Hydromorphone Group Research Articles

Liposomal bupivacaine plus intrathecal hydromorphone associated with shortened length of stay and decreased opioid use in pediatric patients following posterior spinal fusion surgery.

We aimed to determine if the use of intrathecal (IT) hydromorphone and/or liposomal bupivacaine (LB) decreased the amount of postoperative and post-discharge opioids for pediatric patients undergoing fusion (PSF) surgery to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A retrospective review of AIS patients undergoing PSF surgery was conducted. Hospital LOS, and inpatient and post-discharge opioid use were compared. Opioid use was reported as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Three groups were formed from 186 patients: the control (CG) (n = 39), the IT hydromorphone only (IT) (n = 58), and the liposomal bupivacaine with intrathecal hydromorphone (LB + IT) group (n = 89). The mean LOS were 4.8, 4.2, and 3.5 days for the CG, IT, and LB + IT groups, respectively, with the LB + IT group being shorter than both the CG (p < 0.001) and IT groups (p < 0.001). The mean inpatient OMEs were 106.3/day, 69.2/day, and 30.0/day for the CG, IT, and LB + IT groups, respectively, with each group being significantly different than each other (all pairwise comparisons, p < 0.001). The mean total OMEs that patients were prescribed post-discharge were 693.6 in the CG, 581.1 in the IT, and 359.4 in the LB + IT group (F(2,183) = 14.5, p < 0.001), with the LB + IT group being prescribed significantly less than both the IT (p = 0.003) and CG groups (p < 0.001). Both the use of IT hydromorphone and LB were associated with shortened LOS and fewer total and per day in-hospital OMEs; however, the group who received both IT and LB (LB + IT) had the greatest decrease in LOS, and both inpatient and post-discharge OME usage. Level III (retrospective comparative study).

Comparison of Analgesic Effects and Adverse Events of Hydromorphone PCIA Versus Sufentanil PCIA: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect and adverse events of hydromorphone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) without background dose versus sufentanil PCIA with background dose in patients after surgery. DesignA retrospective analysis. MethodsFrom June 2020 to May 2021, 1594 eligible postoperative patients who received PCIA were collected in this study. According to the types of opioids, patients were divided into two groups: sufentanil group and hydromorphone group. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Functional Activity Scale (FAS) and Level of Sedation (LOS) were used to evaluate the analgesic effects between the two groups. In addition, total PCA use, effective number of PCA compressions, and adverse effects of PCIA were compared between the two groups. FindingsAt 24 hours (h) after sugery, the FAS score in the sufentanil group was higher than that in the hydromorphone group (P<0.05). Compared with the sufentanil group, total PCA use, total number of PCA compressions and effective number of PCA consumptions were significantly decreased in the hydromorphone group during a 48h period (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in NRS score, LOS score and adverse events between two groups at 24h and 48h after surgery. ConclusionsCompared with sufentanil PCIA with background dose, under the similar analgesic effect, hydromorphone PCIA without background dose provided lower PCA use. Our findings may provide useful evidence for more future studies related to postoperative analgesia.

Effectiveness of perioperative low-dose esketamine infusion for postoperative pain management in pediatric urological surgery: a prospective clinical trial

BackgroundPostoperative pain is common in pediatric urological surgery. The study assess the impact of perioperative intravenous infusion of low-dose esketamine on postoperative pain in pediatric urological surgery.MethodsPediatric patients (n = 80) undergoing urological surgery were randomized into four groups. Patients in the control group were administered an analgesic pump containing only hydromorphone at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg (Hydromorphone Group 1, H1) or 0.15 mg/kg (Hydromorphone Group 2, H2). Patients in the experimental group were injected intravenously with 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine (Esketamine group 1, ES1) or equal volume of saline (Esketamine Group 2, ES2) during anesthesia induction. Esketamine 1.0 mg/kg and hydromorphone 0.1 mg/kg were added to the analgesic pump. Face, Leg, Activity, Crying, and Comfort (FLACC) scale or the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and adverse effects were recorded at 2, 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Additionally, total and effective PCA button presses were recorded.ResultsIn comparison to the H1 group, the pain scores were notably reduced at all postoperative time points in both the ES1 and H2 groups. The ES2 group exhibited lower pain scores only at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. When compared to the H2 group, there were no significant differences in pain scores at various postoperative time points in the ES2 group. However, the ES1 group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 6, 24 and 48 h postoperatively, and these scores were also significantly lower than those observed in the ES2 group. The total and effective number of PCA button presses in the ES1, ES2 and H2 group were lower than that in the H1 group (P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse effects within 48 h after surgery was 15% in ES1, 22% in ES2, 58% in H1, and 42% in H2, respectively (P = 0.021).ConclusionsThe use of low-dose esketamine infusion in analgesia pump can effectively alleviates postoperative pain in pediatric urological patients, leading to a significant reduction in the number of analgesic pump button press. The combined approach of perioperative anesthesia induction and analgesia pump administration is recommended for optimal pain management in these patients.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry- ChiCTR2300073879 (24/07/2023).

The 50% effective dose of hydromorphone and morphine for epidural analgesia in the hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind, sequential dose-finding study

BackgroundAlthough previous studies have showed that epidural morphine can be used as a complement to local anesthetics for analgesia after postcesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, there is little known about the analgesic dosage of epidural morphine and hydromorphone for hemorrhoidectomy. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the potency ratio of hydromorphone to epidural morphine as well as effective analgesic dose for 50% patients (ED50) undergoing elective hemorrhoidectomy.Methods80 patients under elective hemorrhoidectomy with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in department of anesthesia, Dongguan Tungwah hospital. To assess the ED50, patients were treated with epidural morphine or epidural hydromorphone randomly using a biased coin method-determined dose with a sequential allocation procedure. Following surgery, standardized multimodal analgesia was administered to all patients. A pain response score of ≤ 3 (on a scale of 0–10) was determined to be the effective dose after 24 h following CSEA. The ED50 in both groups were determined using the probit regression and isotonic regression method. We also measured pain intensity by patient interview using a 10 point verbal numeric rating scale prospectively at 6, 12 and 24 h after CSEA, and adverse effects were also noted.ResultsThe ED50 was 0.350 mg (95% CI, 0.259–0.376 mg) in hydromorphone group and 1.129 mg (95% CI, 0.903–1.187 mg) in morphine group, respectively, estimated by isotonic regression method. Regression analysis with the probit, the ED50 of epidural hydromorphone was 0.366 mg (95% CI, 0.276–0.388 mg) and epidural morphine was 1.138 mg (95% CI, 0.910–1.201 mg). Exploratory findings showed that there was no difference between the most frequent dosages of epidural hydromorphone or epidural morphine in the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus. When administered with epidural opioids at ED50 doses or higher, 97.5% (39/40) of epidural morphine patients and 97.5% (39/40) epidural hydromorphone of patients were satisfied with their analgesia.ConclusionEffective hemorrhoidectomy analgesia requires a 3:1 ratio of epidural morphine to epidural hydromorphone. Both drugs provide excellent patient satisfaction.

Effects of S-ketamine added to patient-controlled analgesia on early postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery: A randomized double-blinded controlled trial

Study objectiveTo investigate whether the addition of S-ketamine to patient-controlled hydromorphone analgesia decreases postoperative moderate-to-severe pain and improves the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. DesignSingle-center prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial. SettingTertiary university hospital. Patients242 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with hydromorphone alone or hydromorphone combined with S-ketamine (0.5 mg/kg/48 h, 1 mg/kg/48 h, or 2 mg/kg/48 h). MeasurementsPrimary outcome was proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe pain.(numerical rating scale [NRS] pain scores ≥4 when coughing) within 2 days after surgery. Postoperative QoR scores and other prespecified outcomes were also recorded. Main resultsOf 242 enrolled patients, 220 were included in the final analysis. The results demonstrated that the incidence of postoperative moderate-to-severe pain was significantly different between the hydromorphone group and combined S-ketamine group (absolute difference, 27.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7% to 42.1%; P < 0.001). Patients who received S-ketamine had lower NRS pain scores at rest and when coughing on postoperative day 1 (POD1; median difference 1 and 1, P < 0.001) and postoperative day 2 (POD2; median difference 1 and 1, P < 0.001). The QoR-15 scores were higher in the combined S-ketamine group on POD1 (mean difference 6, P < 0.001) and POD2 (mean difference 6, P < 0.001) than in the hydromorphone group. A higher dose of S-ketamine was associated with deeper sedation. No differences were detected in the other safety outcomes. ConclusionsAddition of S-ketamine to IV-PCA hydromorphone significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative moderate-to-severe pain and improved the QoR in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trail Register (identifier: ChiCTR2200058890).

Patient Controlled Subcutaneous Analgesia of Hydromorphone Versus Morphine to Treat Moderate and Severe Cancer Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

ContextHydromorphone and morphine are the common drugs used for the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain. Patient controlled subcutaneous analgesia (PCSA) is an effective technique to manage cancer pain. However, few studies have been conducted to show the efficacy and safety of PCSA of hydromorphone for the relief of cancer pain. ObjectivesTo explore the short-term efficacy and safety of PCSA elicited by hydromorphone for moderate to severe cancer pain. MethodsThis was a single-center, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind trial (from April 2019 to August 2021). Sixty patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were randomized (1:1) to hydromorphone or morphine groups according to drug delivery by PCSA. The primary outcome was the pain intensity measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity measured by NRS at baseline, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, two hours, eight hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. The daily occurrence of breakthrough pain (BTP), impact of pain on quality of life measured by the brief pain inventory (BPI), the daily additional consumption of opioids and the incidence of adverse events were also recorded. Adverse events included nausea, vomiting, dizziness, constipation and respiratory depression. ResultsA total of 57 patients (28 patients in the hydromorphone group and 29 patients in the morphine group) in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were investigated. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) NRS in the two groups at baseline was 7.8 (1.7) in the hydromorphone group and 7.6 (1.7) in the morphine group, and at 72 hours were 3.4 (1.8) and 3.2 (1.5), respectively. The postoperative NRS in both groups was decreased significantly compared to baseline. The mean (SD) NRS at 30 minutes in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than in the morphine group (3.9 [2.6] vs. 5.3 [2.1], P = 0.035). The daily occurrence of BTP in both groups at 48 hours and 72 hours decreased significantly compared to the corresponding baseline (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The total scores and sub-item scores of BPI at 24 hours and 72 hours after PCSA in both groups decreased significantly from baseline. A comparison of daily additional consumption of opioids between the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference. There were no significant differences in the incidences of nausea, vomiting, dizziness or constipation between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThis study found that the PCSA of both hydromorphone and morphine could effectively and safely relieve short-term moderate to severe cancer pain. Of note, the PCSA of hydromorphone took effect more quickly than that of morphine.

Safety and efficacy of esketamine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients with hypospadias.

To explore the safety and efficacy of the combination of continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine with sacral block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for hypospadias. Pediatric patients (n = 77) undergoing surgery for hypospadias were randomized into two groups: a hydromorphone group (H group, initial dose, 0.02 mg/kg; maintenance dose, 0.01 mg/kg/h) or an esketamine group (E group, initial dose, 0.3 mg/kg; maintenance dose 0.15 mg/kg/h). Caudal epidural block involved injection of 0.2% ropivacaine 1 ml/kg through the sacral hiatus. Age, weight, grade of hypospadias, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and awaking time of patients were recorded. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Ramsay sedation scores were recorded when leaving the PACU (0 h) and at postoperative 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED), incidence of hypotension, respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting and pruritus, and the time to first bowel movement after surgery were recorded. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the H group and the E group. There were no significant differences in FLACC scores at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h in intra-group and inter-group comparisons. There were no significant differences in Ramsay sedation scores at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h in the intra-group comparisons. Ramsay sedation scores were significantly lower at postoperative 2, 12, and 36 h in the H group compared to the E group. There were no significant differences in the PAED scale or incidence of nausea and vomiting or pruritus between the H group and the E group. The incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression was significantly lower, and the time to first bowel movement was significantly shorter in the E group compared to the H group. Urinary tryptophan, 5-hydroxytryptamine and substance P levels were significantly lower but arginine was significantly higher in the E group compared to the H group. The combination of continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine with sacral block provided safe and effective postoperative analgesia for pediatric patients undergoing surgery for hypospadias. Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR2200066967. Clinical trial registry URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=185042&htm=4.

Intrathecal hydromorphone for analgesia after partial hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

IntroductionThere is substantial interest in adding intrathecal opioids, such as hydromorphone to the multimodal pain management strategies. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine whether adding intrathecal hydromorphone to...

Safety and efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine in acute pancreatitis: An open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Background: Hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) provides satisfactory postoperative pain therapy, but its effect has not been assessed in acute pancreatitis (AP). Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone PCA for pain relief in AP. Methods: This open-label trial included AP patients admitted within 72 h of symptom onset, aged 18–70 years old, and with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain intensity ≥5. They were randomized to receive intravenous hydromorphone PCA (0.05 mg/h with 0.2 mg on-demand) or intramuscular pethidine (50 mg as required) for three consecutive days. Intramuscular dezocine (5 mg on demand) was the rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was the change of VAS score recorded every 4 h for 3 days. Interim analysis was conducted by an Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (IDSMC). Results: From 26 July 2019 to 15 January 2020, 77 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis in the interim analysis (39 in the hydromorphone group and 38 in the pethidine group). Baseline parameters were comparable between groups. No difference in VAS between the two groups was found. Hydromorphone PCA was associated with higher moderately severe to severe cases (82.1% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.011), acute peripancreatic fluid collections (53.9% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.027), more cumulative opioid consumption (median 46.7 vs. 5 mg, p < 0.001), higher analgesia costs (median 85.5 vs. 0.5 $, p < 0.001) and hospitalization costs (median 3,778 vs. 2,273 $, p = 0.007), and more adverse events (20.5% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.087). The per-protocol analysis did not change the results. Although a sample size of 122 patients was planned, the IDSMC halted further recruitment as disease worsening or worse clinical outcomes between the groups in the interim analysis. Conclusion: Hydromorphone PCA was not superior to pethidine in relieving pain in AP patients and might have worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, its use is not recommended. Clinical Trial Registration: Chictr.org.cn. ChiCTR1900025971

Analgesic Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Hydromorphone following Surgery for Mixed Hemorrhoids: A Pilot Study

Background Postoperative pain is a major adverse effect of surgery for mixed hemorrhoids. We evaluated whether spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine and hydromorphone provided safe and effective analgesia after surgery for mixed hemorrhoids. Methods This single-center, double-blind pilot study included patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and external hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia at Zhejiang Hospital, China (October 2020 to December 2020). Patients were randomized to a hydromorphone group (spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine and 75 μg hydromorphone) or morphine group (spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine and 150 μg morphine). Pain scores (numerical rating scale), incidences of vomiting and itching, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were recorded at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. Results The analysis included 40 patients in each group. Median (interquartile range) pain score in the hydromorphone group was higher than that in the morphine group at 12 hours (1 (0–2] vs. 0 (0–2), p=0.044) but not significantly different between groups at 6 hours (0 (0–1) vs. 0 (0-0) p=0.228), 18 hours (2 (2–3) vs. 2 (1–3) p=0.060) or 24 hours (2 (2–3) vs. 2 (1–3) p=0.081). The hydromorphone group had a lower incidence of pruritus than the morphine group (47.5% vs. 67.5%, p=0.018). There were no significant differences between groups in vomiting incidence or LoS. Conclusion In patients with mixed hemorrhoids, spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine/hydromorphone has a comparable analgesic effect and a lower incidence of pruritus during the first 24 hours after surgery than spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine/morphine.

Hydromorphone vs sufentanil in patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: A meta-analysis.

Background:Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is an effective method of postoperative pain, there have been many studies performed that have compared the efficacy of hydromorphone with continuous sufentanil. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone and sufentanil.Methods:Seven databases were searched for controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone and sufentanil. After selecting the studies, extracting the data, and assessing study quality, the meta-analysis was performed on several of the studies with RevMan 5.3.Results:Thirteen studies comprised of 812 patients were found. The pain intensity of the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that of the sufentanil group at 12 hours. With no statistical difference at 24 to 48 hours (MD12 = −1.52, 95% CI [−2.13, −1.97], P <.05). The sedation intensity of the hydromorphone group at 12, 24, and 48 hours were lower than those of the sufentanil group, with no statistical difference (MD12 = −0.03, 95% CI [−0.18, 0.12], P > .05; MD24 = −0.20, 95% CI [−0.42, 0.03], P > .05; MD48 = −0.03, 95% CI [−0.18, 0.11)], P > .05). The PCA requests in the hydromorphone group were less than that in the sufentanil group, and there was no significant difference (RR = −0.20, 95% CI [−1.93,1.53], P > .05). The incidence of adverse events in the hydromorphone group was less than that in the sufentanil group, and there was a statistical difference: (RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.47,0.79], P < .05).Conclusion:Compared with sufentanil, PCA with hydromorphone was more effective in relieving pain and PCA requests 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation, and significantly reduced the incidence of adverse events, but it did not have an advantage in sedation intensity.

Hydromorphone for cancer pain.

Hydromorphone for cancer pain.

Analgosedation: The Use of Fentanyl Compared to Hydromorphone.

BackgroundThe 2018 Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on the “Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU” advocate for protocol-based analgosedation practices. There are limited data available to guide which analgesic to use. This study compares outcomes in patients who received continuous infusions of fentanyl or hydromorphone as sedative agents in the intensive care setting.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted into the medical intensive care unit, the surgical intensive care unit, and the cardiac intensive care unit from April 1, 2017, to August 1, 2018, who were placed on continuous analgesics. Patients were divided according to receipt of fentanyl or hydromorphone as a continuous infusion as a sedative agent. The primary endpoints were ICU length of stay and time on mechanical ventilation.ResultsA total of 177 patients were included in the study; 103 received fentanyl as a continuous infusion, and 74 received hydromorphone as a continuous infusion. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the hydromorphone group had deeper sedation targets. Median ICU length of stay was eight days in the fentanyl group compared to seven days in the hydromorphone group (p = 0.11) and median time on mechanical ventilation was 146.47 hours in the fentanyl group and 122.33 hours in the hydromorphone group (p = 0.31). There were no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of ICU length of stay and time on mechanical ventilation between fentanyl and hydromorphone for analgosedation purposes.ConclusionNo statistically significant differences were found in the primary endpoints studied. Patients in the hydromorphone group required more tracheostomies, restraints, and were more likely to have a higher proportion of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) scores > 2.

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia hydromorphone combined with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

BackgroundPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of acute herpes zoster. The treatment of PHN remains a challenge for clinical pain management. Despite the effectiveness of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and lidocaine patches in reducing PHN, many patients still face intractable pain disorders. In this randomized controlled study, we evaluated whether hydromorphone through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) was effective in relieving PHN.MethodsPatients with PHN were randomly divided into two groups, one group received oral pregabalin with IV normal saline, another group received oral pregabalin with additional IV PCA hydromorphone for two weeks. Efficacy was evaluated at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the end of the treatments.ResultsTwo hundred and one patients were followed up for 12 weeks. After treatment, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of patients in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference of NRS scores between the two groups was statistically significant at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. The frequency of breakthrough pain in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that in the control group 1 and 4 weeks after treatment. After treatment, the quality of sleep in the hydromorphone group was significantly improved compared with the control group. The most common adverse reactions in the hydromorphone group were dizziness and nausea, with no significant respiratory depression.ConclusionsIV PCA hydromorphone combined with oral pregabalin provides superior pain relief in patients with PHN, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements in the First Year after Intraoperative Methadone for Complex Spine and Cardiac Surgery.

Methadone is a long-acting opioid that has been reported to reduce postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements and may attenuate development of chronic postsurgical pain. The aim of this secondary analysis of two previous trials was to follow up with patients who had received a single intraoperative dose of either methadone or traditional opioids for complex spine or cardiac surgical procedures. Preplanned analyses of long-term outcomes were conducted for spinal surgery patients randomized to receive 0.2 mg/kg methadone at the start of surgery or 2 mg hydromorphone at surgical closure, and for cardiac surgery patients randomized to receive 0.3 mg/kg methadone or 12 μg/kg fentanyl intraoperatively. A pain questionnaire assessing the weekly frequency (the primary outcome) and intensity of pain was mailed to subjects 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Ordinal data were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test, and nominal data were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability test. The criterion for rejection of the null hypothesis was P < 0.01. Three months after surgery, patients randomized to receive methadone for spine procedures reported the weekly frequency of chronic pain was less (median score 0 on a 0 to 4 scale [less than once a week] vs. 3 [daily] in the hydromorphone group, P = 0.004). Patients randomized to receive methadone for cardiac surgery reported the frequency of postsurgical pain was less at 1 month (median score 0) than it was in patients randomized to receive fentanyl (median score 2 [twice per week], P = 0.004). Analgesic benefits of a single dose of intraoperative methadone were observed during the first 3 months after spinal surgery (but not at 6 and 12 months), and during the first month after cardiac surgery, when the intensity and frequency of pain were the greatest.

Patient-controlled intravenous tramadol versus patient-controlled intravenous hydromorphone for analgesia after secondary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to compare analgesic, anti-anxiety and anti-depression effects.

IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of tramadol and hydromorphone for secondary cesarean delivery (CD) as well as their anti-anxiety and anti-depression properties.MethodsA total of 106 patients receiving secondary CD under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to the tramadol group (n=53) and the hydromorphone group (n=53). Each group received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using flurbiprofen 4 mg/kg combined with tramadol (4 mg/kg) or hydromorphone (0.04 mg/kg) immediately after the surgery. Postoperative pain numerical rating scale (NRS) for incision and visceral pain, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), early walking time and length of hospital stay were assessed.ResultsPatients in the tramadol and hydromorphone groups exhibited equivalent incision pain NRS at different time points (P>0.05). Visceral pain in the tramadol group was higher than that in the hydromorphone group at postoperative 4 hours (2.9 [1.2] vs 2.3 [1.4], P=0.011) and 8 hours (2.4 [1.1] vs 1.8 [1.1], P=0.028). One week after the surgery, the patients in the tramadol group, as compared to the hydromorphone group, had lower anxiety scores (1.9 [3.5] vs 3.6 [4.1], P=0.033) and depression scores (0.8 [1.3] vs 2.7 [4.1], P=0.023). In addition, early walking time (25.3 [7.0] hours vs 29.3 [9.6] hours, P=0.016) and length of hospital stay (2.9 [0.8] days vs 3.3 [0.8] days, P= 0.008) after the surgery in the tramadol group were less than those in the hydromorphone group.ConclusionPostoperative intravenous analgesia with tramadol or hydromorphone for secondary CD provides comparable analgesic effects on incision pain. Tramadol is less effective in controlling visceral pain compared to hydromorphone. However, tramadol can help to alleviate anxiety and depression in the early postpartum period, improve patients’ early mobilization and shorten their hospital stay.Clinical trial number and registry URLNo: ChiCTR-IIR-17011043; URL: www.chictr.org.cn.

Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in thoracolumbosacral spine operations: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

OBJECTIVEPreemptive administration of analgesic medication is more effective than medication given after the onset of the painful stimulus. The efficacy of preoperative or preemptive pain relief after thoracolumbosacral spine surgery has not been well studied. The present study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of preemptive analgesia with a single-shot epidural injection in adult patients undergoing spine surgery.METHODSNinety-nine adult patients undergoing thoracolumbosacral operations via a posterior approach were randomized to receive a single shot of either epidural placebo (group 1), hydromorphone alone (group 2), or bupivacaine with hydromorphone (group 3) before surgery at the preoperative holding area. The primary outcome was the presence of opioid sparing and rescue time-defined as the time interval from when a patient was extubated to the time pain medication was first demanded during the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes include length of stay at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), pain score at the PACU, opioid dose, and hospital length of stay.RESULTSOf the 99 patients, 32 were randomized to the epidural placebo group, 33 to the hydromorphone-alone group, and 34 to the bupivacaine with hydromorphone group. No significant difference was seen across the demographics and surgical complexities for all 3 groups. Compared to the control group, opioid sparing was significantly higher in group 2 (57.6% vs 15.6%, p = 0.0007) and group 3 (52.9% vs 15.6%, p = 0.0045) in the first demand of intravenous hydromorphone as a supplemental analgesic medication. Compared to placebo, the rescue time was significantly higher in group 2 (187 minutes vs 51.5 minutes, p = 0.0014) and group 3 (204.5 minutes vs 51. minutes, p = 0.0045). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.CONCLUSIONSThe authors' study demonstrated that preemptive analgesia in thoracolumbosacral surgeries can significantly reduce analgesia requirements in the immediate postoperative period as evidenced by reduced request for opioid medication in both analgesia study groups who received a preoperative analgesic epidural. Nonetheless, the lack of differences in pain score and opioid dose at the PACU brings into question the role of preemptive epidural opioids in spine surgery patients. Further work is necessary to investigate the long-term effectiveness of preemptive epidural opioids and their role in pain reduction and patient satisfaction.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02968862 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Effect of preoperative hydromorphone in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. A double-blind, randomized and controlled trial.

Objectives:To determine the efficacy of preemptive hydromorphone for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.Methods:The present prospective and double-blinded study was performed in the The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China, between July 2017 and April 2018. Fifty patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical, gastrectomy were equally randomized into 2 groups, which were administrated different drugs 10 minutes before surgery. Group P (the preemptive hydromorphone group) was administrated 2 mg hydromorphone (2 mL), and Group C (the control group) was administrated 2 mL normal saline intravenously. A standardized general anesthesia were conducted. Blood pressure and heart rate, postoperative morphine consumption, pain intensity, sedation status, and side effects were recorded.Results:Group C had larger intraoperative hemodynamic changes, higher postoperative visual analogue scale score, more morphine consumption and lower overall satisfaction degree than Group P. No difference was found between the 2 groups in sedation status and adverse effects.Conclusion:Preoperative 2 mg hydromorphone could reduce intraoperative changes of blood pressure and heart rate, postoperative pain intensity, and morphine consumption without an increase of adverse effects.

Effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using hydromorphone supplement with dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) using hydromorphone supplement with dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Methods: One hundred and eighty patients, age ranged from 40 to 65 years, body mass index from 18 to 25 kg/m(2,) ASA physical status Ⅱ-Ⅲ, who were scheduled for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) under monitor anesthesia care (MAC) were randomly divided into 3 groups: hydromorphone group (H group), hydromorphone supplement with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg group (D1 group), hydromorphone supplement with dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg group (D2 group), 60 patients in every group. All the groups of patients received PCIA pump, in the H group, the PCIA reagent was composed of 120 μg/kg hydromorphone and 5 mg tropisetron in 100 ml of normal saline. In comparison, PCIA regiment was composed of 120 μg/kg hydromorphone, 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 5 mg tropisetron in 100 ml of normal saline in the D1 group, while 120 μg/kg hydromorphone, 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 5 mg tropisetron in 100 ml of normal saline in the D2 group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S) score, patients' satisfaction index, consumption of hydromorphone, the additional dose of morphine, the effective pressing times of PCIA and adverse reactions were recorded in detail at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 and 24 hours after the patients underwent TACE. Results: The total consumptions of hydromorphone were (4.3±0.1), (4.1±0.1), and (3.8±0.1) mg in group H, D1, and D2, respectively, and the effective pressing times were 13±3, 6±2 and 2±1, the additional doses of morphine were (30±5), (15±3), and (3±1) mg, and adverse reaction rates were 45.0%, 28.3%, and 10.0%, respectively. The manifestations mentioned above in D2 group were significantly lower than those in group H and group D1 (P<0.05). Immediately and 5 min after embolization, at the end of surgery and 0.5, 1, 4, 12 and 24 h after surgery, the VAS scores in the D2 group were 1.9±0.2, 2.1±0.3, 1.8±0.4, 1.8±0.3, 1.7±0.3, 1.6±0.3, 1.3±0.2, 1.3±0.3, respectively, lower than those in group H and group D1 (P<0.05); The satisfaction index in D2 group at these times were 8.7±1.1, 8.9±0.8, 9.2±0.9, 9.0±0.7, 9.1±0.8, 9.0±0.6, 9.1±0.7, 9.2±0.9, respectively, higher than those in group H and group D1 (P<0.05). No breath depression happened in these three groups. Conclusion: The formula of hydromorphone combined with dexmedetomidine to patients undergoing TACE is greatly safe and efficient, with advantages in alleviating pain, reducing hydromorphone consumption and the incidence of adverse reaction of hydromorphone, and without breath depression.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Intravenous Hydromorphone for the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department

As clinicians look to nonnarcotic analgesics in the emergency department (ED), it is essential to understand the effectiveness and adverse effects of nonopioid medications in comparison with existing opioid treatments. Studies of intravenous acetaminophen for acute pain in the ED demonstrate mixed results and suffer from small sample sizes and methodological limitations. This study compares intravenous hydromorphone with intravenous acetaminophen in adult ED patients presenting with acute pain. This was a prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing 1 g intravenous acetaminophen with 1 mg intravenous hydromorphone for treatment of adults with severe, acute pain in the ED. The primary outcome was between-group difference in change in numeric rating scale from baseline to 60 minutes postadministration of study medication. Secondary outcomes included the difference in proportion of patients in each group who declined additional analgesia at 60 minutes, received additional medication before 60 minutes, and developed nausea, vomiting, or pruritus. Of 220 subjects randomized, 103 patients in each arm had sufficient data for analysis. At 60 minutes, the mean decrease innumeric rating scale pain score was 5.3 in the hydromorphone arm and 3.3 in the acetaminophen arm, a difference of 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.7) favoring hydromorphone. A greater proportion of patients in the hydromorphone arm also declined additional analgesia at 60 minutes (65% versus 44%; difference 21%; (95% CI 8% to 35%). There was no difference in the proportion ofpatients receiving rescue analgesia before 60 minutes. Significantly more subjects in the hydromorphone group developed nausea(19% versus 3%; difference 16%; 95% CI 4% to 28%) and vomiting (14% versus 3%;difference 11%; 95% CI 0% to 23%). Although both 1 mg intravenous hydromorphone and 1 g intravenous acetaminophen provided clinically meaningful reductions in pain scores, treatment with hydromorphone provided both clinically and statistically greater analgesia than acetaminophen, at the cost of a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.