Hydroxyapatite Phantoms Research Articles

An experimental study of lumbar destabilization. Restabilization and bone density.

An investigation of the effects of bone density on lumbar spine stability using destabilizing and restabilizing procedures. To measure cadaveric vertebral bone densities computed tomographic scans and to correlate the measured densities with lumbar spine stability in the intact and during sequential destabilization and restabilization. The stabilizing effects of lumbar pedicle screw fixation have been widely described. Numerous construct failure mechanisms have been observed, including screw loosening in osteoporosis. Although previous studies have analyzed the effect of bone density on the compression strength of bone similar to that used in interbody fusion and the relationship of pedicle screw pull-out strength to vertebral bone density, a combined study of bone density and construct stability using an interbody bone spacer with pedicle fixation has not been performed. Bone densities were measured in 20 human cadaveric lumbar spines using computed tomography scans and a hydroxyapatite phantom. After the specimens were mounted in a testing frame, the L4-L5 motion segments were subjected to cyclic axial compression-torsional loads, and axial and rotational intervertebral displacements were monitored. Laminectomy, facetectomy, and pedicle screw-plate fixation were performed sequentially in three specimens. Ten others underwent these procedures with an additional destabilization procedure, discectomy, after facetectomy. Seven others underwent the same sequence as the previous group, followed by the insertion of interbody bone. Cyclic testing was resumed after each procedure. Average bone densities varied widely among the specimens. Average bone densities of the pedicle and of the vertebral body for individual specimens were well-correlated (r = 0.897). Displacements were recorded as a percentage of the intact state before destabilization; average percentages are reported as follows: axial displacements increased after facetectomy (145%) and subsequent discectomy (251%), and rotational displacements increased after facetectomy (295%) and discectomy (390%). Instrumentation without interbody bone resulted in specimens with decreased axial (126%) and rotational (156%) displacements. The addition of interbody bone further decreased axial (111%) and rotational (117%) displacements. The rotational stabilization provided by instrumentation was well-correlated with vertebral bone density (r = 0.804). This correlation was enhanced by the use of interbody bone (r = 0.939). The unstable lumbar spine can be partially stabilized using fixation. Interbody bone provides additional stability. The immediate stability provided by pedicle screws is greater in lumbar vertebrae with higher bone density.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for histologic bone sections.

In fundamental osteoporosis research precise and accurate assessment of the mineral quantity in histological bone sections is of particular importance when studying the local effects of implants releasing bone modulating agents. A potentially useful technique to estimate the bone mineral density (BMD) is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A highly collimated (0.13 mm) Hologic 2000 with a line spacing and point resolution of 0.13 mm was used. The mineral content was measured in regions of 3.1 mm(2). A ceramic hydroxyapatite (CHA) phantom was developed as a reference standard. The phantom was made of a single-phase hydroxyapatite starting powder by compressing and sintering at 1000 degrees Celsius. The true density was 3.14 + or - 0.001 g/cm(3). The calcium/phosphorus ratio was close to the theoretical one of 1.67. The mean precision error expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) of the mineral density (MD) measurements of the phantoms with thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm was 0.2%. Embedded undecalcified alveolar bone sections of dogs (0.0015-1 mm in thickness) were scanned simultaneously with a phantom 1 mm in thickness. The precision error (CV) of the BMD measurements calculated by DXA for sections > or = 0.1 mm and with a BMD > or = 0.14 g/cm(2) was 0.81%. There was a linear relationship between the BMD calculated by DXA and the estimated BMD in the histological bone sections by means of the true density of the phantom. It is concluded that DXA using a standard CHA phantom is a precise and accurate method to measure MD changes as small as 1% in histological bone areas of 3.1 mm(2) provided that the loss or gain in BMD is > or = 0.14 g/cm(2).

Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is increasingly used to measure changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around femoral prostheses after total hip arthroplasty. We have studied the factors which affect the accuracy of these measurements. The coefficient of variation was < 2% using a hydroxyapatite phantom, 2.7% in an anthropomorphic phantom specimen, and < 1% in repeated measurements on implanted cadaver femora. The precision did not vary with different implant materials or designs. In patients we found a mean precision error of 2.7% to 3.4%. The most significant factor affecting reproducibility was rotation of the femur. We conclude that DEXA is a precise method of measurement for small changes in BMD around femoral implants, but that correct and careful positioning of patients is essential to obtain reliable results.

Precision of dual x-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units

Irrespective of the method used for noninvasive bone mass determination, data comparison between different centers is a major problem as significant interunit variation may occur. We, therefore, have employed mobile densitometry units to reduce interunit variability in two large epidemiologic studies in Germany. Two cars were equipped with either two dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments (QDR 1000 Hologic, USA) (car I) or a special purposed scanner for peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) (XCT 900, Stratec, FRG) (car II). The cars were moved across Germany 11,090 km and 1651 km during the studies over a period of 30 and 7 months, respectively. Precision in vitro was determined using hydroxyapatite phantoms. Forty-eight patients underwent duplicate measurements at the lumbar spine (n = 22) and hip (n = 26) for assessing reproducibility in vivo. Between the two series of scans, the car was moved 63 km. Long-term precision in vitro of the QDR 1000 instruments were 0.41% and 0.59% for BMD with no evidence of machine drift (rate of change per year 0.04% and 0.05%, respectively). Short-term reproducibility in vivo showed a coefficient of variation (cv) of 1.02% for spinal BMD (L2-L4) and 1.72% for femoral neck. Long-term precision in vitro of the pQCT scanner was 0.9%. Our study shows precision in vivo and in vitro and stability of the mobile densitometers similar to that achieved with stationary equipment. In conclusion, mobile densitometry may become a useful tool not only for epidemiologic surveys and clinical trials but also for routine evaluation in less densely populated areas.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine provides an estimation of the bone mineral content (BMC) corrected by the projected area of the spine and expressed in g/cm2. This two-dimensional estimate of the bone mineral density (BMD) is influenced by the skeletal size, assessed by the subject's height. In order to obtain an estimate of the volumetric BMD, we measured BMC with a new DXA device (Sophos L-XRA) equipped with 24 detectors and a rotating arm, thus allowing scanning of the lumbar spine in both an anteroposterior (AP) projection and a lateral (LAT) projection with the patient in a supine position. Comparison between the results obtained on the third (L3) and fourth (L4) lumbar vertebrae with automatic or manual analysis showed that the best precision was obtained with the lateral measurement of L3 alone with an automatic soft tissue baseline determination. Results were expressed in g/cm2 and in g/cm3 (by dividing the g/cm2 value by the width (AP area divided by the height of the vertebra) of L3), and were compared with those obtained by conventional AP scanning of L2-4 (g/cm2). The in vivo precision error evaluated by triplicate measurements on 10 controls was 17 mg/cm2 (1.96%) and 5.2 mg/cm3 (2.31%) for LAT L3 as compared with 13 mg/cm2 (1.15%) for AP L2-4. Volumetric BMD (g/cm3) measurement, assessed in vitro on a calibrated hydroxyapatite phantom, and the absolute values obtained in normal women were similar to those obtained by quantitative computed tomography (QCT).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prototype of dual energy X-ray tomodensimeter for lumbar spine bone mineral density measurements; choice of the reconstruction algorithm and first experimental results

A dual-energy X-ray tomodensimeter adapted for the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar vertebrae has been directly developed from a typical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer. This apparatus consists of two fundamental parts: a dual energy X-ray tube, and a multidetector made by an array of 24 NaI(Tl) crystals. It provides both tomographic and non-tomographic (anteroposterior, lateral etc) measurement. The detection area is limited to 132 mm. In this condition, the choice of the best reconstruction algorithm in order to give a direct BMD is considered. Preliminary studies based on numerical simulated projections and hydroxyapatite phantoms demonstrated the superiority of algebraic reconstruction algorithms, such as conjugated gradient.