undisputable. However, a combination of these two aspects in teaching and learning human anatomy seems to be unexplored. The Medical Council of India does not mandate the use of AV in the dissection hall (DH) and no study was available in current literature on the effectiveness of AV aids in the DH. Therefore, the current study was undertaken. What was tried? Audiovisual aids were introduced in our department to assist students in cadaveric dissection via live streaming and projection. It comprised of two high-definition Sony! video cameras, wireless microphones with audio-amplifiers and speakers. The video switcher was connected to ten 34-inch LCD panels mounted adjacent to dissection tables. Each dissection session of 2 hours was divided into a pre-dissection workshop of 15 minutes (for stepwise demonstration of dissection in a pre-dissected cadaver), a dissection session of 1.5 hours and a debriefing session of 15 minutes (for discussing the region dissected in nutshell). The effectiveness of AV aids was assessed by two methods in 127 medical undergraduates; first by questionnaire and second by comparing their performance in term-end examinations with that of a previous group, who were taught without using AV aids. Written consent was obtained from students. What lessons were learned? Responding to the questionnaire, 125 (98%) students said that the AV system in the DH facilitated the overall understanding of human anatomy, 119 (93.7%) felt that both the pre-dissection workshops and the post-dissection debriefing are useful and 99 (78%) wanted it to be used in every DH session. Common drawbacks were difficulty in orientation to cadavers (63/49.60%) and difficulty in comprehension (20/15.74%). Although 126 (99.2%) students said image and sound qualities were good, 66 (55.9%) felt that camera and microphone handling by instructors requires more expertise. Feedback from students was used to improve the use of the system. Students performed better in both theory (mean scores: 46.82 ! 9.41% and 51.03 ! 8.79%) and practical examinations (mean scores: 49.14 ! 8.82% and 51.91 ! 8.35%) when AV aids were used. Student’s t-test revealed that the difference in performance was statistically significant at p < 0.05. Hence, DH teaching of human anatomy can be rendered more effective by use of AV aids; especially in the current scenario of teacher to student ratios in India and for the time that is available to medical undergraduates for mastering human anatomy. REFERENCE