Hormone Receptor-positive Subgroup Research Articles

Prognostic value of tumor-associated macrophages according to histologic locations and hormone receptor status in breast cancer.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are involved in tumor progression by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), tumor cell invasion, migration and angiogenesis. However, in breast cancer, the clinical relevance of the TAM infiltration according to distinct histologic locations (intratumoral vs. stromal) and hormone receptor status is unclear. We investigated the significance of the levels of TAM infiltration in distinct histologic locations in invasive breast cancer. We also examined the relationship of the TAM levels with the clinicopathologic features of tumors, expression of EMT markers, and clinical outcomes. Finally, we analyzed the prognostic value of TAM levels according to hormone receptor status. High levels of infiltration of intratumoral, stromal and total TAMs were associated with high histologic grade, p53 overexpression, high Ki-67 proliferation index and negative hormone receptor status. Infiltration of TAMs was also correlated with overexpression of vimentin, smooth muscle actin and alteration of β-catenin. Overall, a high level of infiltration of intratumoral TAMs was associated with poor disease-free survival, and was found to be an independent prognostic factor. In subgroup analyses by hormone receptor status, a high level of infiltration of intratumoral TAM was an independent prognostic factor in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, but not in the hormone-receptor negative subgroup. Our findings suggest that intratumoral TAMs play an important role in tumor progression in breast cancer, especially in the hormone receptor-positive group, and the level of TAM infiltration may be used as a prognostic factor and even a therapeutic target in breast cancer.

Quantitative Measurements of Tumoral p95HER2 Protein Expression in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab: Independent Validation of the p95HER2 Clinical Cutoff

P95HER2 (p95) is a truncated form of the HER2, which lacks the trastuzumab-binding site and contains a hyperactive kinase domain. Previously, an optimal clinical cutoff of p95 expression for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was defined using a quantitative VeraTag assay (Monogram Biosciences) in a training set of trastuzumab-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. In the current study, the predictive value of the p95 VeraTag assay cutoff established in the training set was retrospectively validated for PFS and OS in an independent series of 240 trastuzumab-treated MBC patients from multiple institutions. In the subset of 190 tumors assessed as HER2-total (H2T)-positive using the quantitative HERmark assay (Monogram Biosciences), p95 VeraTag values above the predefined cutoff correlated with shorter PFS (HR = 1.43; P = 0.039) and shorter OS (HR = 1.94; P = 0.0055) where both outcomes were stratified by hormone receptor status and tumor grade. High p95 expression correlated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.41; P = 0.0003) and OS (HR = 2.57; P = 0.0025) in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup of patients (N = 78), but not in the hormone receptor-negative group. In contrast with the quantitative p95 VeraTag measurements, p95 immunohistochemical expression using the same antibody was not significantly correlated with outcomes. The consistency in the p95 VeraTag cutoff across different cohorts of patients with MBC treated with trastuzumab justifies additional studies using blinded analyses in larger series of patients.

Lack of Either Estrogen or Progesterone Receptor Expression Is Associated with Poor Survival Outcome among Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of lack of either estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) on characteristics and outcomes among luminal A breast cancer subtype treated with endocrine with or without chemotherapeutic agents. The luminal A subtype was categorized into three subgroups: ER+/PR+, ER+/PR-, and ER-/PR+. All tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Clinicopathological features and survival were analyzed using the Severance Hospital dataset (n = 1,180) and were validated by the nationwide Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS) registry (n = 9,916). Despite the different distribution of ER/PR status, tumor stage, grade, and local therapies between the two datasets, similarly ER+/PR+ showed smaller size and good differentiation, ER+/PR- patients had the oldest age at diagnosis, and ER-/PR+ was associated with the youngest age at onset and grade III tumor. Single hormone receptor-positive subgroups demonstrated worse disease-related outcomes than the ER+/PR+ subgroup. These associations were confirmed by the KBCS dataset. This trend was also demonstrated in the subpopulation of 1,944 patients with Ki-67 < 14 %. Inferior survival of single receptor-positive tumors was more definite among node-positive patients even when receiving both chemo-endocrine therapies. Current results suggest that the luminal A subtype is also heterogeneous and each subgroup has unique clinicopathologic characteristics. Lack of either ER or PR expression is associated with worse survival, especially among node-positive luminal A subtype.

Adjuvant lapatinib in women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC): Analysis of the hormone receptor-negative subgroup of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of the TEACH trial.

596 Background: TEACH is a randomized, double-blind, placebo (P)-controlled trial evaluating lapatinib (L) in reducing relapse risk in trastuzumab -naive patients (pts) previously treated with chemotherapy for HER2+ BC. The primary results (presented at SABCS 2011) showed a hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) in L arm compared with P of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.00; stratified log-rank 2-sided P=.053). The predefined hormone receptor negative subgroup was analyzed, which in contrast to the hormone receptor positive subgroup of the ITT population (N=3147) had a significantly improved DFS. Methods: 3161 HER2+ BC pts (Stage I-IIIc) were randomized 1:1 to L daily or P for 1 year (yr). Primary endpoint was DFS in the ITT population. Central nervous system (CNS) recurrence rate was a secondary endpoint. A subgroup analysis by Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Models was performed for the hormone receptor negative pts from the ITT population. Results: 1288 pts (41%) comprised the hormone receptor negative subgroup of the ITT (L:639, and P:649). Median time from diagnosis to randomization was 2.4 (0.3-15) yrs, median follow-up was 4 yrs. Median age for this subgroup was 53 (24-87) yrs. With 85 events in L arm and 128 in P arm, the HR for DFS for hormone receptor negative pts was 0.68 (95%CI 0.52-0.89) favoring L. Most hormone receptor negative subgroups showed benefit for L: pts up to 1 yr from diagnosis (HR 0.64; 95%CI 0.41-0.99), node negative (HR 0.57; 95%CI 0.35-0.92), premenopausal (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.37-0.94), and those who received prior anthracycline chemotherapy without taxanes (HR 0.63; 95%CI 0.43-0.92). Node positive patients had a trend to benefit from L (HR 0.74; 95%CI 0.53-1.03). CNS as one site of initial recurrence occurred in 1% in L (n=7) and P (n=8) arms. Conclusions: Lapatinib improved DFS in patients early or late in follow-up from diagnosis of HER2+, hormone receptor negative BC. Similar subset analyses are important in other large adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy trials. Results might provide a better understanding of the subtypes of HER2+ disease and help to further individualized therapy.

CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism predicts pathologic complete response to sequential anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer

Overexpression of CD24 is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. Recently, two polymorphisms in the CD24 gene were linked to disease risk and progression in autoimmune diseases. Here, we evaluated the clinical relevance of these polymorphisms with respect to their potential to predict a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for primary breast cancer (PBC), one of the strongest prognostic factors in this setting. A total of 257 patients were randomized to either doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) or doxorubicin/pemetrexed (AP), both followed by docetaxel (Doc) as NCT for T2-4 N0-2 M0 PBC as part of an international, multicenter, randomized phase II trial. CD24 polymorphisms were analyzed on germ line DNA and correlated with clinicopathologic variables and pCR. No significant associations were found between either of the polymorphisms and any of the clinicopathologic variables. In a multivariate analysis, CD24 Val/Val genotype was the only significant predictor of pCR (OR: 4.97; P = 0.003). The predictive potential was significant in both treatment arms and in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup. There was no correlation between CD24 3'UTR (TG/Del) genotype and pCR. We did not observe any association between CD24 genotype and CD24 protein expression or in vitro chemosensitivity, but there was a significant correlation between CD24 Val/Val and intratumoral lymphocyte aggregates. In conclusion, CD24 Ala/Val SNP is a strong and independent predictor of pCR after NCT for PBC and may affect immune functions rather than tumor characteristics. Further evaluation of the CD24 function and validation of its predictive potential are clearly warranted.

Poor Outcome of Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer at Very Young Age Is Due to Tamoxifen Resistance: Nationwide Survival Data in Korea—A Report From the Korean Breast Cancer Society

Breast cancer in very young women (age < 35 years) is uncommon and poorly understood. We sought to evaluate the prognosis and treatment response of these patients compared with women ages 35 to 50 years. We analyzed data from 9,885 breast cancer patients age < or = 50 years who were part of the Korean Breast Cancer Society registration program between 1992 and 2001. The overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared between age groups. One thousand four hundred forty-four patients (14.6%) were younger than age 35 and 8,441 (85.4%) patients were between 35 and 50 years of age. Younger patients had significantly higher T-stage and higher lymph node positivity and lower hormone receptor expression than older patients. Younger patients had a greater probability of death than older patients, regardless of tumor size or lymph node status. The survival difference was significant for patients with positive or unknown hormone receptor status (P < .0001), but not for patients with negative hormone receptor status. In a multivariate analysis, the interaction term of young age and hormone receptor positivity was significant for OS and BCSS with a hazard ratio for OS of 2.13 (95% CI, 1.52 to 2.98). The significant survival benefit from adjuvant hormone therapy after chemotherapy observed in older patients (hazard ratio for OS, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.79; P = .001) could not be seen in younger patients (P > .05). Younger patients (age < 35) showed worse prognosis than older patients (age, 35 to 50 years) only in the hormone receptor-unknown or hormone receptor-positive subgroups. Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy might provide less survival benefit when added to chemotherapy in very young breast cancer patients.

Advanced breast cancer updates on anastrozole versus tamoxifen

Results from two studies, the North American trial and the Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability (TARGET) trial carried out in Europe/rest of the world comparing ‘Arimidex’ (anastrozole) 1 mg with tamoxifen 20 mg for treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, have previously been reported individually and as a prospectively combined analysis. For the combined analysis, at a median follow-up of 18.2 months anastrozole was shown to be superior to tamoxifen in terms of time to progression (TTP; P=0.022) in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup. Both treatments were well tolerated; anastrozole was associated with significantly fewer thromboembolic events ( P=0.043) and fewer reports of vaginal bleeding. The survival analyses and safety update in the overall population and in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup from the combined data are now available. At a median follow-up of 43 months, 56.0% of patients in the anastrozole group and 56.1% of patients in the tamoxifen group had died. At the cut-off date, 2-year mortality rates were 31.7 and 32.5% with anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively, in the overall population. Median time to death (TTD) was similar for both treatments (39 months versus 40 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, lower 95% confidence limit (CL) 0.84). Similar findings were reported in the hormone receptor-positive population. With longer follow-up, both anastrozole and tamoxifen remained well tolerated. Sequencing data showed that patients crossed from anastrozole to tamoxifen or tamoxifen to anastrozole are similar regarding efficacy. In conclusion, these TTP, survival and tolerability data support the use of anastrozole as a first-line therapy of choice in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.