Hybrid organizations are arenas of conflict when they combine elements from different institutional logics. These conflicts, however, are largely unknown, or at best vaguely explained. We propose a framework to identify conflicts in hybrid organizations. We introduce this framework and apply it to unveil conflicts in organizations that combine commercial and public-sector logics. We show that combining these logics gives rise to three conflicts—managerial locus of attention, redeployment of idle resources, and regulatory oversight. Then, we analyze the impact of these conflicts on different dimensions of governance. Our application results in sets of practices capable of mitigating the impacts of conflicts, preserving organizational efficiency and public interest. We generalize the use of this framework to compare other institutional logics. Our work strengthens the analytical properties of research in institutional logics and provides actionable insights to manage hybrid organizations.