Human Rad51 Research Articles

Expanding the Editing Window of Cytidine Base Editors With the Rad51 DNA-Binding Domain in Rice.

Recently developed base editors provide a powerful tool for plant research and crop improvement. Although a number of different deaminases and Cas proteins have been used to improve base editors the editing efficiency, and editing window are still not optimal. Fusion of a non-sequence-specific single-stranded DNA-binding domain (DBD) from the human Rad51 protein between Cas9 nickase and the deaminase has been reported to dramatically increase the editing efficiency and expand the editing window of base editors in the mammalian cell lines and mouse embryos. We report the use of this strategy in rice, by fusing a rice codon-optimized human Rad51 DBD to the cytidine base editors AncBE4max, AncBE4max-NG, and evoFERNY. Our results show that the addition of Rad51 DBD did not increase editing efficiency in the major editing window but the editing range was expanded in all the three systems. Replacing the human Rad51 DBD with the rice Rad51 DBD homolog also expanded the editing window effectively.

Mechanisms of distinctive mismatch tolerance between Rad51 and Dmc1 in homologous recombination.

Homologous recombination (HR) is a primary DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair mechanism. The recombinases Rad51 and Dmc1 are highly conserved in the RecA family; Rad51 is mainly responsible for DNA repair in somatic cells during mitosis while Dmc1 only works during meiosis in germ cells. This spatiotemporal difference is probably due to their distinctive mismatch tolerance during HR: Rad51 does not permit HR in the presence of mismatches, whereas Dmc1 can tolerate certain mismatches. Here, the cryo-EM structures of Rad51–DNA and Dmc1–DNA complexes revealed that the major conformational differences between these two proteins are located in their Loop2 regions, which contain invading single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding residues and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) complementary strand binding residues, stabilizing ssDNA and dsDNA in presynaptic and postsynaptic complexes, respectively. By combining molecular dynamic simulation and single-molecule FRET assays, we identified that V273 and D274 in the Loop2 region of human RAD51 (hRAD51), corresponding to P274 and G275 of human DMC1 (hDMC1), are the key residues regulating mismatch tolerance during strand exchange in HR. This HR accuracy control mechanism provides mechanistic insights into the specific roles of Rad51 and Dmc1 in DNA double-strand break repair and may shed light on the regulatory mechanism of genetic recombination in mitosis and meiosis.

Nickel nanoparticle-induced cell transformation: involvement of DNA damage and DNA repair defect through HIF-1\u03b1/miR-210/Rad52 pathway

BackgroundNickel nanoparticles (Nano-Ni) are increasingly used in industry and biomedicine with the development of nanotechnology. However, the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of Nano-Ni and the underlying mechanisms are still unclear.MethodsAt first, dose–response (0, 10, 20, and 30 μg/mL) and time-response (0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h) studies were performed in immortalized normal human bronchial epithelial cells BEAS-2B to observe the effects of Nano-Ni on DNA damage response (DDR)-associated proteins and the HIF-1α/miR-210/Rad52 pathway by real-time PCR or Western blot. Then, a Hsp90 inhibitor (1 µM of 17-AAG, an indirect HIF-1α inhibitor), HIF-1α knock-out (KO) cells, and a miR-210 inhibitor (20 nM) were used to determine whether Nano-Ni-induced Rad52 down-regulation was through HIF-1α nuclear accumulation and miR-210 up-regulation. In the long-term experiments, cells were treated with 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL of Nano-Ni for 21 cycles (~ 150 days), and the level of anchorage-independent growth was determined by plating the cells in soft agar. Transduction of lentiviral particles containing human Rad52 ORF into BEAS-2B cells was used to observe the role of Rad52 in Nano-Ni-induced cell transformation. Nano-Ni-induced DNA damage and dysregulation of HIF-1α/miR-210/Rad52 pathway were also investigated in vivo by intratracheal instillation of 50 µg per mouse of Nano-Ni. gpt delta transgenic mice were used to analyze mutant frequency and mutation spectrum in mouse lungs after Nano-Ni exposure.ResultsNano-Ni exposure caused DNA damage at both in vitro and in vivo settings, which was reflected by increased phosphorylation of DDR-associated proteins such as ATM at Ser1981, p53 at Ser15, and H2AX. Nano-Ni exposure also induced HIF-1α nuclear accumulation, miR-210 up-regulation, and down-regulation of homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene Rad52. Inhibition of or knocking-out HIF-1α or miR-210 ameliorated Nano-Ni-induced Rad52 down-regulation. Long-term low-dose Nano-Ni exposure led to cell malignant transformation, and augmentation of Rad52 expression significantly reduced Nano-Ni-induced cell transformation. In addition, increased immunostaining of cell proliferation markers, Ki-67 and PCNA, was observed in bronchiolar epithelial cells and hyperplastic pneumocytes in mouse lungs at day 7 and day 42 after Nano-Ni exposure. Finally, using gpt delta transgenic mice revealed that Nano-Ni exposure did not cause increased gpt mutant frequency and certain DNA mutations, such as base substitution and small base insertions/deletions, are not the main types of Nano-Ni-induced DNA damage.ConclusionsThis study unraveled the mechanisms underlying Nano-Ni-induced cell malignant transformation; the combined effects of Nano-Ni-induced DNA damage and DNA repair defects through HIF-1α/miR-210/Rad52 pathway likely contribute to Nano-Ni-induced genomic instability and ultimately cell transformation. Our findings will provide information to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms of Nano-Ni-induced genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.Graphical

Genome editing with type II-C CRISPR-Cas9 systems from Neisseria meningitidis in rice.

SummaryTwo type II‐C Cas9 orthologs (Nm1Cas9 and Nm2Cas9) were recently identified from Neisseria meningitidis and have been extensively used in mammalian cells, but whether these NmCas9 orthologs or other type II‐C Cas9 proteins can mediate genome editing in plants remains unclear. In this study, we developed and optimized targeted mutagenesis systems from NmCas9s for plants. Efficient genome editing at the target with N4GATT and N4CC protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) was achieved with Nm1Cas9 and Nm2Cas9 respectively. These results indicated that a highly active editing system could be developed from type II‐C Cas9s with distinct PAM preferences, thus providing a reliable strategy to extend the scope of genome editing in plants. Base editors (BEs) were further developed from the NmCas9s. The editing efficiency of adenine BEs (ABEs) of TadA*‐7.10 and cytosine BEs (CBEs) of rat APOBEC1 (rAPO1) or human APOBEC3a (hA3A) were extremely limited, whereas ABEs of TadA‐8e and CBEs of Petromyzon marinus cytidine deaminase 1 (PmCDA1) exhibited markedly improved performance on the same targets. In addition, we found that fusion of a single‐stranded DNA‐binding domain from the human Rad51 protein enhanced the base editing capability of rAPO1‐CBEs of NmCas9s. Together, our results suggest that the engineering of NmCas9s or other type II‐C Cas9s can provide useful alternatives for crop genome editing.

Mutational Analysis of Redβ Single Strand Annealing Protein: Roles of the 14 Lysine Residues in DNA Binding and Recombination In Vivo.

Redβ is a 261 amino acid protein from bacteriophage λ that promotes a single-strand annealing (SSA) reaction for repair of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) breaks. While there is currently no high-resolution structure available for Redβ, models of its DNA binding domain (residues 1–188) have been proposed based on homology with human Rad52, and a crystal structure of its C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 193-261), which binds to λ exonuclease and E. coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), has been determined. To evaluate these models, the 14 lysine residues of Redβ were mutated to alanine, and the variants tested for recombination in vivo and DNA binding and annealing in vitro. Most of the lysines within the DNA binding domain, including K36, K61, K111, K132, K148, K154, and K172, were found to be critical for DNA binding in vitro and recombination in vivo. By contrast, none of the lysines within the CTD, including K214, K245, K251, K253, and K258 were required for DNA binding in vitro, but two, K214 and K253, were critical for recombination in vivo, likely due to their involvement in binding to SSB. K61 was identified as a residue that is critical for DNA annealing, but not for initial ssDNA binding, suggesting a role in binding to the second strand of DNA incorporated into the complex. The K148A variant, which has previously been shown to be defective in oligomer formation, had the lowest affinity for ssDNA, and was the only variant that was completely non-cooperative, suggesting that ssDNA binding is coupled to oligomerization.

Screening a Library of FDA-Approved and Bioactive Compounds for Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has emerged as a major global health threat. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 168 million cases and 3.4 million deaths to date, while the number of cases continues to rise. With limited therapeutic options, the identification of safe and effective therapeutics is urgently needed. The repurposing of known clinical compounds holds the potential for rapid identification of drugs effective against SARS-CoV-2. Here, we utilized a library of FDA-approved and well-studied preclinical and clinical compounds to screen for antivirals against SARS-CoV-2 in human pulmonary epithelial cells. We identified 13 compounds that exhibit potent antiviral activity across multiple orthogonal assays. Hits include known antivirals, compounds with anti-inflammatory activity, and compounds targeting host pathways such as kinases and proteases critical for SARS-CoV-2 replication. We identified seven compounds not previously reported to have activity against SARS-CoV-2, including B02, a human RAD51 inhibitor. We further demonstrated that B02 exhibits synergy with remdesivir, the only antiviral approved by the FDA to treat COVID-19, highlighting the potential for combination therapy. Taken together, our comparative compound screening strategy highlights the potential of drug repurposing screens to identify novel starting points for development of effective antiviral mono- or combination therapies to treat COVID-19.

A small-molecule inhibitor of the BRCA2-RAD51 interaction modulates RAD51 assembly and potentiates DNA damage-induced cell death

SummaryBRCA2 controls RAD51 recombinase during homologous DNA recombination (HDR) through eight evolutionarily conserved BRC repeats, which individually engage RAD51 via the motif Phe-x-x-Ala. Using structure-guided molecular design, templated on a monomeric thermostable chimera between human RAD51 and archaeal RadA, we identify CAM833, a 529 Da orthosteric inhibitor of RAD51:BRC with a Kd of 366 nM. The quinoline of CAM833 occupies a hotspot, the Phe-binding pocket on RAD51 and the methyl of the substituted α-methylbenzyl group occupies the Ala-binding pocket. In cells, CAM833 diminishes formation of damage-induced RAD51 nuclear foci; inhibits RAD51 molecular clustering, suppressing extended RAD51 filament assembly; potentiates cytotoxicity by ionizing radiation, augmenting 4N cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death and works with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP)1 inhibitors to suppress growth in BRCA2-wildtype cells. Thus, chemical inhibition of the protein-protein interaction between BRCA2 and RAD51 disrupts HDR and potentiates DNA damage-induced cell death, with implications for cancer therapy.

RAD18 mediates DNA double-strand break-induced ubiquitination of chromatin protein.

The E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 mono-ubiquitinates PCNA to promote bypass of replication fork-stalling DNA lesions. On the other hand, RAD18 also contributes to DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. RAD18 is recruited to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSB and colocalizes with ubiquitinated chromatin proteins. RAD18 interacts with the ubiquitinated chromatin proteins via its ubiquitin-binding Zinc finger (UBZ) domain and is proposed to propagate DNA DSB signalling and recruit DNA repair proteins. We found that purified human RAD18 protein complexed with RAD6B (RAD6B-RAD18) catalyzes mono- and poly-ubiquitination of histone H2A in vitro while UBZ domain-mutated RAD18 complexed with RAD6B protein catalyzes mono- but not poly-ubiquitination of histone H2A. Human RAD18-/-cells synchronized at the G1 phase show a reduced signal of ubiquitinated protein in chromatin after IR when compared to that of wild-type control cells. The reduced signal of ubiquitinated protein in RAD18-/-cells is rescued by the introduction of RAD18 cDNA but to a lesser extent by the introduction of cDNA coding RAD18 lacking UBZ domain. Taken together, these results indicate that RAD18 mediates DSB-induced ubiquitination of chromatin protein during the G1 phase.

Identification of fidelity-governing factors in human recombinases DMC1 and RAD51 from cryo-EM structures

Both high-fidelity and mismatch-tolerant recombination, catalyzed by RAD51 and DMC1 recombinases, respectively, are indispensable for genomic integrity. Here, we use cryo-EM, MD simulation and functional analysis to elucidate the structural basis for the mismatch tolerance of DMC1. Structural analysis of DMC1 presynaptic and postsynaptic complexes suggested that the lineage-specific Loop 1 Gln244 (Met243 in RAD51) may help stabilize DNA backbone, whereas Loop 2 Pro274 and Gly275 (Val273/Asp274 in RAD51) may provide an open “triplet gate” for mismatch tolerance. In support, DMC1-Q244M displayed marked increase in DNA dynamics, leading to unobservable DNA map. MD simulation showed highly dispersive mismatched DNA ensemble in RAD51 but well-converged DNA in DMC1 and RAD51-V273P/D274G. Replacing Loop 1 or Loop 2 residues in DMC1 with RAD51 counterparts enhanced DMC1 fidelity, while reciprocal mutations in RAD51 attenuated its fidelity. Our results show that three Loop 1/Loop 2 residues jointly enact contrasting fidelities of DNA recombinases.

Structural insights into the inhibition of bacterial RecA by naphthalene polysulfonated compounds.

SummaryAs a promising target for alternative antimicrobials, bacterial recombinase A (RecA) protein has attracted much attention for its roles in antibiotic-driven SOS response and mutagenesis. Naphthalene polysulfonated compounds (NPS) such as suramin have previously been explored as antibiotic adjuvants targeting RecA, although the underlying structural bases for RecA-ligand interactions remain obscure. Based on our in silico predictions and documented activity of NPS in vitro, we conclude that the analyzed NPS likely interact with Tyr103 (Y103) and other key residues in the ATPase activity center (pocket A). For validation, we generated recombinant RecA proteins (wild-type versus Y103 mutant) to determine the binding affinities for RecA protein interactions with suramin and underexamined NPS in isothermal titration calorimetry. The corresponding dissociation constants (Kd) ranged from 11.5 to 18.8 μM, and Y103 was experimentally shown to be critical to RecA-NPS interactions.

Single-Molecule Insights into ATP-Dependent Conformational Dynamics of Nucleoprotein Filaments of Deinococcus radiodurans RecA.

Deinococcus radiodurans (Dr) has one of the most robust DNA repair systems, which is capable of withstanding extreme doses of ionizing radiation and other sources of DNA damage. DrRecA, a central enzyme of recombinational DNA repair, is essential for extreme radioresistance. In the presence of ATP, DrRecA forms nucleoprotein filaments on DNA, similar to other bacterial RecA and eukaryotic DNA strand exchange proteins. However, DrRecA catalyzes DNA strand exchange in a unique reverse pathway. Here, we study the dynamics of DrRecA filaments formed on individual molecules of duplex and single-stranded DNA, and we follow conformational transitions triggered by ATP hydrolysis. Our results reveal that ATP hydrolysis promotes rapid DrRecA dissociation from duplex DNA, whereas on single-stranded DNA, DrRecA filaments interconvert between stretched and compressed conformations, which is a behavior shared by E. coli RecA and human Rad51. This indicates a high conservation of conformational switching in nucleoprotein filaments and suggests that additional factors might contribute to an inverse pathway of DrRecA strand exchange.

Variants of the human RAD52 gene confer defects in ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination repair in budding yeast.

RAD52 is a structurally and functionally conserved component of the DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair apparatus from budding yeast to humans. We recently showed that expressing the human gene, HsRAD52 in rad52 mutant budding yeast cells can suppress both their ionizing radiation (IR) sensitivity and homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects. Intriguingly, we observed that HsRAD52 supports DSB repair by a mechanism of HRR that conserves genome structure and is independent of the canonical HR machinery. In this study we report that naturally occurring variants of HsRAD52, one of which suppresses the pathogenicity of BRCA2 mutations, were unable to suppress the IR sensitivity and HRR defects of rad52 mutant yeast cells, but fully suppressed a defect in DSB repair by single-strand annealing (SSA). This failure to suppress both IR sensitivity and the HRR defect correlated with an inability of HsRAD52 protein to associate with and drive an interaction between genomic sequences during DSB repair by HRR. These results suggest that HsRAD52 supports multiple, distinct DSB repair apparatuses in budding yeast cells and help further define its mechanism of action in HRR. They also imply that disruption of HsRAD52-dependent HRR in BRCA2-defective human cells may contribute to protection against tumorigenesis and provide a target for killing BRCA2-defective cancers.

DNA Strand Exchange to Monitor Human RAD51-Mediated Strand Invasion and Pairing.

The homologous recombination (HR) pathway maintains genomic integrity by repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), single-strand DNA gaps, and collapsed replication forks. The process of HR involves strand invasion, homology search, and DNA strand exchange between paired DNA molecules. HR is critical for the high-fidelity repair of DNA DSBs in mitotic cells and for the exchange of genetic information during meiosis. Here we describe a DNA strand exchange reaction in vitro utilizing purified proteins and defined DNA substrates to measure the strand invasion and pairing activities of the human RAD51 protein. We further discuss how this reaction can be catalytically stimulated by the mediator protein BRCA2.

Physiological and Pathological Roles of RAD52 at DNA Replication Forks.

Understanding basic molecular mechanisms underlying the biology of cancer cells is of outmost importance for identification of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers for patient stratification and better therapy selection. One of these mechanisms, the response to replication stress, fuels cancer genomic instability. It is also an Achille’s heel of cancer. Thus, identification of pathways used by the cancer cells to respond to replication-stress may assist in the identification of new biomarkers and discovery of new therapeutic targets. Alternative mechanisms that act at perturbed DNA replication forks and involve fork degradation by nucleases emerged as crucial for sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapeutics agents inducing replication stress. Despite its important role in homologous recombination and recombinational repair of DNA double strand breaks in lower eukaryotes, RAD52 protein has been considered dispensable in human cells and the full range of its cellular functions remained unclear. Very recently, however, human RAD52 emerged as an important player in multiple aspects of replication fork metabolism under physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we describe recent advances on RAD52’s key functions at stalled or collapsed DNA replication forks, in particular, the unexpected role of RAD52 as a gatekeeper, which prevents unscheduled processing of DNA. Last, we will discuss how these functions can be exploited using specific inhibitors in targeted therapy or for an informed therapy selection.

Molecular flexibility of DNA as a key determinant of RAD51 recruitment

The timely activation of homologous recombination is essential for the maintenance of genome stability, in which the RAD51 recombinase plays a central role. Biochemically, human RAD51 polymerises faster on single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) compared to double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA), raising a key conceptual question: how does it discriminate between them? In this study, we tackled this problem by systematically assessing RAD51 binding kinetics on ssDNA and dsDNA differing in length and flexibility using surface plasmon resonance. By directly fitting a mechanistic model to our experimental data, we demonstrate that the RAD51 polymerisation rate positively correlates with the flexibility of DNA. Once the RAD51‐DNA complex is formed, however, RAD51 remains stably bound independent of DNA flexibility, but rapidly dissociates from flexible DNA when RAD51 self‐association is perturbed. This model presents a new general framework suggesting that the flexibility of DNA, which may increase locally as a result of DNA damage, plays an important role in rapidly recruiting repair factors that multimerise at sites of DNA damage.

Mechanism of Replication Fork Reversal and Protection by Human RAD51 and RAD51 Paralogs

Mechanism of Replication Fork Reversal and Protection by Human RAD51 and RAD51 Paralogs

Understanding Rad51 function is a prerequisite for progress in cancer research.

The human protein Rad51 is double-edged in cancer contexts: on one hand, preventing tumourigenesis by eliminating potentially carcinogenic DNA damage and, on the other, promoting tumours by introducing new mutations. Understanding mechanistic details of Rad51 in homologous recombination (HR) and repair could facilitate design of novel methods, including CRISPR, for Rad51-targeted cancer treatment. Despite extensive research, however, we do not yet understand the mechanism of HR in sufficient detail, partly due to complexity, a large number of Rad51 protein units being involved in the exchange of long DNA segments. Another reason for lack of understanding could be that current recognition models of DNA interactions focus only on hydrogen bond-directed base pair formation. A more complete model may need to include, for example, the kinetic effects of DNA base stacking and unstacking ('longitudinal breathing'). These might explain how Rad51 can recognize sequence identity of DNA over several bases long stretches with high accuracy, despite the fact that a single base mismatch could be tolerated if we consider only the hydrogen bond energy. We here propose that certain specific hydrophobic effects, recently discovered destabilizing stacking of nucleobases, may play a central role in this context for the function of Rad51.

Human RAD51 paralogue RAD51C fosters repair of alkylated DNA by interacting with the ALKBH3 demethylase.

The integrity of our DNA is challenged daily by a variety of chemicals that cause DNA base alkylation. DNA alkylation repair is an essential cellular defence mechanism to prevent the cytotoxicity or mutagenesis from DNA alkylating chemicals. Human oxidative demethylase ALKBH3 is a central component of alkylation repair, especially from single-stranded DNA. However, the molecular mechanism of ALKBH3-mediated damage recognition and repair is less understood. We report that ALKBH3 has a direct protein-protein interaction with human RAD51 paralogue RAD51C. We also provide evidence that RAD51C–ALKBH3 interaction stimulates ALKBH3-mediated repair of methyl-adduct located within 3′-tailed DNA, which serves as a substrate for the RAD51 recombinase. We further show that the lack of RAD51C–ALKBH3 interaction affects ALKBH3 function in vitro and in vivo. Our data provide a molecular mechanism underlying upstream events of alkyl adduct recognition and repair by ALKBH3.

Differential Requirements for the RAD51 Paralogs in Genome Repair and Maintenance in Human Cells.

Deficiency in several of the classical human RAD51 paralogs [RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2 and XRCC3] is associated with cancer predisposition and Fanconi anemia. To investigate their functions, isogenic disruption mutants for each were generated in non-transformed MCF10A mammary epithelial cells and in transformed U2OS and HEK293 cells. In U2OS and HEK293 cells, viable ablated clones were readily isolated for each RAD51 paralog; in contrast, with the exception of RAD51B, RAD51 paralogs are cell-essential in MCF10A cells. Underlining their importance for genomic stability, mutant cell lines display variable growth defects, impaired sister chromatid recombination, reduced levels of stable RAD51 nuclear foci, and hyper-sensitivity to mitomycin C and olaparib, with the weakest phenotypes observed in RAD51B-deficient cells. Altogether these observations underscore the contributions of RAD51 paralogs in diverse DNA repair processes, and demonstrate essential differences in different cell types. Finally, this study will provide useful reagents to analyze patient-derived mutations and to investigate mechanisms of chemotherapeutic resistance deployed by cancers.

Non-enzymatic roles of human RAD51 at stalled replication forks

The central recombination enzyme RAD51 has been implicated in replication fork processing and restart in response to replication stress. Here, we use a separation-of-function allele of RAD51 that retains DNA binding, but not D-loop activity, to reveal mechanistic aspects of RAD51’s roles in the response to replication stress. Here, we find that cells lacking RAD51’s enzymatic activity protect replication forks from MRE11-dependent degradation, as expected from previous studies. Unexpectedly, we find that RAD51’s strand exchange activity is not required to convert stalled forks to a form that can be degraded by DNA2. Such conversion was shown previously to require replication fork regression, supporting a model in which fork regression depends on a non-enzymatic function of RAD51. We also show RAD51 promotes replication restart by both strand exchange-dependent and strand exchange-independent mechanisms.