IntroductionThe development of contemporary society, the mass media, and new technologies improves living standards on the one hand and, on the other, enhances the risk of large-scale catastrophes, accidents, and natural disasters (Yanitsky, 2004). From year to year the number of people who survive natural disasters and human-caused accidents and catastrophes is growing, as is the number of professionals involved in disaster-relief operations, such as rescuers, medical professionals, and psychologists. The 1990s saw the intensive development of new work for psychologists: rendering psychological aid to people affected by emergencies. During that time, because of a shift in the political system and the democratization of society, these issues gained a public dimension.The Center for Emergency Psychological Aid of EMERCOM of Russia became one of the first subdivisions within the law-enforcement (security) agencies whose task was to provide psychological aid to the injured (Vorobjev, 2001). Subsequently, it sparked the promotion of a unique work stream within the psychological service of law-enforcement agencies consisting of psychological follow-up in rescue and emergency-response operations; this work involved the implementation of a set of measures aimed at stabilizing the sociopsychological environment in the emergency area, providing emergency psychological aid to the injured, and preventing negative sociopsychological implications for the sufferers and the professionals from EMERCOM of Russia (Shoygu, 2012a).As early as the First World War the necessity for developing special forms of emergency short-term assistance was articulated. At that time the primary objective of psychiatrists operating in the front-line hospitals was the recovery and reactivation of the officers and men (Fedunina, 2006).Objectives and scope of emergency psychological aidAt a later time, when extreme conditions no longer applied to normal life and when emergency-related experiences ceased to be an unavoidable component of human development, people who were affected by extreme factors without being specifically trained professionals were identified as the injured (sufferers); in many cases they were in need of medical and psychological aid (Dmitrieva, 2003). By systematizing and analyzing the experiences of psychologists working in extreme circumstances a classification of victims was devised (Shoygu, 2007):* directly affected people, isolated in emergency beds* people affected in a material or physical sense as well as people who lost family members and relatives or lacked information about them* witnesses: people residing in close vicinity to a place of tragedy* speculators* participants in disaster-relief operations.Through the use of continual and numerous observations, the psychogenic responses and disorders arising in extreme circumstances can be split into two groups: those with and those without psychotic symptoms (Alexandrovsky, Lobastov, & Spivak, 1991). According to the observations of professional psychiatrists, psychotic symptoms are rare (Reshetnikov, Baranov, Mukhin, & Chermyanin, 1989). Longitudinal studies of the delayed psychogenic implications of catastrophic events led to the conclusion that a maximum degree of immediate aid is necessary (Shoygu, 2012a).Coincidently, according to the estimations of professionals, only dining the 20th century, did such diverse events as earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, tsunami, tornados, fires, avalanches, mudflows, and epidemics deprive over tens of millions of people of life (Vorobyev, 2000). This situation led to the emergence of an independent area in psychological practice -- emergency psychological aid -- the focus of which is a human being who finds himself/herself in extraordinary, extreme circumstances. This practice can be defined as short-term aid to human beings following a severe, negative, stressful impact (distress). …