Recently, rainfall runoff models have been introduced for planning a storm sewer network in an urban areas because they can calculate the flood hydrograph as well as peak flow. This would solve the flood problem for the entire watershed. While a rainfall hyetograph is an essential input to a rainfall-runoff model, there is no proper guideline for an urban area on how to obtain a rainfall hyetograph from a temporal distribution of probable rainfall. The purpose of this study is to suggest an appropriate method for temporal distribution of probable rainfall for a storm sewer network. Thus, Huffâs quartile method, which is widely used in practice, and the alternating block method (ABM), which is known to be reasonable for planning medium- or small-scale drainage facilities, were compared. The two estimation results were used for the comparison: the probable rainfall amounts by duration; the peak flows from arbitrary watersheds. The results showed that the ABM was more appropriate than the Huff method from three perspectives: reproducibility of actual rainfall phenomena, accuracy of peak flow estimates for small drainage areas in urban regions, and consideration of continuity for the storm sewer network. These results may contribute to enhance planning methods for a storm sewer network in urban areas. Keywords: Temporal Distribution, Rainfall, Storm Sewer Network, ABM, Huff