The 19th-century concepts of rapid transport and treatment of the injured developed primarily in the military contexts of the Napoleonic and American Civil wars. Before the 1790s, wounded soldiers were either left on the battlefield until the day after the battle or carried to the rear lines by comrades. Under the direction of Napoleon's surgeon, Dominique Jean Larrey, the Grande Armee developed mobile field hospitals, or ambulances volantes (flying ambulances), as well as a corps of soldiers specially trained and equipped to remove the wounded from the battlefield and initiate treatment. Follow¬ ing French practice, for most of the 19th century the word meant both a horse-drawn transport wagon and crew as well as a mobile field hospital.1 A system of railroad ambulance cars and base hospitals appeared on the Union side during the American CivilWar—developments that have prompted many historians to cite the Civil War as the be¬ ginning of the modern military ambulance system. It is important to note, however, that systematic practices for care of the wounded existed in substantial form only in the Union Army and then only because prominent civilians, in¬ cluding several physicians, expressed outraged at the lack of treatment for the wounded in the war's first years. For ex¬ ample, at the second battle of Bull Run in August 1862, 3000 wounded Union soldiers lay on the battlefield for 3 dayswith no medical care, and 600 languished for 1 week.2 Union am¬ bulance wagons existed before that time, but they were not under medical direction, and an inspection team led byWilliam Bowditch, MD, reported sufficient atrocities of poor care to enable the Surgeon-General to gain control of ambulance services from the quartermaster corps, which previously had not considered care of the wounded a major priority.3 Civil War medical experiences shaped a whole generation of postwar medical reformers, particularly in the northern states. Under the stewardship of Edward B. Dalton, MD, New York City, which then comprised only Manhattan, as¬ sumed world leadership in ambulance services in the late 1860s. Forging an alliance between public agencies and hos¬ pitals and private hospitals in Manhattan, Dalton and his successors crafted a system that divided the city into ambu¬ lance zones, with each hospital accepting responsibility for its zone. Most service requests came through the police, whose stations maintained dedicated electronic links (via telegraph and, later, telephone wires) to hospitals. Also, citizens made use of fire alarm signal boxes dispersed around the city. Horse-drawn ambulances, which carried 2 pa¬ tients, a driver, and an ambulance surgeon, also carried medi¬ cine chests that included emetics for overdoses and poisonings, anesthetics, morphine, amyl nitrite for cardiac patients, as well as other drugs and equipment. Despite their impressive array ofmedicines and equipment,most 19th-century ambulance sur¬ geons limited their field interventions to first aid, performing definitive care on arrival at the hospital. Although 19th-century technology may seem crude to us, meticulous logs kept during the 1880s documented a typical 8-minute response time from receipt of signal to arrival on the
Read full abstract