Courtship, Marriage Vows,and Political Metaphor in Vanbrugh's TheRelapse and TheProvokedWife JEMCS 1.2 (Fall/Winter 2001) Carlos J. G6mez playwrights' viewsonmarriage provide, as Robert D. Hume has noted, "an importantkey to the shifting ideological stances"oftheperiod ("Marital Discord" 248).Although tragedy is potentially a moreliteralvehicleforpoliticaldebate on the public sphere,comic themesare metaphorsfor,and consequencesof,social and politicalchanges.Actually, many charactersdefine theirdomestic, private situationswithimages ofpoliticalauthority, sovereignty included. For instance, in Etherege's She WouldifShe Could(1668),Arianaand Gatty, two unmarried girls, agreeto"become absolutetyrants,* shouldtheir gallants behave"likelawlesssubjects"(I.ii.177-81).Iftheir gender inversion ofthemale/sovereign analogyis a fantasy derived from thelanguagesofpremarital courtship and precieusegallantry,1 in thesame playSir Oliver'slikening his wifeto an usurperof his "empire"(II.ii.176-79) reveals his assimilation of both patriarchal and patriarchalist discourses - thesubordination of womentomenand monarchic powerbeinganalogoustofamilial authorityrespectively(see, forexample, McKeon). Gender relations areoften defined through political metaphor. TheLadies Dictionary (1694) states that "a BeautifulWoman fixesher unshakenEmpirein the heartsofherAdmirers" (59), but,as MaryAstellwarnsherfemalereaderin 1700, a man "maycall himself herSlave a fewdays,butitis onlyinordertomakeher his all therestofhis Life." Actually, those"whomaketheIdols, are thegreater Deities"(44-45). Mypurposeis to examinethegenderedpowerrelationsof theprivatesphere(courtship and marriage) inVanbrugh'stwo majorplays,and theuse ofpoliticalanalogiesto definethem. Vanbrugh's realistic portrayal ofpost-Revolutionary timesreveals 94 TheJournal forEarlyModern Cultural Studies his concernforwomen'slot. TheRelapse (Nov.1696) and The Provoked Wife (April1697)belongtoa decade inwhichprivate/ public-sphere tropesare particularly frequent and underscore the crisis ofpatriarchalist notionsofthe polity,a crisisthat coexistswiththeratification ofpatriarchy inthemaritalsphere and thereformulation ofwomen'sprimarily moralassignment; thatis, the appearance ofa socializingmatriarchy.2 Conduct bookslikeRichard Allestree's influential TheLadiesCalling (1673) could ask women to "draw offmen's eyes" fromsin and simultaneously insistthatGodhas "determined subjection tobe women'slot."3 In myopinion, Vanbrugh's playsunderline this duplicity. Thefollowing sequenceofeventsdefines women'sfate in his plots.Once a womanenterstheprivate worldofhernew home, subjection replaces the fantasies nourished during courtship. Still,although hersexualpower overherformer suitor disappearsaftera while,thelibertines outtherein thepublic, social realmstilloffer herimagesofpowerthatarea reversal of her domesticsituation.Ifthewifedoes not enterthis sexual market, thenhervirtue willbe granted persuasivepowersmuch moretranscendentthan her former sexual appeal: both the privateand thepublicspheresmaybenefit from herinfluence, sincebothbad husbandsandlibertines maybe reformed. Cibber hadendorsed thispoint, butVanbrugh's is thatsuchmatriarchal powersare eventuallysterile,since post-Revolutionary rakes perpetuate oldstandardsoflibertinism. The reversal of power roles inherentlyassociated with marriageis impliedin many early Restorationcomedies. A playwright thatdenouncesitveryexplicitly is ThomasDurfey, whose Madam Fickle,in the play ofthat name (1676), sees through theartificial discourseofhersuitors.Bellamore, who uses "a whining method," evenrevealsthegamehe is at: "What womanbutyoudurstprovoke a loverthus?Nay,one thatis to marry you,and consequently to have powerto tyrannize over you"(II.ii.71;95-97).Vanbrugh provides hisownexampleinThe Relapse. Whentheinexperienced Hoyden, whois familiar only withparentalauthority, is asked to giveher "consent,"she wonderswhyshe is notexpectedtoobeyhersuitor,and Young Fashionhas toexplaintoherprecisely whatAstell warnscourted womenabout: "That'swhenwe are married;tillthen,I am to obey you."4The temporariness ofmale subjectionguarantees patriarchal order, sinceindulgence leads tousurpation.Such is Manly'sopinioninCibber'sTheProvoked Husband(1728),based on Vanbrugh'sunfinished A Journey toLondon:LordTownly "shouldhavetakenup thehusband"(1.327-30), buthe has kept Gomez 95 on acting the loverand treatinghis wifeas an idolized mistress. Ifmost Restorationheroines feartheirworshippinggallants may turn into brutes, women characters of the 1690s in particular need not be warned against the fictionality offemale power. As Durfey'sBerenice puts it afterabusing her suitor, "[t]hetimeof Wooing is a Woman's own,/ But when she's Married once, her time is gone" (IILi, 28). In George Granville's The She-Gallants (Dec. 1695?), Constantia, conscious of "what Dissemblers are Men" (I, 3), disguises herself as her own brother because by venturing into her gallant's company in male attire, by establishing homosocial relations,5 she will have "many opportunitiestopryintohis mostsecretaffections" (1,3). Another cross-dresserwho believes in theopportunitiesprovidedbymale partnership is the untamed Charlotte in She Venturesand He Wins(1695), by"Ariadne." A loverwill"flatter and deceive"without showing "his paw till he has got his preyfast in his clutches." The couple's first meetingas man and woman is on theirweddingday , her only"day ofpower"because she supposes the "devout" lover will soon claim the "lawfulauthority"of his new status: "beingthe last that I must reign,you must expect me to be very tyrannical"(Li, 109; III.v, 133). Many other female characters, whetherseriouslyornot,assume such temporary powerrelations based on absolute authority;forinstance...