Japanese Hypertensive Patients Research Articles

Losartan reduces the onset of type 2 diabetes in hypertensive Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C

The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to assess the cumulative development incidence and predictive factors for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in HCV positive and hypertensive patients treated with losartan. Eighty Japanese patients were given 50 mg of losartan per day after diagnosis of hypertension (losartan group). Another 160 treated with spironolactone were selected as control (spironolactone group). Patients in spironolactone group were matched 1:2 with losartan group for age and sex. The mean observation period was 5.2 years in losartan group and 5.4 years in spironolactone group. An overnight (12 hr) fasting blood sample or a casual blood sample was taken for routine analyses during follow-up. The primary goal is the onset of T2DM. Evaluation was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the cox proportional hazards analysis. Three patients in losartan group and 20 in spironolactone group developed T2DM. The 5th year cumulative appearance rates of T2DM were 5.4% in losartan group and 14.4% in spironolactone group. Multivariate cox proportional hazards analysis showed that T2DM development after the initiation of anti-hypertensive drugs occurred when anti-hypertensive drug was spironolactone (hazard ratio: 6.10; 95% confidence interval = 1.78-20.84; P = 0.004), histological staging was advanced (hazard ratio: 4.31; 95% confidence interval = 1.94-9.60; P < 0.001), fatty liver was present (hazard ratio: 3.28; 95% confidence interval = 1.47-7.27; P = 0.004), and patient had pre-diabetes (hazard ratio: 2.47; 95% confidence interval = 1.08-5.63; P = 0.032). Our results indicate losartan causes about 60% reduction of the onset of T2DM compared to patients treated with spironolactone.

The influence of insulin resistance and obesity on left atrial size in Japanese hypertensive patients

Left atrial (LA) enlargement is an early sign of hypertensive heart disease. Insulin resistance and obesity, integral components of metabolic syndrome, are closely associated with the development of hypertension. However, few echocardiographic studies have assessed the relations of insulin resistance and obesity to LA size in hypertensive patients. We enrolled 106 never-treated hypertensive patients (57 men and 49 women) to assess the possible relations of insulin resistance and obesity to LA size. Insulin resistance was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) formula. Echocardiographically determined LA dimension, left ventricular (LV) mass and relative wall thickness (RWT) were measured as markers of LA size, LV hypertrophy and LV geometry. The E/A ratio estimated by transmitral flow velocity was measured as a marker of LV diastolic function. In addition, body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m)(2) as a marker of obesity. Multivariable regression analyses showed that BMI was the strongest independent predictor of LA size (P<0.0001), followed by the HOMA value (P=0.0003). However, LV mass, RWT and the E/A ratio did not bear significant relations to LA size. There were no sex-specific differences in the relations of HOMA value or BMI to LA size. In conclusion, LA size is influenced by insulin resistance and obesity, integral components of the metabolic syndrome, independently of LV hypertrophy, LV geometry or LV diastolic function in nondiabetic Japanese hypertensive patients.

Candesartan for cardiovascular prevention in Japanese hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease

validity. The HIJ-CREATE investigators recruited among selected hospitalized patients undergoing coronary angiography. Patients without stenotic coronary lesions were eligible for randomization in the presence of a history of coronary revascularization or coronary spasm. Of those screened, only 40.9% were enrolled. The trial was powered to detect a 20% reduction in the primary endpoint at a rate in the control group of 100 events per 1000 patientyears. The observed rate was only 67 events per 1000 patientyears and explains why the trial was underpowered. The primary endpoint included weak events, such as a clinically defined diagnosis of heart failure or growing aortic aneurysm without dissection. The daily dose of candesartan used in the HIJ-CREATE trial (range 4‐12 mg) was lower than in most other countries (8‐16 mg in hypertensive patients, and up to 32 mg in patients with heart failure). By the end of the trial, 23.0% of patients of the non-ARB group had crossed over to treatment with ARBs. Furthermore, the HIJ-CREATE trial had a prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) design. 2 An independent and blinded endpoint committee adjudicated the endpoints. However, such a PROBE design does not protect against observer bias in the assessment and reporting of endpoints or side effects. Only reported endpoints and symptoms qualify for blinded validation. HIJ-CREATE was not a trial of differential cardiovascular outcomes on ARB vs. non-ARB treatment, but a comparison of candesartan with a number of unspecified ACEIs. 1 In the non-ARB group, the use of ACEIs increased from 38.0% at randomization to 70.5%. About half of the patients in both treatment groups were on treatment with calcium channel blockers or b-blockers. Only 10% of patients were on treatment with diuretics. The investigators reported that the incidence of side effects leading to discontinuation of medications was 5.7% on candesartan and 12.2% on non-ARB treatment. Not unexpectedly, cough

Relationship between the achieved blood pressure and the incidence of cardiovascular events in Japanese hypertensive patients with complications: a sub-analysis of the CASE-J trial

Various guidelines for hypertension specify that the target blood pressure (BP) should be below 140/90 mm Hg and that strict control is recommended for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. We examined the relationship between the achieved BP and the incidence of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with complications as a sub-analysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial. A total of 4703 patients were evaluated for efficacy in the CASE-J trial. In this sub-analysis, 4553 patients had at least one follow-up visit without any cardiovascular events. We examined the relationship between the achieved BP and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD) or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) at baseline. Possible baseline confounders were adjusted by using the multiple Cox regression model. A higher achieved BP was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with complications (DM, CKD or LVH). In patients with LVH, who achieved systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) <130/75-79 mm Hg, the risk of cardiovascular events was reduced to the same level of SBP/DBP <130/75-79 mm Hg in those without LVH. However, the risks of cardiovascular events in patients with DM or CKD, who achieved SBP/DBP <130/75-79 mm Hg, were still significantly higher than in those without DM or CKD. In conclusion, this study extended the significance of BP control in hypertensive patients especially with complications. Further investigation in a large-scale clinical trial is needed to determine the optimal target BP for LVH patients.

Blood Pressure and Lipid Control Status in Japanese Hypertensive Patients

Strict blood pressure (BP) as well as lipid control is important to prevent cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BP and lipid control status in hypertensive patients. Subjects were a total of 717 hypertensive patients who had been followed at National Kyushu Medical Center in FuKuoka, Japan. Goal BP was defined as < 130/85 mmHg (< 65 years) or < 140/90 mmHg (≥ 65 years). According to the Japanese guidelines, goal LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were defined based on the patient category.Average BP level and the number of anti-hypertensive drugs were 133 ± 12/74 ± 9 mmHg and 2.1 ± 1.1, respectively, and the LDL-C level was 119 ± 27 mg/dl. Goal BP was achieved in 40% of the patients of < 65 years and 67% of the elderly patients. Goal LDL-C was achieved in 65% of the patients. Even in the patients taking lipid-lowering agents (n = 178), 30% failed to achieve goal LDL-C levels. In the patients who achieved BP < 130/85 mmHg, 67% also achieved goal LDL-C, whereas 61% of the patients whose BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg achieved goal LDL-C. Both goal BP and LDL-C were achieved in 39% of the male and 36% of the female patients. In contrast, neither goal BP nor goal LDL-C was achieved in 16% of the male and 17% of the female patients.Results suggest that intensive intervention should be required to achieve satisfactory BP and lipid control in hypertensive patients.

The Importance of Home Blood Pressure Measurement for Preventing Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease in Hypertensive Patients: A Sub-Analysis of the Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) Study, a Prospective Nationwide Observational Study

White-coat hypertension (HT) and masked HT can be identified by home blood pressure (BP) measurement. The prevalence of these subtypes and the associated risk of cardiovascular disease have not been fully investigated among Japanese hypertensive patients. The risk of cardiovascular events due to HT and its relationship with home BP measurement were examined among Japanese hypertensive patients receiving treatment in the Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) study, a nationwide prospective observational study. Both home and clinic BP were measured during treatment, and the occurrence of cardiovascular events was monitored in 4,596 Japanese patients (mean age of 60.8 years, 43.2% men, and mean follow-up period of 3.5 years). HT was defined as a systolic BP > or =140 mmHg for clinic BP and > or =135 mmHg for home BP while on treatment. The relative risk of all cardiovascular events and stroke increased along with higher clinic and home BP levels during treatment. The prevalence of white-coat HT, masked HT, well-controlled HT, and poorly controlled HT was 12.6%, 19.5%, 23.8%, and 44.1%, respectively. The relative risk of cardiovascular events was not significantly increased in the poorly controlled HT (relative risk [RR]: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-5.45), white-coat HT (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.15-3.96), and masked HT (RR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.67-5.98) subgroups compared with the well-controlled-HT subgroup; however, the risk of masked HT was similar to that of poorly controlled HT. Monitoring both clinic and home BP is important to diagnose masked HT and to prevent cardiovascular disease in this subtype of HT. However, further investigation is required to fully characterize the cardiovascular risks associated with masked HT among Japanese patients receiving treatment.

ARB candesartan and CCB amlodipine in hypertensive patients: the CASE-J trial

The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial was a comparative study of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), candesartan, and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), amlodipine, regarding the incidence of cardiovascular events in high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients. The study design was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group comparison study with a response-dependent dose titration and blinded assessment of the end point. The CASE-J trial enrolled 4728 patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years and a mean BMI of 24.6 kg/m2, who were randomly assigned to either candesartan- or amlodipine-based treatment regimens. Blood pressure was well controlled to the level of less than 140/80 mmHg in both of the treatment regimens. During 3.2 years of follow-up, primary cardiovascular events occurred in 134 patients in each of the two treatment-based regimens, resulting in no significant difference in the incidence of cardiovascular events between them (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.79–1.28; p = 0.969). In 404 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, a significantly larger decrease in left ventricular mass index 3 years after enrollment was observed in candesartan-based (n = 205) than amlodipine-based (n = 199) regimens (-22.9 vs -13.4 g/m2, respectively; p = 0.023). Furthermore, new-onset diabetes occurred in fewer patients taking candesartan than in those taking amlodipine, resulting in a 36% relative risk reduction (p = 0.030). The CASE-J trial demonstrated that both an ARB, candesartan, and a CCB, amlodipine, equally suppressed the incidence of cardiovascular events. The ARB may confer more beneficial effects to hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or for those at-risk of diabetes than CCB.

Cardiovascular Risks of Dipping Status and Chronic Kidney Disease in Elderly Japanese Hypertensive Patients

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of cardiovascular events and is often associated with the nondipping pattern of blood pressure (BP). We evaluated ambulatory BP, CKD, and the incidence of cardiovascular events in 811 older hypertensive patients. CKD and the dipping pattern increased the risk of cardiovascular events independent of the 24-hour systolic BP level (CKD: hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-4.54; nondippers: HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.19-3.91; extreme dippers: HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.17-4.83). However, after adjustment for covariates that included CKD, the risk in nondippers was insignificant (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.998-3.34; P=.051), while the risk in extreme dippers remained (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.26-5.32; P=.009) (CKD: HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.93-3.54; P=.081). Patients with CKD have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. CKD and other cardiovascular risk factors may account for some of the increased risk in nondippers, but it does not explain the higher risk in extreme dippers.

Rationale and design of the KYOTO HEART study: effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with high risk of cardiovascular events

It remains to be determined whether the evidence in Western countries for blockade of the renin-angiotensin System in cardiovascular diseases could be directly applied to East Asian races including the Japanese population as a long-term strategy. The KYOTO HEART Study (KHS) is designed to investigate the add-on effect of valsartan versus conventional anti-hypertensive treatment on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Japanese hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure and with high cardiovascular risk. Over 3000 high-risk Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension were randomised to receive either additional treatment with valsartan or conventional non-angiotensin receptor blocker therapies, and the follow-up period will be at least 3 years. The primary end point is a composite of defined cardio- or cerebro-vascular events. Secondary end points include all causes of mortality, worsening of cardiac function, new onset or worsening of arrhythmias or diabetes mellitus. The KHS will provide new evidence for the management of blood pressure in hypertensive patients with high risk.

Microalbuminuria Reduction with Telmisartan in Normotensive and Hypertensive Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Incipient to Overt: Angiotensin II Blocker, Telmisartan, Investigation on Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy (INNOVATION) Study

The Incipient to Overt: Angiotensin II Blocker, Telmisartan, Investigation on Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy (INNOVATION) study previously showed that treatment with telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, effectively reduced the transition from incipient to overt nephropathy in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. However, that large study included both normotensive and hypertensive patients. In the present post hoc analysis, we aimed to assess whether or not telmisartan elicits beneficial effects on the progression of microalbuminuria in normotensive patients. We randomized 163 microalbuminuric (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio: UACR of 100 to 300 mg/g creatinine) normotensive type 2 diabetic patients to treatment with telmisartan (40 or 80 mg once daily) or placebo over 52 weeks. The patients treated with either dose of telmisartan showed lower transition rates from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy compared to the placebo group. In addition, more patients on telmisartan reverted to normoalbuminuria (UACR<30 mg/g creatinine): 15.5% of the 40 mg group, 19.6% of the 80 mg group, and 1.9% of the placebo group. In normotensive patients treated with telmisartan, changes in UACR were not significantly correlated with changes in blood pressure. Side effects did not differ among the groups. The present study demonstrates that telmisartan prevents the progression of microalbuminuria (in some cases induces remission of albuminuria) in normotensive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Telmisartan is shown to be safe and well tolerated in these patients.

The Use of Olmesartan Medoxomil as Monotherapy or in Combination With Other Antihypertensive Agents in Elderly Hypertensive Patients in Japan

The efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) was assessed in 550 elderly Japanese hypertensive patients who were followed for 24 weeks in daily clinical practice. Patients were given OLM alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs at the discretion of the investigators. After 24 weeks of treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) significantly decreased from baseline (P<.0001). When patients were classified as either young-old (65-74 years) or older-old (75 years and older), with either isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) or systolic-diastolic hypertension (SDH), the reduction of diastolic BP in ISH patients was significantly smaller than that in SDH patients (5.0 vs 15.2 mm Hg; P<.0001), indicating that OLM did not cause excessive reduction of diastolic BP in ISH patients. Treatment was well tolerated in all groups. In conclusion, the medication was safe and effective in reducing BP levels in ISH patients aged 75 years and older, as well as in other elderly hypertensive patients.

Functional polymorphisms in carboxylesterase1A2 ( CES1A2) gene involves specific protein 1 (Sp1) binding sites

Carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) is involved in metabolic activation of a variety of prodrugs into active derivatives and plays an important role in pharmacokinetics. We previously reported that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), −816A/C of the CES1A2 gene associates with the responsiveness to an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, imidapril, whose activity is achieved by CES1. To identify relevant functional polymorphisms, we re-sequenced the CES1A2 promoter region (∼1 kb) in 100 Japanese hypertensive patients. Altogether 10 SNPs and one insertion/deletion (I/D) were identified, among which seven SNPs and one I/D residing between −62 and −32 were in almost complete linkage disequilibrium ( D′ = 1.00, r2 = 0.97). They consisted a minor and a major haplotype, the allele frequencies of which were 22% and 74%, respectively. The minor haplotype possessed two putative Sp1 binding sites while the major haplotype did not have any Sp1 binding site. The minor haplotype had a higher transcription and Sp1 binding activities than the major haplotype, in vitro. The original −816A/C was in high linkage disequilibrium with these haplotypes ( D′ = 0.92, r2 = 0.85), and well agreed with the efficacy of imidapril medication. These results suggest that the Sp1 binding site variation in the CES1A2 promoter is functional, and are good candidates for the pharmacogenetic studies of CES1-activated drugs.

Kidney and Circadian Blood Pressure Rhythm

Association between nondipper pattern of circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) and impaired renal capacity to excrete sodium into urine was confirmed by Bankir et al1 in this issue of Hypertension based on a large number of subjects. Although this association has been observed in small studies,2,3 their study1 is the first to show it in a large-scale setting, and, therefore, is highly welcomed. Because there is a tight link between kidney and hypertension, renal dysfunction causes hypertension, whereas hypertension accelerates renal damage. It is well appreciated that the kidneys play an important role in the long-term regulation of BP. Usually it takes almost 1 week for kidneys to achieve a new steady-state balance of sodium, when sodium intake is altered. Therefore, renal participation in the short-term BP regulation, such as circadian rhythm, has been overlooked. However, the findings of Bankir et al1 strongly suggest that nocturnal hypertension and nondipper pattern of circadian BP rhythm are because of impaired renal capacity to excrete sodium, and circadian BP rhythm is at least in part regulated by kidneys. Sodium sensitivity of BP is also determined by renal capacity to excrete sodium and is regulated by glomerulotubular balance between glomerular ultrafiltration capability and rate of tubular sodium reabsorption.4 Thus, sodium sensitivity is increased in chronic kidney disease (CKD) where glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is reduced and also in disorders with enhanced tubular sodium reabsorption, including primary aldosteronism, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome, where GFR is augmented. When sodium sensitivity is increased, glomerular capillary pressure is usually elevated, resulting in albuminuria and renal damage. It becomes evident that, in patients with high-sodium sensitivity, the nocturnal dip in …

Effects of Candesartan Compared With Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients With High Cardiovascular Risks

The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan Trial was designed to compare the long-term effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine on the incidence of cardiovascular events, represented as a composite of sudden death and cerebrovascular, cardiac, renal, and vascular events in high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded assessment of the end point in 4728 Japanese hypertensive patients (mean age: 63.8 years; mean body mass index: 24.6 kg/m(2)). Patients were followed for an average of 3.2 years. Blood pressure was well controlled with both treatment-based regimens (systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure: 136.1/77.3 mm Hg for candesartan-based regimens and 134.4/76.7 mm Hg for amlodipine-based regimens after 3 years). Primary cardiovascular events occurred in 134 patients with both the candesartan- and amlodipine-based regimens. The 2 treatment-based regimens produced no significant differences in cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in the high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.28; P=0.969). In each primary end point category, there was no significant difference between the 2 treatment-based regimens. New-onset diabetes occurred in fewer patients taking candesartan (8.7/1000 person-years) than in those taking amlodipine (13.6/1000 person-years), which resulted in a 36% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.97; P=0.033). We disclosed that candesartan-based and amlodipine-based regimens produced no statistical differences in terms of the primary cardiovascular end point, whereas candesartan prevented new-onset diabetes more effectively than amlodipine.

Impact of Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Events in 26,512 Japanese Hypertensive Patients: The Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) Study, a Prospective Nationwide Observational Study

The Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) study was performed to investigate the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and development of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) in Japanese hypertensive patients. A total of 26,512 hypertensive patients (mean age: 62.2 years, 43.9% men) were analyzed. All patients received open-labelled losartan for a maximum of 5 years. Endpoints were stroke, MI including sudden cardiac death, and all cardiovascular (CV) events (stroke and MI). The mean observation period was 3.0 years. The mean baseline systolic/diastolic BP was 165.8/94.8 mmHg and decreased to 141.6/82.0 mmHg during treatment. The incidences of stroke, MI, and total CV events were 3.90, 1.02, and 4.92 per 1,000 patient-years, respectively. Aging, diabetes, a history of CV disease, and smoking were independent risk factors for CV events. The risk of all CV events was positively related to BP level during treatment, and increased significantly when the BP exceeded 140/90 mmHg. Age was a strong contributor to CV events, but about a half of the very elderly patients (>or=85 years, n=692) had a BP below 140/90 mmHg during treatment and significantly fewer events occurred in these patients than in those with a BP of 140/90 mmHg or higher. These results suggest that BP should be below 140/90 mmHg in Japanese patients with hypertension for reducing the risk of CV events. BP was controlled below 140/90 mmHg in a half of the very elderly hypertensive patients in this study, and these patients also had a lower incidence of CV events.

Effects of Strict Blood Pressure Control by a Long-Acting Calcium Channel Blocker on Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Urinary Albumin Excretion Rate in Japanese Hypertensive Patients

Strong adherence to antihypertensive therapy has been shown to reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events by strictly controlling blood pressure. Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are among the most popular antihypertensive drugs in Japan, few trials have been conducted using high CCB doses in Japanese patients. In this study, we administered amlodipine 5 mg or 10 mg to patients with hypertension in order to compare the efficacy and tolerability of low and high doses, and measured two surrogate markers of hypertensive target organ damage, i.e., brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a risk marker of cardiac overload and microalbuminuria as a measure of renal damage. Seventy-two patients were randomly assigned to either amlodipine 5 mg (n = 35) or 10 mg (n = 37) dose groups. The latter group achieved greater reductions in clinic as well as both morning and evening home BP levels without an increase in pulse rate (the differences between the two groups in clinic/morning/evening systolic BP were 4.7/4.7/5.4 mmHg, and for diastolic BP they were 4.2/3.6/3.8 mmHg). Reductions in BNP and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UAR) levels were significantly correlated with the reductions in systolic BP levels (BNP, clinic/morning BP: r = 0.256, p = 0.030/r = 0.330, p = 0.005; UAR, clinic BP: r = 0.316, p = 0.007). In conclusion, the higher dose (10 mg) of amlodipine induced greater reductions in all BP levels than did the lower dose, without increasing the pulse rate. These additional reductions were significantly correlated with reductions in hypertensive cardiac overload, as evaluated by BNP levels, and a reduction in renal damage, as evaluated by microalbuminuria levels. Moreover, a reduction in the microalbuminuria may have occurred concomitant with a reduction in clinic systolic BP level.

A One-Year Study of the Antiatherosclerotic Effect of the Angiotensin-II Receptor Blocker Losartan in Hypertensive Patients A Comparison With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have been emerging as drugs to treat atherosclerosis. The effectiveness of the ARB losartan at reducing atherosclerosis was compared with that of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients. A total of 50 patients with hypertension were divided into 3 groups: a control group receiving neither an ARB nor an ACE inhibitor (n = 14), a losartan group (n = 22) receiving 50 mg/day of losartan, and an ACE inhibitor group (n = 14) receiving either 5 mg/day of enalapril or 5 mg/day of imidapril. Atherosclerosis was evaluated based on the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery measured by B-mode ultrasound at baseline and after approximately 12 months of treatment. After the treatment, IMT significantly decreased with losartan (from 0.87 +/- 0.14 to 0.79 +/- 0.16 mm, P < 0.05) and with ACE inhibitor (from 0.81 +/- 0.14 to 0.74 +/- 0.11 mm, P < 0.05). The reduction was comparable between the two groups, -0.078 +/- 0.136 with losartan and -0.073 +/- 0.109 mm with ACE inhibitor, and the rate of the reduction was similar between the two drugs; -0.098 +/- 0.142 mm/year with losartan and (-0.076 +/- 0.118 mm/year) with ACE inhibitor. On the contrary, IMT did not change in the control group (from 0.90 +/- 0.20 to 0.95 +/- 0.26 mm) during the treatment period. Concomitant medication and coronary risk factors such as hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking did not differ significantly among the groups. The antiatherosclerotic effect of losartan on the carotid artery was comparable to that of ACE-inhibitors, and less adverse effects, such as coughing that occurs with ACE inhibitors, were observed. Losartan appears to be a better alternative to ACE inhibitors for treating atherosclerosis in Japanese hypertensive patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Losartan Therapy Demonstrated by a Prospective Observational Study in Japanese Patients with Hypertension: The Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) Study

The Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) study is a nationwide, prospective, multicentered, observational study that was designed to enroll 30,000 hypertensive Japanese patients from more than 3,000 private practitioners. It is the first large-scale observational study to assess the efficacy and safety of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in Japan. Patients were enrolled between June 2000 and May 2002, and followed up to June 2005. The data from 29,850 patients were used for the analysis of safety and efficacy. These patients were treated with losartan mostly at a daily dose of 25-50 mg. The mean follow-up period was 2.9 years. The patients were aged 62.4+/-12.1 years (mean+/-SD) and their mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 165.3+/-17.2/94.3+/-11.7 mmHg (mean+/-SD). Mean blood pressure in patients who were evaluated for efficacy decreased from 165.8/94.8 mmHg (n=26,512) at baseline to 145.5/84.4 mmHg after 3 months (n=21,269) and 138.6/80.0 mmHg after 36 months of treatment (n=13,879). Blood pressure was well controlled during the study period by losartan alone or losartan-based combination therapy. In nearly half of the patients, blood pressure was reduced to less than 140/90 mmHg during the study period. In addition to its antihypertensive effect, losartan reduced the uric acid level in patients whose baseline uric acid level was > or =7 mg/dL. Losartan also prevented acceleration of proteinuria. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 1,081 of the 29,850 patients. Long-term losartan therapy was effective and well tolerated in Japanese clinical practice.

Nifedipine retard prevents hospitalization for angina pectoris better than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertensive Japanese patients with previous myocardial infarction (JMIC-B substudy)

We previously reported that nifedipine retard showed comparable efficacy to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for the prevention of cardiac events in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease during the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases B study. In the nifedipine group, patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) showed a significant reduction in hospitalization for angina pectoris compared with the ACE inhibitor group. We investigated whether this difference was related to the progression of coronary arteriosclerosis. To evaluate coronary arteriosclerosis, we performed coronary angiography (CAG) and a quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms. The cumulative incidence of hospitalization for angina was significantly lower in the nifedipine group (log-rank test P = 0.013). The etiology of angina requiring hospitalization was determined on the basis of CAG findings. Its incidence secondary to the development of new lesions or the progression of existing lesions was significantly lower in the nifedipine group than in the ACE inhibitor group (log-rank test P = 0.042 and P = 0.028, respectively). Using quantitative coronary analysis, changes in the coronary artery luminal diameter were compared between the nifedipine and ACE inhibitor groups. The minimum coronary lumen diameter did not show a significant change in the nifedipine group, whereas it decreased significantly in the ACE inhibitor group (paired t-test P = 0.002), and there was a significant difference between the two groups by analysis of covariance (P = 0.047). These results indicate that nifedipine more effectively prevented admission for angina pectoris by inhibiting the progression of coronary artery disease in patients with a history of MI.

Prevention of Transition From Incipient to Overt Nephropathy With Telmisartan in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

To date, evidence for long-term renoprotection with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has come almost exclusively from Caucasian patients (1–3), despite Japanese people being at high risk of diabetic nephropathy and very susceptible to end-stage renal disease (4–6). We conducted the INNOVATION Study (Incipient to Overt: Angiotensin II Blocker, Telmisartan, Investigation on Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy) to evaluate the efficacy of an ARB in preventing transition from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy in Japanese patients (7). This study is the first large-scale clinical study to investigate prevention of overt diabetic nephropathy using an ARB in normotensive and hypertensive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. The randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in patients aged from 30 to 74 years with type 2 diabetes and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 100–300 mg/g and serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl (men) and <1.3 mg/dl (women). Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, age of diabetes onset <30 years, seated systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥180/100 mmHg, and definable chronic kidney disease …