ABSTRACT Arbitration in individual labor disputes is considered an important subject due to its impact on workers’ rights, the high costs of arbitration, and the fact that workers agree to it because of their weak negotiating position against employers. Despite this danger, Saudi labor law explicitly permits arbitration, while the laws of other Gulf countries remain silent. However, they stipulate the protection of workers’ rights through imperative rules and prohibit agreements that contravene these rules unless they are more beneficial to the worker. The research addresses the following questions: Did Saudi law undermine workers’ rights by allowing arbitration? Is arbitration permissible in other Gulf countries that have remained silent? Does the arbitration agreement constitute a waiver by the worker of their right to free litigation guaranteed by law? Does the arbitration agreement mean a violation of the legal protection of workers’ rights? Can workers insist on nullifying the arbitration clause after agreeing to it? The article concluded that arbitration is permissible after the employment contract ends, as the worker would have been freed from the employer’s authority. However, the arbitration clause in the employment contract itself should be considered by the court on a case-by-case basis according to the worker’s interest.
Read full abstract