W ' ith regard to the question of a peripheral action of opiates in altering nociceptive transmission, the focus article by Hargreaves and Joris makes a cogent argument that where a peripheral injury or irritation results in a reduced threshold, opiate drugs delivered at or near the peripheral terminal can diminish the hyperalgesic state. Support for the case is based on several observations: (1)the total response curve for reducing hyperalgesia after local injection lies to the left of the dose response curve for systemic delivery; (2) agents not thought to cross the blood brain barrier, such as the quaternary forms of certain opioids or those that are polar, have measurable activity in inflammatory pain models. (It must be shown that the agents do not cross the blood brain barrier in quantities sufficient to account for the effect. Quaternary drugs can be demethylated, as with methylatropine, and exert a central action, while even polar compounds, such as morphine or beta-endorphin, can exert central effects after systemic delivery. How much is enough?); and (3) normalization of the hyperalgesic state is limited to the body surface into which the opiate was directly delivered, showing that the change in sensitivity was limited to the site of injection and not to a contralateral site of inflammation. The important question that follows is that of whether the observed effect is mediated by an interaction with an opioid receptor. This can only be established by virtue of the pharmacology of the observed effects as it pertains to the stereospecificity, relative potency, and the antagonists' selectivity known to define opioid receptor activity. The failure
Read full abstract