Human eRF1 Research Articles

NMR assignments of the C-terminal domain of human polypeptide release factor eRF1

We report NMR assignments of the protein backbone of the C-terminal domain (163 a.a.) of human class 1 translation termination factor eRF1. It was found that several protein loop residues exist in two slowly interconverting conformational states.

Role of the individual domains of translation termination factor eRF1 in GTP binding to eRF3

Eukaryotic translational termination is triggered by polypeptide release factors eRF1, eRF3, and one of the three stop codons at the ribosomal A-site. Isothermal titration calorimetry shows that (i) the separated MC, M, and C domains of human eRF1 bind to eRF3; (ii) GTP binding to eRF3 requires complex formation with either the MC or M + C domains; (iii) the M domain interacts with the N and C domains; (iv) the MC domain and Mg2+ induce GTPase activity of eRF3 in the ribosome. We suggest that GDP binding site of eRF3 acquires an ability to bind gamma-phosphate of GTP if altered by cooperative action of the M and C domains of eRF1. Thus, the stop-codon decoding is associated with the N domain of eRF1 while the GTPase activity of eRF3 is controlled by the MC domain of eRF1 demonstrating a substantial structural uncoupling of these two activities though functionally they are interrelated.

Different modes of stop codon restriction by the Stylonychia and Paramecium eRF1 translation termination factors.

In universal-code eukaryotes, a single-translation termination factor, eukaryote class-1 polypeptide release factor (eRF1), decodes the three stop codons: UAA, UAG, and UGA. In some ciliates, like Stylonychia and Paramecium, eRF1s exhibit UGA-only decoding specificity, whereas UAG and UAA are reassigned as sense codons. Because variant-code ciliates may have evolved from universal-code ancestor(s), structural features should exist in ciliate eRF1s that restrict their stop codon recognition. In omnipotent eRF1s, stop codon recognition is associated with the N-terminal domain of the protein. Using both in vitro and in vivo assays, we show here that chimeric molecules composed of the N-terminal domain of Stylonychia eRF1 fused to the core domain (MC domain) of human eRF1 retained specificity toward UGA; this unambiguously associates eRF1 stop codon specificity to the nature of its N-terminal domain. Functional analysis of eRF1 chimeras constructed by swapping ciliate N-terminal domain sequences with the matching ones from the human protein highlighted the crucial role of the tripeptide QFM in restricting Stylonychia eRF1 specificity toward UGA. Using the site-directed mutagenesis, we show that Paramecium eRF1 specificity toward UGA resides within the NIKS (amino acids 61-64) and YxCxxxF (amino acids 124-131) motifs. Thus, we establish that eRF1 from two different ciliates relies on different molecular mechanisms to achieve specificity toward the UGA stop codon. This finding suggests that eRF1 restriction of specificity to only UGA might have been an early event occurring in independent instances in ciliate evolutionary history, possibly facilitating the reassignment of UAG and UAA to sense codons.

Stop codon decoding at the termination step of translation

Stop codon decoding in the decoding center of the eukaryotic ribosome is mediated by class-1 polypeptide release factor eRF1 via its N domain. In order to understand how eRF1 decodes stop codons within the ribosome, we (partly in collaboration with other groups) employed several strategies including site-directed mutagenesis of the N domain, crosslinking of eRF1 to stop codons containing different kinds of photoactivatable groups at 1st, 2nd, 3d and 4th positions followed by identification of the cross-linked sites, molecular modeling of eRF1 3D structure within the ribosome. Most importantly, we constructed, expressed and purified numerous chimeric eRF1s composed of parts of the N domains from omnipotent human eRF1 and unipotent or bipotent eRF1s from organisms with variant genetic codes (ciliates) followed by in vitro functional analyses of these chimeric eRF1s. All the data, combined together, allowed us to identify for the first time the stop codon specificity determinants within the N domain of eRF1. A new “negative elements” concept has been proposed explaining how stop codon recognition was restricted in eRF1s of variant code organisms. The data show that stop codon recognition mechanisms in eukaryotes and prokaryotes are different and that in evolution omnipotent stop codon recognition emerged earlier than uni- and bipotent recognition.

Influence of individual domains of the translation termination factor eRF1 on induction of the GTPase activity of the translation termination factor eRF3

Translation termination in eukaryotes is governed by two proteins, belonging to the class-1 (eRF1) and class-2 (eRF3) polypeptide release factors. eRF3 catalyzes hydrolysis of GTP to GDP and inorganic phosphate in the ribosome in the absence of mRNA, tRNA, aminoacyl-tRNA and peptidyl-tRNA but needs the presence of eRF1. It's known that eRF1 and eRF3 interact with each other in vitro and in vivo via their C-terminal regions. eRF1 consists of three domains - N, M, and C. In this study we examined the influence of individual domains of the human eRF1 on induction of the human eRF3 GTPase activity in the ribosome in vitro. It was shown that none of the N-, M-, C- and NM-domains induces eRF3 GTPase activity in presence of the ribosomes. MC-domain does induce GTPase activity of eRF3 but four times less efficient than full-length eRF1, therefore, MC-domain (and very likely M-domain) binds to the ribosome in the presence of eRF3. Based on these data and taking into account the data available in literature, a conclusion was drawn that the N domain of eRF1 is not essential for eRF1-dependent induction of the eRF3 GTPase activity. A working hypothesis is formulated, postulating that GTPase activity eRF3 during the translation termination is associated with the intermolecular interactions of GTP/GDP, GTPase center of the large ribosomal subunit (60S), MC-domain of eRF1, C-terminal region and GTP-binding domains of eRF3, but without participation of the N-terminal region of eRF3.

NMR Assignments of the Middle Domain of Human Polypeptide Release Factor eRF1

NMR Assignments of the Middle Domain of Human Polypeptide Release Factor eRF1

Invariant amino acids essential for decoding function of polypeptide release factor eRF1.

In eukaryotic ribosome, the N domain of polypeptide release factor eRF1 is involved in decoding stop signals in mRNAs. However, structure of the decoding site remains obscure. Here, we specifically altered the stop codon recognition pattern of human eRF1 by point mutagenesis of the invariant Glu55 and Tyr125 residues in the N domain. The 3D structure of generated eRF1 mutants was not destabilized as demonstrated by calorimetric measurements and calculated free energy perturbations. In mutants, the UAG response was most profoundly and selectively affected. Surprisingly, Glu55Arg mutant completely retained its release activity. Substitution of the aromatic ring in position 125 reduced response toward all stop codons. This result demonstrates the critical importance of Tyr125 for maintenance of the intact structure of the eRF1 decoding site. The results also suggest that Tyr125 is implicated in recognition of the 3d stop codon position and probably forms an H-bond with Glu55. The data point to a pivotal role played by the YxCxxxF motif (positions 125–131) in purine discrimination of the stop codons. We speculate that eRF1 decoding site is formed by a 3D network of amino acids side chains.

The Glutamine Residue of the Conserved GGQ Motif in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Release Factor eRF1 Is Methylated by the Product of the YDR140w Gene

Polypeptide release factors from eubacteria and eukaryotes, although similar in function, belong to different protein families. They share one sequence motif, a GGQ tripeptide that is vital to release factor (RF) activity in both kingdoms. In bacteria, the Gln residue of the motif in RF1 and RF2 is modified to N(5)-methyl-Gln by the S-adenosyl l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase PrmC and the absence of Gln methylation decreases the release activity of Escherichia coli RF2 in vitro severalfold. We show here that the same modification is made to the GGQ motif of Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factor eRF1, the first time that N(5)-methyl-Gln has been found outside the bacterial kingdom. The product of the YDR140w gene is required for the methylation of eRF1 in vivo and for optimal yeast cell growth. YDR140w protein has significant homology to PrmC but lacks the N-terminal domain thought to be involved in the recognition of the bacterial release factors. Overproduced in S. cerevisiae, YDR140w can methylate eRF1 from yeast or man in vitro using S-adenosyl l-methionine as methyl donor provided that eRF3 and GTP are also present, suggesting that the natural substrate of the methyltransferase YDR140w is the ternary complex eRF1.eRF3.GTP.

Molecular Morphology of Eukaryotic Class-1 Translation Termination Factor eRF1 in Solution

The integral structural parameters and the shape of the molecule of human translation termination factor eRF1 were determined from the small-angle X-ray scattering in solution. The molecular shapes were found by bead modeling with nonlinear minimization of the root-mean-square deviation of the calculated from the experimental scattering curve. Comparisons of the small-angle scattering curves computed for atomic-resolution structures of eRF1 with the experimental data on scattering from solution testified that the crystal and the solution conformations are close. In the ribosome, the distance between the eRF1 motifs GGQ and NIKS must be shorter than in crystal or solution (75 versus 107-112 A). Therefore, like its bacterial counterpart RF2, the eukaryotic eRF1 must change its conformation as it binds to the ribosome. The conformational mobility of eukaryotic and prokaryotic class-1 release factors is another feature making them functionally akin to tRNA.

Stop Codons and UGG Promote Efficient Binding of the Polypeptide Release Factor eRF1 to the Ribosomal A Site

To investigate the codon dependence of human eRF1 binding to the mRNA–ribosome complex, we examined the formation of photocrosslinks between ribosomal components and mRNAs bearing a photoactivable 4-thiouridine probe in the first position of the codon located in the A site. Addition of eRF1 to the phased mRNA–ribosome complexes triggers a codon-dependent quenching of crosslink formation. The concentration of eRF1 triggering half quenching ranges from low for the three stop codons, to intermediate for s4UGG and high for other near-cognate triplets. A theoretical analysis of the photochemical processes occurring in a two-state bimolecular model raises a number of stringent conditions, fulfilled by the system studied here, and shows that in any case sound KD values can be extracted if the ratio mT/KD≪1 (mT is total concentration of mRNA added). Considering the KD values obtained for the stop, s4UGG and sense codons (≈0.06 μM, 0.45 μM and 2.3 μM, respectively) and our previous finding that only the stop and s4UGG codons are able to promote formation of an eRF1–mRNA crosslink, implying a role for the NIKS loop at the tip of the N domain, we propose a two-step model for eRF1 binding to the A site: a codon-independent bimolecular step is followed by an isomerisation step observed solely with stop and s4UGG codons. Full recognition of the stop codons by the N domain of eRF1 triggers a rearrangement of bound eRF1 from an open to a closed conformation, allowing the universally conserved GGQ loop at the tip of the M domain to come into close proximity of the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. UGG is expected to behave as a cryptic stop codon, which, owing to imperfect eRF1-codon recognition, does not allow full reorientation of the M domain of eRF1. As far as the physical steps of eRF1 binding to the ribosome are considered, they appear to closely mimic the behaviour of the tRNA/EF-Tu/GTP complex, but clearly eRF1 is endowed with a greater conformational flexibility than tRNA.

Stop codon selection in eukaryotic translation termination: comparison of the discriminating potential between human and ciliate eRF1s.

During eukaryotic translation termination, eRF1 responds to three stop codons. However, in ciliates with variant genetic codes, only one or two codons function as a stop signal. To localize the region of ciliate eRF1 implicated in stop codon discrimination, we have constructed ciliate-human hybrid eRF1s by swapping regions of human eRF1 for the equivalent region of ciliate Euplotes eRF1. We have examined the formation of a cross-link between recombinant eRF1s and mRNA analogs containing the photoactivable 4-thiouridine (s(4)U) at the first position of stop and control sense codons. With human eRF1, this cross-link can be detected only when either stop or UGG codons are located in the ribosomal A site. Here we show that the cross-link of the Euplotes-human hybrid eRF1 is restricted to mRNAs containing UAG and UAA codons, and that the entire N-terminal domain of Euplotes eRF1 is involved in discriminating against UGA and UGG. On the basis of these results, we discuss the steps of the selection process that determine the accuracy of stop codon recognition in eukaryotes.

The essential role of the invariant GGQ motif in the function and stability in vivo of bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2.

Release factors RF1 and RF2 are required in bacteria for the cleavage of peptidyl-tRNA. A single sequence motif, GGQ, is conserved in all eubacterial, archaebacterial and eukaryotic release factors and may mimic the CCA end of tRNA, although the position of the motif in the crystal structures of human eRF1 and Escherichia coli RF2 is strikingly different. Mutations have been introduced at each of the three conserved positions. Changing the Gln residue to Ala or Glu allowed the factors to retain about 22% of tetrapeptide release activity in vitro, but these mutants could not complement thermosensitive RF mutants in vivo. None of several mutants with altered Gly residues retained activity in vivo or in vitro. Many GGQ mutants were poorly expressed and are presumably unstable; many were also toxic to the cell. The toxic mutant factors or their degradation products may bind to ribosomes inhibiting the action of the normal factor. These data are consistent with a common role for the GGQ motif in bacterial and eukaryotic release factors, despite strong divergence in primary, secondary and tertiary structure, but are difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that the amide nitrogen of the Gln plays a vital role in peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis.

The invariant uridine of stop codons contacts the conserved NIKSR loop of human eRF1 in the ribosome.

To unravel the region of human eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) that is close to stop codons within the ribosome, we used mRNAs containing a single photoactivatable 4-thiouridine (s(4)U) residue in the first position of stop or control sense codons. Accurate phasing of these mRNAs onto the ribosome was achieved by the addition of tRNA(Asp). Under these conditions, eRF1 was shown to crosslink exclusively to mRNAs containing a stop or s(4)UGG codon. A procedure that yielded (32)P-labeled eRF1 deprived of the mRNA chain was developed; analysis of the labeled peptides generated after specific cleavage of both wild-type and mutant eRF1s maps the crosslink in the tripeptide KSR (positions 63-65 of human eRF1) and points to K63 located in the conserved NIKS loop as the main crosslinking site. These data directly show the interaction of the N-terminal (N) domain of eRF1 with stop codons within the 40S ribosomal subunit and provide strong support for the positioning of the eRF1 middle (M) domain on the 60S subunit. Thus, the N and M domains mimic the tRNA anticodon and acceptor arms, respectively.

Mouse GSPT2, but not GSPT1, can substitute for yeast eRF3 in vivo

The termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes involves at least two polypeptide release factors (eRFs), eRF1 and eRF3. In mammals two genes encoding eRF3 structural homologues were identified and named GSPT1 and GSPT2. In the present study, we demonstrate that mouse mGSPT2 but not mGSPT1 could functionally substitute the essential yeast gene SUP35. However, we show that the complementation property of mGSPT1 protein is modified when NH2-tagged by GST. Since mGSPT1 and mGSPT2 differ mainly in their N-terminal regions, we developed a series of N-terminal deleted constructs and tested them for complementation in yeast. We found that at least amino acids spanning 84-120 of mGSPT1 prevent the complementation of sup35 mutation. The fact that chimeras between mGSPT1, mGSPT2 and yeast Sup35 complement the disruption of the SUP35 gene indicates that the N-terminal region of mGSPT1 is not sufficient by itself to prevent complementation. Complementation of the mutant with a double disruption of SUP35 and SUP45 genes is obtained when mGSPT2 and human eRF1 are co-expressed but not by co-expression of mGSPT1 and human eRF1. Our results strongly suggest that the two proteins (mGSPT1 and mGSPT2) are different. We hypothesize that the full length mGSPT1 does not have the properties expected for eRF3.

Conversion of omnipotent translation termination factor eRF1 into ciliate-like UGA-only unipotent eRF1.

In eukaryotic ribosomes, termination of translation is triggered by class 1 polypeptide release factor, eRF1. In organisms with a universal code, eRF1 responds to three stop codons, whereas, in ciliates with variant codes, only one or two codon(s) remain(s) as stop signals. By mutagenesis of the Y-C-F minidomain of the N domain, we converted an omnipotent human eRF1 recognizing all three stop codons into a unipotent 'ciliate-like' UGA-only eRF1. The conserved Cys127 located in the Y-C-F minidomain plays a critical role in stop codon recognition. The UGA-only response has also been achieved by concomitant substitutions of four other amino acids located at the Y-C-F and NIKS minidomains of eRF1. We suggest that for eRF1 the stop codon decoding is of a non-linear (non-protein-anticodon) type and explores a combination of positive and negative determinants. We assume that stop codon recognition is profoundly different by eukaryotic and prokaryotic class 1 RFs.

Highly conserved NIKS tetrapeptide is functionally essential in eukaryotic translation termination factor eRF1.

Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors (RFs) play a key role in translation termination. Eukaryotic (eRF1) and archaeal class-1 RFs possess a highly conserved Asn-Ile-Lys-Ser (NIKS) tetrapeptide located at the N-terminal domain of human eRF1. In the three-dimensional structure, NIKS forms a loop between helices. The universal occurrence and exposed nature of this motif provoke the appearance of hypotheses postulating an essential role of this tetrapeptide in stop codon recognition and ribosome binding. To approach this problem experimentally, site-directed mutagenesis of the NIKS (positions 61-64) in human eRF1 and adjacent amino acids has been applied followed by determination of release activity and ribosome-binding capacity of mutants. Substitutions of Asn61 and Ile62 residues of the NIKS cause a decrease in the ability of eRF1 mutants to promote termination reaction in vitro, but to a different extent depending on the stop codon specificity, position, and nature of the substituting residues. This observation points to a possibility that Asn-Ile dipeptide modulates the specific recognition of the stop codons by eRF1. Some replacements at positions 60, 63, and 64 cause a negligible (if any) effect in contrast to what has been deduced from some current hypotheses predicting the structure of the termination codon recognition site in eRF1. Reduction in ribosome binding revealed for Ile62, Ser64, Arg65, and Arg68 mutants argues in favor of the essential role played by the right part of the NIKS loop in interaction with the ribosome, most probably with ribosomal RNA.

A new method to measure the functional activity of class-1 translation termination factor eRF1

Termination of protein synthesis (hydrolysis of the last peptidyl-tRNA on the ribosome) takes place when the ribosomal A site is occupied simultaneously by one of the three stop codons and by a class-1 translation termination factor. The existing procedures to measure the functional activity of this factor both in vitro and in vivo have serious drawbacks, the main of which are artificial conditions for in vitro assays, far from those in the cell, and indirect evaluation of activity in in vivo systems. A simple reliable and sensitive system to measure the functional activity of class-1 translation termination factors could considerably expedite the study of the terminal steps of protein synthesis, at present remaining poorly known, especially in eukaryotes. We suggest a novel system to test the functional activity in vitro using native functionally active mRNA, rather than tri-, tetra-, or oligonucleotides as before. This mRNA is specially designed to contain one of the three terminating (stop) codons within the coding nucleotide sequence. Plasmids have been generated that carry the genes of suppressor tRNAs each of which is specific toward one of the three stop codons. They were shown to support normal synthesis of a reporter protein, luciferase, by reading through the stop codon within the coding mRNA sequence. We have demonstrated that human class-1 translation termination factor eRF1 is able to compete with suppressor tRNA for a stop codon and to completely prevent its suppressive effect at a sufficient concentration. Forms of eRF1 with point mutations in functionally essential regions have lower competitive ability, demonstrating the sensitivity of the method to the eRF1 structure. The enzymatic reaction catalyzed by the full-size reporter protein is accompanied by emission of light quanta. Therefore, competition between suppressor tRNA and eRF1 can be measured using a luminometer, and this allows precise kinetic measurements in a continuous automatic mode.

Class-1 translation termination factors: invariant GGQ minidomain is essential for release activity and ribosome binding but not for stop codon recognition.

Previously, we have shown that all class-1 polypeptide release factors (RFs) share a common glycine-glycine-glutamine (GGQ) motif, which is critical for RF activity. Here, we subjected to site-directed mutagenesis two invariant amino acids, Gln185 and Arg189, situated in the GGQ minidomain of human eRF1, followed by determination of RF activity and the ribosome binding capacity for mutant eRF1. We show that replacement of Gln185 with polar amino acid residues causes partial inactivation of RF activity; Gln185Ile, Arg189Ala and Arg189Gln mutants are completely inactive; all mutants that retain partial RF activity respond similarly to three stop codons. We suggest that loss of RF activity for Gln185 and Arg189 mutants is caused by distortion of the conformation of the GGQ minidomain but not by damage of the stop codon recognition site of eRF1. Our data are inconsistent with the model postulating direct involvement of Gln185 side chain in orientation of water molecule toward peptidyl-tRNA ester bond at the ribosomal peptidyl transferase centre. Most of the Gln185 mutants exhibit reduced ability to bind to the ribosome, probably, to rRNA and/or (peptidyl)-tRNA(s). The data suggest that the GGQ motif is implicated both in promoting peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis and binding to the ribosome.

Molecular mechanism of stop codon recognition by eRF1: a wobble hypothesis for peptide anticodons

We propose that the amino acid residues 57/58 and 60/61 of eukaryotic release factors (eRF1s) (counted from the N-terminal Met of human eRF1) are responsible for stop codon recognition in protein synthesis. The proposal is based on amino acid exchanges in these positions in the eRF1s of two ciliates that reassigned one or two stop codons to sense codons in evolution and on the crystal structure of human eRF1. The proposed mechanism of stop codon recognition assumes that the amino acid residues 57/58 interact with the second and the residues 60/61 with the third position of a stop codon. The fact that conventional eRF1s recognize all three stop codons but not the codon for tryptophan is attributed to the flexibility of the helix containing these residues. We suggest that the helix is able to assume a partly relaxed or tight conformation depending on the stop codon recognized. The restricted codon recognition observed in organisms with unconventional eRF1s is attributed mainly to the loss of flexibility of the helix due to exchanged amino acids.

The ciliate Euplotes octocarinatus expresses two polypeptide release factors of the type eRF1

Amplification of macronuclear DNA of the ciliate Euplotes octocarinatus revealed the presence of two genes encoding putative polypeptide release factors (RFs) of the codon specific class-I type. They are named eRF1a and eRF1b, respectively. cDNA amplification revealed that both eRF1 genes are expressed. Determination of their copy numbers showed that they are similarly amplified to a level of about 27,000. The deduced protein sequences of the two genes are 57 and 58% identical with human eRF1 and 79% identical to each other. The gene encoding eRF1b possesses three in-frame UGA codons. This codon is known to encode cysteine in Euplotes; only UAA and UAG are used as stop codons in this organism. The primary structure of the two release factors is analyzed and compared with the primary structure of other eukaryotic release factors including the one of Tetrahymena thermophila which uses only UGA as a stop codon. eRF1a and eRF1b of Euplotes as well as eRF1 of Tetrahymena differ from human eRF1 and other class-I release factors of eukaryotes in a domain recently proposed to be responsible for codon recognition. Based on the changes which we observe in this region and the differential use of the stop codons in these two ciliates we predict the amino acids participating in stop codon recognition in eRF1 release factors.