Six steers (3/4 Charolaisx1/4 Brahman) (mean body weight 314+/-27 kg) and six spayed heifers (3/5 Shorthornx2/5 Red Angus) (mean body weight 478+/-30 kg) were used to determine the effects of climatic conditions and hormone growth promotants (HGP) on respiration rate (RR; breaths/min), pulse rate (beats/min), rectal temperature (RT; degrees C), and heat production (HP; kJ). Cattle were exposed to the following climatic conditions prior to implantation with a HGP and then again 12 days after implantation: 2 days of thermoneutral conditions (TNL) [21.9+/-0.9 degrees C ambient temperature (T(A)) and 61.7+/-22.1% relative humidity (RH)] then 2 days of hot conditions [HOT; 29.2+/-4 degrees C (T(A)) and 78.3+/-13.2% (RH)], then TNL for 3 days and then 2 days of cold conditions [COLD; 17.6+/-0.9 degrees C (T(A)) and 63.4+/-1.8% (RH); cattle were wet during this treatment]. The HGP implants used were: estrogenic implant (E), trenbolone acetate implant (TBA), or both (ET). Both prior to and following administration of HGP, RRs were lower (P<0.05) on cold days and greater (P<0.05) on hot days compared to TNL. On hot days, RTs, were 0.62 degrees C higher after compared to before implanting. Across all conditions, RTs were >0.5 degrees C greater (P<0.05) for E cattle than for TBA or ET cattle. On cold days, RTs of steers were >0.8 degrees C higher than for the heifers, while under TNL and HOT, RTs of steers were 0.2-0.35 degrees C higher than those of heifers. Prior to implantation, HP per hour and per unit of metabolic body weight was higher (P<0.05) for cattle exposed to hot conditions, when compared to HP on cold days. After implantation, HP was greater (P<0.05) on hot days than on cold days. Under TNL, ET cattle had the lowest HP and greatest feed intake. On hot days, E cattle had the lowest HP, and the highest RT; therefore, if the potential exists for cattle death from heat episodes, the use of either TBA or ET may be preferred. Under cold conditions HP was similar among implant groups.
Read full abstract