Although, as far as I am aware, there is as yet no journal wholly devoted to it, nor any burgeoning biotechnology company committed to its commercial exploitation, the genetic suppression of tumour formation is a subject that has now moved to centre stage in the intricate melodrama of contemporary cancer research. This event has been a long time in the making. It is more than twenty years since the discovery was made that normal cells contain genes that have the ability to suppress the malignant phenotype (Harris et al. 1969). The experiment had two parts. First, it was shown, in an assay that denned malignancy as the ability of a cell to grow progressively and kill its host, that hybrids formed by fusing malignant and non-malignant mouse cells were initially nonmalignant; and second, that when certain specific chromosomes were eliminated from the hybrid, the malignant phenotype reappeared (Harris, 1971). The second part of the experiment was no less important than the first, for without the reappearance of malignancy in the hybrid cell populations, we would have had no plausible explanation for its disappearance. As it was, the conclusion was drawn, rightly it turned out, that the non-malignant character of the hybrids between malignant and non-malignant cells was due to the activity of normal genes that had the ability to suppress malignancy in a reversible fashion. As is usual, these initially heterodox ideas met with a good deal of resistance, but with the passage of the years evidence in support of them, derived from experiments with many different types of tumour cell and involving several animal species including man, continued to accumulate; and I do not think that anyone now resists the idea that malignancy is a suppressible phenotype and that the normal cell does contain genes that suppress tumour formation. We now call these genes tumour suppressor genes. (For a recent review, see Harris (1988).)
Read full abstract