Homomeric Kir4 Research Articles

Differential expression and distribution of Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 inwardly rectifying K+ channels in retina.

Kir5.1 is an inwardly rectifying K+ channel subunit whose functional role has not been fully elucidated. Expression and distribution of Kir5.1 in retina were examined with a specific polyclonal antibody. Kir5.1 immunoreactivity was detected in glial Müller cells and in some retinal neurons. In the Kir5.1-positive neurons the expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) was detected, suggesting that they may be GABAergic-amacrine cells. In Müller cells, spots of Kir5.1 immunoreactivity distributed diffusely at the cell body and in the distal portions, where Kir4.1 immunoreactivity largely overlapped. In addition, Kir4.1 immunoreactivity without Kir5.1 was strongly concentrated at the endfoot of Müller cells facing the vitreous surface or in the processes surrounding vessels. The immunoprecipitant obtained from retina with anti-Kir4.1 antibody contained Kir5.1. These results suggest that heterotetrameric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels may exist in the cell body and distal portion of Müller cells, whereas homomeric Kir4.1 channels are clustered in the endfeet and surrounding vessels. It is possible that homomeric Kir4.1 and heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels play different functional roles in the K+-buffering action of Müller cells.

Biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels by CO2 and pH.

CO2 chemoreception may be related to modulation of inward rectifier K+ channels (Kir channels) in brainstem neurons. Kir4.1 is expressed predominantly in the brainstem and inhibited during hypercapnia. Although the homomeric Kir4.1 only responds to severe intracellular acidification, coexpression of Kir4.1 with Kir5.1 greatly enhances channel sensitivities to CO2 and pH. To understand the biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of these currents by CO2 and pH, heteromeric Kir4. 1-Kir5.1 were studied in inside-out patches. These Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents showed a single channel conductance of 59 pS with open-state probability (P(open)) approximately 0.4 at pH 7.4. Channel activity reached the maximum at pH 8.5 and was completely suppressed at pH 6.5 with pKa 7.45. The effect of low pH on these currents was due to selective suppression of P(open) without evident effects on single channel conductance, leading to a decrease in the channel mean open time and an increase in the mean closed time. At pH 8.5, single-channel currents showed two sublevels of conductance at approximately 1/4 and 3/4 of the maximal openings. None of them was affected by lowering pH. The Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents were modulated by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) that enhanced baseline P(open) and reduced channel sensitivity to intracellular protons. In the presence of 10 microM PIP2, the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 showed a pKa value of 7.22. The effect of PIP2, however, was not seen in homomeric Kir4.1 currents. The CO2/pH sensitivities were related to a lysine residue in the NH2 terminus of Kir4.1. Mutation of this residue (K67M, K67Q) completely eliminated the CO2 sensitivity of both homomeric Kir4.1 and heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1. In excised patches, interestingly, the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 carrying K67M mutation remained sensitive to low pHi. Such pH sensitivity, however, disappeared in the presence of PIP2. The effect of PIP2 on shifting the titration curve of wild-type and mutant channels was totally abolished when Arg178 in Kir5.1 was mutated. Thus, these studies demonstrate a heteromeric Kir channel that can be modulated by both acidic and alkaline pH, show the modulation of pH sensitivity of Kir channels by PIP2, and provide information of the biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the Kir modulation by intracellular protons.

In vivo formation of a proton-sensitive K+ channel by heteromeric subunit assembly of Kir5.1 with Kir4.1.

Kir5.1 is an inwardly rectifying K+ channel (Kir) subunit, whose physiological function is unknown. Human embryonic kidney HEK293T cells co-transfected with rat Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 cDNA expressed a functional K+ channel, whose properties were significantly different from those of the homomeric Kir4.1 channel. Formation of a Kir4. 1/Kir5.1 assembly in HEK293T was confirmed biochemically. We found that heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channel activity was affected by internal pH levels between 6.0 and 8.0, when the homomeric Kir4.1 channel activity was relatively stable. Changing external pH in this range had no effect on either Kir channel. Western blot analysis using specific antibodies revealed that Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 proteins were expressed in kidney and brain, but co-immunoprecipitated only from kidney. These results indicate that the co-assembly of Kir5.1 with Kir4.1 occurs in vivo, at least in kidney. The heteromeric Kir4. 1/Kir5.1 channel may therefore sense intracellular pH in renal epithelium and be involved in the regulation of acid-base homeostasis.

Modulation of kir4.1 and kir5.1 by hypercapnia and intracellular acidosis.

CO2 chemoreception may be mediated by the modulation of certain ion channels in neurons. Kir4.1 and Kir5.1, two members of the inward rectifier K+ channel family, are expressed in several brain regions including the brainstem. To test the hypothesis that Kir4.1 and Kir5. 1 are modulated by CO2 and pH, we carried out experiments by expressing Kir4.1 and coexpressing Kir4.1 with Kir5.1 (Kir4.1-Kir5. 1) in Xenopus oocytes. K+ currents were then studied using two-electrode voltage clamp and excised patches. Exposure of the oocytes to CO2 (5, 10 and 15 %) produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the whole-cell K+ currents. This inhibition was fast and reversible. Exposure to 15 % CO2 suppressed Kir4.1 currents by approximately 20 % and Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents by approximately 60 %. The effect of CO2 was likely to be mediated by intracellular acidification, because selective intracellular, but not extracellular, acidification to the measured hypercapnic pH levels lowered the currents as effectively as hypercapnia. In excised inside-out patches, exposure of the cytosolic side of membranes to solutions with various pH levels brought about a dose-dependent inhibition of the macroscopic K+ currents. The pK value (-log of dissociation constant) for the inhibition was 6.03 in the Kir4.1 channels, while it was 7.45 in Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels, an increase in pH sensitivity of 1.4 pH units. Hypercapnia without changing pH did not inhibit the Kir4.1 and Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents, suggesting that these channels are inhibited by protons rather than molecular CO2. A lysine residue in the N terminus of Kir4.1 is critical. Mutation of this lysine at position 67 to methionine (K67M) completely eliminated the CO2 sensitivity of both the homomeric Kir4. 1 and heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1. These results therefore indicate that the Kir4.1 channel is inhibited during hypercapnia by a decrease in intracellular pH, and the coexpression of Kir4.1 with Kir5.1 greatly enhances channel sensitivity to CO2/pH and may enable cells to detect both increases and decreases in PCO2 and intracellular pH at physiological levels.

Co-expression of Human Kir3 Subunits Can Yield Channels with Different Functional Properties

To date, no comprehensive study has been done on all combinations of the human homologues of the Kir3.0 channel family, and the human homologue of Kir3.3 has not yet been identified. To obtain support for the contention that most of the functional data on non-human Kir3.0 channels can be extrapolated to human channels, we have cloned the human homologues of the Kir3.0 family, including the yet unidentified human Kir3.3, and the human Kir4.1. 1 1 Accession numbers for the Genbank database are U50964 for Kir3.1, U52153 for Kir3.2, U52152 for Kir3.3, U52154 for Kir3.4 and U52155 for Kir4.1. The expression pattern of these channels in various human brain areas and peripheral tissues, analysed by Northern blot analysis, allows for the existence of various homomeric and heteromeric forms of human Kir3.0 channels. Expression studies of all possible combinations in Xenopus oocytes indicated that in homomeric Kir3.2c and heteromeric Kir3.1/3.2c channels mediate, in our studies, inward currents with largest amplitude of any other Kir3.0 channel combinations, followed by heteromeric Kir3.1/3.4 and homomeric Kir4.1 channels. Channel combinations which include Kir3.3 are detrimental to the formation of functional channels. The co-expression experiments with different Kir channel subunits indicate the selective formation of certain channel combinations, suggesting that channel specificity is not solely dependent on spatial and temporal regulation of Kir subunit expression.