radiation dermatitis severity, erythema, hyperpigmentation as well as subjective treatment-related symptom experiences, while adverse reactions were rare and minor. Therefore, a prophylactic application of Hydrofilm polyurethane films can be suggested in hypofractionated WBI.