Human Papillomavirus Testing Research Articles

An outreach strategy to increase uptake of vaginal self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in older French women: The RIDECA interventional research protocol.

In France, approximately 40% of women, including menopausal women, do not participate in cervical cancer screening. Many studies and meta-analyses have shown that self-sampling devices for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing are valuable tools to increase participation. The success of self-sampling screening strategies depends on several factors, including the manner and circumstances in which the women are invited to participate. The acceptability and effectiveness of these strategies should be evaluated before further implementation. The primary objective is to evaluate the uptake of cervical cancer screening in under-screened women, based on a direct offer of a vaginal self-sampling device by a midwife. RIDECA is an interventional research project located in the South of France. Six hundred women aged 50-65 with no cervical smear or HR-HPV test for 3 years or more will be recruited at two sites. The device will be offered to enrolled women to utilize at home and return to the Montpellier Hospital laboratory for HR-HPV testing. Completion of self-sampling by women who have accepted the device and follow-up of those with positive HR-HPV DNA tests will be monitored. During recruitment, participants will complete questionnaires on their socio-economic environment and motivational factors based on the psychosocial I-Change model. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a sub-group to identify barriers and levers to participation. Statistical analyses will be conducted for the full research sample and for each recruitment site. The project was approved by the Ethical Research Committee Ile de France VI and by the French Data Protection Authority. The results will provide useful information on the effectiveness (acceptability, efficiency) of this outreach strategy and identify barriers and levers that facilitate its implementation. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04716127), January 20, 2021.

Age-specific performance of human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA assay versus cytology for primary cervical cancer screening and triage: community-based screening in China.

In the general population, primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is advocated for cervical cancer (CC) screening. HPV E6/E7 mRNA (Aptima HPV, AHPV) assays have garnered considerable traction due to their higher specificity when compared with HPV DNA assays. Here, we investigated age-specific primary AHPV screening assays and different triage strategies versus cytology to identify the best approach. Between April 2018 and December 2021, we recruited female participants from 34 communities across Liaoning province and Qingdao City, China. Primary cervical screening protocols included liquid-based cytology (LBC) and AHPV assays, with females positive for any assays undergoing colposcopy. Genotyping (AHPV-GT) was conducted on all HPV-positive samples. Our primary outcomes were the identification of age-specific detection rates, colposcopy referral rates, and sensitivity and specificity values for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+). AHPV and different triage strategy performances were also examined across different age cohorts. Our investigation included 9911 eligible females. Age-specific abnormal cytology rates were in the 6.1%-8.0% range, and were highest in 45-54-year olds. When compared with 35-44-or 45-54-year olds, HPV prevalence was highest in 55-64-year olds (12.2% or 11.6% vs.14.1%, P = 0.048 and P = 0.002, respectively). In 35-44-year olds, AHPV sensitivity for detecting HSIL+ was 96.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.7-100) - significantly higher than LBC sensitivity (65.5 [95% CI: 48.3-82.8], P < 0.001). When compared with LBC, HSIL+ detection rates by AHPV-GT using reflex LBC triage increased by 31.5% (9.6‰ vs. 7.3‰), and colposcopy referral rates decreased by 16.4% (5.1% vs. 6.1%). In 45-54-year olds, HSIL+ detection rates for AHPV-GT using reflex LBC triage were lower than LBC rates (6.2‰ vs. 6.6‰). In 55-64-year olds, AHPV sensitivity (97.2 [95% CI: 91.7-100.0]) was higher than LBC sensitivity (66.7 [95% CI: 50.0-80.6], P = 0.003). The area under the curve (AUC) value was not significantly different between AHPV-GT with reflex LBC triage and LBC (0.845 [95% CI: 0.771-0.920] vs. 0.812 [95% CI: 0.734-0.891], P = 0.236). Primary AHPV screening using different triage strategies were different across different age cohorts. Thus, AHPV may be an appropriate primary screening method for 35-44 and 55-64 year old females, while AHPV-GT with reflex LBC triage may be more apt for 35-44 year old females.

Integrating Implementation Theory to Address Inequities in Cancer Care: Perspectives from an International Working Group

Background . There are well‐established, persistent inequities in cancer care and cancer outcomes within and between countries. The aim of this article is to explore how implementation theory, specifically the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), alongside coproduction principles, could be used to maximise the effectiveness of innovations with a vision of reducing inequity in cancer care. Methods. Workshops were conducted with partners from US, Australia, and UK, participating in the University Global Partnership Network (UGPN), which funded the collaboration. From these workshops, three case studies were identified and the framework was applied to identify ways of using CFIR to maximise the effectiveness of innovations. Results. The three case studies focused on human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and vaccination, participation in clinical trials, and use of translation services. We identified opportunities, for each of the case studies, where CFIR could be applied to improve implementation and proposed recommendations to ensure effective implementation of innovations using CFIR domains, including individual constructs (e.g., awareness and cultural competence), inner setting constructs (e.g., technology infrastructure), and outer setting constructs (e.g., how services are monitored, evaluated, and commissioned). Conclusions. Applying CFIR as an implementation framework offers a structured and holistic approach to consider how to maximise the effectiveness of innovations in the context of reducing inequities in cancer care. Working with other countries to apply this framework also provides a uniform approach to understand and reduce inequities across a range of innovations and address the global mission to improve cancer care for all.

Prevalence and correlates of Human Papillomavirus infection in females from Southern Province, Zambia: A cross-sectional study.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is strongly associated with cervical cancer with almost all cases being associated with the infection. Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women in Zambia and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. However, there is limited data on the burden and associated factors of HPV in sub-Saharan Africa. This study therefore aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of HPV infection in the Southern province of Zambia. This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) among 4,612 women from different districts of the southern province being screened for HPV infection between September 2021 and August 2022. Demographic and clinical data were collected from an existing laboratory programmatic database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the factors associated with HPV infection. The study participants had a median age of 39 years [interquartile range (IQR) 30, 47]. The prevalence of HPV infection was 35.56% (95%CI). At multivariable analysis, the factors associated with a positive HPV result were younger age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-0.99; p. value 0.001), having provider collected sample (AOR 2.15; 95%CI 1.66-2.79; p. value <0.001) and living with HIV (AOR 1.77; 95%CI 1.22-2.55; p. value <0.002). The prevalence of HPV in women in the southern province of Zambia is high, and likely influenced by age and HIV status. Additionally, the outcome of the HPV test is affected by the sample collection method. Therefore, there is a necessity to enhance HPV and cervical cancer screening, especially among people with HIV.

Significance of negative cervical cytology and positive HPV in the diagnosis of cervical lesions by colposcopy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of colposcopy in diagnosing cervical lesions when negative cervical cytology is combined with positive human papillomavirus (HPV). Overall, 370 patients with cervical epithelial lesions who had negative cervical fluid-based cytology combined with positive HPV results were selected and analysed for severity of cervical lesions and HPV distribution. Among the patients with cervical lesions, 242 had a single HPV infection, and 128 cases had multiple infections. No significant difference was found between HPV single infection and multiple infections in both groups of patients with cervical lesions (P > 0.05). Furthermore, 137 had non-HPV 16 and 18, accounting for 37.30% of all the patients with cervical lesions. Among them, HPV 52, 58, and 33 infections were the most common at 38.69, 30.66 and 29.20%, respectively - significantly higher than other high-risk HPV types (P < 0.05). High-risk HPV testing is crucial in patients with negative cervical fluid-based cytology combined with positive HPV results. Patients with HPV 16 and 18 and those with simple HPV 52, 58, and 33 infections should undergo timely colposcopy.

A real-world, cross-sectional, and longitudinal study on high-risk human papillomavirus genotype distribution in 31,942 women in Dongguan, China.

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection remains a key risk factor for cervical cancer. HPV-based primary screening is widely recommended in clinical guidelines, and further longitudinal studies are needed to optimize strategies for detecting high-grade cervical lesions compared to cytology. From November 2015 to December 2023, 31,942 participants were included in the real-world observational study. Among those, 4,219 participants underwent at least two rounds of HPV tests, and 397 completed three rounds of HPV tests. All participants were tested for high-risk types of HPV 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68 (hrHPV) and low-risk types of HPV6/11 genotyping. Some participants also received cytology or colposcopy with pathology. In the cross-sectional cohort, the prevalence of hrHPV and all HPV subtypes was 6.6% (2,108/31,942) and 6.8% (2,177/31,942), respectively. The three top hrHPV genotypes were HPV52 (1.9%), HPV58 (0.9%), and HPV16 (0.9%). Age distributions showed two peaks at 45-49 and 60-65 years. For the primary screening cohort, the hrHPV prevalence rate increased from 4.8% in 2015-2017 to 7.0% in 2020-2020 and finally reached 7.2% in 2023. For the longitudinal cohort study, the hrHPV prevalence rates in the repeated population (3.9, 5.3, and 6.0%) were lower than the primary hrHPV screening rates (6.6%), which indicated that repeated screening might decrease the prevalence rate. Methodologically, the hrHPV (89.5%) and the screening group of 16 subtypes (92.3%) demonstrated superior sensitivity than the cytology group (54.4%). Moreover, the longitudinal study indicated that the persistent hrHPV subgroup had a significantly higher (p = 0.04) incidence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more histology progression events (7/17 vs. 0/5) than the reinfection group. The study indicates a rising high-risk HPV prevalence in Dongguan, with repeated screening reducing this trend. The findings support HPV-based primary screening and might guide HPV vaccination and cervical cancer prevention in South China.

Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing and Other New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening

(Abstracted from Obstet Gynecol 2023;142(5):1036–1043) Cervical cancer screening has saved millions of lives over the past 7 decades. Never-screened or underscreened women currently account for more than half of all cervical cancer cases in the United States.

Acceptability of Integrated Community-Based HIV and Cervical Cancer Screening in Mayuge District, Uganda.

To assess the acceptability of integrated screening for cervical cancer and HIV in the community setting. We developed surveys for patients and community health workers (CHWs) who participated in the Advances in Screening and Prevention in Reproductive Cancers (ASPIRE) Mayuge trial that compared self-collected human papillomavirus testing at home versus community health meetings in Mayuge district, Uganda. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Open-ended questions were analyzed using an inductive approach with thematic content analysis. We conducted 102 patient surveys and 31 CHW surveys between June and August 2021. Ninety-nine percent of patients and 100% of CHWs indicated that they would find the addition of an HIV test to their self-collected cervical cancer test acceptable. The most frequently stated reasons in favor of adding an HIV test to the ASPIRE Mayuge cervical cancer screening pathways were time-saving, privacy, and support from other women and CHWs. The most frequently stated reasons against integrated screening were related to concerns about confidentiality, most often in reference to women's family members and other women in their village. Integrated community-based cervical cancer and HIV testing would be highly acceptable to both women and CHWs.

Primary Human Papillomavirus Test Uptake and Cervical Cancer Screening Trends in the Midwest, United States.

Despite U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society endorsement of primary HPV screening, limited published data shows low uptake. Assess cervical cancer screening rates over time, particularly primary HPV test uptake, among patients in a midwestern practice. Evaluate associations between sociodemographics and screening adherence. Cross-sectional study. Qualifying subjects and type of screening test used were identified by applying ICD-9, ICD-10, lab test, and CPT codes to the Unified Data Platform. Sociodemographics were found through the electronic health record. Primary HPV uptake represented <1% of annual screening from 1/2017 to 1/2022. On 1/1/2022, only 55% of 21 to 29 year old and 63% of 30 to 65 year old were up to date with screening among the studied population. For 21 to 29 year old, compared with White women, Black women were 28% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.72 (0.66-0.79)]. Compared with never-smokers, current smokers were 9% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.91 (0.87-0.96)], past smokers were 14% more likely [RR = 1.14 (1.09-1.2)]. Among 30 to 65 year old, compared with White women, Black women were 14% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.86 (0.81-0.9)]. Compared with never-smokers, current smokers were 21% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.79 (0.77-0.81)], past smokers were 6% less likely [RR = 0.94 (0.92-0.95)]. Jointly considering race, ethnicity, smoking status, Charlson score, and rurality, findings were similar for 21 to 29 year old; Black women were screened less than White women [RR = 0.73 (0.67-0.79)]; current smokers [RR = 0.9 (0.85-0.94)] and past smokers [RR = 1.12 (1.06-1.17)] were screened less than never smokers. For 30 to 65 year old, Black women were screened less than White women [RR = 0.83 (0.79-0.88)]; current smokers [RR = 0.8 (0.78-0.81)] and past smokers [RR = 0.95 (0.93-0.96)] were screened less than never smokers. Screening rates remained below the Healthy People 2030 goal of 79.2% over time, particularly for younger Black women and current smokers, with minimal use of primary HPV screening.

Human papillomavirus DNA testing with the urine sample is not yet available: the accuracy of two distinct kits.

The aim of this study was to assess the results and efficiency of two real-time polymerase chain reaction procedures for detecting human papillomavirus utilizing urine samples. This study comprised 151 patients who had previously tested positive for human papillomavirus in their cervical samples. Two different commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques were used for identification and genotyping human papillomavirus in urine specimens. The urine samples of 151 patients were evaluated via the Roche Cobas test, and the urine samples of 91 patients were also evaluated via the Qiagen test. The overall consistency of urine and cervical swab specimens for the identification of human papillomavirus in Roche Cobas and Qiagen tests were 44.8 and 44%, respectively. The rates of positive human papillomavirus results from urine samples were 57 and 70.3%, respectively. The overall concordance among Roche Cobas and Qiagen tests utilizing urine samples for human papillomavirus type 16/18 was 84.3% with a kappa value of 0.675, and for other high-risk-human papillomavirus, it was 75.60% with a kappa value of 0.535. Roche Cobas showed high concordance with Qiagen test. human papillomavirus positivity was not detected in all urine samples. It is still inappropriate to recommend the use of urine liquid biopsy for the accurate and reliable detection of human papillomavirus. Due to the lack of a standardized tool, the utilization of urine samples as a screening human papillomavirus test remains a challenge.

High-grade cervical lesions diagnosed by JAM3/PAX1 methylation in high-risk human papillomavirus-infected patients.

Currently, traditional cervical cancer screening methods, such as high-risk human papillomavirus testing and liquid based cytology (LBC), still possess limitations. This study aims to identify new diagnostic biomarkers to achieve the goal of "precision screening" via exploring the clinical value of DNA methylation [ΔCtP: paired box gene 1 (PAX1)and ΔCtJ: junctional adhesion molecule 3 (JAM3)] detection in cervical exfoliated cells for the diagnosis of high-grade cervical lesions. A total of 136 patients who underwent gynecological examinations in the vaginal room of the Department of Gynecology at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from June 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively studied. Among them, 122 patients had non-high-grade cervical lesions, and 14 patients had high-grade cervical lesions. The variables included general information (age, body mass index, and menopause status), LBC, high-risk human papillomavirus, cervical tissue pathology, vaginal examination results, and the ΔCt values of JAM3 and PAX1 gene methylation. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors affecting the diagnosis of high-grade cervical lesions, followed by correlation analysis and construction of a conditional inference tree model. Logistic regression analysis showed that the methylation ΔCt values of PAX1 and JAM3 genes and LBC detection results were statistically significant between the high-grade cervical lesions group and the non-high-grade cervical lesions group (all P<0.05). Correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between cervical pathological changes and ΔCtP (r=-0.36, P<0.001), ΔCtJ (r=-0.448, P<0.001), LBC (r=-0.305, P<0.001), or bacterial diversity (r=-0.183, P=0.037). The conditional inference tree showed that when ΔCtJ>10.13, all of patients had non-high-grade cervical lesions, while ΔCtP>6.22, the number of non-high-grade lesions accounted for 97.5% (117/120), and high-grade lesions accounted for only 2.5% (3/120). When ΔCtJ>8.61 and LBC were atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance or negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), 105 (99.1%) patients were non-high-grade cervical lesions, only 1 (0.9%) patient was high-grade lesion. When the results of LBC were high-grade lesions, only 9 patients' histopathological examination was the high-grade lesions and 3 non-high-grade lesions. When LBC indicated low-grade lesions, atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance, no intraepithelial lesions, and ΔCtP>6.22, 117 (97.5%) of patients' histopathological examination was the non-high-grade lesions. The JAM3/PAX1 gene methylation test can be used independently for the stratified diagnosis of high-grade/non-high-grade cervical lesions in women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection, independent of the cytological results of cervical excision. The JAM3/PAX1 gene methylation test can also be used in combination with LBC to make up for the shortcomings of low sensitivity of LBC. In addition, the application of methylation kit in large-scale cervical cancer screening in the future will be good to the detection of more patients with high-grade cervical lesions, and achieve early screening and early treatment for cervical lesions/cancer.

Clinical Characteristics and Detection Sensitivity of Cervical Cancer Screening in Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and screening history of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) or vaginal cancer and compare the sensitivity of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) tests on the cervix against vaginal and cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or cancer. This study included patients who underwent colposcopy-directed biopsy and were diagnosed with VaIN or vaginal cancer from February 2013 to November 2022. Clinical information was obtained from the medical records of the department. Statistical analysis was performed on SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) using t test, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests. A total of 1,166 patients were included in this study. The median age of VaIN2+ patients was 50.5 years, whereas VaIN1 reported a median age of 42.1 years old, p < .001. This study reported that VaIN was significantly and positively correlated with cervical lesions (r = 0.244). The high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) detection rate was 88.2% (858/973) in VaIN and 95.2% in VaIN2+. Human papillomavirus 16 was the most prevalent HPV type in VaIN2+, which accounted for 54.9%, followed by HPV58 (19.5%), HPV52 (15.2%), HPV51 (12.2%), and HPV18 (11.0%). The sensitivity of hr-HPV and cytology tests on the cervix for detecting VaIN2+ was 94.7% and 83.4%, respectively. Both tests were not significantly different from detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+. Human papillomavirus 16 is the dominant HPV type in vaginal precancer lesions. Cervical cancer screening has similar sensitivity for VaIN2+ as for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+, with hr-HPV testing showing higher sensitivity than cytology.

Cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus triage approaches among vaccinated women in Norway: A model-based analysis.

As Norway considers revising triage approaches following their first adolescent cohort with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination entering the cervical cancer screening program, we analyzed the health impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative primary HPV triage approaches for women initiating cervical cancer screening in 2023. We used a multimodeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to evaluate the health benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of alternative extended genotyping and age-based triage strategies under five-yearly primary HPV testing (including the status-quo screening strategy in Norway) for women born in 1998 (ie, age 25 in 2023). We examined 35 strategies that varied alternative groupings of high-risk HPV genotypes ("high-risk" genotypes; "medium-risk" genotypes or "intermediate-risk" genotypes), number and types of HPV included in each group, management of HPV-positive women to direct colposcopy or active surveillance, wait time for re-testing and age at which the HPV triage algorithm switched from less to more intensive strategies. Given the range of benchmarks for severity-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway, we found that the preferred strategy for vaccinated women aged 25 years in 2023 involved an age-based switch from a less to more intensive follow-up algorithm at age 30 or 35 years with HPV-16/18 genotypes in the "high-risk" group. The two potentially cost-effective strategies could reduce the number of colposcopies compared to current guidelines and simultaneously improve health benefits. Using age to guide primary HPV triage, paired with selective HPV genotype and follow-up time for re-testing, could improve both the cervical cancer program effectiveness and efficiency.

From Diagnosis to Treatment: Exploring the Latest Management Trends in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) stands as a precancerous condition with the potential to progress to invasive cervical cancer. This comprehensive review explores the intricacies of CIN management, beginning with its definition, classification, and etiology. It emphasizes the significance of early detection and outlines the latest trends in diagnosis, including Pap smears, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and colposcopy. Grading and staging, pivotal in treatment selection, are elucidated. Current management approaches, encompassing watchful waiting, surgical interventions, emerging minimally invasive techniques, and immunotherapy, are detailed. The factors influencing treatment decisions, informed consent, and patient education are discussed. Potential complications following treatment, the importance of long-term follow-up, and the role of HPV vaccination in prevention are underscored. Finally, the review looks to the future, discussing advances in detection, novel treatments, and the promise of precision medicine. In conclusion, early detection and management remain the cornerstone of CIN care, offering hope for a future where cervical cancer is a preventable and treatable condition.

Staged design recommendations for validating relative sensitivity of self-sample human papillomavirus tests for cervical screening

ObjectivesTo ensure that the emerging methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected samples in cervical screening are evaluated robustly. Study Design and SettingWe assess paired study designs for relative sensitivity of self-collected vs. traditional clinician-collected samples in detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. ResultsDesigns considered are (D1) both samples at screening, with clinical actions triggered by HPV positivity; (D2) offering a self-sample test to clinician-collected HPV-positive women; (D3) as D2 but using a repeat clinician-sample as comparator; (D4) offering a choice of self- vs. clinician-sampling, and the alternative test in HPV-positive women; (D5) paired samples at referral appointment. D1 is simple to analyze but requires the largest sample size and referral of self-sample positive, clinician-sample negative women. D2 requires a much smaller sample size, and no change to clinical practice, and could be used to rule-in a test because estimates are conservative (against self-sampling). D3 mitigates this bias but requires a second clinician sample. D4 is only manageable where self-sampling already occurs. The liberal D5 might be used to rule-out a self-sampling test. ConclusionA universal recommendation for an optimal study design is challenging. Staged validation might be useful with D5 as a gatekeeper for D1-D4.

Efficacy of Cobas HPV testing for predicting grade 2+ cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cancer prevention center and a gynecologic oncology clinic: A single-institution experience.

To evaluate the efficacy of Cobas human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to predict cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or higher (CIN2+), Cobas HPV testing results were correlated with follow-up biopsy in patients from Cancer Prevention Center (CPC) and Gynecologic Oncology Clinic (GOC) of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Institutional data for patients who underwent Cobas HPV and Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology cotesting from 2019 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical follow-up results were compared with Cobas HPV testing results in two populations. A total of 2226 patients, including 921 women (mean age, 55.2years) seen at the CPC and 1305 women (mean age, 49.3years) seen at the GOC, were included. Specimens from GOC patients had a significantly higher HPV positivity rate than did those from CPC patients (22.9% vs. 10.1%; p<.001). Cobas HPV testing was positive in all seven CPC patients with surgical follow-up results showing CIN2+. Among 36 GOC patients with CIN2+ lesions, five patients had HPV-/Pap+testing results. Although only seven CPC patients had CIN2+, Cobas HPV testing showed 100% sensitivity for predicting CIN2+ in this group. Sensitivity for CIN2+ was 86.5% in the GOC group, whereas 13.9% of GOC patients with CIN2+ had negative HPV testing results. Cobas HPV testing was highly efficacious for predicting CIN2+ lesions in the low-risk CPC population, which supports HPV primary screening for cervical cancer in low-risk populations. For high-risk patients, especially those with a history of CIN2+/cervical cancer, HPV/Pap cotesting may still be necessary to maintain a high clinical sensitivity for CIN2+.

Evaluation of Visual Inspection by Acetic Acid, High Risk Human Papilloma Virus Testing and Human Papilloma Virus 16/18 Genotyping to Screen for Cervical Cancer in a Low Resource Setting

Evaluation of Visual Inspection by Acetic Acid, High Risk Human Papilloma Virus Testing and Human Papilloma Virus 16/18 Genotyping to Screen for Cervical Cancer in a Low Resource Setting

HPV testing as an effective triage strategy in the follow-up after fertility-sparing treatment for glandular lesions of the uterine cervix

ObjectiveThe management and surveillance of glandular pre-cancerous lesions of the uterine cervix present distinct challenges compared with squamous lesions, primarily attributed to the lower effectiveness of diagnostic methods such as...

OP81 Cost Effectiveness Of Human Papillomavirus Extended Genotyping For Cervical Cancer Screening In Singapore

IntroductionThe World Health Organization recommends the human papillomavirus (HPV) test for cervical cancer screening. HPV partial genotyping (PGT) identifies HPV16 and HPV18 individually and the 12 other high-risk HPV genotypes (hrHPV) collectively. In contrast, HPV extended genotyping (XGT) identifies six hrHPV individually (HPV16,18,31,45,51, and 52) and the other eight in three groups (HPV33/58, HPV56/59/66, and HPV35/39/68). XGT allows better risk stratification for patient management and monitoring of persistent same-genotype infections (PSGI), which convey a higher risk for cervical cancer. This study compared the cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and resource use of XGT with PGT when used as the primary cervical cancer screening method in Singapore.MethodsA discretely integrated condition event simulation was developed for screening 500,122 women aged 30 to 69 years over five years from the health system perspective, using a three percent annual discount. For XGT, women with HPV35/39/51/56/59/66/68 and reflex cytology of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were recalled for a repeat screening in one year, instead of the immediate colposcopy referral that occurs with PGT. At repeat screening, colposcopy was only provided for women with PSGI on XGT. Published data from Singapore were used for inputs and supplemented with data from international literature. Deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analyses were conducted. Scenario analysis was conducted to simulate various HPV burdens among women. XGT was cost effective when the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) relative to PGT was below SGD100,000 (USD118,906) (gross domestic product per capita in 2021).ResultsXGT was cost effective relative to PGT (ICER SGD16,370 [USD19,465]), with fewer colposcopies (n=7,130; 19%), liquid-based cytology tests (n=6,027; 7%), and clinic consultations (n=9,787; 2%) but more HPV tests (n=2,446; 0.5%). The ICER was most sensitive to the relative cost of XGT and the cost of PGT. XGT remained cost effective in one-way sensitivity analysis in all 1,000 probabilistic uncertainty simulations and in scenario analysis with various HPV burdens.ConclusionsXGT can provide a cost effective, risk-based approach to primary cervical cancer screening, with lower resource utilization than PGT.

Human papillomavirus testing using HPV APTIMA® assay and an external cellularity control in self-collected samples.

In cervical cancer screening programs, the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)is now widely implemented on physician-collected samples and has expanded to include self-collected samples. The use of a cellularity control (CC)is needed to reduce false-negative HPV results. An external mRNA CC forthe HPV APTIMA®assay was assessed for its analytical performance and the results were compared with both cervix cytobrush samples taken by physicians and self-collected vaginal samples from 148 women. The performance of the CC was adjusted to control for the presence of cellular mRNA in the ThinPrep® and Multitest® transport media. This CC is user-friendly but implies to perform two independent assays on PANTHER®automate. Self-collected vaginal sampling gives a lower median CC results (13.2 vs. 16.9 min) but a higher risk of negative CC results (3.3 vs. 0%). The usefulness of the CC for the HR-HPVassay may be optimized by the definition of a threshold for a minimum cell number to be tested to increase confidence in HPV-negative results. The systematic use of an RNA CC increases confidence for HPV RNA assays on self-collected vaginal samples.