Human GnRH Receptor Research Articles

Arrestin-mediated ERK Activation by Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors: RECEPTOR-SPECIFIC ACTIVATION MECHANISMS AND COMPARTMENTALIZATION

Activation of seven-transmembrane region receptors typically causes their phosphorylation with consequent arrestin binding and desensitization. Arrestins also act as scaffolds, mediating signaling to Raf and ERK and, for some receptors, inhibiting nuclear translocation of ERK. GnRH receptors (GnRHRs) act via Gq/11 to stimulate the phospholipase C/Ca2+/protein kinase C (PKC) cascade and the Raf/MEK/ERK cassette. Uniquely, type I mammalian GnRHRs lack the C-tails that are found in other seven-transmembrane region receptors (including nonmammalian GnRHRs) and are implicated in arrestin binding. Here we have compared ERK signaling by human GnRHRs (hGnRHRs) and Xenopus GnRHRs (XGnRHRs). In HeLa cells, XGnRHRs underwent rapid and arrestin-dependent internalization and caused arrestin/green fluorescent protein (GFP) translocation to the membrane and endosomes, whereas hGnRHRs did not. Internalized XGnRHRs were co-localized with arrestin-GFP, whereas hGnRHRs were not. Both receptors mediated transient ERK phosphorylation and nuclear translocation (revealed by immunohistochemistry or by imaging of co-transfected ERK2-GFP), and for both, ERK phosphorylation was reduced by PKC inhibition but not by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor autophosphorylation. In the presence of PKC inhibitor, Deltaarrestin-(319-418) blocked XGnRHR-mediated, but not hGnRHR-mediated, ERK phosphorylation. When receptor number was varied, hGnRHRs activated phospholipase C and ERK more efficiently than XGnRHRs but were less efficient at causing ERK2-GFP translocation. At high receptor number, XGnRHRs and hGnRHRs both caused ERK2-GFP translocation to the nucleus, but at low receptor number, XGnRHRs caused ERK2-GFP translocation, whereas hGnRHRs did not. Thus, experiments with XGnRHRs have revealed the first direct evidence of arrestin-mediated (probably G protein-independent) GnRHR signaling, whereas those with hGnRHRs imply that scaffolds other than arrestins can determine GnRHR effects on ERK compartmentalization.

Overlapping, Nonidentical Binding Sites of Different Classes of Nonpeptide Antagonists for the Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor

Peptide agonists and antagonists of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) are widely used to treat a range of reproductive hormone related diseases. Recently, nonpeptide, orally available GnRH-R antagonists have emerged from several chemical classes. To understand how a relatively large peptide-binding pocket can recognize numerous nonpeptide ligands, we undertook a systematic mapping of GnRH-R residues involved in the binding of three nonpeptide antagonists. A region composed of the extracellular portions of transmembrane helices 6 and 7, extracellular loop 3, and the N-terminal domain significantly contributed to nonpeptide antagonist binding. However, each molecule was affected by a different subset of residues in these regions, indicating that each appears to occupy distinct, partially overlapping subregions within the more extensive peptide-binding pocket. Moreover, the resulting receptor interaction maps provide a basis to begin to reconcile structure-activity relationships between various nonpeptide and peptide series and facilitate the design of improved therapeutic agents.

Expression and transcriptional regulation of the GnRH receptor gene in human neuronal cells

GnRH, acts via the GnRH receptor (GnRHR), plays a pivotal role in human reproduction by stimulating the synthesis and secretion of gonadotropins from pituitary gonadotropes. Studies have also suggested that it has other extra-pituitary functions. To date, the transcriptional regulation of human GnRHR gene in the brain remains largely unknown. Recently, the human cerebellar medulloblastoma cell line TE-671 is found to express GnRH. We report here for the first time that GnRHR is also expressed in this neuronal cell line. Treatment with GnRHR agonist stimulated the phosphorylation of both ERK1/2 and JNK in the cells. Moreover, transient transfection of various human GnRHR promoter-luciferase constructs into the cells identified an upstream promoter region located between -2197 and -1018. Important cis-acting regulatory elements were found at -1300/-1018 and -2197/- 1900, as deletion of either region caused a dramatic decrease in the promoter activity. An upstream GnRHR promoter element was identified to be important for basal transcription in the human neuronal TE-671 cells, in contrast to the previous finding that a downstream promoter is responsible for the gonadotrope-specific expression. Furthermore, we showed that antide (GnRHR antagonist) significantly stimulated the GnRHR promoter activity and inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) pathway by staurosporine could also up-regulate the promoter activity in dose- and time-dependent manners. Taken together, these data suggest that activation of the GnRHR by interacting with GnRH may transcriptionally down-regulate itself via the PKC pathway in human neuronal cells.

Bifunctional Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist-Progesterone Analogs with Increased Efficacy and Duration of Action

GnRH peptide analogs are widely used to treat diverse clinical conditions. However, they have poor oral activity and exhibit rapid metabolic clearance, thus requiring injection and depot formulation. Because steroid hormones are bound to plasma proteins, we explored the possibility of conjugating hydroxylated progesterones to GnRH analogs to reduce metabolic clearance of the peptides. Conjugation of [D-Lys6]GnRH agonist to the alpha11-hydroxyl of alpha11-hydroxyl progesterone via a hemi-succinate bridge increased the plasma half-life after iv injection in rabbits by 3.6-fold while retaining high binding affinity, thus providing proof of concept. Five GnRH antagonists were then synthesized with 21-hydroxyprogesterone conjugated via C21-hydroxyl to positions six (conjugates A and B) and position seven (conjugates C and D) of GnRH antagonists. In the fifth compound the NH2 terminus of a GnRH antagonist lacking the first two amino acids was conjugated via the C21-hydroxyl to 21-hydroxyprogesterone (conjugate E). All five analogs bound to guinea pig progesterone binding globulin with relatively high affinities (264-1020 nM). Moreover, all five conjugates retained high progestogenic activity in stimulating a progesterone-response-element-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene in the T47D breast cancer cell line. Conjugation via the epsilon-amino function of D-Lys6 (conjugates A and B) produced compounds with high binding affinity for the human GnRH receptor (15 and 7 nM) comparable to that of the unconjugated GnRH antagonists (4 and 26 nM). Conjugation via the epsilon-amino function of Lys7 (conjugates C and D) or the NH2 terminus of an N-terminally truncated antagonist (conjugate E) produced compounds of low binding affinity. Conjugates A and B also exhibited high functional antagonism of GnRH stimulation of inositol phosphate production in COS-7 cells expressing the human GnRH receptor (2.6 and 16 nM) compared with the unconjugated antagonists (1.3 and 122 nM). In accordance with their poor receptor binding affinity, conjugates C, D, and E had poor functional antagonism. Preliminary dose-finding studies in female marmosets showed transitory progesterone inhibition by 0.25 mg and prolonged suppression of 12 and 17 d by 0.5- and 1.0-mg doses. Injection of conjugate A in adult male marmosets (0.5 mg sc) rapidly suppressed plasma testosterone levels, which remained suppressed for at least 3 d. In contrast, the unconjugated parent antagonist alone or with progesterone suppressed testosterone for only 8 h to 1 d. The findings demonstrate that conjugation of progesterone to GnRH antagonists conveys plasma binding and progestogenic properties and increases their efficacy and duration of action in vivo. These new GnRH antagonists show promise as therapeutic agents for hormone-dependent diseases and as contraceptives.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Induces Actin Cytoskeleton Remodeling and Affects Cell Migration in a Cell-Type-Specific Manner in TSU-Pr1 and DU145 Cells

GnRH was first identified as the hypothalamic decapeptide that promotes gonadotropin release from pituitary gonadotropes. Thereafter, direct stimulatory and inhibitory effects of GnRH on cell proliferation were demonstrated in a number of types of primary cultured cells and established cell lines. Recently, the effects of GnRH on cell attachment, cytoskeleton remodeling, and cell migration have also been reported. Thus, the effects of GnRH on various cell activities are of great interest among researchers who study the actions of GnRH. In this study, we demonstrated that GnRH induces actin cytoskeleton remodeling and affects cell migration using two human prostatic carcinoma cell lines, TSU-Pr1 and DU145. In TSU-Pr1, GnRH-I and -II induced the filopodia formation of the cells and promoted cell migration, whereas in DU145, GnRH-I and -II induced the formation of the cells with stress fiber and inhibited cell migration. In our previous studies, we reported the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of GnRH on the cell proliferation of TSU-Pr1 and DU145 cells. This study provides the first evidence for the effects of GnRH on actin cytoskeleton remodeling and cell migration of cells in which cell proliferation was affected by GnRH at the same time. Moreover, we also demonstrated that the same human GnRH receptor subtype, human type I GnRH receptor, is essential for the effects of GnRH-I and -II on actin cytoskeleton remodeling and cell migration in both TSU-Pr1 and DU145 cells using the technique of gene knock-down by RNA interference.

Mutations Remote from the Human Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor-binding Sites Specifically Increase Binding Affinity for GnRH II but Not GnRH I: EVIDENCE FOR LIGAND-SELECTIVE, RECEPTOR-ACTIVE CONFORMATIONS

The human gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor is evolutionarily configured for high affinity binding of GnRH I ([Tyr(5),Leu(7),Arg(8)]GnRH) but at lower affinity for GnRH II ([His(5),Trp(7),Tyr(8)]GnRH). GnRH I is more potent in the activation of the G(q/11) protein in the gonadotrope; however, GnRH II is more potent in the stimulation of apoptosis and antiproliferative effects through activating G(i) protein-mediated signaling, implying that GnRH I and II selectively stabilize different receptor-active conformations that preferentially couple to different signaling pathways. Receptor activation involves ligand induction or conformational selection, but the molecular basis of the communication between ligand-binding sites and receptor allosteric sites remains unclear. We have sought conformational coupling between receptor-ligand intermolecular interactions and intramolecular interaction networks in the human GnRH receptor by mutating remote residues that induce differential ligand binding affinity shifts for GnRH I and II. We have demonstrated that certain Ala mutations in the intracellular segments of transmembrane domains 3 (Met(132)), 5 (Met(227)), 6 (Phe(272) and Phe(276)), and 7 (Ile(322) and Tyr(323)) of the human GnRH receptor allosterically increased ligand binding affinity for GnRH II but had little effect on GnRH I binding affinity. We examined the role of the three amino acids that differ in these two ligands, and we found that Tyr(8) in GnRH II plays a dominant role for the increased affinity of the receptor mutants for GnRH II. We propose that creation of a high affinity binding site for GnRH II accompanies receptor conformational changes, i.e."induced fit" or "conformational selection," mainly determined by the intermolecular interactions between Tyr(8) and the receptor contact residues, which can be facilitated by disruption of particular sets of receptor-stabilizing intramolecular interactions. The findings suggest that GnRH I and II binding may selectively stabilize different receptor-active conformations and therefore different ligand-induced selective signaling described previously for these ligands.

Internalization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors (GnRHRs): does arrestin binding to the C-terminal tail target GnRHRs for dynamin-dependent internalization?

Activation of seven-transmembrane receptors is typically followed by desensitization and arrestin-dependent internalization via vesicles that are pinched off by a dynamin collar. Arrestins also scaffold Src, which mediates dynamin-dependent internalization of beta2-adrenergic receptors. Type I mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors (GnRHRs) do not rapidly desensitize or internalize (characteristics attributed to their unique lack of C-terminal tails) whereas non-mammalian GnRHRs (that have C-terminal tails) are rapidly internalized and desensitized. Moreover, internalization of Xenopus (X) GnRHRs is dynamin-dependent whereas that of human (h) GnRHRs is not, raising the possibility that binding of arrestin to the C-terminal tails of GnRHRs targets them to the dynamin-dependent internalization pathway. To test this we have compared wild-type GnRHRs with chimeric receptors (XGnRHR C-terminal tail added to the hGnRHR alone (h.XtGnRHR) or with exchange of the third intracellular loops (h.Xl.XtGnRHR)). We show that adding the XGnRHR C-terminal tail facilitates arrestin- and dynamin-dependent internalization as well as arrestin/green fluorescent protein translocation, but Src (or mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase kinase) inhibition does not slow internalization, and h.XtGnRHR internalization is slower than that of the hGnRHR. Moreover, arrestin expression increased XGnRHR internalization even when dynamin was inhibited and h.Xl.XtGnRHR underwent rapid arrestin-dependent internalization without signaling to G(q/11). Thus, although the C-terminal tail can direct GnRHRs for arrestin- and dynamin-dependent internalization, this effect is not dependent on Src activation and arrestin can also facilitate dynamin-independent internalization.

Iterative Approach to the Discovery of Novel Degarelix Analogues: Substitutions at Positions 3, 7, and 8. Part II

Degarelix (FE200486, Ac-d-2Nal(1)-d-4Cpa(2)-d-3Pal(3)-Ser(4)-4Aph(l-Hor)(5)-d-4Aph(Cbm)(6)-Leu(7)-ILys(8)-Pro(9)-d-Ala(10)-NH(2)) is a potent and very long acting antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after subcutaneous administration in mammals including humans. Analogues of degarelix were synthesized, characterized, and screened for the antagonism of GnRH-induced response in a reporter gene assay in HEK-293 cells expressing the human GnRH receptor. The duration of action was also determined in the castrated male rat assay to measure the extent (efficacy and duration of action) of inhibition of luteinizing hormone (LH) release. Structurally, this series of analogues has novel substitutions at positions 3, 7, and 8 and N(alpha)-methylation at positions 6, 7, and 8 in the structure of degarelix. These substitutions were designed to probe the spatial limitations of the receptor's cavity and to map the steric and ionic boundaries. Some functional groups were introduced that were hypothesized to influence the phamacokinetic properties of the analogues such as bioavailability, solubility, intra- or intermolecular hydrogen bond forming capacity, and ability to bind carrier proteins. Substitutions at positions 3 ([N(beta)-(2-pyridyl-methyl)d-Dap(3)]degarelix, IC(50) = 2.71 nM) (5), 7 ([Pra(7)]degarelix, IC(50) = 2.11 nM) (16), and 8 ([N(delta)-(IGly)Orn(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.38 nM) (20) and N-methylation ([N(alpha)-methyl-Leu(7)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.47 nM) (32) yielded analogues that were equipotent to degarelix (2) in vitro (IC(50) = 1.64 nM) but shorter acting in vivo. Out of the 33 novel analogues tested for the duration of action in this series, two analogues ([N(epsilon)-cyclohexyl-Lys(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.50 nM) (23) and ([N(beta)-(IbetaAla)Dap(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.98 nM) (26) had antagonist potencies and duration of action similar to that of azaline B {inhibited LH (>80%) release for >72 h after sc injection to castrated male rats at a standard dose of 50 mug/rat in 5% mannitol}. Under similar conditions analogues ([N(gamma)-(IGly)Dab(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.56 nM) (21) and ([IOrn(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.72 nM) (18) had a longer duration of action {inhibited LH (>96 h) release} than azaline B; however they were shorter acting than degarelix. Hydrophilicity of these analogues, a potential measure of their ability to be formulated for sustained release, was determined using RP-HPLC at neutral pH yielding analogues with shorter as well as longer retention times. No correlation was found between retention times and antagonist potency or duration of action.

Efficient Synthesis of Bicyclic Oxazolino‐ and Thiazolino[3,2‐c]pyrimidine‐5,7‐diones and Its Application to the Synthesis of GnRH Antagonists.

AbstractFor Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text.

Structure–activity relationships of 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triones as human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonists

SAR studies of 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triones as human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonists resulted in potent compounds. The best compound from the series had a binding affinity of 2 nM.

Antagonist and agonist binding models of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the most important classes of drug targets. Since the first high-resolution structure of a GPCR was determined by Palczewski and co-workers [K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C.A. Behnke, H. Motoshima, B.A. Fox, I. Le Trong, D.C. Teller, T. Okada, R.E. Stenkamp, M. Yamamoto, M. Miyano, Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G-protein-coupled receptor, Science 289 (2000) 739–745], development of in silico models of rhodopsin-like GPCRs could be rationally founded. In this work, we present a model of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor based on the rhodopsin structure. The transmembrane helices are modeled by homology, while the extra- and intra-cellular loops are modeled in such a way that experimentally determined interactions and microdomains (e.g., hydrophobic cores) are retained. We conclude that specifically tailored models, compared to more automatic approaches, have the benefit that known interactions are easily introduced early in the homology modeling. Furthermore, tailored models, although more tedious to construct, are better suited for drug lead finding and for compound optimization. To test the stability of the receptor, we performed a 1 ns molecular dynamics simulation. Moreover, we docked two agonists (native GnRH and Triptorelin, [ dTrp 6]-GnRH) and two antagonists (Cetrorelix, dNal 1- dCpa 2- dPal 3-Ser 4-Tyr 5- dCit 6-Leu 7-Arg 8-Pro 9- dAla 10), and the covalently constrained dicyclic decapeptide dicyclo(1,1′-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu 1(Gly 1′)- dCpa 2- dTrp 3-Asp 4- dbu 5- dNal 6-Leu 7-Arg 8-Pro 9- dpr 10-NH 2] into the putative receptor binding site. The docked ligand conformations result in ligand–receptor interactions that are generally in good agreement with site-directed mutagenesis and ligand-binding studies presented in the literature. Our results indicate that the binding conformation of the antagonists differs from that of the agonists. This difference can be linked to the activation or inhibition of the receptor.

Uracils as potent antagonists of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor without atropisomers

Uracil derivatives were designed and synthesized to avoid atropisomers observed in the 6-methyluracils as antagonists of the human GnRH receptor. Optimization at the 1- and 5-positions of the uracil resulted in potent compounds such as 24 (Ki=0.45nM).

High-Throughput Screening Using β-Lactamase Reporter-Gene Technology for Identification of Low-Molecular-Weight Antagonists of the Human Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Receptor

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) signal via G-proteins to intracellular second messengers. Assays that link transcription of a detectable reporter to promoters that are activated by such signaling cascades are highly sensitive and allow screening for compounds that either activate or inactivate a GPCR of interest. This study describes the development and performance of an antagonistic screen on the human gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R). Compounds (245,000) were tested in a high-throughput screen using a Chinese hamster ovary cell line stably expressing the human GnRH-R and the Ca2+ sensitive reporter nuclear factor activated in T-cells/ activator protein-1-beta-lactamase. In total, 4,160 active compounds were identified. Colored and toxic compounds, as well as dust and compound aggregates, have been depicted as artifacts. To deselect non-target hits, several follow-up assays, including luminescent and fluorescent Ca2+ mobilization assays and radioligand binding, were developed for the GnRH-R. These assays were validated using peptide and low-molecular-weight GnRH-R reference compounds before hits from screening were also profiled in these assays. For several reference compounds the use of different assay technologies resulted in a poor correlation of potency values. In conclusion, beta-lactamase as a primary high-throughput screening assay is a powerful complementation to other screening technologies. The beta-lactamase technology has several advantages, including lack of cell lysis and ratiometric read-out, which augments assay robustness. Based on technology comparison, it is not adequate to assume that the same hits would be found regardless of which assay technology is used.

In Vitro Coexpression and Pharmacological Rescue of Mutant Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors Causing Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism in Humans Expressing Compound Heterozygous Alleles

We analyzed the function of mutant GnRH receptor (GnRHR) pairs associated with compound heterozygous patients showing complete or partial forms of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. We did this to examine potential interactions between misfolded mutants that may influence net receptor function and response to pharmacological rescue. Nine pairs of GnRHR mutants and an unreported combination (L314X((stop))/R262Q) were studied. Coexpression of each pair of mutants in COS-7 cells resulted in an active predominant effect (Q106R/L266R, A171T/Q106R, T32I/C200Y, and R262Q/A129D mutant GnRHR pairs), an additive effect (R262Q/Q106R, N10K/Q106R, and R262Q/Y284C human GnRHR pairs), or a dominant-negative effect (L314X((stop))/Q106R, Q106R+S217R/R262Q, and L314X((stop))/R262Q GnRHRs). For all combinations, addition of the pharmacoperone IN3 increased both agonist binding and effector coupling. The IN3 response was unpredictable because responses could be either similar, higher, or lower, compared with that exhibited by the less affected mutant. The clinical phenotype in patients expressing complex heterozygous alleles appears to be dictated by both the contribution from each mutant and a dominant-negative effect similar to that reported for mutants and wild-type receptor. Depending on the genotype, partial or full restoration of receptor function in response to pharmacological chaperones may be achievable goals in patients bearing inactivating mutations in the GnRHR gene.

Synthesis and biological activity of GnRH antagonists modified at position 3 with 3‐(2‐methoxy‐5‐pyridyl)‐alanine*

Degarelix is a potent very long-acting GnRH antagonist after subcutaneous administration. In this paper, we describe the synthesis of two analogs of degarelix incorporating racemic 3-(2-methoxy-5-pyridyl)-alanine (2-OMe-5Pal, 5) at position 3. The two diastereomers were separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and the absolute stereochemistry at position 3 in the peptides was determined by enzymatic digestion with proteinase K. These analogs were tested in vitro for their ability to antagonize the GnRH receptor and in vivo for duration of action in a castrated male rat assay. Analog 7 with D2-OMe-5Pal was potent in vitro (IC50 = 5.22 nM); however, analog 8 with L2-OMe-5Pal at position 3 in degarelix lost potency as an antagonist of the human GnRH receptor (IC50 = 36.95 nM). Both the analogs were found to be short-acting in vivo.

3-[(2R)-Amino-2-phenylethyl]-1-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)-5-(2-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)- 6-methylpyrimidin-2,4-dione (NBI 42902) as a Potent and Orally Active Antagonist of the Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor. Design, Synthesis, and in Vitro and in Vivo Characterization

Further structure-activity relationship studies of a series of substituted uracils at the 1, 3, and 5 positions resulted in the discovery of several potent antagonists of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Uracils bearing a side chain derived from phenylglycinol at the 3-position were shown to be orally bioavailable in monkeys. 3-[(2R)-Amino-2-phenylethyl]-1-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)-5-(2-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)-6-methylpyrimidin-2,4-dione (R-13b, NBI 42902) displayed subnanomolar binding affinity (K(i) = 0.56 nM) and was a potent functional antagonist (IC(50) = 3.0 nM in Ca(2+) flux assay) at the human GnRH receptor. It also bound to the monkey GnRH receptor with high affinity (K(i) = 3.9 nM). In addition, R-13bhad good plasma exposure in cynomolgus monkeys after oral administration, with a C(max) of 737 ng/mL and an AUC of 2392 ng/mL.h at a 10 mg/kg dose. Moreover, oral administration of R-13b to castrated male cynomolgus monkeys resulted in a significant decrease in serum levels of luteinizing hormone. These results demonstrate that compounds from this series of uracils are potent GnRH antagonists with good oral bioavailability and efficacy in nonhuman primates.

Efficient synthesis of bicyclic oxazolino- and thiazolino[3,2- c]pyrimidine-5,7-diones and its application to the synthesis of GnRH antagonists

Treatment of various 2-methyl oxazolines or thiazolines with chlorocarbonyl isocyanate gives the corresponding bicyclic oxazolino- or thiazolino[3,2- c]pyrimidin-5,7-dione derivatives in very good yield. This reaction has been applied to the rapid syntheses of human gonadotropin-releasing hormone ( hGnRH) receptor antagonists for SAR study, resulting in 13e with binding affinity in the low nanomolar range (4.5 nM).

Atropisomeric property of 1‐(2,6‐difluorobenzyl)‐3‐[(2R)‐amino‐2‐phenethyl]‐5‐(2‐fluoro‐3‐methoxyphenyl)‐6‐methyluracil

1-(2,6-Difluorobenzyl)-3-[(2R)-amino-2-phenethyl]-5-(2-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)-6-methyluracil (6), a potent and orally active antagonist of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor, exists as a pair of atropisomers in solution, which was detected by NMR spectroscopy, and separable by HPLC. In addition to a (R)-configured benzylamine, there is a second stereogenic element due to the presence of a chiral axis between the substituted 5-phenyl group and the uracil core. The rate constant of the interconversion (k = 5.07 x 10(-5) s(-1)) of these two atropisomers was determined by proton NMR analysis of a diastereoisomer-enriched sample in aqueous solution at 25 degrees C, and the corresponding Gibbs free energy DeltaG(#) of rotation barrier (97.4 kJ mol(-1)) was calculated using the Eyring equation. The diastereoisomer half-life at physiological temperature (37 degrees C) in aqueous media was estimated to be about 46 min.

Novel gonadotropin‐releasing hormone antagonists with substitutions at position 5

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists with high potency and improved duration of action are needed for potential clinical applications. We synthesized four new antagonists (2-5) of GnRH homologues to Azaline B (1), with a common core sequence of [Aph(X)5, D-Aph(Cbm)6]Azaline B. In these analogs, (X) contains hydrophobic aromatic moieties (like homoveratoyl in 2, homovanillyl in 3, 2,5-dimethoxyphenylacetyl in 4, and 3,5-dimethoxyphenylacetyl in 5) designed to improve the duration of action over that of Azaline B. These analogs were tested in vitro for their ability to antagonize the GnRH receptor and in vivo for duration of action in a castrated male rat assay. Analogs 2, 4, and 5 were potent in vitro, but were found to be short acting in vivo. However, analog 3 [Aph(Hvn)5,D-Aph(Cbm)6]Azaline B is a potent human GnRH receptor antagonist in vitro (IC50 1.47 nM) and exhibits a longer duration of action than azaline B.

Synthesis and Structure—Activity Relationships of Uracil Derived Human GnRH Receptor Antagonists: (R)‐3‐[2‐(2‐Amino)phenethyl]‐1‐(2,6‐difluorobenzyl)‐6‐methyluracils Containing a Substituted Thiophene or Thiazole at C‐5.

AbstractFor Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text.