Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Research Articles

Ovarian cancer survival outcomes of debulking surgery in the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) era

Ovarian cancer survival outcomes of debulking surgery in the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) era

Ninety-day readmissions after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer

Ninety-day readmissions after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: A critical appraisal of indications and clinical implications

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: A critical appraisal of indications and clinical implications

Expanding eligibility for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Consideration for stage IV disease and patients aged 67 and over

Expanding eligibility for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Consideration for stage IV disease and patients aged 67 and over

Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival among advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery: A National Cancer Database analysis

Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival among advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery: A National Cancer Database analysis

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for a Recurrent Colon Cancer: A Life-Threatening Complication

(1) Background: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, or stress cardiomyopathy, is an acute heart failure condition with transient left ventricular (LV) motion abnormalities but no significant coronary artery obstruction. It mimics acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with symptoms like chest pain, dyspnea, and ECG changes. (2) Case Report: We present the case of a 44-year-old female with relapsed colon cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. After undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), she experienced cardiac arrest from ventricular fibrillation 18 h postoperatively. Echocardiography revealed a reduced LV ejection fraction (20%) and apical akinesia, suggesting a Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Intensive resuscitation and inotropic support led to gradual recovery. Coronary angiography confirmed no coronary artery obstruction. (3) Discussion: This case highlights TTS as a rare but severe complication following major oncological surgeries, possibly triggered by both physical and emotional stressors. TTS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of perioperative cardiac events in cancer patients. (4) Conclusions: Prompt recognition and management of TTS in the perioperative period are crucial to improving outcomes, especially in high-risk oncological patients undergoing extensive surgeries.

Surgical and oncological outcome after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma : Aretrospective single center experience.

Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is arare disease with various histopathological subtypes. For malignant peritoneal mesothelioma and borderline subgroups locoregional therapy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been implemented. The aim of our study was to retrospectively present the outcome after CRS and HIPEC for patients with different subtypes of peritoneal mesothelioma. In total 15patients received CRS and HIPEC due to peritoneal mesothelioma at our tertiary referral hospital between 2013 and 2022. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of 14 of those patients were retrospectively evaluated as one patient was lost to follow-up. The cohort consisted of 9patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (64.3%), 3patients with multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (21.4%) and 2patients with well-differentiated peritoneal mesothelioma (14.3%). Complete cytoreduction was possible in 85.7% (n = 12). The major complication rate was 28.6% (n = 4) and the reoperation rate was 14.3% (n = 2). Median follow-up was 55months (standard error, SE 15.0%, 95% confidence interval, CI 25.6-84.4 months). Over this time period 64.3% (n = 9) had no evidence of disease, 21.4% (n = 3) were alive with disease and 14.3% (n = 2) died of peritoneal mesothelioma. The median recurrence-free survival of patients was 13months (SE13.0%, 95% CI 0.0-32.2 months). None of the patients with multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma had evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up. Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma should receive locoregional treatment as good oncological results can be achieved with reasonable postoperative morbidity. Thus, awareness is necessary for this rare but potentially aggressive disease to offer the best medical care.

Guidelines for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Peritoneal Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A GRADE-Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendations.

Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) are common in colorectal cancer patients. This article aims to provide GRADE guidelines for the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two clinical situations: (1) To determine the value of adjuvant HIPEC for the prevention of CPM in high-risk colorectal cancer patients; (2) to determine the impact on survival of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with CPM.

Management of the Uninvolved Uterus and Adnexa During Routine Pelvic Peritonectomy in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Varies by Histology and Menopausal Status: An International Survey of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Surgeons.

No guidelines exist regarding the management of the uninvolved uterus or adnexa (fallopian tubes and/or ovaries) in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from non-gynecologic malignancies. It is unclear whether salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or both should be performed when a complete pelvic peritonectomy is otherwise warranted. A 25-item electronic survey was sent to 225 surgeons worldwide who routinely perform cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Participants were recruited through listservs of expert groups. Individual surgeon approaches to the management of the grossly uninvolved uterus and adnexa in pre- and post-menopausal women with PM from low- and high-grade appendiceal neoplasms, colorectal cancer, and peritoneal mesothelioma were collected using a 5-point Likert scale. A total of 135 complete responses (60% response rate) were obtained from surgeons practicing in 27 countries. Respondents reported a median practice of 10 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6-15 years) and a median performance of 20 (IQR 12-30) CRS/HIPEC operations per year. Rates of salpingo-oophorectomy differed by histology and a woman's menopausal status, ranging from 29 to 42% in pre-menopausal women to 71-77% in post-menopausal women (P < 0.001). Notably, the number of surgeons who would perform a hysterectomy was lower, ranging from 12 to 27% for pre-menopausal women and from 32 to 44% for post-menopausal women, dependent on histology (P < 0.001). Surgeons are overall more aggressive with adnexal resection than with hysterectomy in both pre- and post-menopausal women with PM from non-gynecologic malignancies. Further prospective studies are required to determine the best approach to optimize surgical and oncologic outcomes while also accounting for the fertility and hormonal impact.

ASO Visual Abstract: Triphasic Learning Curve of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

ASO Visual Abstract: Triphasic Learning Curve of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Effect of glucose-insulin-potassium on lactate levels at the end of surgery in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

IntroductionCytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been established as an effective treatment for peritoneal cancer (PC). However, this kind of combination therapy is associated with a high lactate level. Moreover, studies have suggested that the rate of complications early after surgery directly increased with elevated lactate levels. Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIP), a potent cardioprotective intervention, has been demonstrated to adjust blood glucose (BG) levels and reduce lactate levels. However, the insulin-glucose ratio should be adjusted according to the surgery performed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the advantages of using modified GIP during CRS/HIPEC to reduce the lactate level at the end of surgery and further reduce the incidence of early postoperative complications.Methods and analysisThe modified GIP versus conventional management during surgery study is a single-center, randomized, single-blinded outcome assessment clinical trial of 80 patients with PC who are between 18 and 64 years old and undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive modified GIP or conventional treatment (1:1). The primary outcome will be the plasma lactate level at the end of surgery. The secondary outcomes will include the highest levels and fluctuation ranges of lactate and BG during surgery, extubation time, APACHE-II score 24 h after surgery, postoperative defecation and exhaust time, postoperative lactate clearance time, postoperative liver and kidney function, incidence of complications within 7 days after surgery, length of intensive care unit stay (LIS), length of hospital stay (LHS), and total cost of hospitalization.Ethics and disseminationThe trial protocol was approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University, approval number sjtky11-1x-2022(118). The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registrationChiCTR2200057258. Registered on March 5, 2022.

Eighteen-Months Safety and Efficacy Following Intraperitoneal Treatment With 224Radium-Labeled Microparticles After CRS-HIPEC in Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer.

Peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer carries a high risk for relapse after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). A novel alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical (Radspherin) has been designed to deliver short-range radiation to micrometastases and free-floating tumor cells. A Phase 1/2a study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and signal of efficacy of escalating doses of Radspherin injected intraperitoneally after CRS-HIPEC. Eleven patients received 1-4 MBq (Group 1) whereas 12 patients received 7 MBq; nine patients single dose/three patients split-dose (Group 2). Median age was 66.5 and 61.5 years, and median peritoneal cancer index 6 and 7, respectively. One hundred and seventy-eight adverse events were reported, only seven were deemed related to Radspherin. Thirteen serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in eight patients and no SAEs were related to Radspherin. At 18-months, none of the 12 patients receiving 7 MBq experienced peritoneal recurrences, however four had non-peritoneal recurrences. Across both groups (n = 22), 41% had recurrent disease, only 14% of them in the peritoneum. Radspherin was well tolerated. At 18 months, median disease-free survival has not been reached, and none of the patients receiving the recommended dose (7 MBq) had peritoneal recurrences. The results are encouraging and warrant further clinical evaluation.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is NOT a Last Resort: Rationale for Early Surgical Referral.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is NOT a Last Resort: Rationale for Early Surgical Referral.

HIPEC as Up-Front Treatment in Locally Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of naïve ovarian cancer women undergoing complete or near-complete cytoreduction by assessing the overall survival, the disease-specific survival, and the disease-free survival. The secondary objective is the identification of prognostic indicators of survival and recurrence of these patients. Patients—Methods: Retrospective study of treatment in naïve women with locally advanced ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC and compared with those who were treated with cytoreduction alone. Clinicopathologic variables were correlated to overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival using Kaplan–Meier method, and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: 5- and 10-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients treated with CRS and HIPEC. These patients were 67% less likely to die from any cause (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 0.33, p = 0.001), 75% less likely to die from cancer (aHR = 0.25, p = 0.003), and 46% less likely to develop recurrence (aHR = 0.54, p = 0.041) compared to patients treated with CRS alone. Moreover, the poor performance status (aHR = 2.96, p &lt; 0.001), the serous carcinomas (aHR = 0.14, p = 0.007), and the morbidity (aHR = 6.87, p &lt; 0.001) were identified as independent indicators of poor overall survival. The degree of differentiation (aHR = 8.64, p = 0.003) was identified as the independent indicator of disease-specific survival (aHR = 4.13, p = 0.002), while the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis (aHR = 2.32, p &lt; 0.001) as the independent indicator of disease-free survival. Conclusions: Treatment in naïve patients with locally advanced ovarian cancer undergoing CRS plus HIPEC appears to have improved overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival.

Robotic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is there a benefit?

Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a therapeutic option for the management of malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis and of peritoneal origin. Robotic surgery shows promise as a minimally invasive approach for select patients. We aimed to evaluate the differences in outcomes between robotic versus open CRS/HIPEC and hypothesized less morbidity and faster recovery in the robotic approach group. We conducted a retrospective cohort study from our HIPEC database including all tumor origins. We included patients aged 18-89years who underwent CRS/HIPEC for curative intent at a single institution between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023. Patients were stratified by open versus robotic-assisted surgery. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher Exact tests were used to compare differences in patient characteristics and outcomes. A total of 111 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for curative intent, with 95 (85.6%) cases performed open and 16 (14.4%) robotically. The groups were demographically similar, except patients undergoing robotic CRS/HIPEC had a significantly higher median income ($83,845 vs. $70,519, p < 0.001). Rate of comorbidities and cancer type, including appendiceal, colorectal, and ovarian, were the same. The peritoneal carcinomatosis index and completion of cytoreduction score were similar between groups. Robotic approach was associated with statistically significant lower estimated blood loss (113 vs. 400mL, p < 0.001) and postoperative transfusions (6.3% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.036). Total complications, readmission rates, and 30-day mortality were similar among groups, but the robotic group had a significantly shorter length of stay (5.5 vs. 9 d., p < 0.001). Robotic CRS/HIPEC holds promise to decrease intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusions, and hospital stay while providing similar immediate postoperative outcomes in select patients. These results should be validated in the setting of a prospective trial and effects on long-term oncologic outcomes should be investigated.

ASO Visual Abstract: Decision Regret in Appendiceal Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

ASO Visual Abstract: Decision Regret in Appendiceal Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Role of Tumor Microenvironment in the Risk of Thromboembolic Complications in Ovarian Cancer

Introduction. Incidence of ovarian cancer remains high in the overall prevalence of oncological pathology. Adjuvant chemotherapy refers to its treatment options. Patients with oncological pathology are faced with a high risk of thrombosis and thromboembolism, with up to 30% lethal outcome within a month of its development. A number of cancer cells are known to induce platelet aggregation, contributing to thrombosis and metastasis as a result of this interaction. Accordingly, the paper is aimed at presenting a clinical case for demonstrating the role of P-selectin expression in the complications in a patient with ovarian cancer. Materials and methods. The present paper evaluates platelet activation marker in a patient undergoing chemotherapy courses after cytoreductive surgery. Following the case conference and in accordance with the clinical recommendations of the Russian Oncology Association (AOR) and Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), cytoreduction (CC-0), radical hysterectomy, transverse colectomy, left hemicolectomy with rectum resection were performed. The interventions included ascendostomy, pelvic, lateral right-sided and left-sided peritonectomy, pelvic lymphoadenectomy, total omentectomy, Renape-French HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy), abdominal and pelvic drainage. Expression of P-selectin on the platelet surface was measured as a marker of platelet activation. Results and discussion. At the time of admission, the patient had high CD62 expression activity compared to healthy volunteers (CD62 ADP- — 11.2%, CD62 ADP — 24.7% vs CD62 ADP- — 1.3%, CD62 ADP — 17.2%). During the complex treatment of ovarian cancer, the platelet activation increased (CD62 ADP- — 21.8 %, CD62 ADP+ — 30.1 %). At discharge, CD62 expression values reached the conditional norm, presumably indicating thrombosis development. Conclusion. Tumor microenvironment influences the hemostasis system. Detailed study into this issue obtains a high potential for the prevention of primary and secondary thromboembolic complications in oncologic patients.

Bilateral erector spinae plane block by multiple injection for pain control in pseudomyxoma peritonei surgery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveCurrently, the primary surgical treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The perioperative period is frequently accompanied by severe pain. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can enhance analgesia for abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of bilateral multiple-injection ESPB in patients with PMP.MethodsFifty patients with PMP were randomly divided into two groups: the ESPB combined with general anesthesia group (Group E) and the general anesthesia alone group (Group C). Prior to the induction, patients in Group E underwent ESPB at the T7 and T11 levels. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during rest at 6 h post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, time for first rescue analgesia, frequency distribution of rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, adverse events associated with ESPB.ResultsThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores in Group E were significantly lower compared to Group C at immediate post-extubation (1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.008), and at 2 (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.001), 4 (2.4 ± 1.5 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.001), and 6 h (2.7 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.004) post-extubation during rest. Similarly, the VAS scores in Group E were significantly lower than those in Group C at immediate post-extubation (3.0 ± 1.4 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), and at 2 (3.8 ± 1.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.4, P = 0.019), 4 (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.5, P < 0.001), and 6 h (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.3, P = 0.004) post-extubation during movement. In Group E, the intraoperative remifentanil administration (2319.3 ± 1089.5 vs. 2984.6 ± 796.1, P = 0.017) and the amount of rescue analgesia within 2 h post-extubation (0 vs. 4, P = 0.037) were significantly less than in Group C, and the first rescue analgesia time was shorter as well (231.4 ± 147.5 vs. 668.8 ± 416.7, P < 0.001).ConclusionCompared to general anesthesia alone, bilateral multiple-injection ESPB with 0.2% ropivacaine can enhance analgesia and reduce opioid administration in patients with PMP. However, the duration of analgesia with ESPB is relatively short due to the low concentration of the local anesthetic used.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300069504, 20/03/2023.

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor with Peritoneal Metastasis: A Review of Current Management.

Peritoneal metastasis in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors poses a significant clinical challenge, with limited data guiding management strategies. We review the existing literature on surgical and systemic treatment modalities for peritoneal metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgical interventions, including cytoreductive surgery, have shown promise in improving symptom control and overall survival-particularly in cases in which 70% cytoreduction can be achieved. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy remains controversial due to a paucity of high-level evidence and a lack of consensus for routine use. The use of systemic therapy in the setting of peritoneal metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is extrapolated from high-quality evidence for its use in the setting of the solid organ metastasis of this disease. The use of somatostatin analogs for symptom control and some antiproliferative effects is supported by large clinical trials. Additional strong evidence exists for the use of interferon-alpha, everolimus, and sunitinib, particularly in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may be used in select cases, though as an emerging treatment modality, the optimal sequence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy within the existing algorithms is unknown. Significant gaps in understanding and standardized management exist, particularly for those patients presenting with peritoneal metastasis, and targeted research to optimize outcomes in this population is needed.

Classic and Visceral-Sparing Complete Pelvic Peritonectomy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: A Video Demonstration in Female Patients.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has become standard for resectable peritoneal surface malignancies. CRS aims to achieve complete resection of macroscopic disease through peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections. The pelvis is very frequently involved in peritoneal malignancies, making surgical techniques that ensure complete tumor removal an essential part of CRS. This is best achieved through an enbloc pelvic peritonectomy, which frequently includes a hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in women. We created a video to review technical steps and exposure tips to achieve a complete cytoreduction of the pelvis in female patients with enbloc resection of the entire pelvic peritoneum, including the cul-de-sac, the uterus, and the adnexa, with ('classic pelvic peritonectomy') or without ('visceral-sparing pelvic peritonectomy') rectosigmoid resection. The creation of a protective ileostomy in classic pelvic peritonectomy is routine in many centers, while other centers advocate only selective and sparing use of ileostomy. In our center, protective ileostomy is used selectively and is therefore not included in the video. In the first part of the video, we review the rationale, indications, and steps, while in the second part, we show a practical demonstration of both a classic and a visceral-sparing pelvic peritonectomy in female patients. Complete pelvic peritonectomy can be achieved both with or without enbloc resection of the rectosigmoid colon. This technique is an essential part of CRS, and mastery of the technique can help the likelihood of achieving complete tumor removal in advanced or complex involvement of the pelvis.