Human Platelet Antigen Antibodies Research Articles

Three novel beta3 domain-deletion peptides for the sensitive and specific detection of HPA-4 and six low frequency beta3-HPA antibodies.

Antibodies against human platelet antigens (HPA) are clinically important in fetal-maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, refractoriness to platelet transfusions and post-transfusion purpura. Of the 16 HPAs, nine are located on the beta3 subunit of the alphaIIb beta3 integrin. Antibody detection is generally based on platelet-derived alphaIIb beta3 from HPA-genotyped donors. Recombinant allelic beta3 peptides, expressed at high levels would improve consistency in antibody detection, but the expression of soluble and monomeric integrins expressing complex dependent epitopes has previously proved challenging. We aimed to generate three recombinant beta3 peptides for the detection of antibodies against HPA-4, HPA-8bw and five of the six remaining low frequency beta3 alloantigens. The removal of the specificity-determining loop from the betaA domain and fusion of truncated beta3 to calmodulin was exploited to obtain expression of monomeric protein. Using site-directed mutagenesis, the mutations for HPA-4b and HPA-8bw were introduced in the ITGB3*001 haplotype. A third peptide for the detection of antibodies against HPA coded by non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms of low frequency was generated by the introduction of five mutations forming the basis of HPA-6bw, -7bw, -10bw, -11bw, and -16bw antigens. Reactivity of the three peptides with beta3-specific murine monoclonal antibodies and human HPA-1a phage antibodies confirmed the structural integrity of the recombinant fragments, and reactivity with a unique panel of polyclonal anti-HPA sera confirmed expression of the relevant HPA epitopes. These data demonstrate that beta3 integrin domain-deletion fragments are suitable molecular targets for HPA antibody detection.

Report on the 13th International Society of Blood Transfusion Platelet Immunology Workshop

The aim of the 13th International Society of Blood Transfusion Platelet Immunology Workshop was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the in-house method for the detection of human platelet antigen (HPA) antibodies currently used in participating laboratories with a modified rapid protocol for the monoclonal antibody (mAb) immobilization of platelet antigen (MR-MAIPA) assay. Twenty-eight laboratories from 15 countries participated. A set of four freeze-dried minimum potency reference reagents with known single-specificity HPA antibodies were supplied for testing by titration with both assays and two coded freeze-dried plasma samples were provided for antibody specificity testing. Critical reagents and materials for the MR-MAIPA were provided including lyophilized panel platelets and five capture mAbs. Titration of the reference standards showed that the sensitivity of the MR-MAIPA was the same as the in-house methods. The proposed replacement anti-HPA-1a reference reagent 05/106 gave results that did not differ significantly from the current reference reagent 93/710. The results with the two blinded samples showed that in the first sample, 27 out of the 28 laboratories were able to correctly identify the anti-HPA-1a present when using their respective in-house methods, but only 23 correctly identified the antibody when using the rapid MAIPA method. The results from the second sample, which contained multispecificities, showed that only 50% of the participants correctly identified all five antibodies present using their in-house method. The results for the rapid MAIPA were lower, with only 32% identifying all specificities. The variability in the reconstitution of the freeze-dried platelets may have been one of the contributing factors to the poorer results. The sensitivity of the MR-MAIPA compared favourably with that of the in-house methods. Most laboratories were able to identify anti-HPA-1a alone in Sample 1 but more than half of the participants were not able to correctly assign the specificity of all HPA antibodies present in the second sample. The usefulness of the panel of freeze-dried platelets varied considerably between laboratories.

A modified rapid monoclonal antibody‐specific immobilization of platelet antigen assay for the detection of human platelet antigen (HPA) antibodies: a multicentre evaluation

The monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay is the cornerstone technique for the detection and identification of human platelet antigen (HPA) antibodies. However, the original technique described by Kiefel and colleagues requires approximately 8 h adding to diagnostic delay. Moreover, proficiency exercises indicate that there are substantial variations in the MAIPA protocol, and that these may account for interlaboratory differences in sensitivity and specificity. A review of current MAIPA assay protocols from six laboratories together with performance in quality-assessment schemes identified several key variables potentially affecting the assay results. An optimized protocol was derived and assay time reduced to 5 h. The modified rapid MAIPA (MR-MAIPA) assay was evaluated using 61 samples with a range of HPA antibodies typically encountered in cases of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (n = 22), post-transfusion purpura (n = 8), platelet refractoriness (n = 7) and other platelet immune conditions (n = 24). The sensitivity of the assay was assessed using three international standards and the recombinant HPA-1a antibody CamTran007. The results obtained were compared with the original findings obtained with the local MAIPA assays. In addition, four different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa capture monoclonal antibodies were evaluated for their effect on assay sensitivity. Complete concordance was found between the original MAIPA results and those obtained with the new assay when testing a selected panel of clinical samples. The modified assay had nanogram level sensitivity for the detection of HPA-1a antibodies and titration of HPA-1a and HPA-5b antibody sensitivity standards yielded end-points equal to or greater than the mean recorded in international workshops. The MR-MAIPA assay offers improved turnaround for the detection of HPA antibodies without loss of sensitivity.

Interlaboratory variation in the detection of HPA‐specific alloantibodies and in molecular HPA typing

Platelet immunology quality assurance exercises have been organized by National Institute for Biological Standards and Control since 1991 and, as of 2006, 35 laboratories participate in the serology section. Molecular human platelet antigen (HPA) typing has been included in the exercises since 1998 and, as of 2006, 29 laboratories participate in this part of the exercise. This report details the performance of laboratories in these two areas. Every 6 months laboratories are sent up to four coded serum/plasma samples for testing in their in-house assays for HPA antibody detection/identification and four coded whole blood samples to be typed for HPA-1, -2, -3 -5 and (since 2003) -15 by their molecular typing assays ('genotyping'). Fifty-two sera containing HPA-specific alloantibodies and 13 sera that were inert, contained only human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class I or high-titre anti-A+B antibodies were distributed; 15 sera were issued in more than one exercise. The percentage of participating laboratories that were able to detect HPA-specific alloantibodies ranged from 15.0 to 100%; the percentage that were able to correctly determine the specificities also ranged from 15.0 to 100%. Over the 20 serology exercises the percentage of laboratories classified as poor performers ranged from 3.1 to 36.7%. A total of 12 780 individual HPA genotyping results were assessed. The overall error rate was 0.7% but there was considerable variation between HPA alleles. Over 11 exercises the percentage of laboratories classified as poor performers varied from 6.3 to 26.3%. The ability to detect and to identify platelet-specific alloantibodies varied widely between laboratories and between various examples of antibodies issued. An increase in the number of laboratories screening for HPA-15 antibodies was seen, although detection and identification of these antibodies was problematic. The majority of examples of HPA-3a antibodies and some examples of HPA-1a and -5b were also difficult to detect and identify. In addition, this scheme has shown that despite the apparent reliability of molecular typing techniques, mistakes do occur, particularly with certain systems. Approximately one in five laboratories participating in the serology exercises and one in seven participating in the genotyping exercises were classified as poor performer at one point or more during the series of exercises.

Incidence of transfusion‐induced platelet‐reactive antibodies evaluated by specific assays for the detection of human leucocyte antigen and human platelet antigen antibodies

The aim of this work was to study the incidence of transfusion-induced platelet-reactive antibodies in a selective patient population and evaluate different methodologies for platelet antibody screening (PAS). The patients were retrospectively selected and divided into three separate groups: haematological malignancies (Group 1: n = 33); cardiac and orthopaedic patients (Group 2: n = 31) and a control group (Group 3: n = 23) selected with the same diagnoses of Group 2. PRE- and POST-transfusion samples were tested for PAS by the following tests: PIFT (platelet immunofluorescence test), MAIPA (monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigen), Flow PRA(R) and LCT (lymphocytotoxicity test). There was not a 100% concordance among the methodologies used. PIFT, MAIPA and Flow PRA presented very similar results whereas that of LCT differed from the other methods. A high rate of positive results (32%) was found in the PRE samples followed by an increase of almost 50% after blood transfusion (POST samples: 42.5% of positivity), but there was a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between the PRE and POST transfusion sample only for the Flow PRA(R) technique tested on Group 2. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class I antibodies were present on 97.4% of POST positive samples, 5.4% presented anti-human platelet antigen (HPA)-1b antibodies and 8.1% presented a mix of pan-reactive antibodies against glycoprotein IIbIIIa, IaIIa and IbIX. Blood transfusion did not increase the rate of alloimmunization in our haematological patients (Group 1); however, the patients were already admitted with a high rate of alloimmunization (12%). Group 2 patients are being immunized and the impact of this procedure remains to be studied as these patients may eventually undergo further hospitalization and receive more blood transfusion.

Management and outcome of 200 cases of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT) is the commonest cause of severe thrombocytopenia in term neonates but its management remains controversial. A 7-year prospective observational study of 200 cases of FMAIT evaluated the relationship between human platelet antigen (HPA) antibody specificity, clinical presentation, morbidity, mortality, and therapeutic interventions in the antenatal and postnatal period, with long-term follow-up of neonates with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In 1148 referrals for FMAIT, HPA antibodies were confirmed in 200 (17%). The commonest specificities were anti-HPA-1a, 150 (75%); anti-HPA-5b, 31 (15.5%); and anti-HPA-15b, 8 (4%). Of 123 (62%) cases (two sets of twins) with no previous history of FMAIT, intrauterine deaths occurred in 5: anti-HPA-1a alone, 3; in combination with anti-HPA-5b, 1; and anti-HPA-15b, 1. Of the 120 live neonates, 103 had severe thrombocytopenia and 17 (14%) developed ICH (anti-HPA-1a, 13; anti-HPA-5b, 3; anti-HPA-15b, 1). Postnatal care varied widely with 37 percent of neonates receiving random rather than HPA-1a and -5b-negative platelets. Of the remaining 77 cases with a history of FMAIT, 40 received intrauterine transfusions. Six (15%) of these fetuses died in utero and an additional 2 developed ICH postnatally. Of the 19 children with ICH, 1 (anti-HPA-15b) died on Day +1, and neurologic sequelae persist in 13 (mean follow-up, 2.5 years). HPA-1a antibodies are most commonly implicated in severe thrombocytopenia but HPA-5b and HPA-15b antibodies can also result in poor outcome. Postnatal transfusion management is extremely variable, and fetal transfusions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia caused by human leucocyte antigen‐B27 antibody

Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) occurs when maternal alloantibodies to antigens presented on foetal platelets cause their immune destruction. Whether human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies can cause NAIT is controversial. Here, a patient was described who suffered from a NAIT caused by an HLA-B27 antibody. Sera from the mother and the newborn were tested for human platelet antigen antibodies and HLA antibodies by monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay, solid phase-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), lymphocytotoxicity assay (LCT) and flow cytometric analysis. No antibodies against cluster designation (CD)109 and platelet glycoproteins of the father were found in patient's and mother's serum. However, HLA ELISA was used to identify HLA antibody in both sera. The antibody was specified as HLA-B27 antibody. Typing results showed that the father descended HLA-B27 antigen on patient and his brother. The mother was HLA-B27 negative. It is most conceivable that the previous pregnancy of the mother induced the production of anti-HLA-B27 antibody, which crossed the placenta and subsequently caused an NAIT in the case presented.

Report on the 12th International Society of Blood Transfusion platelet immunology workshop

The aims of the 12th International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Platelet Immunology Workshop were to evaluate the proficiency of molecular human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping and detection of platelet antibodies of unusual specificity or reactivity, to assess whether quantification of anti-HPA-1a is practicable, and to determine the variability of reagents and components used in the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens assay (MAIPA). Forty participants from 23 countries were sent 10 samples for DNA typing, five samples for antibody detection, a freeze-dried anti-HPA-1a standard, three samples for anti-HPA-1a quantification and a MAIPA method questionnaire. The detection and identification of HPA antibodies varied from 2.7 to 95% of participants. The number of HPA genotyping errors per sample ranged from 0 to 3.96% per HPA loci. The majority of laboratories were able to assign an arbitrary number of units/ml of anti-HPA-1a activity to the unknown samples. The MAIPA questionnaire indicated a wide variation among participants, both in method and in reagents used. The results obtained from this workshop highlighted deficiencies in testing regimes and identified a need for internationally available reference materials.

Management of bleeding in a multi-transfused patient with positive HLA class I alloantibodies and thrombocytopenia associated with platelet dysfunction refractory to transfusion of cross-matched platelets

Thrombocytopenia is a common condition in the critical care setting. Repetitive platelet transfusion might lead to formation of alloantibodies. HLA class I and human platelet antigen antibodies can lead to transfusion-refractory thrombocytopenia. Transfusion of cross-matched platelets often is effective in these patients. We report on the successful use of recombinant activated factor VII in an acute bleeding situation in a multi-transfused patient presenting with positive HLA class I alloantibody status and thrombocytopenia associated with platelet dysfunction refractory to even transfusion of cross-matched platelets. The 41-year-old female patient developed HLA class I antibodies during former episodes of massive transfusion. Her former medical history was empty concerning hemorrhagic events. During this specific bleeding episode the patient suffered from intractable profuse bleeding from the nasopharynx and oral cavity. Global coagulation tests were within the normal range. Platelet dysfunction was confirmed by PFA100. Initially the patient responded well to Desmopressin infusion, but after 36 h she became thrombocytopenic and refractory to even transfusion of cross-matched platelets. Recombinant activated factor VII was chosen as the last resort. Two identical boli of 160 microg/kg NovoSeven each were injected via a central line within an interval of 3 h. After the first injection bleeding was significantly reduced and vasopressor support discontinued. After the second bolus bleeding completely ceased and did not reoccur. We did not observe any side effects. The pluripotent hemostatic agent recombinant activated factor VII might be a new option in the treatment of hemorrhagic episodes in patients presenting with this rare disorder, especially when the patient is refractory to cross-matched platelets or matched platelets are not available.

Fetal bradycardia following intrauterine platelet transfusion: might elevated levels of donor soluble CD40 ligand play a role?

Fetal bradycardia following intrauterine platelet transfusion: might elevated levels of donor soluble CD40 ligand play a role?

Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (GTI PakPlus) for the detection of antibodies against human platelet antigens.

Twenty-six serum samples from 24 patients were investigated for the presence of platelet-specific antibodies in a partly retrospective (n = 15) and partly prospective (n = 9) study. The sera contained either alloantibodies to human platelet antigens (HPA) (n = 23) or were from clinically suspected cases of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAITP) in which platelet-specific antibodies had not been detected (n = 3). Three techniques were used to detect platelet antibodies: the platelet immunofluorescence test, the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay and a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay--GTI PakPlus (GTI kit). Two alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antiglobulin reagents provided by the manufacturer were used in the GTI kit: an antihuman IgG/IgA/IgM (IgGAM) conjugate and an antihuman IgG conjugate. The GTI kit with the anti-IgGAM conjugate failed to detect eight antibody specificities in seven sera (anti-HPA-1a [n = 3], anti-HPA-3a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3b [n = 1] and anti-HPA-5b [n = 3]). Greater signal-to-background ratios were achieved in the GTI kit with the anti-IgG conjugate but five antibody specificities (anti-HPA-1a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3b [n = 1], anti-HPA-5b [n = 2]) remained undetectable. All the sera were detected by MAIPA assay and, furthermore, the MAIPA assay achieved the greatest signal-to-background ratio in the majority of sera tested. These findings re-emphasize the value of the MAIPA assay in reference laboratories and illustrate that the GTI kit may either fail to detect or incorrectly identify clinically significant HPA antibodies.

HLA and HPA typing in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura patients treated with Kami-kihi-to.

We performed human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and human platelet antigen (HPA) in patients with Kami-kihi-to-responsive idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. The HLA-A2, A61 and Cw1 were significantly increased in responders compared with nonresponders, as were HLA DRB1 *0901, DRB1 *1502, and DPB1 *0501. In contrast, HLA DPB1 *0201 and DPB1 *0901 were significantly decreased in responders. The a/b genotype of HPA-2 and a/a genotype of HPA-3 were markedly increased in nonresponders, and anti-GPIb antibody was also increased. These results suggest that HLA, HPA, and anti-GP antibody studies may predict the response of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura to Kami-kihi-to.