e16357 Background: A major impediment to cancer therapy is the reality that cancer is a heterogeneous disease. A single tumor can consist of many genotypic or phenotypic profiles, which are marked by degrees of sensitivity to different therapeutics. Identifying and targeting origins of cancer cell heterogeneity is critical for predicting patient outcome and enhancing treatment efficacy. We observe a novel source of cancer cell heterogeneity that involves one of the largest stress-sensing platforms described to date: the stress granule (SG). Stress granules are non-membranous, cytoplasmic organelles that assemble in response to stress, and promote cell survival. Deregulation of SGs has been linked to several pathological conditions, including cancer, neurodegeneration, ischemia, and viral infections. SGs have been shown to promote tumor growth and metastasis, as well as contribute to mechanisms of chemo-resistance. Thus, these signaling hubs are emerging as a potential target in cancer. Methods: To induce SG formation, human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines were treated with sodium arsenite, thapsigargin, or exposed to hypoxic conditions. Immunoflourescent staining of core SG proteins was then conducted. To investigate cell cycle-driven mechanisms of SG heterogeneity, cell cycle stage was identified by expression of a Fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci) lentiviral system. To investigate cPLA2’s role in SG formation, the chemical inhibitor Pyrrophenone, an shRNA targeting cPLA2, and an exogenous full-length or cleaved form of cPLA2, were used. In vivo, ES149 cells expressing Luciferase and the Fucci system were orthotopically implanted into C57BL/6 mice. Established tumors were treated every 3 days with Vehicle, Oxaliplatin, Pyrrophenone, or a combination of the latter. Tumor size was tracked via IVIS Spectrum. Fucci flourescence was used to identify cell cycle phase. SGs and cell death were assessed by immunoflourescent staining of tumors. Results: Cancer cells show a high degree of heterogeneity in their production of SGs. Cell cycle phase dictates SG heterogeneity. G2 phase cells have significantly higher levels of SG formation as compared cells in G1/S. This process is regulated by cleavage of the cPLA2 protein. Oxaliplatin administration increases G2 phase content in tumors. Co-treatment with Oxaliplatin and Pyrrophenone significantly decreases SG formation, increases cell death, and leads to tumor regressions in vivo. Conclusions: G2 phase cancer cells develop higher levels of SGs when exposed to stressful stimuli, as compared to G1/S phase counterparts. The cPLA2 protein is cleaved into a catalytically dead form that is present in G1/S phases, but absent in G2 phase. Oxaliplatin treatment in vivo leads to an increase in G2 phase tumor cells. When paired with cPLA2 inhibition, this results in increased cancer cell death and decreased tumor growth.