Abstract
The evolving complexities of railroad systems also increase their vulnerability to failure from human error. This study compared the outcomes of two workflows that incorporated 11 different machine learning techniques to identify characteristics of railroad operations that are generally associated with human-caused accidents. The first workflow engineered features from the fixed attribute fields of a large railroad accident database and the second applied natural language processing to extract features from the unstructured accident narratives. Both workflows applied a Shapely game-theoretic model to rank the importance of features based on their marginal contribution towards predicting accident cause. Among several interesting findings, some of the most unexpected were that human-caused accidents are generally not associated with high train speeds nor derailment type accidents, and that shoving cars is riskier than pulling cars. Those, and other findings, from this study can inform management decisions, planning, and policies to minimize the risk of human-caused accidents.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
