You have accessJournal of UrologyRobotics - Renal1 Apr 2016V9-03 ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR HILAR TUMORS Matthew J. Maurice, Daniel Ramirez, Peter A. Caputo, Ryan J. Nelson, Onder Kara, Ercan Malkoc, and Jihad H. Kaouk Matthew J. MauriceMatthew J. Maurice More articles by this author , Daniel RamirezDaniel Ramirez More articles by this author , Peter A. CaputoPeter A. Caputo More articles by this author , Ryan J. NelsonRyan J. Nelson More articles by this author , Onder KaraOnder Kara More articles by this author , Ercan MalkocErcan Malkoc More articles by this author , and Jihad H. KaoukJihad H. Kaouk More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.1194AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Hilar tumors are challenging due to their centrality and proximity to the renal hilum, increasing the complexity of tumor excision and renal reconstruction. We sought to highlight these challenges and demonstrate techniques for successful execution and excellent outcomes. METHODS Using our retrospective robotic partial nephrectomy database, we abstracted data on patients who were treated between 2006 and 2015. Videos demonstrating robotic partial nephrectomy for two particularly challenging hilar tumors were selected for presentation. For all cases, patients were positioned in full 45-degree flank, and surgery was performed with four working ports. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to identify tumor margins and guide excision. The renorrhaphy was performed in a minimum of two layers, including a deep layer closed with 2-0 polyglactin 910 in a running fashion and a capsular layer closed with 0 polyglactin 910 suture in a horizontal mattress fashion. RESULTS Of 1123 total operations, 97 (8.9%) were performed for hilar tumors. Median tumor size was 3.7 cm (IQR, 3.0-4.6), and median RENAL score was 9 (IQR, 8-10). Median estimated blood loss was 200 cc (IQR, 100-300). Median operative and warm ischemia times were 3.3 hours (IQR, 2.7-4.3) and 26 minutes (IQR, 21-33), respectively. The overall complication rate for all tumors was 22.2% (249/1,123), including 183 (16.3%) minor and 66 (5.9%) major complications. For hilar tumors, the complication rate was 30.9% (30/97), including 21 (21.6%) minor and 9 (9.3%) major complications. CONCLUSIONS Robotic partial nephrectomy is technically feasible for highly complex hilar tumors. Operative times and warm ischemia may be prolonged. For select cases, clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes are excellent. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e860 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Matthew J. Maurice More articles by this author Daniel Ramirez More articles by this author Peter A. Caputo More articles by this author Ryan J. Nelson More articles by this author Onder Kara More articles by this author Ercan Malkoc More articles by this author Jihad H. Kaouk More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract