Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. For a thoughtful and thought‐provoking paper on the concept of a degree, what counts as academic study, etc,. see Best (1980 Best, D. 1980. A policy for the study of physical education and human movement. The Journal of Human Movement Studies, 6: 336–347. [Google Scholar]). 2. See, for example, Binkley (1976 Binkley, T. 1976. “Deciding about art”. In Culture and art, Edited by: Aagaard‐Mogensen, L. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press. [Google Scholar]). 3. This is not to discount the possibility of accompaniment being provided by an individual or individuals other than the choreographer alongside the composing of the movement. Nevertheless, decisions as to its suitability at every stage do require time on her/his part (and if s/he does not take ultimate responsibility, difficult problems must arise here when it comes to evaluation). 4. See, for example, Griffiths (1965 Griffiths, A. P. 1965. “A deduction of universities”. In Philosophical analysis and education, Edited by: Archambault, R. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Google Scholar]). 5. See Schaper (1983 Schaper, E. 1983. “The pleasures of taste”. In Pleasure, preference and value, Edited by: Schaper, E. London: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]). 6. The valuable work of David Best in recent years, however, should not go unmentioned. 7. This sort of doubt, it might be said, typically assails the ‘man in the street’ confronted by anything new in the arts. My point here is that even for those accustomed to radical departures from what has previously been accepted as art (or dance, music, etc.) perhaps expecting to be surprised, shocked, disturbed, and so on, new dances sometimes seem retrogressive rather than progressive in terms of art; and that this is often confirmed by what choreographers say about their work. See Redfern (1983 Redfern, B. 1983. Dance, art and aesthetics, London: Dance Books Ltd. [Google Scholar]). 8. See, for example, the chapter on Deborah Hay in Banes (1980 Banes, S. 1980. Terpsichore in sneakers: post‐modern dance, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]). 9. In a Radio 4 ‘Kaleidoscope’ programme, July, 1981. 10. See, however, Sircello (1975 Sircello, G. 1975. A new theory of beauty, Princeton: University Press. [Google Scholar]). 11. See Stolnitz (1960 Stolnitz, J. 1960. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art criticism, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]). 12. See Scruton (1979 Scruton, R. 1979. The aesthetics of architecture, London: Methuen. [Google Scholar]) and Tanner (1977 Tanner, M. 1977. Sentimentality. The Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXVII: 127–147. [Google Scholar]).
Read full abstract