HPV-positive Oropharyngeal Cancer Research Articles

O5.2 Nodal involvement determines the initial quantity of circulating free HPV16 DNA in patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

O5.2 Nodal involvement determines the initial quantity of circulating free HPV16 DNA in patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

P25 The role of ultrasound elastography for clinical neck staging in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

P25 The role of ultrasound elastography for clinical neck staging in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

O3.1 Differences between HPV positive and HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer detected by Non-Gaussian IVIM

O3.1 Differences between HPV positive and HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer detected by Non-Gaussian IVIM

Radiation Dose and Volume De-Escalation for High-Risk HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal cancers (HPV+OPC) have a favorable prognosis with standard of care treatment paradigms. Recently published and ongoing clinical trials are investigating therapy de-escalation for patients with HPV+OPC with low-risk features with promising results, but largely exclude high risk (HR) patients. This is a secondary pooled analysis reporting outcomes of patients with HR HPV+OPC treated on consecutive prospective response-adaptive de-escalation trials. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Patients meeting HR criteria treated on the prospective phase II trials (NCT02258659, NCT03107182) as well as on a prospective cohort registry were included for analysis. HR criteria were defined by the NRG-HN005 exclusion criteria (T4, N2c-N3 (AJCC 7th ed.), and/or > 10 pack year smoking history). Patients were treated with induction chemo- or chemoimmunotherapy followed by RECIST 1.1 response adapted volume and dose de-escalated definitive chemoradiation. Patients with ≥ 50% response to induction therapy were treated either to 45 Gy in 1.5 Gy BID fractions with 3 cycles of TFHX in a week on week off fashion or to 50 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions delivered over 5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin. Those with < 50% response received standard dose chemoradiotherapy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for progression free survival (PFS), locoregional PFS (LRPFS), and overall survival (OS). Log rank analysis was used to investigate association between the number of NRG risk factors (RF) (1 vs > 1 RF) and LRPFS. <h3>Results</h3> 80 patients met HR criteria and were evaluable (15 registry patients). Median follow up was 38.5 (IQR 27.25-61.25) months. 60% smoked > 10 pack years. 25% of patients had T4 and 45% had N2c-N3 disease. 72.5%, 25%, and 2.5% had 1, 2, and 3 NRG RF, respectively. 56 of 80 (70%) patients were de-escalated. 3-year PFS, OS, and LRPFS was 92.9%, 93.5%, and 94.7%, respectively. Locoregional failure (LRF) was 1.7% in patients with 1 NRG RF, and 13.6% LRF in patients with 2 or 3 NRG RF (p=0.0265). 3-year LRPFS was 100% for patients with N0-N2b disease and 88.6% for patients with N2c-N3 disease; all 4 locoregional failures were in-field and in patients with N2c-N3 disease who were de-escalated. Only 1 patient had an isolated distant failure. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This prospective experience demonstrates feasible dose and volume de-escalation of HPV+OPC patients with NRG HR factors. The results for the overall cohort compare favorably to prior published results. Importantly, the failure rate in de-escalated patients is in line with acceptability criteria on prior phase II de-escalation studies for low-risk patients. No patients experienced regional out-of-field failures and distant failure rates were low in a traditionally HR population. Our pooled results call for renewed cooperative group focus on trial design for radiation dose de-escalation for HPV+ patients with higher-risk disease features.

P30 Prospects and challenges of HPV16 detection in liquid biopsy in patients who have completed treatment due to HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

P30 Prospects and challenges of HPV16 detection in liquid biopsy in patients who have completed treatment due to HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

Consensuses, controversies, and future directions in treatment deintensification for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

The most common cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the United States is oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and its incidence has been rising since the turn of the century. Because of substantial long-term morbidities with chemoradiation and the favorable prognosis of HPV-positive OPC, identifying the optimal deintensification strategy for this group has been a keystone of academic head-and-neck surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for over the past decade. However, the first generation of randomized chemotherapy deintensification trials failed to change the standard of care, triggering concern over the feasibility of de-escalation. National database studies estimate that up to one third of patients receive nonstandard de-escalated treatments, which have subspecialty-specific nuances. A synthesis of the multidisciplinary deintensification data and current treatment standards is important for the oncology community to reinforce best practices and ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this review, the authors present a summary and comparison of prospective HPV-positive OPC de-escalation trials. Chemotherapy attenuation compromises outcomes without reducing toxicity. Limited data comparing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with radiation raise concern over toxicity and outcomes with TORS. There are promising data to support de-escalating adjuvant therapy after TORS, but consensus on treatment indications is needed. Encouraging radiation deintensification strategies have been reported (upfront dose reduction and induction chemotherapy-based patient selection), but level I evidence is years away. Ultimately, stage and HPV status may be insufficient to guide de-escalation. The future of deintensification may lie in incorporating intratreatment response assessments to harness the powers of personalized medicine and integrate real-time surveillance.

Association of Pretreatment Circulating Tumor Tissue–Modified Viral HPV DNA With Clinicopathologic Factors in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

Circulating tumor tissue-modified viral (TTMV) human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA is a dynamic, clinically relevant biomarker for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Reasons for its wide pretreatment interpatient variability are not well understood. To characterize clinicopathologic factors associated with TTMV HPV DNA. This cross-sectional study included patients evaluated for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, between December 2019 and January 2022 and who were undergoing curative-intent treatment. Clinicopathologic characteristics including demographic variables, tumor and nodal staging, HPV genotype, and imaging findings. Pretreatment circulating TTMV HPV DNA from 5 genotypes (16, 18, 31, 33, and 35) assessed using a commercially available digital droplet polymerase chain reaction-based assay, considered as either detectable/undetectable or a continuous score (fragments/mL). Among 110 included patients, 96 were men (87%) and 104 were White (95%), with a mean (SD) age of 62.2 (9.4) years. Circulating TTMV HPV DNA was detected in 98 patients (89%), with a median (IQR) score of 315 (47-2686) fragments/mL (range, 0-60 061 fragments/mL). Most detectable TTMV HPV DNA was genotype 16 (n = 86 [88%]), while 12 patients (12%) harbored other genotypes. Circulating TTMV HPV DNA detection was most strongly associated with clinical N stage. Although few patients had clinical stage N0 disease, only 4 of these 11 patients (36%) had detectable DNA compared with 94 of 99 patients (95%) with clinical stage N1 to N3 disease (proportion difference, 59%; 95% CI, 30%-87%). Among patients with undetectable TTMV HPV DNA, more than half (7 of 12 [58%]) had clinical stage N0 disease. The TTMV HPV DNA prevalence and score increased with progressively higher clinical nodal stage, diameter of largest lymph node, and higher nodal maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In multivariable analysis, clinical nodal stage and nodal maximum standardized uptake value were each strongly associated with TTMV HPV DNA score. Among 27 surgically treated patients, more patients with than without lymphovascular invasion had detectable TTMV HPV DNA (12 of 12 [100%] vs 9 of 15 [60%]). In this cross-sectional study, circulating TTMV HPV DNA was statistically significantly associated with nodal disease at HPV-positive OPSCC diagnosis. The few patients with undetectable levels had predominantly clinical stage N0 disease, suggesting assay sensitivity for diagnostic purposes may be lower among patients without cervical lymphadenopathy. Mechanisms underlying this association, and the use of this biomarker for surveillance of patients with undetectable baseline values, warrant further investigation.

Intra-Treatment Tumor Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, a Quantitative Imaging Metric, is Associated with Neck Nodal Recurrence in De-Escalated Treatment of HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC)

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> De-escalation strategies for the treatment of HPV-associated OPC show promise for effective, less toxic treatment. However, identifying accurate markers of more aggressive subsets of HPV OPC remains challenging. The 30 Reduction in Radiation for OPC (ROC) trial prospectively used intra-treatment ¹⁸F-FMISO imaging to selectively de-escalate patients to 30Gy chemoradiotherapy, however, a subset of patients still developed nodal recurrence. We hypothesized that diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI-derived quantitative imaging metrics, such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a surrogate marker of tumor cellularity based on water diffusion patterns, might help identify patients at high risk of recurrence and enable broader use of de-escalation strategies<b>.</b> <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> The 30 ROC trial enrolled patients with p16-positive OPC, cT0-2, N1-2c (AJCC 7^th ed). All patients had pre-treatment ¹⁸F-FMISO (fluoromisonidazole) PET scan and those with baseline nodal hypoxia underwent a 2^nd intra-treatment scan. All patients underwent primary site surgery where negative margin was not required. All patients had gross neck nodal disease. Those with intra-treatment resolution of nodal hypoxia or without initial hypoxia were de-escalated to 30Gy (non-hypoxic group) with 2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy, while those with persistent radiographic hypoxia (hypoxic group) were treated to 70Gy. Standard T1, T2 weighted, and multiple b-value DW-MRI data were acquired pre-treatment and weekly during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Two radiation oncologists delineated nodal tumor regions of interest (ROIs) in a blinded fashion with ITK-SNAP on DW images (b= 0 s/mm²). Multiple b-value DW data were fitted to a monoexponential model to calculate ADC (mm²/s). The data analysis was performed on ROIs and voxel-wise using the in-house developed tool MRI-QAMPER. Standard statistical analysis was performed using MRI and clinical response data based on RECISTv1.1 provided by a radiologist. <h3>Results</h3> 158 patients were enrolled, of whom 95 had pre-treatment DW-MRI data available with tumor ROI with ADC values. Based on overall ¹⁸F-FMISO imaging, 12.6% (12/95) exhibited persistent hypoxia and 87.4% (83/95) had resolved/no hypoxia. All patients with nodal recurrences were in the de-escalated non-hypoxic group (8/83). Pre-treatment ADC was not different between overall hypoxic and non-hypoxic groups. Among de-escalated patients, those who developed nodal recurrence exhibited significantly different intra-treatment ADC at week 3 (before completing 30Gy) relative to those who did not recur (P<0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The quantitative imaging metric, ADC, reflects both the restricted and hindered Brownian motion of water molecules in tumor tissue. Thus, ADC may be a useful intra-treatment marker to identify patients at risk for nodal recurrence to benefit from the incorporation of an upfront planned neck dissection after 30Gy as part of the de-escalation strategy.

Dental health in patients with and without HPV-positive oropharyngeal and tongue cancer.

BackgroundHuman papilloma virus is associated with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Our aim was to examine oral health in patients with oropharyngeal (OPSCC) and oral tongue cancer (OTSCC), expecting better oral health among OPSCC patients.Material and methodsFifty-five OPSCC patients with known HPV status and 59 OTSCC patients were randomly selected from a list of consecutive patients of the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Oral health was assessed from panoramic jaw radiographs. Total Dental Index (TDI) summarizing the dental health status was calculated and Finnish population study data were used for comparison. Descriptive statistics were used for analyses.ResultsPatients with HPV-positive OPSCC had higher periapical lesion index compared with HPV-negative OPSCC patients or with OTSCC patients. Residual roots were more common among OPSCC patients compared with OTSCC patients, because of their higher occurrence among HPV-negative OPSCC patients compared with OTSCC patients. Similarly, modified TDI score was significantly higher among OPSCC patients than among OTSCC patients, because of higher TDI score among HPV-negative OPSCC patients compared with OTSCC patients. OPSCC patients more often used a removable prosthesis than OTSCC patients. Dental health of the cancer patients was poorer when compared with the population data.ConclusionsOur study hypothesis was only partly confirmed. Periapical lesions were more prevalent among HPV-positive OPSCC patients, compared with the other groups. The number of residual roots was higher among HPV-negative subgroup. Thus, OPSCC patients had worse oral health parameters than OTSCC patients.

Folate functionalized gold-coated magnetic nanoparticles effect in combined electroporation and radiation treatment of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer.

The rate of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer incidence is increasing, especially in the young population. While these patients show good responses to radiotherapy. The major complication of radiotherapy is normal tissue involvement. Thus, finding an effective treatment method is essential. Multimodal therapy with the lowest side effect could be an effective treatment method. Theranostic gold magnetic core-shell nanostructure was developed as aplatform for multimodal therapy of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. The folate functionalized gold-magnetic core-shell nanostructure has been synthesized in a stepwise approach and characterized with various techniques including TEM, UV-Vis, and FTIR spectroscopy. KB was selected as a host for HPV and folate receptor-positive cancer. HGF as normal cell lines was selected. Both cell lines have been treated with nanoparticles, electric field and radiotherapy, either separately or in combination. Cell viability and apoptosis rate were determined by MTT and flow cytometry assay. In addition, cellular uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by ICP-OES analysis. The average size of folate functionalized gold-magnetic core-shell nanostructure was 13.8 ± 6.4nm. A characteristic plasmonic peak of gold nanoshells was observed in the UV-Vis spectrum. The functionalization of synthesized nanostructure was confirmed with FTIR spectroscopy. None of the treatments alone can cause a significant death in cancerous cells. Combination treatments can increase cancer cell mortality and increase the proportion of apoptotic cells in them. Furthermore, it has been observed that the electric field enhanced the cellular uptake of nanoparticles just in cancerous cells. Based on our findings, we conclude that the combination of folate functionalized nanoparticles and electroporation opens a new way to improve radiation therapy efficacy of HPV-positive cancers.

Incidence and Characteristics of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancers by p16 Expression

Background: Head-and-neck cancers are one of the most common cancers in the Indian subcontinent. The rising incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV), especially in oropharyngeal cancers is likely to increase the burden by many folds. Hence, we decided to study the incidence of HPV in oropharyngeal carcinoma and its characteristics. Materials and Methods: Patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx registered in our hospital between September 2018 and July 2020 were included in the study after obtaining informed consent. A total of 60 patients were included in the study. The evaluation of HPV status was done by immunohistochemistry for p16 expression. Results: The median age of presentation was 60 years (range: 38–85 years). Fifty-four patients were male and six patients were female. The incidence of HPV in oropharyngeal carcinoma was 21.7% (n = 13). There was no difference seen when we compare HPV-positive patients with HPV-negative patients as well as with the entire study population for the demographic characteristics such as age (P = 0.569), gender (P = 0.754), smoker (P = 0.368), history of alcohol consumption (P = 0.558), and history of tobacco chewing (P = 0.781). We did not find any association between HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients with anatomical subsites (P = 0.369), tumor stage (P = 0.397), and nodal stage (P = 0.592). HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC) patients presented more at early stage as compared to HPV-negative patients (P = 0.005). HPV-positive patients had higher incidence of histological poor differentiation than HPV-negative patients (P = 0.024). Conclusion: The study highlighted the incidence of HPV (21.7%) among OPSCC patients using p16 expression. HPV-positive patients have propensity for early stage of presentation and histological poor differentiation. The demographic characteristics and anatomical subsites of OPSCC had no impact on HPV status.

Current Evidence of a Deintensification Strategy for Patients with HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Simple SummaryHuman papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer represents a distinct disease entity, showing favorable treatment responses and survival outcomes. While the deintensification of treatment for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer is widely considered necessary, details concerning patient selection and optimal strategies are undetermined. The heterogeneity of study populations and interventions in trials complicate the ability of physicians to apply the results in daily practice. The evolving landscape also requires physicians to consistently update the results of these trials. This article reviews the most recent evidence on the deintensification of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. We aim to provide physicians with some guidance regarding management options and assist researchers in appropriately designing trials in the future.Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer differs from HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer in terms of etiology, epidemiology, and prognosis. Younger and lower comorbidity patient demographics and favorable prognosis allow HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients to anticipate longer life expectancy. Reducing long-term toxicities has become an increasingly important issue. Treatment deintensification to reduce toxicities has been investigated in terms of many aspects, and the reduction of radiotherapy (RT) dose in definitive treatment, replacement of platinum-based chemotherapy with cetuximab, response-tailored dose prescription after induction chemotherapy, and reduction of adjuvant RT dose after transoral surgery have been evaluated. We performed a literature review of prospective trials of deintensification for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. In phase II trials, reduction of RT dose in definitive treatment showed comparable survival outcomes to historical results. Two phase III randomized trials reported inferior survival outcomes for cetuximab-based chemoradiation compared with cisplatin-based chemoradiation. In a randomized phase III trial investigating adjuvant RT, deintensified RT showed noninferior survival outcomes in patients without extranodal extension but worse survival in patients with extranodal extension. Optimal RT dosage and patient selection require confirmation in future studies. Although many phase II trials have reported promising outcomes, the results of phase III trials are needed to change the standard treatment. Since high-level evidence has not been established, current deintensification should only be performed as part of a clinical study with caution. Implementation in clinical practice should not be undertaken until evidence from phase III randomized trials is available.

Concurrent weekly cisplatin and simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer represents a major clinical challenge. Any treatment intensification aiming at improved treatment outcomes poten-tially results in a higher toxicity. The search for optimal treatment schedule involving conventional or altered fractionation of radiotherapy and the frequency and dose of concomitant cisplatin or other systemic agents has been spanning over several decades. To evaluate long-term outcomes and toxicity of accelerated chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). Forty patients with stage III and IVA (TNM, 7th Ed.) LA SCCHN were treated with accelerated radiotherapy with a total dose of 67.5 Gy in 6 weeks delivered with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB IMRT) and concomitant weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2. Five-year outcomes and early and late toxicity were evaluated. With the median follow-up of 47.8 months, a 5-year locoregional control rate (LCR) was 56.5%, distant control rate (DCR) was 87% and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37 and 45%, respectively. Cisplatin cumulative dose of 200mg/m2 was administered in 83% of patients. Grade 2 late toxicity with dietary change was observed in 21 (53%) patients. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status determined by p16 immunohistochemistry was the only significant factor in 5-year treatment outcomes analysis with LCR 100 vs. 41% (P &lt; 0.01), DCR 100 vs. 78% (P = 0.154), PFS 80 vs. 23% (P = 0.01) and OS 80 vs. 34% (P = 0.03) for HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and other HPV negative LA SCCHN. High proportion of patients with LA SCCHN received an adequate cumulative dose of concurrent cisplatin with accelerated radiotherapy with SIB IMRT. This study demonstrated that chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin resulted in favorable local control rate and survival in patients with HPV+ OPC.

Importance of lymph node ratio in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment.

ObjectivesThe pathologic nodal stage of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients is classified according to the number of lymph nodes (LNs), as revised in 2018. Previous studies showed that the LN ratio (LNR) could be also a significant prognostic factor in head and neck cancer, but there are few studies on the LNR in HPV-related [HPV(+)] OPC. The aim of the present study was to analyze the predictive value of the LNR for survival and recurrence in HPV(+) OPC patients.Materials and methodsHPV(+) OPC patients treated with surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy from January 2000 to March 2019 were evaluated. The patients were divided into two sets of three groups, according to LN numbers based on pathologic nodal stages, and LNRs by a cutoff value of 0.05. The medical records were reviewed, and the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis incidence were analyzed.ResultsNinty patients were included and the median follow-up period was 38.2 months. There were no significant differences in OS in the LN number groups. However, there was a significant difference in OS in the LNR groups (P = 0.010). The incidence of distant metastasis in the LNR groups was significantly different (P = 0.005).ConclusionThe LNR in HPV(+) OPC patients may be a more useful tool to predict survival and distant metastasis than the LN number. Additional research and consensus on surgical pathology are needed before applying the LNR to adjuvant treatment decisions and pathologic nodal staging.

Influence of sex on survival rates of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers.

The role of human papillomavirus (HPV) status for the prognosis of oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) is discussed controversially. Here, we present an analysis of 144,969 head and neck cancer cases (ICD-10 codes: C00–C13) with a sub-cohort of 62,775 tumor cases of the oropharynx (C01, C09, and C10). To this end, de-identified data from electronic health records of about 60 healthcare organizations from 30 different countries were used. Odds ratios, hazard ratios (HRs), and Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to compare outcomes between different cancer entities of neoplasms of the base of the tongue (C01), of tonsils (C09), and of the oropharynx (C10) of women and men with and without HPV infection. To avoid the bias from different age distributions, the cohorts were balanced using propensity score matching. The 5-year survival rate for HPV-positive patients is somewhat better than that for HPV-negative patients, but for age- and sex-balanced cohorts, there remains no significant advantage for HPV-positive patients [HR, 1.126 (0.897–1.413)]. Looking at the different entities and HPV status for age-matched male and female patients separately, HPV is a significantly positive prognostic factor for female patients in some entities, whereas for male patients, it is only a positive prognostic factor for malignant neoplasms of oropharynx (C10) [HR, 1.077 (0.602–1.926)].

Upfront transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: real-world data from a tertiary comprehensive cancer centre.

SUMMARYObjectiveThis study aims to provide real-world data on oncologic and functional outcomes of the most modern surgical and non-surgical treatments of locally advanced HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer.MethodsWe reviewed data on patients treated for stage III and IV HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with either endoscopic surgery (Transoral Robotic Surgery, TORS; Transoral Laser Microsurgery, TLM – group A) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT – group B). The minimum follow-up required was 6 months. Survival outcomes and toxicities of treatments were evaluated.Results30 patients in group A and 66 in group B were eligible for the analysis. 28% of patients in group A underwent a unimodal treatment, while 42% needed trimodal treatment. 90% of patients in group B underwent concurrent chemoradiation. We found no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes (group A: overall survival 97%, progression-free survival 83%; group B: OS 98%, PFS 86%) or toxicities between groups.ConclusionsBoth transoral surgery and IMRT provide excellent outcomes in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Because of the good prognosis, treatments need to be refined to reduce toxicities while preserving oncologic soundness.

The Prognostic Role of Baseline Eosinophils in HPV-Related Cancers: a Multi-institutional Analysis of Anal SCC and OPC Patients Treated with Radical CT-RT

Background and AimAnal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are rare tumors associated with HPV infection. Bioumoral predictors of response to chemoradiation (CT-RT) are lacking in these settings. With the aim to find new biomarkers, we investigated the role of eosinophils in both HPV-positive anal SCC and HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).MethodsWe retrieved clinical and laboratory data of patients with HPV-positive anal SCC treated with CT-RT in 5 institutions, and patients with locally advanced OPC SCC treated with CT-RT in 2 institutions. We examined the association between baseline eosinophil count (the best cutoff has been evaluated by ROC curve analysis: 100 × 10^9/L) and disease-free survival (DFS). Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios by baseline characteristics were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThree hundred four patients with HPV-positive anal SCCs and 168 patients with OPCs (122 HPV-positive, 46 HPV-negative diseases) were analyzed. In anal SCC, low eosinophil count (< 100 × 10^9/L) correlates to a better DFS (HR = 0.59; p = 0.0392); likewise, in HPV-positive OPC, low eosinophil count correlates to a better DFS (HR = 0.50; p = 0.0428). In HPV-negative OPC, low eosinophil count confers worse DFS compared to high eosinophil count (HR = 3.53; p = 0.0098). After adjustment for age and sex, eosinophils were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors for DFS (HR = 4.55; p = 0.0139).ConclusionEosinophil count could be used as a prognostic factor in anal HPV-positive SCC. The worse prognosis showed in HPV-positive patients with high eosinophil count is likely to derive from an unfavorable interaction between the HPV-induced immunomodulation and eosinophils, which may hamper the curative effect of RT.

Assessing knowledge of human papillomavirus among men who have sex with men (MSM) using targeted dating applications

BackgroundThe incidence of HPV-related oropharyngeal and anal cancer has been increasing significantly over the past 30 years, especially among males. This study sought to better understand the level of knowledge of HPV-related disease in the LGBTQ+ community, and serve as a method to increase awareness for HPV vaccination as a safe and effective method for cancer prevention. MethodsSCRUFF and Jack’d are geosocial networking and dating mobile applications for men who have sex with men (MSM). All users of the applications who were located in the US at the time of the study were invited to participate in a survey on HPV knowledge, the HPV vaccine, and vaccination status. The Pearson test was used to identify possible associations. ResultsHalf of the HPV vaccine-eligible respondents reported having received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine, while only 37.9% of the individuals aged 9–26 reported being vaccinated against HPV. Among the unvaccinated, 63.3% reported being interested in future vaccination, or learning more about it. No significant differences were noted regarding vaccination status nor HPV knowledge between respondents from rural vs urban locations. Respondents from the South were the least knowledgeable about cancer and genital warts caused by HPV (79.4%, p < 0.01), and had the lowest rate of vaccination compared to other regions (18.5%, p < 0.01). More than half of respondents reported being either somewhat comfortable (15.8%) or very comfortable (42.2%) with receiving the HPV vaccine from a dentist. ConclusionsThe findings of this study identify demographic groups and geographical areas where preventive campaigns for HPV would be most needed. The findings highlight dental providers as an underutilized source of HPV education and vaccine recommendation. The study reveals opportunities to close gaps in care and knowledge, and points to future directions for research and development of effective interventions.

Treatment strategy for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: a literature review

This review presents data on the strategy for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer associated with human papillomavirus. This pathology occurs mainly in young people without bad habits. Despite the low degree of differentiation, the course of the disease is relatively favorable. In addition, the tumor has a rather high sensitivity to conservative methods of treatment. The article discusses various options for de-escalation of therapy, modern drug regimens, as well as the results of the most significant randomized trials on this issue.

PSY7-4 Novel de-escalation strategy for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer

Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) accounts for 30-40% of HPV-associated cancers. The incidence of HPV-associated OPC is increasing in the United States and Western Europe, as well as in Asian countries. HPV-positive OPC is often diagnosed in younger nonsmoking patients at relatively advanced stages and with nodal involvement. However, HPV-positive OPC is associated with favorable clinical outcomes regardless of treatment modality, including surgery or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The recent trend in the treatment strategy for HPV-positive OPC has been deintensification of treatment.