Housekeeping Promoter Research Articles

Large-scale analysis of the integration of enhancer-enhancer signals by promoters.

Genes are often regulated by multiple enhancers. It is poorly understood how the individual enhancer activities are combined to control promoter activity. Anecdotal evidence has shown that enhancers can combine sub-additively, additively, synergistically, or redundantly. However, it is not clear which of these modes are more frequent in mammalian genomes. Here, we systematically tested how pairs of enhancers activate promoters using a three-way combinatorial reporter assay in mouse embryonic stem cells. By assaying about 69,000 enhancer-enhancer-promoter combinations we found that enhancer pairs generally combine near-additively. This behaviour was conserved across seven developmental promoters tested. Surprisingly, these promoters scale the enhancer signals in a non-linear manner that depends on promoter strength. A housekeeping promoter showed an overall different response to enhancer pairs, and a smaller dynamic range. Thus, our data indicate that enhancers mostly act additively, but promoters transform their collective effect non-linearly.

Large-scale analysis of the integration of enhancer-enhancer signals by promoters

Genes are often regulated by multiple enhancers. It is poorly understood how the individual enhancer activities are combined to control promoter activity. Anecdotal evidence has shown that enhancers can combine sub-additively, additively, synergistically, or redundantly. However, it is not clear which of these modes are more frequent in mammalian genomes. Here, we systematically tested how pairs of enhancers activate promoters using a three-way combinatorial reporter assay in mouse embryonic stem cells. By assaying about 69,000 enhancer-enhancer-promoter combinations we found that enhancer pairs generally combine near-additively. This behaviour was conserved across seven developmental promoters tested. Surprisingly, these promoters scale the enhancer signals in a non-linear manner that depends on promoter strength. A housekeeping promoter showed an overall different response to enhancer pairs, and a smaller dynamic range. Thus, our data indicate that enhancers mostly act additively, but promoters transform their collective effect non-linearly.

Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila

Genomic enhancers are key transcriptional regulators which, upon the binding of sequence-specific transcription factors, activate their cognate target promoters. Although enhancers have been extensively studied in isolation, a substantial number of genes have more than one simultaneously active enhancer, and it remains unclear how these cooperate to regulate transcription. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we assay the activities of more than a thousand individual enhancers and about a million enhancer pairs toward housekeeping and developmental core promoters with STARR-seq. We report that housekeeping and developmental enhancers show distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity: while housekeeping enhancers are additive such that their combined activity mirrors the sum of their individual activities, developmental enhancers are super-additive and combine multiplicatively. Super-additivity between developmental enhancers is promiscuous and neither depends on the enhancers’ endogenous genomic contexts nor on specific transcription factor motif signatures. However, it can be further boosted by Twist and Trl motifs and saturates for the highest levels of enhancer activity. These results have important implications for our understanding of gene regulation in complex multi-enhancer developmental loci and genomically clustered housekeeping genes, providing a rationale to interpret the transcriptional impact of non-coding mutations at different loci.

Impact of promoter region mutations of Pim-1 on c-Myc expression as well as survival in patients with breast cancer

Purpose: Breast cancer accounts for most cancer-related deaths in women with over 2.3 million new breast cancer cases diagnosed every year worldwide. Pim kinases are oncogenic proteins that play important role in various cancers. Pim-1 contains 1.7 kb promoter region without any transcriptional regulation, which is a characteristic feature of a housekeeping or constitutive promoter. This study was carried out to ascertain potential mutations in the promoter region of Pim-1 in breast cancer and also to comprehend the effect of mutations on c-Myc expression as well as on patients’ survival. Methods: Ninety-six Indian subjects with a first diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent surgery at our hospital were recruited in this study. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood, amplified and sequenced to identify potential mutations at the promoter region of Pim-1. FFPE sections were used to determine the c-Mycexpression in all the studied groups. Results: We observed a transversion (C>A at –502) and a deletion (–754Cdel) mutation in the promoter region with negligible association with tumor biology and c-Myc expression. Positive c-Myc expression was noted in almost 50% of the studied population with absolute nuclear staining or both cytoplasmic/nuclear staining. As per survival analysis, promoter region mutations did not modulate the patients’ survival, but patients with negative c-Myc expression had better disease-free survival compared with positive c-Myc expression. Conclusion: Our findings identified the presence of mutation in the promoter region of Pim-1 with negligible impact on c-Myc expression in patients with breast cancer.

Improved engineering of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to study the adaptation of pyoverdine production under intra- or inter- specific bacterial competition

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a common cause of chronic infections, particularly feared by cystic fibrosis patients. PA colonizes the lung where it adapts to the local environment, and/or to treatments by drugs. This genotypic and phenotypic adaptation, in turns, influences its interaction with its environment, like bacteria from the microbiota. As an example, to access iron, PA produces and secretes two siderophores, pyoverdine and pyochelin that are iron chelators scavenging iron from the environment and bringing it back into the bacterial cells. Siderophores production depends on the level of iron starvation, on the presence of other bacteria, etc. this latter component being less well investigated. Even if studies on bacterial interactions, and their evolution, have been increasing since several years, we are still facing a lack of tools, for example, to specifically follow the growth of PA isolates in such competitive environments. We thus improved a cloning method to gain time in the cloning steps, to lower the polar effects, and to accurately follow the interactions of any PA isolate with other bacteria. For that, a fluorescent reporter gene was inserted between two genes, the glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase (glmS) and PA5548. This reporter was efficiently produced either from an inducible or a house-keeping promoter, and its expression did not lead to polar effects.We used this strain to study intra and inter-specific bacterial competitions for iron between different lung pathogens. We thus grew wild-type PA together either with an isogenic PA ΔpvdS variant, that does not produce the most efficient siderophore pyoverdine, or with Klebsiella pneumoniae or Acinetobacter baumanii, two other lung pathogens. We finally monitored the effect of the loss of pvdS on the competition between PA and the other bacterial species. These studies enabled us to differentiate intra from inter specific competitions, both arising in the lung environment, and pinpoint the importance of the bacterial specie for the adaptation of pyoverdine production.

A Synthetic Cumate-Inducible Promoter for Graded and Homogenous Gene Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Inducible gene expression systems are powerful genetic tools to study bacterial physiology, probing essential and toxic gene functions, gene dosage effects, and overexpression phenotypes. For the opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, dedicated inducible gene expression systems are scarce. In the current study, we developed a minimal synthetic 4-isopropylbenzoic acid (cumate)-inducible promoter, called PQJ, that is tunable over several orders of magnitude. This was achieved by combining semirandomized housekeeping promoter libraries and control elements from the Pseudomonas putida strain F1 cym/cmt system with powerful fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to select functionally optimized variants. Using flow cytometry and live-cell fluorescence microscopy, we demonstrate that PQJ responds rapidly and homogenously to the inducer cumate in a graded manner at the single-cell level. PQJ and cumate are orthogonal to the frequently used isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-regulated lacIq-Ptac expression system. The modular design of the cumate-inducible expression cassette together with the FACS-based enrichment strategy presented here facilitates portability, thus serving as a blueprint for the development of tailored gene expression systems for a wide range of bacteria. IMPORTANCE Reverse genetics is a powerful approach to study bacterial physiology and behavior by relying on well-developed genetic tools, such as inducible promoters. For the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, well-characterized inducible promoters are scarce. In the current work, we used a synthetic biology-based approach to develop a cumate-inducible promoter for P. aeruginosa, termed PQJ, that shows excellent induction properties at the single-cell level. This genetic tool provides the means for qualitative and quantitative gene function studies describing P. aeruginosa's physiology and virulence in vitro and in vivo. Because this synthetic approach to constructing species-specific inducible promoters is portable, it can serve as a blueprint for similar tailored gene expression systems in bacteria largely lacking such tools, including, for example, representatives of the human microbiota.

Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns

Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we demonstrate that different promoter classes function via distinct PICs. Promoter DNA of developmentally regulated genes readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not, and instead recruit other factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are differentially required by distinct promoter types. TBP and its paralog TRF2 also function at different promoter types in a partially redundant manner. In contrast, TFIIA is required at all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. Promoter activation by tethering these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes utilize distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which translate into different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

300-OR: A Modular Massively Parallel Reporter Assay Uncovers Context-Specific Activity of Diabetes-Associated Regulatory Elements

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of signals associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) , most (∼90%) of which are found in noncoding regions of the genome enriched in tissue-specific regulatory regions. However, most GWAS signals span hundreds of tightly linked variants, and predicting each of their functional effects is difficult. Consequently, progress to translate associations to mechanisms has proceeded slowly. Here, we have designed a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) to systematically screen enhancer activity across a panel of genomic fragments, including (1) islet-specific TSSs defined by cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) and (2) allelic pairs for over 10k T2D- and metabolic trait-associated variants. We cloned this library up- or downstream of a reporter gene driven by a synthetic housekeeping promoter (SCP1) or the human insulin (INS) promoter, together enabling enhancer activity measurements across different promoter and enhancer contexts. We examined expression bias within our library (FDR < 0.05) and found that 43% of CAGE-defined oligos were marked by positional bias (n = 565/1,305) , skewed towards higher expression in the upstream position (n = 539/565) . In contrast, two unique subsets of GWAS oligos displayed either positional (n = 702/11,656) or promoter (n = 698/11,656) bias. Oligos with positional bias were evenly split between the two cloning positions, while most promoter-biased oligos were more highly expressed when paired with the INS promoter (n = 512/698) . To identify sequence features associated with promoter bias, we performed Lasso regression using a set of 562 genomic annotations. This analysis revealed that presence of HNF1 motifs was associated with higher enhancer activity in the context of the INS promoter. Together, these results indicate that reporter construct design clearly influences assayed regulatory activity, particularly with use of tissue-relevant promoters. Disclosure A.Tovar: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (R01DK117960, T32DK101357)

Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome

SummaryGene expression is in part controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers and repressive elements. Anecdotal evidence has indicated that a CRE and a promoter need to be biochemically compatible for promoter regulation to occur, but this compatibility has remained poorly characterized in mammalian cells. We used high-throughput combinatorial reporter assays to test thousands of CRE-promoter pairs from three Mb-sized genomic regions in mouse cells. This revealed that CREs vary substantially in their promoter compatibility, ranging from striking specificity to broad promiscuity. More than half of the tested CREs exhibit significant promoter selectivity. Housekeeping promoters tend to have similar CRE preferences, but other promoters exhibit a wide diversity of compatibilities. Higher-order transcription factors (TF) motif combinations may account for compatibility. CRE-promoter selectivity does not correlate with looping interactions in the native genomic context, suggesting that chromatin folding and compatibility are two orthogonal mechanisms that confer specificity to gene regulation.

89Zr-3,2-HOPO-Mesothelin Antibody PET Imaging Reflects Tumor Uptake of Mesothelin-Targeted 227Th-Conjugate Therapy in Mice.

The mesothelin (MSLN)-targeted 227Th conjugate is a novel α-therapy developed to treat MSLN-overexpressing cancers. We radiolabeled the same antibody-chelator conjugate with 89Zr to evaluate whether PET imaging with 89Zr-MSLN matches 227Th-MSLN tumor uptake, biodistribution, and antitumor activity. Methods: Serial PET imaging with protein doses of 4, 20, or 40 μg of 89Zr-MSLN and 89Zr-control was performed up to 168 h after tracer injection in human tumor-bearing nude mice with high (HT29-MSLN) and low (BxPc3) MSLN expression. 89Zr-MSLN and 227Th-MSLN ex vivo tumor uptake and biodistribution were compared at 6 time points in HT29-MSLN and in medium-MSLN-expressing (OVCAR-3) tumor-bearing mice. 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging was performed before 227Th-MSLN treatment in HT29-MSLN and BxPc3 tumor-bearing mice. Results: 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging showed an SUVmean of 2.2 ± 0.5 in HT29-MSLN tumors. Ex vivo tumor uptake was 10.6% ± 2.4% injected dose per gram at 168 h. 89Zr-MSLN tumor uptake was higher than uptake of 89Zr-control (P = 0.0043). 89Zr-MSLN and 227Th-MSLN showed comparable tumor uptake and biodistribution in OVCAR-3 and HT29-MSLN tumor-bearing mice. Pretreatment SUVmean was 2.2 ± 0.2 in HT29-MSLN tumors, which decreased in volume on 227Th-MSLN treatment. BxPc3 tumors showed an SUVmean of 1.2 ± 0.3 and remained similar in size after 227Th-MSLN treatment. Conclusion: 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging reflected MSLN expression and matched 227Th-MSLN tumor uptake and biodistribution. Our data support the clinical exploration of 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging together with 227Th-MSLN therapy, both using the same antibody-chelator conjugate.

Sigma regulatory network in Rhodococcus erythropolis CCM2595.

The aim of this investigation was to discover the promoters that drive expression of the sig genes encoding sigma factors of RNA polymerase in Rhodococcus erythropolis CCM2595 and classify these promoters according to the sigma factors which control their activity. To analyze the regulation of major sigma factors, which control large regulons that also contain genes expressed under exponential growth and non-stressed conditions, we used the R. erythropolis CCM2595 culture, which grew rapidly in minimal medium. The transcriptional start sites (TSSs) of the genes sigA, sigB, sigD, sigE, sigG, sigH, sigJ, and sigK were detected by primary 5'-end-specific RNA sequencing. The promoters localized upstream of the detected TSSs were defined by their -35 and -10 elements, which were identical or closely similar to these sequences in the related species Corynebacterium glutamicum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Regulation of the promoter activities by different sigma factors was demonstrated by two independent techniques (in vivo and in vitro). All analyzed sig genes encoding the sigma factors with extracytoplasmic function (ECF) were found to be also driven from additional housekeeping promoters. Based on the classification of the sig gene promoters, a model of the basic sigma transcriptional regulatory network in R. erythropolis was designed.

Plasmid and Sequencing Library Preparation for CRISPRi Barcoded Expression Reporter Sequencing (CiBER-seq) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Genetic networks regulate nearly all biological processes, including cellular differentiation, homeostasis, and immune responses. Determining the precise role of each gene within a regulatory network can explain its overall, integrated function, and pinpoint mechanisms underlying misregulation in disease states. Transcriptional reporter assays are a useful tool for dissecting these genetic networks, because they link a molecular process to a measurable readout, such as the expression of a fluorescent protein. Here, we introduce a new technique that uses expressed RNA barcodes as reporters, to measure transcriptional changes induced by CRISPRi-mediated genetic perturbation across a diverse, genome-wide library of guide RNAs. We describe an exemplary reporter based on the promoter that drives His4 expression in these guidelines, which can be used as a framework to interrogate other expression phenotypes. In this workflow, a library of plasmids is assembled, encoding a CRISPRi guide RNA (gRNA) along with one or more transcriptional reporters that drive expression of guide-specific nucleotide barcode sequences. For example, when interrogating regulation of the budding yeast HIS4 promoter normalized against a control housekeeping promoter that drives Pgk1 expression, this plasmid library contains a gRNA expression cassette, a HIS4 reporter driving expression of one gRNA-specific nucleotide barcode, and a PGK1 reporter driving expression of a second, gRNA-specific barcode. Long-read sequencing is used to determine which gRNA is associated with these nucleotide barcodes. The plasmid library is then transformed into yeast cells, where each cell receives one plasmid, and experiences a genetic perturbation driven by the guide on that plasmid. The expressed RNA barcodes are extracted in bulk and quantified using high-throughput sequencing, thereby measuring the effect of their corresponding gRNA on barcoded reporter expression. In the case of the HIS4 reporter described above, guides disrupting translation elongation will increase expression of the associated HIS4 barcode specifically, without changing expression of the PGK1 control barcode. It is further possible to quantify plasmid abundance by DNA sequencing, as an additional approach to normalize for differences in plasmid abundance within the population of cells. This protocol outlines the steps to prepare barcode reporter CRISPRi plasmid libraries, link guides to barcodes with long-read sequencing, and measure expression changes through barcode RNA and DNA sequencing. This method is ideal for probing transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation, as it measures the effects of a genetic perturbation by directly quantifying reporter RNA abundance, rather than relying on indirect growth or fluorescence readouts. Graphic abstract.

Promoter-Proximal Chromatin Domain Insulator Protein BEAF Mediates Local and Long-Range Communication with a Transcription Factor and Directly Activates a Housekeeping Promoter in Drosophila.

BEAF (Boundary Element-Associated Factor) was originally identified as a Drosophila melanogaster chromatin domain insulator-binding protein, suggesting a role in gene regulation through chromatin organization and dynamics. Genome-wide mapping found that BEAF usually binds near transcription start sites, often of housekeeping genes, suggesting a role in promoter function. This would be a nontraditional role for an insulator-binding protein. To gain insight into molecular mechanisms of BEAF function, we identified interacting proteins using yeast two-hybrid assays. Here, we focus on the transcription factor Serendipity δ (Sry-δ). Interactions were confirmed in pull-down experiments using bacterially expressed proteins, by bimolecular fluorescence complementation, and in a genetic assay in transgenic flies. Sry-δ interacted with promoter-proximal BEAF both when bound to DNA adjacent to BEAF or > 2-kb upstream to activate a reporter gene in transient transfection experiments. The interaction between BEAF and Sry-δ was detected using both a minimal developmental promoter (y) and a housekeeping promoter (RpS12), while BEAF alone strongly activated the housekeeping promoter. These two functions for BEAF implicate it in playing a direct role in gene regulation at hundreds of BEAF-associated promoters.

Characterization of gene promoters in pig: conservative elements, regulatory motifs and evolutionary trend.

It is vital to understand the conservation and evolution of gene promoter sequences in order to understand environmental adaptation. The level of promoter conservation varies greatly between housekeeping (HK) and tissue-specific (TS) genes, denoting differences in the strength of the evolutionary constraints. Here, we analyzed promoter conservation and evolution to exploit differential regulation between HK and TS genes. The analysis of conserved elements showed CpG islands, short tandem repeats and G-quadruplex sequences are highly enriched in HK promoters relative to TS promoters. In addition, the type and density of regulatory motifs in TS promoters are much higher than HK promoters, indicating that TS genes show more complex regulatory patterns than HK genes. Moreover, the evolutionary dynamics of promoters showed similar evolutionary trend to coding sequences. HK promoters suffer more stringent selective pressure in the long-term evolutionary process. HK genes tend to show increased upstream sequence conservation due to stringent selection pressures acting on the promoter regions. The specificity of TS gene expression may be due to complex regulatory motifs acting in different tissues or conditions. The results from this study can be used to deepen our understanding of adaptive evolution.

Improved GFP Variants to Study Gene Expression in Haloarchaea.

The study of promoter activities in haloarchaea is carried out exclusively using enzymes as reporters. An alternative reporter is the gene encoding the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), a simple and fast tool for investigating promoter strengths. However, the GFP variant smRS-GFP, used to analyze protein stabilities in haloarchaea, is not suitable to quantify weak promoter activities, since the fluorescence signal is too low. We enhanced the fluorescence of smRS-GFP 3.3-fold by introducing ten amino acid substitutions, resulting in mGFP6. Using mGFP6 as reporter, we studied six haloarchaeal promoters exhibiting different promoter strengths. The strongest activity was observed with the housekeeping promoters Pfdx of the ferredoxin gene and P2 of the ribosomal 16S rRNA gene. Much lower activities were determined for the promoters of the p-vac region driving the expression of gas vesicle protein (gvp) genes in Halobacterium salinarum PHH1. The basal promoter strength dropped in the order PpA, PpO > PpF, PpD. All promoters showed a growth-dependent activity pattern. The GvpE-induced activities of PpA and PpD were high, but lower compared to the Pfdx or P2 promoter activities. The mGFP6 reporter was also used to investigate the regulatory effects of 5′-untranslated regions (5′-UTRs) of three different gvp mRNAs. A deletion of the 5′-UTR always resulted in an increased expression, implying a negative effect of the 5′-UTRs on translation. Our experiments confirmed mGFP6 as simple, fast and sensitive reporter to study gene expression in haloarchaea.

H2AFY promoter deletion causes PITX1 endoactivation and Liebenberg syndrome

BackgroundStructural variants (SVs) affecting non-coding cis-regulatory elements are a common cause of congenital limb malformation. Yet, the functional interpretation of these non-coding variants remains challenging. The human Liebenberg syndrome is...

Overlap of Promoter Recognition Specificity of Stress Response Sigma Factors SigD and SigH in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032.

Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 harbors five sigma subunits of RNA polymerase belonging to Group IV, also called extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors. These factors σC, σD, σE, σH, and σM are mostly involved in stress responses. The role of σD consists in the control of cell wall integrity. The σD regulon is involved in the synthesis of components of the mycomembrane which is part of the cell wall in C. glutamicum. RNA sequencing of the transcriptome from a strain overexpressing the sigD gene provided 29 potential σD-controlled genes and enabled us to precisely localize their transcriptional start sites. Analysis of the respective promoters by both in vitro transcription and the in vivo two-plasmid assay confirmed that transcription of 11 of the tested genes is directly σD-dependent. The key sequence elements of all these promoters were found to be identical or closely similar to the motifs -35 GTAACA/G and -10 GAT. Surprisingly, nearly all of these σD-dependent promoters were also active to a much lower extent with σH in vivo and one (Pcg0607) also in vitro, although the known highly conserved consensus sequence of the σH-dependent promoters is different (-35 GGAAT/C and -10 GTT). In addition to the activity of σH at the σD-controlled promoters, we discovered separated or overlapping σA- or σB-regulated or σH-regulated promoters within the upstream region of 8 genes of the σD-regulon. We found that phenol in the cultivation medium acts as a stress factor inducing expression of some σD-dependent genes. Computer modeling revealed that σH binds to the promoter DNA in a similar manner as σD to the analogous promoter elements. The homology models together with mutational analysis showed that the key amino acids, Ala 60 in σD and Lys 53 in σH, bind to the second nucleotide within the respective -10 promoter elements (GAT and GTT, respectively). The presented data obtained by integrating in vivo, in vitro and in silico approaches demonstrate that most of the σD-controlled genes also belong to the σH-regulon and are also transcribed from the overlapping or closely located housekeeping (σA-regulated) and/or general stress (σB-regulated) promoters.

Efficacy and safety of a clinically relevant foamy vector design in human hematopoietic repopulating cells.

Previous studies have shown that foamy viral (FV) vectors are a promising alternative to gammaretroviral and lentiviral vectors and also that insulators can improve FV vector safety. However, in a previous analysis of insulator effects on FV vector safety, strong viral promoters were used to elicit genotoxic events. In the present study, we developed and analyzed the efficacy and safety of a high-titer, clinically relevant FV vector driven by the housekeeping promoter elongation factor-1α and insulated with an enhancer blocking A1 insulator (FV-EGW-A1). Human CD34+ cord blood cells were exposed to an enhanced green fluorescent protein expressing vector, FV-EGW-A1, at a multiplicity of infection of 10 and then maintained in vitro or transplanted into immunodeficient mice. Flow cytometry was used to measure engraftment and marking in vivo. FV vector integration sites were analyzed to assess safety. FV-EGW-A1 resulted in high-marking, multilineage engraftment of human repopulating cells with no evidence of silencing. Engraftment was highly polyclonal with no clonal dominance and a promising safety profile based on integration site analysis. An FV vector with an elongation factor-1α promoter and an A1 insulator is a promising vector design for use in the clinic.

Expression of the arsenite oxidation regulatory operon in Rhizobium sp. str. NT-26 is under the control of two promoters that respond to different environmental cues.

Rhizobium sp. str. NT‐26 is a Gram‐negative facultative chemolithoautotrophic arsenite oxidizer that has been used as a model organism to study various aspects of arsenite oxidation including the regulation of arsenite oxidation. The three regulatory genes, aioX, aioS, and aioR, are cotranscribed when NT‐26 was grown in the presence or absence of arsenite. The aioXSR operon is upregulated in stationary phase but not by the presence of arsenite in the growth medium. The two transcription start sites upstream of aioX were determined which led to the identification of two promoters, the housekeeping promoter RpoD and the growth‐phase‐dependent promoter RpoE2. Promoter–lacZ fusions confirmed their constitutive and stationary phase expressions. The involvement of the NT‐26 sigma factor RpoE2 in acting on the NT‐26 RpoE2 promoter was confirmed in vivo in Escherichia coli, which lacks a rpoE2 homolog, using a strain carrying both the promoter–lacZ fusion and the NT‐26 rpoE2 gene. An in silico approach was used to search for other RpoE2 promoters and AioR‐binding motifs and led to the identification of other genes that could be regulated by these proteins including those involved in quorum sensing, chemotaxis, and motility expanding the signaling networks important for the microbial metabolism of arsenite.

Assignment of sigma factors of RNA polymerase to promoters in Corynebacterium glutamicum

Corynebacterium glutamicum is an important industrial producer of various amino acids and other metabolites. The C. glutamicum genome encodes seven sigma subunits (factors) of RNA polymerase: the primary sigma factor SigA (σA), the primary-like σB and five alternative sigma factors (σC, σD, σE, σH and σM). We have developed in vitro and in vivo methods to assign particular sigma factors to individual promoters of different classes. In vitro transcription assays and measurements of promoter activity using the overexpression of a single sigma factor gene and the transcriptional fusion of the promoter to the gfpuv reporter gene enabled us to reliably define the sigma factor dependency of promoters. To document the strengths of these methods, we tested examples of respective promoters for each C. glutamicum sigma factor. Promoters of the rshA (anti-sigma for σH) and trxB1 (thioredoxin) genes were found to be σH-dependent, whereas the promoter of the sigB gene (sigma factor σB) was σE- and σH-dependent. It was confirmed that the promoter of the cg2556 gene (iron-regulated membrane protein) is σC-dependent as suggested recently by other authors. The promoter of cmt1 (trehalose corynemycolyl transferase) was found to be clearly σD-dependent. No σM-dependent promoter was identified. The typical housekeeping promoter P2sigA (sigma factor σA) was proven to be σA-dependent but also recognized by σB. Similarly, the promoter of fba (fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase) was confirmed to be σB-dependent but also functional with σA. The study provided demonstrations of the broad applicability of the developed methods and produced original data on the analyzed promoters.