The Manmade Environment: Nya Nordiska Landskap (New Nordic Landscapes). DogA (Norwegian Centre for Art and Design), Oslo, 23 September–21 November 2010. Gammal Dock, Copenhagen, 11 February–22 May 2011. Arkitekturmuseet, Stockholm, 16 June–18 September 2011. Museum of Finnish Architecture, Helsinki, 7 October–4 December 2011. Architectural exhibitions are rare enough in this world given the paucity of informed staff to conceive and produce them and venues for their display. Landscape architecture exhibitions are rarer still; in the last decade only four stand out in terms of ambition, content, and presentation: Groundswell: Constructing the Contemporary Landscape , at the Museum of Modern Art (2005); Alexandre Chemetoff: Situations construites, at the Arc en Reve Centre d'Architecture in Bordeaux (2009); Stadtgrun: Urban Green: European Landscape Design for the 21st Century , at the Deutsches Architetkturmuseum in Frankfurt (2010), and Roberto Burle Marx: La Permanence de l'instable , originating at the Paco Imperial in Rio de Janeiro and recently shown at the Cite de l'Architecture et du Patrimoine in Paris (2011). A substantial publication accompanied each of these exhibitions. Significant efforts also lie behind The Manmade Environment: New Nordic Scopes , a collaboration of the Danish Architecture Centre and Norsk Form (Oslo), with the Arkitekturmuseet (Swedish Museum of Architecture), the Suomen Rakennustaiteen Museo (Museum of Finnish Architecture), and the Norraena husið (Nordic House) in Reykjavik, and the first attempt at a comprehensive look at landscape design in all five countries (Figures 1, 2). While the exhibition purports to present outstanding recent works of Nordic landscape architecture, that premise is open to question, as discussed below. This review comments on the presentation of the exhibition at the Swedish Museum of Architecture in Stockholm, where the revised subtitle was New Nordic Landscapes . Figure 1 The Manmade Environment: Nya Nordiska Landskap (Photo: Matti Ostling, Arkitekturmuseet) Figure 2 Detail of Figure 1 Historically, considerable disparity in what constitutes landscape architecture—or designed landscapes, if you will—has qualified work in the Nordic countries. Icelandic, Finnish, and Norwegian landscapes, with rare exceptions and until relatively recently, have tended to promote the look of the primeval landscape. The rare …
Read full abstract