In addition to self-awareness, self-determination, pre-behavior, and other phenomena in social-psychological field, modern psychological studies pay considerable attention to phenomenon of interpersonal confidence; authors of these studies consider confidence to be one of foundations for a social subject's categorization of social space and for interactional environment. In particular, the discrepancy between character of organization of subject-spatial environment and man's nature primordially affects different structures of psyche in a destructive manner and subsequently distorts and wrecks an individual's personality (Zinchenko & Perelygina, 2013, p. 104). Confidence is described in context of theme-oriented and practical activities of individuals interacting in formats for social and economic behavior. It is conditioned by a set of previous behavior patterns embracing interaction with other social subjects, organizations, and social institutions; these patterns provide a basis for prognostic understanding of other subjects' actions and their probable consequences. Behavioral events as a component of social interaction are determined not only by gaining insight into another person but also by sacral status of regulation of organized interaction.The process of personalization associated with development of humanistic and moral foundations of life has made it possible to draw parallels between a number of dichotomies: trust expectations-mistrust expectations, condition of security-condition of insecurity. These parallels were methodically addressed by Zinchenko (2011b, p. 6): formation of life-purpose orientations and systematization of information about world in a definite way that affects self-awareness of society and dominating values in it depend on particular constructions of subjective world and on perception of world through lens of security/insecurity.In a book about self theories, Dweck (2002) focuses on prognostic potential of trust in social interaction: When we observe intricate shifts or situations fraught with failure we find out that confidence loses its potential of being predictable (p. 52).In course of professional interaction another context emerges in which level of expectation and prediction of behavioral experience is connected with criteria for personal values. So, confidence in a firefighter when flames are rushing near can be interpreted as obligatory trust in a professional who is literally responsible for human lives. The same obligatory confidence in political institutions, banking and financial organizations, leaders, and others can (and has to!) be inspired. Institutions, governmental structures, churches, division into classes exist only in a flow of links and matches thatinvolve them in mutual relations. Everything is dependence, a link, a contact, a metamorphosis... It is no use looking here for essence of collective and material phenomena without their interrelationships (Moscovici, 1998, p. 462).The confidence factor is a strong component in psychological interaction. In interpersonal relationships role of an individual's trust in a partner's honesty and trustworthiness is great; sincerity and human decency in a social group are important factors for security of intragroup interaction. At level of a state and its institutions, relations are based on trustworthiness or its absence, and here evaluation of reputations, relationships, and conscientiousness of officials can result in macro-effects. Garfinkel (2009) emphasizes that assessment of individuals adds to disorganization of social interaction: We are able to remember how greatly people can be at risk, those people whose appearance disturbs characteristic arrangement of everyday life; it is of no importance whether they do it with experimental aims or, like a psychopath, demonstrate it as a customary behavior pattern. …