Abstract Background: Estrogen typically promotes the progression of hormone-dependent breast cancer through activation of estrogen receptor (ER)-α encoded by ESR1. While estrogen-induced tumor suppression in ER+ breast cancer has been clinically observed as an unexpected outcome of aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistance, the molecular mechanisms have not yet been fully defined. Methods: Characterization of estrogen regulation in the two ER+ breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models with opposite responses to estrogen offered us an unprecedented opportunity to assess how 17β-estradiol (E2) modulates ER+ cancer. We succeeded in establishing estrogen-stimulating (SC31) and estrogen-suppressing (GS3) PDX models. In vivo tumor promotion or suppression by estrogen was confirmed through experiments by implanting E2 pellets in mice carrying SC31/GS3, and then single cell analysis was performed using SC31/GS3 tumors. To investigate whether GS3 would change its response to E2, we performed intermittent E2 treatment every 28 days (E2 pellet on/off every 28 days) and whole-genome RNA sequencing using GS3 tumors. Results: SC31 and GS3 behaved oppositely regarding estrogen-mediated tumor growth. Immunohistochemistry indicated that the number of ERα+ cells and Ki-67+ cells were increased in SC31 and decreased in GS3 after E2 treatment, but progesterone receptor+ cells appeared in both SC31 and GS3 after E2 treatment at the protein level. The E2-induced suppression of GS3 involves ERα, not ERβ, which was wild-type and not amplified. Single cell RNA sequencing analysis of these PDXs had revealed that E2 upregulated the expression of estrogen-regulated genes (e.g., PGR and AREG) in both SC31 and GS3. However, E2 treatment induced cell cycle promotion in SC31, while E2 induced cell cycle arrest in GS3. These gene-expression changes occurred in both ESR1+ cells and ESR1- cells, demonstrating for the first time the influence of estrogen on ESR1- cells in ER+breast tumors. This result suggests that 100% ER positivity is not essential for endocrine response. E2 also upregulated a tumor suppressor gene, IL24, only in GS3. More IL24+ cells were ESR1+ and in G1 phase than IL24- cells. Hallmark apoptosis gene sets were upregulated and the hallmark G2M checkpoint gene set was downregulated in IL24+ cells after E2 treatment. After three rounds of intermittent E2 treatment on GS3, an E2 independent growth developed. Approximately 60% of genes in the intermittent E2-treated sample had the same trend as E2-treated samples (mainly ER target genes), in which 40% of the genes behaved similarly to the placebo-treated sample (mainly cell cycle progression genes). Furthermore, lower levels of IL24 were linked to estrogen independence. Conclusions: Estrogen/ERα signaling increases the expression of estrogen-regulated genes, but it can modulate HR+ tumor growth in different manners. While E2 should activate ERα and regulate ESR1+ cells, our findings regarding ESR1- cells were new and suggested crosstalk between ESR1+ cells and ESR1- cells in both estrogen-stimulating and -suppressing ER+ tumors. Furthermore, our studies demonstrate the potential roles of tumor suppressor gene, IL24 in HR+ cancer. Our findings point to the need to identify biomarkers for patients with estrogen-suppressing tumors who can benefit from E2 treatment after AI resistance; measurements of ER and PR expression are insufficient. Expression of IL24 in AI-resistant tumors may be one such indicator for favorable response to E2 therapy. Citation Format: Hitomi Mori, Kohei Saeki, Gregory Chang, Jinhui Wang, Xiwei Wu, Pei-Yin Hsu, Noriko Kanaya, George Somlo, Masafumi Nakamura, Andrea Bild, Shiuan Chen. Estrogen-mediated mechanisms in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer at the single cell level [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-04.
Read full abstract