Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Research Articles

Radiation dose reduction and image quality improvement with ultra-high resolution temporal bone CT using deep learning-based reconstruction: An anatomical study

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the achievable radiation dose reduction of an ultra-high resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) scanner using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) while maintaining temporal bone image quality equal to or better than high-resolution CT (HR-CT). Materials and methodsUHR-CT acquisitions were performed with variable tube voltages and currents at eight different dose levels (volumic CT dose index [CTDIvol] range: 4.6–79 mGy), 10242 matrix, and 0.25 mm slice thickness and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms. HR-CT images were acquired using a standard protocol (120 kV/220 mAs; CTDI vol, 54.2 mGy, 5122 matrix, and 0.5 mm slice thickness). Two radiologists rated the image quality of seven structures using a five point confidence scale on six cadaveric temporal bone CTs. A global image quality score was obtained for each CT protocol by summing the image quality scores of all structures. ResultsWith DLR, UHR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 50.9 mGy) and 140 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 79 mGy) received the highest global image quality scores (4.88 ± 0.32 [standard deviation (SD)] [range: 4–5] and 4.85 ± 0.35 [range: 4–5], respectively; P = 0.31), while HR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs and UHR-CT at 120 kV/20 mAs received the lowest (i.e., 3.14 ± 0.75 [SD] [range: 2–5] and 2.97 ± 0.86 [SD] [range: 1–5], respectively; P = 0.14). All the DLR protocols had better image quality scores than HR-CT with HIR. ConclusionUHR-CT with DLR can be performed with up to a tenfold reduction in radiation dose compared to HR-CT with HIR while maintaining or improving image quality.

Investigating the role of imaging factors in the variability of CT-based texture analysis metrics.

This study assesses the robustness of first-order radiomic texture features namely interquartile range (IQR), coefficient of variation (CV) and standard deviation (SD) derived from computed tomography (CT) images by varying dose, reconstruction algorithms and slice thickness using scans of a uniform water phantom, a commercial anthropomorphic liver phantom, and a human liver in-vivo. Scans were acquired on a 16cm detector GE Revolution Apex Edition CT scanner with variations across three different nominal slice thicknesses: 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5mm, three different dose levels: CTDIvol of 13.86 mGy for the standard dose, 40% reduced dose and 60% reduced dose and two different reconstruction algorithms: a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-high) algorithm and a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm ASiR-V50% (AV50) were explored, varying one at a time. To assess the effect of non-linear modifications of images by AV50 and DLIR-high, images of the water phantom were also reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP). Quantitative measures of IQR, CV and SD were extracted from twelve pre-selected, circular (1cm diameter) regions of interest (ROIs) capturing different texture patterns across all scans. Across all scans, imaging, and reconstruction settings, CV, IQR and SD were observed to increase with reduction in dose and slice thickness. An exception to this observation was found when using FBP reconstruction. Lower values of CV, IQR and SD were observed in DLIR-high reconstructions compared to AV50 and FBP. The Poisson statistics were more stringently noted in FBP than DLIR-high and AV50, due to the non-linear nature of the latter two algorithms. Variation in image noise due to dose reduction algorithms, tube current, and slice thickness show a consistent trend across phantom and patient scans. Prospective evaluation across multiple centers, scanners and imaging protocols is needed for establishing quality assurance standards of radiomics.

Retracted: Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography Image Features under Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Staging Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/7733654.].

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for CCTA: Image Quality Assessment and Clinical Application.

The increasing number of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) requests raised concerns about dose exposure. New dose reduction strategies based on artificial intelligence have been proposed to overcome limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. Our prospective study sought to explore the added value of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in comparison with a hybrid IR algorithm (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-veo [ASiR-V]) in CCTA, even in clinical challenging scenarios, as obesity, heavily calcified vessels and coronary stents. We prospectively included 103 consecutive patients who underwent CCTA. Data sets were reconstructed with ASiR-V and DLIR. For each reconstruction signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated, and qualitative assessment was made with a four-point Likert scale by two independent and blinded radiologists with different expertise. Both SNR and CNR were significantly higher in DLIR (SNR-DLIR median value [interquartile range] of 13.89 [11.06-16.35] and SNR-ASiR-V 25.42 [22.46-32.22], P < 0.001; CNR-DLIR 16.84 [9.83-27.08] vs CNR-ASiR-V 10.09 [5.69-13.5], P < 0.001).Median qualitative score was 4 for DLIR images versus 3 for ASiR-V ( P < 0.001), with a good interreader reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient(2,1)e intraclass correlation coefficient(3,1) 0.60 for DLIR and 0.62 and 0.73 for ASiR-V].In the obese and in the "calcifications and stents" groups, DLIR showed significantly higher values of SNR (24.23 vs 11.11, P < 0.001 and 24.55 vs 14.09, P < 0.001, respectively) and CNR (16.08 vs 8.04, P = 0.008 and 17.31 vs 10.14, P = 0.003) and image quality. Deep-learning image reconstruction in CCTA allows better SNR, CNR, and qualitative assessment than ASiR-V, with an added value in the most challenging clinical scenarios.

Image Quality and Lesion Detectability of Pancreatic Phase Thin-Slice Computed Tomography Images With a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm.

To evaluate the image quality and lesion detectability of pancreatic phase thin-slice computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm compared with filtered-back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. Fifty-three patients who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT including pancreatic phase were enrolled in this retrospective study. Pancreatic phase thin-slice (0.625 mm) images were reconstructed with each FBP, hybrid IR, and DLR. Objective image quality and signal-to-noise ratio of the pancreatic parenchyma, and contrast-to-noise ratio of pancreatic lesions were compared between the 3 reconstruction algorithms. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality of all images. The diagnostic performance for the detection of pancreatic lesions was compared among the reconstruction algorithms using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Deep learning-based reconstruction resulted in significantly lower image noise and higher signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio than hybrid IR and FBP ( P < 0.001). Deep learning-based reconstruction also yielded significantly higher visual scores than hybrid IR and FBP ( P < 0.01). The diagnostic performance of DLR for detecting pancreatic lesions was highest for both readers, although a significant difference was found only between DLR and FBP in one reader ( P = 0.02). Deep learning-based reconstruction showed improved objective and subjective image quality of pancreatic phase thin-slice CT relative to other reconstruction algorithms and has potential for improving lesion detectability.

In vivo depiction of cortical bone vascularization with ultra-high resolution-CT and deep learning algorithm reconstruction using osteoid osteoma as a model

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability to depict in vivo bone vascularization using ultra-high-resolution (UHR) computed tomography (CT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm, compared to simulated conventional CT, using osteoid osteoma as a model. Materials and methodsPatients with histopathologically proven cortical osteoid osteoma who underwent UHR-CT between October 2019 and October 2022 were retrospectively included. Images were acquired with a 1024 × 1024 matrix and reconstructed with DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm. To simulate conventional CT, images with a 512 × 512 matrix were also reconstructed. Two radiologists (R1, R2) independently evaluated the number of blood vessels entering the nidus and crossing the bone cortex, as well as vessel identification and image quality with a 5-point scale. Standard deviation (SD) of attenuation in the adjacent muscle and that of air were used as image noise and recorded. ResultsThirteen patients with 13 osteoid osteomas were included. There were 11 men and two women with a mean age of 21.8 ± 9.1 (SD) years. For both readers, UHR-CT with DLR depicted more nidus vessels (11.5 ± 4.3 [SD] (R1) and 11.9 ± 4.6 [SD] (R2)) and cortical vessels (4 ± 3.8 [SD] and 4.3 ± 4.1 [SD], respectively) than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (10.5 ± 4.3 [SD] and 10.4 ± 4.6 [SD], and 4.1 ± 3.8 [SD] and 4.3 ± 3.8 [SD], respectively) and simulated conventional CT (5.3 ± 2.2 [SD] and 6.4 ± 2.5 [SD], 2 ± 1.2 [SD] and 2.4 ± 1.6 [SD], respectively) (P < 0.05). UHR-CT with DLR provided less image noise than simulated conventional CT and UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (P < 0.05). UHR-CT with DLR received the greatest score and simulated conventional CT the lowest score for vessel identification and image quality. ConclusionUHR-CT with DLR shows less noise than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction and significantly improves cortical bone vascularization depiction compared to simulated conventional CT.

Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve the image quality of low radiation dose head CT.

To evaluate the image quality of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR), model-based (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms for lower-dose (LD) unenhanced head CT and compare it with those of standard-dose (STD) HIR images. This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent unenhanced head CT using the STD (n = 57) or LD (n = 57) protocol on a 320-row CT. STD images were reconstructed with HIR; LD images were reconstructed with HIR (LD-HIR), MBIR (LD-MBIR), and DLR (LD-DLR). The image noise, gray and white matter (GM-WM) contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the basal ganglia and posterior fossa levels were quantified. The noise magnitude, noise texture, GM-WM contrast, image sharpness, streak artifact, and subjective acceptability were independently scored by three radiologists (1 = worst, 5 = best). The lesion conspicuity of LD-HIR, LD-MBIR, and LD-DLR was ranked through side-by-side assessments (1 = worst, 3 = best). Reconstruction times of three algorithms were measured. The effective dose of LD was 25% lower than that of STD. Lower image noise, higher GM-WM contrast, and higher CNR were observed in LD-DLR and LD-MBIR than those in STD (all, p ≤ 0.035). Compared with STD, the noise texture, image sharpness, and subjective acceptability were inferior for LD-MBIR and superior for LD-DLR (all, p < 0.001). The lesion conspicuity of LD-DLR (2.9 ± 0.2) was higher than that of HIR (1.2 ± 0.3) and MBIR (1.8 ± 0.4) (all, p < 0.001). Reconstruction times of HIR, MBIR, and DLR were 11 ± 1, 319 ± 17, and 24 ± 1s, respectively. DLR can enhance the image quality of head CT while preserving low radiation dose level and short reconstruction time. •For unenhanced head CT, DLR reduced the image noise and improved the GM-WM contrast and lesion delineation without sacrificing the natural noise texture and image sharpness relative to HIR. •The subjective and objective image quality of DLR was better than that of HIR even at 25% reduced dose without considerably increasing the image reconstruction times (24s vs. 11s). •Despite the strong noise reduction and improved GM-WM contrast performance, MBIR degraded the noise texture, sharpness, and subjective acceptance with prolonged reconstruction times relative to HIR, potentially hampering its feasibility.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography

PurposeTo perform a comprehensive intraindividual objective and subjective image quality evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and to assess correlation with routinely applied hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V).Material and methodsFifty-one patients (29 males) undergoing clinically indicated CCTA from April to December 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Fourteen datasets were reconstructed for each patient: three DLIR strength levels (DLIR_L, DLIR_M, and DLIR_H), ASiR-V from 10% to 100% in 10%-increment, and filtered back-projection (FBP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) determined objective image quality. Subjective image quality was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale. Concordance between reconstruction algorithms was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient.ResultsDLIR algorithm did not impact vascular attenuation (P ≥ 0.374). DLIR_H showed the lowest noise, comparable with ASiR-V 100% (P = 1) and significantly lower than other reconstructions (P ≤ 0.021).DLIR_H achieved the highest objective quality, with SNR and CNR comparable to ASiR-V 100% (P = 0.139 and 0.075, respectively). DLIR_M obtained comparable objective image quality with ASiR-V 80% and 90% (P ≥ 0.281), while achieved the highest subjective image quality (4, IQR: 4–4; P ≤ 0.001). DLIR and ASiR-V datasets returned a very strong correlation in the assessment of CAD (r = 0.874, P = 0.001).ConclusionDLIR_M significantly improves CCTA image quality and has very strong correlation with routinely applied ASiR-V 50% dataset in the diagnosis of CAD.

Improved image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT with deep-learning reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study.

To assess the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (Precise Image; AI-DLR) algorithm on image quality against a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm in abdominal CT for different clinical indications. Acquisitions on phantoms were performed at 5 dose levels (CTDIvol: 13/11/9/6/1.8 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using level 4 of iDose4 (i4) and 3 levels of AI-DLR (Smoother/Smooth/Standard). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed: d' modelled detection of a liver metastasis (LM) and hepatocellular carcinoma at portal (HCCp) and arterial (HCCa) phases. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by 2 radiologists. From Standard to Smoother levels, noise magnitude and average NPS spatial frequency decreased and the detectability (d') of all simulated lesions increased. For both inserts, TTF values were similar for all three AI-DLR levels from 13 to 6 mGy but decreased from Standard to Smoother levels at 1.8 mGy. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d' values were higher using theSmoother and Smooth levels and close for the Standard level. For all dose levels, except at 1.8 mGy, radiologists considered images satisfactory for clinical use for the 3 levels of AI-DLR, but rated images too smooth using the Smoother level. Use ofthe Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reducesthe image noise and improves the detectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. Using the Smooth level is apparently the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality. • Evaluation of the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (AI-DLR) on image quality and dose compared to a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reduced theimage noise and improved thedetectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. • The Smooth level seems the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality.

Impact of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study.

BackgroundRecently, computed tomography (CT) manufacturers have developed deep‐learning‐based reconstruction algorithms to compensate for the limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as image smoothing and the spatial resolution's dependence on contrast and dose levels.PurposeTo assess the impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction (AI‐DLR) algorithm on image quality and dose reduction compared with a hybrid IR algorithm in chest CT for different clinical indications.MethodsAcquisitions on the CT American College of Radiology (ACR) 464 and CT Torso CTU‐41 phantoms were performed at five dose levels (CTDIvol: 9.5/7.5/6/2.5/0.4 mGy) used for chest CT conditions. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, two levels of IR (iDose4 levels 4 (i4) and 7 (i7)), and five levels of AI‐DLR (Precise Image; Smoother, Smooth, Standard, Sharp, Sharper). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task‐based transfer function, and detectability index (d′) were computed: d′‐modeled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule (low‐contrast soft tissue chest nodule within the mediastinum [LCN]), ground‐glass opacity (GGO), or high‐contrast pulmonary (HCP) lesion. The subjective image quality of chest anthropomorphic phantom images was independently evaluated by two radiologists. They assessed image noise, image smoothing, contrast between vessels and fat in the mediastinum for mediastinal images, visual border detection between bronchus and lung parenchyma for parenchymal images, and overall image quality using a commonly used four‐ or five‐point scale.ResultsFrom Standard to Smoother levels, on average, the noise magnitude decreased (for all dose levels: −66.3% ± 0.5% for mediastinal images and −63.1% ± 0.1% for parenchymal images), the average NPS spatial frequency decreased (for all dose levels: −35.3% ± 2.2% for mediastinal images and −13.3% ± 2.2% for parenchymal images), and the detectability (d′) of the three lesions increased. The opposite pattern was found from Standard to Sharper levels. From Smoother to Sharper levels, the spatial resolution increased for the low‐contrast polyethylene insert and the opposite for the high‐contrast air insert. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d′ values were higher using Smoother (mean for all dose levels: 338.7% ± 29.4%), Smooth (103.4% ± 11.2%), and Standard (34.1% ± 6.6%) levels for the LCN on mediastinal images and Smoother (169.5% ± 53.2% for GGO and 136.9% ± 1.6% for HCP) and Smooth (36.4% ± 22.1% and 24.1% ± 0.9%, respectively) levels for parenchymal images. Radiologists considered the images satisfactory for clinical use at these levels, but adaptation to the dose level of the protocol is required.ConclusionWith AI‐DLR, the smoothest levels reduced the noise and improved the detectability of chest lesions but increased the image smoothing. The opposite was found with the sharpest levels. The choice of level depends on the dose level and type of image: mediastinal or parenchymal.

Clinical validation of an AI-based motion correction reconstruction algorithm in cerebral CT.

To evaluate the clinical performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based motion correction (MC) reconstruction algorithm for cerebral CT. A total of 53 cases, where motion artifacts were found in the first scan so that an immediate rescan was taken, were retrospectively enrolled. While the rescanned images were reconstructed with a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm (reference group), images of the first scan were reconstructed with both the hybrid IR (motion group) and the MC algorithm (MC group). Image quality was compared in terms of standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and mutual information (MI), as well as subjective scores. The diagnostic performance for each case was evaluated accordingly by lesion detectability or the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) assessment. Compared with the motion group, the SNR and CNR of the MC group were significantly increased. The MSE, PSNR, SSIM, and MI with respect to the reference group were improved by 44.1%, 15.8%, 7.4%, and 18.3%, respectively (all p < 0.001). Subjective image quality indicators were scored higher for the MC than the motion group (p < 0.05). Improved lesion detectability and higher AUC (0.817 vs 0.614) in the ASPECTS assessment were found for the MC to the motion group. The AI-based MC reconstruction algorithm has been clinically validated for reducing motion artifacts and improving diagnostic performance of cerebral CT. • An artificial intelligence-based motion correction (MC) reconstruction algorithm has been clinically validated in both qualitative and quantitative manner. • The MC algorithm reduces motion artifacts in cerebral CT and increases the diagnostic confidence for brain lesions. • The MC algorithm can help avoiding rescans caused by motion and improving the efficiency of cerebral CT in the emergency department.

Phantom task-based image quality assessment of three generations of rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT systems on virtual monoenergetic images.

To compare the spectral performance of three rapid kV switching dual-energy CT (DECT) systems on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low-energy levels on abdominal imaging. A multi-energy phantom was scanned on three DECT systems equipped with three different gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) platforms: GSI (1st generation, GSI-1st), GSI-Pro (2nd generation, GSI-2nd ), and GSI-Xtream (3rd generation, GSI-3rd). Acquisitions on the phantom were performed with a CTDIvol close to 11mGy. For all platforms, raw data were reconstructed using filtered-back projection (FBP) and a hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASIR-V at 50%; AV50). A deep-learning image reconstruction (DLR) algorithm (TrueFidelity) was used only for the GSI-3rd. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated from 40 to 80 keV of VMIs. A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of two contrast-enhanced lesions according to the keV level used. For all GSI platforms, the noise magnitude decreased from 40 to 70 keV, and using AV50 compared to FBP. The average NPS spatial frequency (fav ) and spatial resolution (TTF50% ) were similar from 40 to 70 keV and decreased with AV50 compared to FBP. Compared to AV50, using DLR reduced the noise magnitude (-27% ± 3%) and improved fav values (10% ± 0%) and altering spatial resolution (2% ± 5%). For the two lesions, d' values peaked at 70 keV for GSI-1st and GSI-2nd platforms and at 40/50 keV for GSI-3rd, for all reconstruction algorithms. The highest d' values were found for the GSI-3rd with DLR. Differences in image quality were found between the GSI platforms for VMIs at low keV. The new DLR algorithm on the GSI-3rd platform reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture for VMIs at low keV. The choice of the best energy level in VMIs depends on the platform and the reconstruction algorithm.

Image quality assessment of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for low dose aortic CTA: A feasibility study of 70 kVp and reduced contrast medium volume

PurposeTo investigate the image quality and feasibility of a novel artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) algorithm for aortic computer tomography angiography (CTA) with a low radiation dose and contrast material (CM) dosage protocol in comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithm for standard-of-care aortic CTA. MethodsFifty consecutive patients (mean age 58 ± 14 years, mean BMI 24.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with aortic diseases were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent at least twice follow-up aortic CTA examinations. Standard dose CT (SDCT) was applied in the initial follow-up examination (100 kVp, auto mAs, contrast dose 0.8 mgL/kg), images were reconstructed with HIR (SDCT-HIR). In the second follow-up examination, patients underwent scanning with low dose CT (LDCT) (70 kVp, auto mAs, contrast dose 0.5 mgL/kg), images were reconstructed with HIR (LDCT-HIR) as well as AIIR (LDCT-AIIR). Attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for objective analysis. Subjective image quality was rated by two blinded radiologists using a 5-point scale. The effective radiation dose and CM dosage were also recorded. ResultsThe effective radiation dose (1.58 ± 0.17 mSv vs. 9.96 ± 1.05 mSv, P < 0.001) and CM dosage (34.38 ± 5.43 ml vs. 54.64 ± 8.63 ml, P < 0.001) achieved a remarkable reduction of 84.14% and 37.08% in the LDCT compared to the SDCT. The attenuation was similar among the three reconstructed images (P > 0.05). Compared to LDCT-HIR images, LDCT-AIIR showed a lower noise and higher SNR and CNR. For qualitative analysis, there were no significant differences between the LDCT-AIIR and the SDCT-HIR images among four metrics (P > 0.05). ConclusionsCompared to standard-of-care aortic CTA with HIR, the application of the AIIR algorithm allows for radiation dose and CM dosage reduction while preserving image quality on low dose aortic CTA.

Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT.

ObjectiveTo compare a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for pediatric abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.Materials and MethodsPost-contrast abdominopelvic CT scans obtained from 120 pediatric patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 8.7 ± 5.2 years; 60 males) between May 2020 and October 2020 were evaluated in this retrospective study. Images were reconstructed using FBP, a hybrid IR algorithm (ASiR-V) with blending factors of 50% and 100% (AV50 and AV100, respectively), and a DLR algorithm (TrueFidelity) with three strength levels (low, medium, and high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and edge rise distance (ERD) were used to evaluate noise characteristics and spatial resolution, respectively. Image noise, edge definition, overall image quality, lesion detectability and conspicuity, and artifacts were qualitatively scored by two pediatric radiologists, and the scores of the two reviewers were averaged. A repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare NPS and ERD among the six reconstruction methods. The Friedman rank sum test followed by the Nemenyi-Wilcoxon-Wilcox all-pairs test was used to compare the results of the qualitative visual analysis among the six reconstruction methods.ResultsThe NPS noise magnitude of AV100 was significantly lower than that of the DLR, whereas the NPS peak of AV100 was significantly higher than that of the high- and medium-strength DLR (p < 0.001). The NPS average spatial frequencies were higher for DLR than for ASiR-V (p < 0.001). ERD was shorter with DLR than with ASiR-V and FBP (p < 0.001). Qualitative visual analysis revealed better overall image quality with high-strength DLR than with ASiR-V (p < 0.001).ConclusionFor pediatric abdominopelvic CT, the DLR algorithm may provide improved noise characteristics and better spatial resolution than the hybrid IR algorithm.

Effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography imaging on image quality and dose reduction compared with two iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study.

New reconstruction algorithms based on deep learning have been developed to correct the image texture changes related to the use of iterative reconstruction algorithms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a new deep learning image reconstruction [Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE)] algorithm on image-quality and dose reduction compared to a hybrid iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) algorithm and a model-based iterative reconstruction (FIRST) algorithm. Acquisitions were carried out using the ACR 464 phantom (and its body ring) at six dose levels (volume computed tomography dose index 15/10/7.5/5/2.5/1 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using three levels (Mild/Standard/Strong) of AIDR 3D, of FIRST and AiCE. Noise-power-spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. Detectability index was computed to model the detection of a small calcification (1.5-mm diameter and 500 HU) and a large mass in the liver (25-mm diameter and 120 HU). NPS peaks were lower with AiCE than with AIDR 3D (-41%±6% for all levels) or FIRST (-15%±6% for Strong level and -41%±11% for both other levels). The average NPS spatial frequency was lower with AICE than AIDR 3D (-9%±2% using Mild and -3%±2% using Strong) but higher than FIRST for Standard (6%±3%) and Strong (25%±3%) levels. For acrylic insert, values of TTF at 50 percent were higher with AICE than AIDR 3D and FIRST, except for Mild level (-6%±6% and -13%±3%, respectively). For bone insert, values of TTF at 50 percent were higher with AICE than AIDR 3D but lower than FIRST (-19%±14%). For both simulated lesions, detectability index values were higher with AICE than AIDR 3D and FIRST (except for Strong level and for the small feature; -21%±14%). Using the Standard level, dose could be reduced by -79% for the small calcification and -57% for the large mass using AICE compared to AIDR 3D. The new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm AiCE generates an image-quality with less noise and/or less smudged/smooth images and a higher detectability than the AIDR 3D or FIRST algorithms. The outcomes of our phantom study suggest a good potential of dose reduction using AiCE but it should be confirmed clinically in patients.

Computed Tomography Image under Optimized Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm to Analyze the Characteristics of Blood Flow Field in Cerebral Aneurysm before and after Stent Implantation

In order to analyze the change characteristics of blood flow field in cerebral aneurysms before and after stent implantation, this study first constructed an optimized iterative reconstruction algorithm to reconstruct CT images of patients with cerebral aneurysms and used it to solve the problem of image sharpness. In addition, backprojection image reconstruction algorithm and Fourier transform analytic method were introduced. According to the CT images of cerebral arteries of patients, the lesions were presented in a three-dimensional and visual way through the reconstructed three-dimensional images, thus achieving the effects of simulation and simulation. The results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the optimized iterative reconstruction algorithm were 90.78%, 83.27%, and 94.82%, which were significantly higher than those of the backprojection image reconstruction algorithm and Fourier transform analysis method, and the difference was statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05 ). Before operation, the blood flow velocity in the neck of aneurysm was 7.35 × 10−2 m/s, the exit velocity was 1.51 × 10−1 m/s, and the maximum velocity appeared in the upstream part of the exit. After passing through the aneurysm, the blood flow velocity began to decrease gradually, forming a vortex at the top of the tumor. After stent implantation, the neck and outlet velocities of cerebral aneurysm were 9.352 × 10−2 m/s and 1.897 × 10−2 m/s, respectively. The velocity of blood flow decreased after entering the aneurysm, and there was no vortex at the top of the aneurysm. Among the outlet velocities of arterial blood vessels, the velocity before stent implantation was significantly lower than that after stent implantation, and the difference was statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05 ). Compared with prestent, the shear force distribution on the wall of cerebral aneurysm showed a significant decrease, and the difference was statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05 ). To sum up, pelvic floor ultrasound based on hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm has high accuracy in diagnosing the changes of blood flow field in cerebral aneurysms. The application of CT images in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms can objectively provide imaging data for clinical practice and has high application value.

Impact of dose reduction and iterative model reconstruction on multi-detector CT imaging of the brain in patients with suspected ischemic stroke

Non-contrast cerebral computed tomography (CT) is frequently performed as a first-line diagnostic approach in patients with suspected ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of hybrid and model-based iterative image reconstruction for standard-dose (SD) and low-dose (LD) non-contrast cerebral imaging by multi-detector CT (MDCT). We retrospectively analyzed 131 patients with suspected ischemic stroke (mean age: 74.2 ± 14.3 years, 67 females) who underwent initial MDCT with a SD protocol (300 mAs) as well as follow-up MDCT after a maximum of 10 days with a LD protocol (200 mAs). Ischemic demarcation was detected in 26 patients for initial and in 64 patients for follow-up imaging, with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming ischemia in all of those patients. The non-contrast cerebral MDCT images were reconstructed using hybrid (Philips “iDose4”) and model-based iterative (Philips “IMR3”) reconstruction algorithms. Two readers assessed overall image quality, anatomic detail, differentiation of gray matter (GM)/white matter (WM), and conspicuity of ischemic demarcation, if any. Quantitative assessment included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations for WM, GM, and demarcated areas. Ischemic demarcation was detected in all MDCT images of affected patients by both readers, irrespective of the reconstruction method used. For LD imaging, anatomic detail and GM/WM differentiation was significantly better when using the model-based iterative compared to the hybrid reconstruction method. Furthermore, CNR of GM/WM as well as the SNR of WM and GM of healthy brain tissue were significantly higher for LD images with model-based iterative reconstruction when compared to SD or LD images reconstructed with the hybrid algorithm. For patients with ischemic demarcation, there was a significant difference between images using hybrid versus model-based iterative reconstruction for CNR of ischemic/contralateral unaffected areas (mean ± standard deviation: SD_IMR: 4.4 ± 3.1, SD_iDose: 3.5 ± 2.3, P < 0.0001; LD_IMR: 4.6 ± 2.9, LD_iDose: 3.2 ± 2.1, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, model-based iterative reconstruction provides higher CNR and SNR without significant loss of image quality for non-enhanced cerebral MDCT.

Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography Image Features under Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Staging Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.

Objective This study was aimed to explore the accuracy of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) scan in preoperative staging diagnosis of bladder cancer based on hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm, so as to provide a more reasonable supporting basis for guiding clinical work in the future. Methods Retrospectively, 120 patients admitted to hospital from July 2019 to April 2021, who were confirmed to be with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder by pathological examination after surgical treatment, were selected. CT images before processing were set as the control group and those after processing were set as the observation group according to whether they were processed by the hybrid iterative algorithm. Postoperative pathological examination was utilized as the standard for analysis. The accuracy and consistency of the two methods were compared. Results The accuracy of the results of each stage of the observation group (T1 stage: 91.09%, T2 stage: 89.66%, T3 stage: 88.89%, and T4 stage: 88.89%) and consistency (T1 stage: 0.66, T2 stage: 0.69, T3 stage: 0.71, and T4 stage: 0.82) were higher than those of the control group (accuracy: T1—57.01%, T2—48.28%, T3—44.44%, and T4—44.44%). The consistency was as follows: T1—0.32, T2—0.24, T3—0.37, and T4—0.43, and the comparison was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The adoption value of the image features based on the hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm in the diagnosis of bladder cancer staging was higher than that of the conventional multi-slice spiral CT, indicating that the hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm had a good adoption prospect in clinical examination.

Chest Computerized Tomography Images under Iterative Model Reconstruction Algorithm in Patients with Lung Cancer

To explore the effect of the full iterative model reconstruction algorithm (IMR) on chest CT image processing and its adoption value in the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer patients, multislice spiral CT (MSCT) scans were performed on 96 patients with pulmonary nodules. Reconstruction was performed by hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose4) and IMR2 algorithms. Then, the image contrast, spatial resolution, density resolution, image uniformity, and noise of the CT reconstructed image were recorded. The benign and malignant pulmonary nodules of patients were collected and classified into malignant pulmonary nodule group and benign pulmonary nodule group, and the differences in chest CT imaging characteristics between the two groups were compared. The subject’s receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CT for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. It was found that the spatial resolution, density resolution, image uniformity, and contrast of the CT image reconstructed by the IMR2 algorithm were remarkably greater than those of the iDose4 algorithm, and the noise was considerably less than that of the iDose4 algorithm ( P &lt; 0.05 ). Among 96 patients with pulmonary nodules, 65 were malignant nodules, including 15 squamous cell carcinoma, 31 adenocarcinoma, and 19 small cell carcinomas. There were 31 cases of benign nodules, including 14 cases of hamartoma, 10 cases of tuberculous granuloma, 2 cases of sclerosing hemangioma, and 5 cases of diffuse lymphocyte proliferation. The pulmonary nodule malignant group and the pulmonary nodule benign group had statistical differences in pulmonary nodule size, nodule morphology, burr sign, lobular sign, vascular sign, bronchial sign, and pleural depression sign ( P &lt; 0.05 ). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of IMR2 algorithm processing chest CT images for liver cancer diagnosis were 85.7%, 82.3%, and 0.815, respectively, which were significantly higher than the original CT images ( P &lt; 0.05 ). In short, chest MSCT based on the IMR2 algorithm can greatly improve the diagnosis efficiency of lung cancer and had practical significance for the timely detection of early lung cancer.

Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography under Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Staging Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer and Ceramide Glycosylation

This study was to discuss the application of multislice spiral computed tomography (CT) in the staging diagnosis of bladder cancer and the effect of ceramide glycosylation. The hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm was applied. Immunohistochemistry and western blot were used to detect the normal bladder tissues (30 cases) of GCS in group 1 (100 cases) and group 2. The scanned images of all the research objects were obtained, the images with the iterative reconstruction algorithm were reconstructed, and statistical analysis on the CT value under the algorithm was conducted. The results showed that the image quality, blood vessel sharpness, average image score, signal-to-noise ratio, and radiation dose after the spiral CT and iterative reconstruction algorithm all increased, while the noise value decreased. The optical density value of glucosylceramide synthase in group 2 patients increased by 71%, and the optical density value of group 1 increased by 29%. The optical density expression of glucosylceramide synthase in group 1 patients was significantly higher than that in the control group, and there was a statistical difference between the two ( P &lt; 0.05 ). Among the results of multislice spiral CT for tumor staging, the lesions larger than 5 cm and in the range of 1.1–2 cm in diameter were more sensitive. In 41 patients, there were multiple lesions. A total of 142 cancer lesions were found. The diameter of the tissue ranged from 0.5 to 6.8 cm, with an average diameter of 2.03 ± 0.35 cm. The optical density of glucosylceramide synthase in the group 1 was 5526, and the optical density in group 2 was 2576. The OD expression of GCS in group 1 was greatly higher in contrast to that in group 2, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups ( P &lt; 0.05 ). The multislice spiral CT examination under this algorithm found that the diagnosis and staging accuracy of lesions with a diameter greater than 5 cm and tumor diameters in the range of 1.1 to 2 cm was higher. The image processed by the hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm had good effect, high definition, and accuracy.