Hydrofluoroalkane-134a Beclomethasone Research Articles

Characterization of respiratory deposition of fluticasone-salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane-134a and hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone in asthmatic patients

Fixed combination fluticasone-salmeterol is the most used anti-inflammatory asthma treatment in North America, yet no studies report the actual respiratory tract dose or the distribution of drug within the lungs. Inflammation due to asthma affects all airways of the lungs, both large and small. Inhaled steroid delivery to airways results from a range of drug particle sizes, with emphasis on smaller drug particles capable of reaching the peripheral airways. Previous studies suggested that smaller drug particles increase pulmonary deposition and decrease oropharyngeal deposition. To characterize the dose of fluticasone-salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) (particle size, 2.7 μm) delivered to asthmatic patients and examine the drug distribution within the lungs. The results were compared with the inhalation delivery of HFA beclomethasone (particle size, 0.7 μm). A crossover study was conducted in asthmatic patients with commercial formulations of fluticasone-salmeterol and HFA beclomethasone radiolabeled with technetium Tc 99m. Deposition was measured using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography gamma scintigraphy. Two-dimensional planar image analysis indicated that 58% of the HFA beclomethasone and 16% of the fluticasone-salmeterol HFA were deposited in the patient's lungs. The oropharyngeal cavity and gut analyses indicated that 77% of the fluticasone-salmeterol HFA was deposited in the oropharynx compared with 35% of the HFA beclomethasone. The decreased peripheral airway deposition and increased oropharyngeal deposition of fluticasone-salmeterol HFA was a result of its larger particle size. The smaller particle size of HFA beclomethasone allowed a greater proportion of lung deposition with a concomitant decrease in oropharyngeal deposition.

Comparison of mannitol, methacholine and exercise challenge test to evaluate bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children

To compare the effect of hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 400μ g/d) with that of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) BDP (800 μg/d) on asthma health-related quality of life in a 12-week, parallel-group, multicenter study.HFA-BDP is a new CFC-free preparation of BDP, which was developed as a result of CFCs being phased out from metered dose inhalers.Following 7 to 12 days of prednisone, 30 mg/d, 347 adults with moderate asthma were randomized to receive either 400μ g/d HFA-BDP, 800 μg/d CFC-BDP, or HFA placebo for 12 weeks (all other oral and inhaled steroids were withdrawn). Patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and clinical asthma status was measured at the end of a run-in period, at randomization (after oral steroid treatment), and at the end of the study treatment.Sixty-one patients withdrew, 43 due to worsening asthma (33 placebo; 5 HFA-BDP; 5 CFC-BDP). There was a deterioration in the AQLQ score (− 0.81) in the placebo group, and the difference between this and the stability observed in both the HFA-BDP group (+ 0.13) and the CFC-BDP group (− 0.03) was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.003). The difference between the two active treatments was not significant (p = 0.290). The calculated number of patients who needed to be treated in order to see a benefit in one patient (with the placebo as the standard treatment) was 2.4 for HFA-BDP and 3.0 for CFC-BDP. Only weak to moderate correlations were observed between changes in AQLQ scores and between asthma clinical status measures.HFA-BDP (400μ g/d) was as effective as CFC-BDP (800 μg/d) in sustaining improvements in asthma quality of life following withdrawal of 7 to 12 days of prednisone treatment in moderate asthma.

Gastroesophageal pH monitoring, exercise and atopic inflammation in children with recurrent respiratory symptoms

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study compared the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP [QVAR]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 0.8-1.2 m) versus cholorofluorocarbon-11/12 BDP (CFC-BDP [Beclovent]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 3.5-4.0 m) in 31 steroid naive patients with mild to moderate asthma (PC20, 4 mg/mL). Functional high-resolution computed tomography was used to assess the relative efficacy of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on regional air trapping, as an indirect measure of small airways function and on regional hyperreactivity. Pretreatment functional computed tomography was performed at residual volume before and after methacholine challenge. After 4 weeks of treatment, functional imaging was repeated before and after the same concentration of methacholine that was administered before the treatment (n = 19 patients). Quantitative assessment of changes in distribution of lung attenuation was performed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the HFA-BDP group showed significantly more improvement in air trapping overall (a shift in the lung attenuation curve at residual volume toward more attenuation) on the posttreatment computed tomography scan (P < .05; Fisher’s Exact Test). After an equal constrictor stimulus (methacholine concentration), subjects treated with HFA-BDP (n = 10 patients) showed less increase in air trapping overall than subjects treated with CFC-BDP (n = 9 patients) on the posttreatment scans compared with the pretreatment scans (P < .001; Fisher’s Exact Test). No significant difference was demonstrated between the 2 treatment groups with respect to improvement in symptoms, spirometry, or methacholine responsiveness assessed by FEV1, except for a greater reduction in breathlessness in the HFA-BDP group (P < .05). We conclude that HFA-BDP may have greater efficacy in the peripheral airways and that this effect is better assessed with functional imaging computed tomography techniques than with conventional physiologic tests. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:S258-67.)

Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on small airways in asthma: Investigation using impulse oscillometry

Small airways appear to have an important role in asthma. Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) has ultrafine particles and accordingly greater deposition in the small airways than chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP. Impulse oscillometry systems (IOS), a new and non-invasive measure of pulmonary function, can examine the resistance of total (R5), large (R20), and small airways (R5-R20) separately, and low-frequency reactance area (AX), also considered a measure of small airways dysfunction. Mild-to-moderate asthmatics who were inhaled corticosteroid naïve were randomized to receive 200 mcg HFA-BDP bid (n 1/4 26) or 400 mcg CFC-BDP bid (n 1/4 12) for 12 weeks in an open-label manner. Following baseline measurements, IOS and spirometry were repeated every 4 weeks, and methacholine challenge to separately assess airway sensitivity and airway reactivity and lung volumes at 12 weeks. Moderate correlations were found between R5-R20 or AX and spirometry and lung volume indices of small airways, and between R20 and peak expiratory flow at baseline. The two groups did not significantly differ in baseline clinical or functional parameters. At 12 weeks, all IOS indices improved in the HFA-BDP group, whereas all but R5-R20 improved with CFC-BDP. R5-R20 and AX progressively improved with HFA-BDP; these changes achieved statistical significance at 12 weeks versus the CFC-BDP group. Other IOS and spirometry indices failed to show such trends. HFA-BDP significantly attenuated methacholine airway sensitivity; the degree of this attenuation strongly correlated with R5-R20 and AX baseline values, and with improvement of AX with treatment. HFA-BDP is an effective treatment of small airways in asthma. Prolonged treatment provides a progressive effect over time, which is associated with an attenuation of airway responsiveness.

Esophageal candidiasis as a side effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder: recovery by switching over to hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP)

Esophageal candidiasis is one of the local side effects of inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and it is difficult to prevent this condition. Our previous report indicated that the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis among patients treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder (FP-dp) reached up to 37% in Japanese patients. Although a reduction in the daily dose of inhaled FP-dp can eliminate this infection, it may lead to asthma not being well-controlled in these patients. The aim of this study was to estimate whether switching to an equal daily dose of inhaled hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP), the oropharyngeal deposition of which is very low, can eliminate the infection without deterioration of asthma. A total of 10 stable asthmatic patients with esophageal candidiasis, induced by inhaled FP-dp treatment (400 or 800 microg/ day), were enrolled in this study. A second upper GI endoscopy was performed, more than 1 month but less than 3 months after switching to an equal dose of inhaled HFA-BDP with a tube spacer device, Duopacer. The patients' medications were not changed during the study. Esophageal candidiasis was eliminated in 9 of the 10 patients. The degree of candidiasis reduced in another patient. The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1.0) did not worsen during the study. Switching from FP-dp to HFA-BDP with Duopacer is useful in preventing esophageal candidiasis.

A comparison of 2 extrafine hydrofluoroalkane-134a–beclomethasone formulations on methacholine hyperresponsiveness

Small airways inflammation is a recognized pathologic component of asthma, and it is postulated that the observed airway-wall remodeling in small airways could be due to uncontrolled inflammation in airways that are not penetrated by conventional inhaled corticosteroids. Thus, extrafine particle formulations of inhaled corticosteroids are of clinical interest. To compare 2 extrafine solution hydrofluoroalkane-134a formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate (Beclate and Qvar). Fifteen asthmatic patients (mean +/- SEM forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 2.62 +/- 0.21 L; provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 [PC20], 1.06 +/- 0.58) were randomized to completion in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover manner to receive Beclate or Qvar at doses of 100 or 400 microg/d for 2 weeks, with a 1-week washout period before each randomized treatment. Methacholine hyperresponsiveness was the primary outcome measure. The 2 formulations were equivalent in terms of predefined equivalence limits of +/- 1 doubling dilution for PC20 at both doses: -0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.77 to 0.27) doubling dilution difference between the 100-microg doses and a 0.26 (95% CI, -0.29 to 0.82) doubling dilution difference between the 400-microg doses for the difference between Beclate and Qvar, respectively. Both formulations, at either dose, produced a statistically significant (P < .05) reduction in mean exhaled nitric oxide levels: 400 microg/d of Beclate, 14.1 ppb (95% CI, 5.6 to 22.6 ppb); and 400 microg/d of Qvar, 14.2 ppb (95% CI, 6.0 to 22.4 ppb). The higher doses produced a statistically significant (P < .05) reduction in early morning urinary cortisol-creatinine ratio (geometric mean fold suppression: Beclate, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.89]; and Qvar, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.79]). Both formulations significantly improved peak expiratory flow, FEV1, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity at the higher doses (P < .05). Beclate and Qvar were equivalent for all primary and secondary outcome measures.

Bronchial Asthma Showing Reduction in FEV1 after Inhalation of Qvar™

The administration of Qvar (a hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate; HFA-BDP) is highly useful for the treatment of patients with asthma. However, we found in a case of bronchial asthma that replacing the prior inhaled corticosteroids with Qvar resulted in temporary dyspnea and reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Qvar contains beclomethasone dipropionate combined with absolute ethanol and an alternative to fluorocarbon. The patient had complicated alcohol-induced asthma. FEV1 decreased markedly and immediately after Qvar inhalation. The Qvar placebo is free of beclomethasone but contains other ingredients (ethanol and fluorocarbon). FEV1 did not decrease after the Qvar placebo, Aldecin inhalation, and Qvar inhalation orally treated with atropine before inhalation of Qvar™. It seems unlikely that the components of Qvar (except beclomethasone) are responsible for the reduction in FEV1 observed immediately after inhalation of Qvar. These findings would be noteworthy when using Qvar for Japanese patients with asthma known to have a relatively high frequency of the complication of alcohol-induced asthma.

HYDROFLUOROALKANE-134A BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE IS MORE EFFECTIVE THAN DOUBLE DOSE CHLOROFLUOROCARBON BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEVERE ASTHMA

PURPOSE: The extent of lung deposition is known to be a major determinant of the therapeutic efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid. The lung deposition of extrafine aerosol of Hydrofluoroalkane-134a Beclomethasone Dipropionate (HFA-BDP) was found to be better compared with the suspension aerosol of chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP). The aim of this study is to evaluate pulmonary function in patients with severe asthma when CFC-BDP was changed over to HFA-BDP at half the daily dose.

Comparison of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by CFC propellant and non-CFC propellant metered dose inhalers in healthy subjects

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study comparing the systemic pharmacodynamic effects (heart rate and serum potassium) and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by the non-CFC hydrofluoralkane (HFA) propellant 134a and the CFC propellant (propellant 11/12) metered dose inhalers (MDI) in healthy subjects. At the therapeutic dose (50 microg), salmeterol-mediated systemic pharmacodynamics were equivalent for the HFA and CFC MDIs. Higher doses of salmeterol (150 and 300 microg) produced dose-related beta-agonist pharmacodynamic effects irrespective of the propellant. However, these effects were lower with salmeterol HFA MDI than with the salmeterol CFC MDI at all dose levels. Overall, salmeterol Cmax and AUC(0-t) values were lower for salmeterol HFA compared with salmeterol CFC MDI. At the highest dose (300 microg), where a full pharmacokinetic profile was obtained, exposure to salmeterol delivered by the HFA MDI compared with the salmeterol CFC MDI was 27% and 30% lower for Cmax and AUC(0-t), respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations were generally seen in the first plasma samples taken 5 min after the start of dosing. Salmeterol HFA was well-tolerated. At supratherapeutic doses, adverse events were typical for high-dose salmeterol with fewer adverse events occurring with the HFA compared with the CFC formulation. These data indicate that the salmeterol HFA MDI would not be associated with a significantly different pharmacodynamic, safety and tolerability profile compared with the salmeterol CFC MDI.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone as a dominant economic asthma therapy

Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma treatment have become mainstay of therapy for patients with persistent asthma. Numerous inhaled corticosteroids are available but to date no prospective cost-effectiveness studies have been reported using exclusively US patients and costs. The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of HFA-bectomethasone (QVAR) compared to CFC-beclomethasone (Vanceril) using data from a year-long prospective randomized, open label, parallel multicenter trial. Eligibility criteria required patients to have been on a stable dose of CFC-BDP prior to enrollment. Patients were randomized to either HFA-BDP at approximately half their previous daily dose of CFC-BDP or to continue CFC-BDP Effectiveness data, in terms of symptom-free days (SFDs), were used in a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted from the viewpoint of managed care. Patients receiving HFA-BDP reported a greater increase (median = 22.1) in the number of SFDs than those receiving CFC-BDP (median = 14.3) (P = 0.03). Total costs of care were less for patients taking HFA-BDP (median = dollars 668) compared to CFC-BDP (median = dollars 977). The median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was dollars -5.77 (95% CI: dollars -68.08 to dollars -4.08). The results of this analysis indicate that HFA-BDP was a dominant therapy (more effective, less costly) compared to CFC-BDP.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone or chlorofluorocarbon fluticasone: Effect on small airways in poorly controlled asthma

Inflammation in asthma extends into the small airways ( 2 mm. Therefore, inflammation in the small airways of patients with asthma may not be adequately treated with these preparations. Some inhaled corticosteroids, on the other hand, are compounded with alcohol, resulting in a solution producing an aerosol that has a mean particle diameter of < 2 mm. This study was designed to compare the addition of equivalent amounts of two inhaled corticosteroids (one a suspension and one a solution) to the treatment of patients with asthma, which was uncontrolled despite treatment with moderate to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and usually additional controller medications. The study was performed with 30 patients, � 18 years of age. Subjects were randomized in a single-blind fashion to receive, in addition to their current asthma therapy, either CFC-FP 220 mg each morning and 110 mg each evening (n = 10) or HFA-BDP 160 mcg twice daily (n = 20). Pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry, single breath nitrogen washout for closing volume and residual volume by plethysmography were assessed before and after 3 months of therapy. In the subjects who received HFA-BDP, the ratio of closing volume (CV) to vital capacity (VC) and residual volume (RV) decreased significantly ( p = 0.0214 and 0.0433, respectively), whereas forced expiratory flow over 25 – 75% of the vital capacity (FEF25 – 75%), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and morning peak flow improved significantly ( p = 0.0014, 0.0184, and 0.0321). Improvements from baseline of CV, CV/VC, and postbronchodilator FEF25 – 75%, were statistically significant in the HFA-BDP group compared with the CFC-FP group ( p = 0.0049, 0.0194, and 0.0355, respectively). These preliminary findings suggest that the addition of HFA-BDP, compared with CFC-FP in patients with poorly controlled asthma despite receiving moderate to high doses of inhaled steroids, has a greater effect on parameters reflecting small airway patency presumably secondary to reduction in inflammation.

Airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone and beclomethasone in patients with asthma

Background: With the transition to hydrofluoroalkane-134a propellants in metered dose inhalers, it is important to consider the efficacy and safety profiles of formulations containing inhaled corticosteroids. We examined the airway...

Lung Deposition of Hydrofluoroalkane-134a Beclomethasone Is Greater Than That of Chlorofluorocarbon Fluticasone and Chlorofluorocarbon Beclomethasone: A Cross-over Study in Healthy Volunteers

To compare the lung deposition of radiolabeled hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) with chlorofluorocarbon fluticasone propionate (CFC-FP) and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone (CFC-BDP). Six-day, open-label, nonrandomized, crossover study. Clinical research laboratory. Nine healthy, nonsmoking, adult volunteers. On each study day, participants inhaled one or two puffs of 99mTc-labeled HFA-BDP, CFC-FP, or CFC-BDP. All products delivered 50 micro g per puff ex-valve. Subjects used a respiratory training and monitoring device to meet predefined, standardized inhalation patterns. Immediately after inhalation of radiolabeled study drug, planar gamma camera images were obtained. Radiolabeled HFA-BDP had a higher deposition in the lungs (53% ex-actuator) compared with CFC-FP (12 to 13%) and CFC-BDP (4%). Conversely, CFC-FP and CFC-BDP had a much higher distribution to the oropharynx (72 to 78%, and 82%, respectively) than HFA-BDP (29%). HFA-BDP was deposited evenly throughout the lungs, while CFC-FP and CFC-BDP deposition was primarily in the large central and intermediate airways. Andersen particle size sampling gave mass median aerodynamic diameters for HFA-BDP, CFC-FP, and CFC-BDP of 0.9 micro m, 2.0 micro m, and 3.5 micro m, respectively. Lung deposition was greater with HFA-BDP compared with CFC-FP and CFC-BDP. Deposition values appeared to be related to the particle size distribution of each inhaler, with the smaller particles of HFA-BDP providing the greatest lung deposition and least oropharyngeal deposition.

Efficacy of HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate extra-fine aerosol (800 μ g day−1) versus HFA-fluticasone propionate (1000 μ g day−1) in patients with asthma

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extra-fine aerosol and HFA-fluticasone propionate (HFA-FP) are chlorofluorocarbon-free inhalers. We conducted an 8-week, open study to demonstrate the equivalence of HFA-BDP (800 microg day(-1)) and HFA-FP (1000 microg day(-1)) in moderate to severe asthma. Symptomatic patients on 500-1000 microg day(-1) CFC-BDP (or equivalent) and short-acting beta-agonist, were randomized to HFA-BDP (n = 101) or HFA-FP (n = 97) after 7-14 (+/-2) day run-in. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 198), both treatments provided clinically and statistically significant improvements in asthma control, with increases in peak expiratory flow in the morning (AM PEF) and asthma symptoms (within treatment analysis P<0.05). Mean (SE) change in AM PEF from baseline at week 8 was equivalent (defined as 90% CI for the mean difference between treatments within +/-25 l min(-1)) in the two groups: 29.59 (5.19) l min(-1) for HFA-BDP vs. 17.3 (5.45) l min(-1) for HFA-FP (90% CI-0.02, 24.91). For the perprotocol population (n = 121), the mean (SE) change in AM PEF from baseline was not equivalent; AM PEF improved to a significantly greater extent in the HFA-BDP group than HFA-FP group [34.84 (7.08) vs. 20.63 (7.32) l min(-1) P<0.01; 90% CI; 2.66, 31.10]. At week 8 in the ITT population, there were no statistically significant differences in FEV1, beta-agonist use, asthma symptom/sleep disturbance scores, or percentage of days without asthma symptoms/sleep disturbance. There was a significantly greater reduction from baseline in mean eosinophil count for HFA-BDP compared with HFA-FP at weeks 3 and 8 (P<0.01), and eosinophil cationic protein value at week 8 (P<0.01). Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no statistically significant differences in urinary cortisol creatinine parameters. In conclusion, this study showed that, in patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic asthma, HFA-BDP extra-fine aerosol 800 microg(-1) was at least as effective and equally well tolerated as 1000 microg day(-1) HFA-FP.

Switching from chlorofluorocarbon-beclomethasone dipropionate to a hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate metered-dose inhaler: Study of patient preferences

The aims of this study were to assess the acceptability of a new hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and the ease with which patients switched from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) BDP MDI to the new MDI. BDP has been reformulated in a new CFC-free MDI that uses HFA as the propellant. A total of 385 adult patients with asthma who already used inhaled corticosteroids completed a questionnaire about the MDI they had used before entering the study. They also assessed a CFC-BDP MDI during a 2-week run-in period. After the run-in period, 267 patients were assigned randomly to 1 month of treatment with the HFA-BDP MDI. At the end of the 1-month treatment period, patients assessed the HFA-BDP MDI and indicated their preference for the CFC or HFA MDI. Patients reported no major differences between the 2 MDIs in terms of adapter size and style or mouthpiece size and shape. Overall, 235 of the 267 participants (88%) found the HFA-BDP MDI to be an acceptable replacement for the CFC-BDP MDI, whereas 150 patients (56%) reported that the HFA-BDP MDI had advantages over the CFC-BDP MDI. These advantages included the lower number of puffs per day, the lack of CFCs, and the better or more comfortable mouthpiece. Most patients (256 [96%]of 267) found it easy to switch from the CFC-BDP to the HFA-BDP MDI. In all, 160 (60%) of the 267 patients indicated that they preferred the HFA-BDP MDI to the CFC-BDP MDI. Results of this study confirm that the HFA-BDP MDI is an acceptable replacement for the CFC-BDP MDI and that most patients find the switch from a CFC-BDP MDI to the HFA-BDP MDI to be easy.

Effectiveness of Low Doses (50 and 100 μg b.i.d.) of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Delivered as a CFC-Free Extrafine Aerosol in Adults with Mild to Moderate Asthma

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low doses (50 and 100 μg b.i.d.) of hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine aerosol in improving asthma control. Reformulation of BDP in a new chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propellant (HFA) has produced an extrafine aerosol with increased delivery of the drug to the airways of the lung. The study population comprised 270 steroid-naive patients with mild to moderate asthma (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV,] as a percentage of predicted normal of 65%-85%). This was a 6-week, blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive 50 or 100 μg b.i.d. HFA-BDP or HFA-placebo. Treatment with either 50 or 100 μg b.i.d. HFA-BDP resulted in a significantly greater improvement compared with placebo in FEV, (mean change from baseline as percentage of predicted normal of 6.7%, 8.6%, and 0.4%, respectively; p ≤ 0.01 active treatment groups vs. placebo), with a significant trend toward increasing improvement with increasing doses (p ≤ 0.0001). Treatment also resulted in significantly greater mean changes from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow compared with placebo (29.5, 33.8, and 5.0 L/min, respectively; p ≤ 0.01 active treatment groups vs. placebo). All other pulmonary function and asthma symptom measures supported these data. The study treatments were well tolerated. These results show that low doses of HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol effectively improve asthma control in adult patients with mild to moderate asthma. However, it is important that inhaled corticosteroid therapy is still given at a dose high enough to control airway inflammation as well as asthma symptoms.

Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: Assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study compared the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP [QVAR]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 0. 8-1.2 m) versus cholorofluorocarbon-11/12 BDP (CFC-BDP [Beclovent]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 3.5-4.0 m) in 31 steroid naive patients with mild to moderate asthma (PC(20,) 4 mg/mL). Functional high-resolution computed tomography was used to assess the relative efficacy of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on regional air trapping, as an indirect measure of small airways function and on regional hyperreactivity. Pretreatment functional computed tomography was performed at residual volume before and after methacholine challenge. After 4 weeks of treatment, functional imaging was repeated before and after the same concentration of methacholine that was administered before the treatment (n = 19 patients). Quantitative assessment of changes in distribution of lung attenuation was performed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the HFA-BDP group showed significantly more improvement in air trapping overall (a shift in the lung attenuation curve at residual volume toward more attenuation) on the posttreatment computed tomography scan (P <.05; Fisher's Exact Test). After an equal constrictor stimulus (methacholine concentration), subjects treated with HFA-BDP (n = 10 patients) showed less increase in air trapping overall than subjects treated with CFC-BDP (n = 9 patients) on the posttreatment scans compared with the pretreatment scans (P <.001; Fisher's Exact Test). No significant difference was demonstrated between the 2 treatment groups with respect to improvement in symptoms, spirometry, or methacholine responsiveness assessed by FEV(1), except for a greater reduction in breathlessness in the HFA-BDP group (P <.05). We conclude that HFA-BDP may have greater efficacy in the peripheral airways and that this effect is better assessed with functional imaging computed tomography techniques than with conventional physiologic tests.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Moderate Asthma: 400 μg Hydrofluoroalkane Beclomethasone Dipropionate vs 800 μg Chlorofluorocarbon Beclomethasone Dipropionate

To compare the effect of hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 400 microg/d) with that of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) BDP (800 microg/d) on asthma health-related quality of life in a 12-week, parallel-group, multicenter study. HFA-BDP is a new CFC-free preparation of BDP, which was developed as a result of CFCs being phased out from metered dose inhalers. Following 7 to 12 days of prednisone, 30 mg/d, 347 adults with moderate asthma were randomized to receive either 400 microg/d HFA-BDP, 800 microg/d CFC-BDP, or HFA placebo for 12 weeks (all other oral and inhaled steroids were withdrawn). Patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and clinical asthma status was measured at the end of a run-in period, at randomization (after oral steroid treatment), and at the end of the study treatment. Sixty-one patients withdrew, 43 due to worsening asthma (33 placebo; 5 HFA-BDP; 5 CFC-BDP). There was a deterioration in the AQLQ score (- 0.81) in the placebo group, and the difference between this and the stability observed in both the HFA-BDP group (+ 0.13) and the CFC-BDP group (- 0.03) was statistically significant (p </= 0.003). The difference between the two active treatments was not significant (p = 0.290). The calculated number of patients who needed to be treated in order to see a benefit in one patient (with the placebo as the standard treatment) was 2.4 for HFA-BDP and 3.0 for CFC-BDP. Only weak to moderate correlations were observed between changes in AQLQ scores and between asthma clinical status measures. HFA-BDP (400 microg/d) was as effective as CFC-BDP (800 microg/d) in sustaining improvements in asthma quality of life following withdrawal of 7 to 12 days of prednisone treatment in moderate asthma.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a Beclomethasone Dipropionate, 400 μg, Is as Effective as Chlorofluorocarbon Beclomethasone Dipropionate, 800 μg, for the Treatment of Moderate Asthma

The improved lung deposition of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extrafine aerosol compared with chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) suggests that lower doses of HFA-BDP may be required to provide equivalent asthma control. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis. A 10- to 12-day run-in period confirmed that patients met established criteria of at least moderate asthma and the asthma was inadequately controlled by current therapy (inhaled beta-agonist and CFC-BDP [< or = 400 microg/d]). A short course of oral prednisone, 30 mg/d for 7 to 12 days, was followed to establish the patients were steroid responsive and to provide an "in-study" baseline of "optimal" asthma control. A total of 347 patients were then randomized to HFA-BDP 400 microg/d, CFC-BDP 800 microg/d, or HFA-placebo for 12 weeks. Morning peak expiratory flow (AM PEF) measurements showed that HFA-BDP 400 microg/d achieved equivalent control of asthma to CFC-BDP 800 microg/d at all time intervals after oral steroid treatment. All other efficacy variables supported the AM PEF results and both active treatments were more effective than placebo. The safety profile of HFA-BDP compared favorably with that of CFC-BDP with no unexpected adverse events reported. These findings demonstrate that HFA-BDP provides equivalent control of moderate or moderately severe asthma as CFC-BDP in the population studied, but at half the total daily dose.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control to chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate at approximately half the total daily dose

The mandatory requirement to eliminate chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as propellants in pharmaceutical aerosols has provided the opportunity to enhance significantly the delivery of aerosol drugs to the respiratory tract. This randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study was undertaken to assess whether beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) provided equivalent control of moderately severe asthma to BDP in CFC but at approximately half the total daily dose, as might be expected from the improved lung deposition of the HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol. The novel study design included a 10-12 day run-in period to confirm that patients met established criteria of moderately severe asthma and were symptomatic on current therapy (inhaled beta-agonist plus CFC-BDP 400-800 micrograms day-1). This run-in period was followed by a short course of oral steroid therapy (prednisolone 30 mg day-1 for 7-13 days) to demonstrate steroid responsiveness [> or = 15% improvement in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF)] and to provide a within-study baseline of improved asthma control. A total of 233 patients were randomized to treatment for 12 weeks with HFA-BDP 800 micrograms day-1 (116 patients) or CFC-BDP 1500 micrograms day-1 (117 patients). The mean change from oral steroid treatment in morning PEF with HFA-BDP was equivalent to that seen with CFC-BDP at all time intervals. Changes in other measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores and beta-agonist use were equivalent in the two treatment groups throughout the 12 week treatment period. The safety profile of HFA-BDP compared favourably with that of CFC-BDP with no unexpected adverse events reported. Fewer patients on HFA-BDP than on CFC-BDP had plasma cortisol levels below the normal reference range after 12 weeks of therapy (5.1% vs. 17.3%, respectively). In conclusion, HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol was found to provide equivalent control of moderately severe asthma to CFC-BDP at approximately half the daily dose with a favourable safety profile, suggesting an improved therapeutic ratio.