Hans Ulrich Vogel and Gunter Dux, editors, Introduction and Overview by Mark Elvin, Concepts of Nature: A Chinese-European Cross-Cultural Perspective. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010, 566pp. US $241 hardcover (ISBN 978 90 04 18526 5) The ongoing debates over the great between Europe and--the rest of the world continue to generate scholarly light as well as considerable polemical heat. Some scholars appear to be alarmed by what they perceive to be the dilution or even the destruction of some allegedly pure European culture by multicultural barbarians who are well within the gates. Others seek to exorcise the allegedly pernicious effects of some homogenous European or Western culture on their allegedly pristine and hermetically sealed existence. Overwrought accusations of Orientalism, Occidentalism, Eurocentrism, and Nativism continue to be traded. Despite the proverbial exceptions that alert us to the rules, many proponents on each side of the divide have couched their arguments in a culturalist mode in which culture is assumed to be relatively unhinged from social structure. In stark contrast to the prevailing intellectual mood, the fifteen contributors to Concepts of Nature enter this debate with a calm demeanour that, in addition to enhancing our understanding of the important issue of patterns of culture and cognition, promises to considerably cool the temperatures raised by unrestrained polemics. Deploying conceptions of nature and science as the criterion, the contributors to this volume seek to analyze the varying degrees of convergence and divergence between cultures in imperial China and ancient Greece in particular and Europe until 1700 in general. The overall conceptual framework that broadly informs all the papers is sociologist Gunter Dux's Historical-Genetic Theory of Culture which deploys and develops Jean Piaget's argument that all cultures share a broadly similar pattern of development in the childhood of individuals up until a latency period during and after which, cultural variations or divergences emerge. The contributors to the volume also implicitly adopt the sociology of knowledge framework deployed by Joseph M. Bryant in his Moral Codes and Social Structure in Ancient Greece by explicitly exploring the complex interconnections between patterns of intellectual culture, knowledge, and social structure. As the renowned China specialist Mark Elvin points out in his lucid and engaging Overview, despite the differing emphases, the general intellectual goal of all the contributors to this volume is to pursue the question of whether it is possible to identify some general underlying trends in the development of human cognitive capacities beneath the seemingly infinite global cultural variations. Not unexpectedly, the findings of this important yet complex quest are unlikely to satisfy those who prefer to live in ideologically sealed either Orientalist or Occidentalist tents. As Mark Elvin points out (p.2), those searching for an overall, definitive resolution to the questions will be disappointed mostly because the project itself is as yet not quite developed to satisfy the demand or even expectations of complete answers. However, this in itself does not mean that such questions should not be pursued with the help of existing research and empirical material with the aim of provoking further research as well as the identification of the strengths, possible problems, perils, and pitfalls of comparative historical sociology. According to Elvin, one of these pitfalls is the frequent comparison of the intellectual culture of China in the imperial age with modern rather than Europe in late antiquity or the medieval era. For example, predictive and interpretative astrology based on the assumption of a complex web of links between events in the heavens above and the earth below was widely accepted in late Western antiquity through the eleventh century. As Elvin points out, it disappeared or went underground only to be revived during the Renaissance. …