HIGH LAND VALUE TAXATION tends to force good land into use and thus to make the rent of land lower. It offers more incentive to saving and to investment in the production of useful capital. It encourages increase of capital in the land-value-tax communities. It thus better provides labor with both land and capital, thereby makes labor more productive and tends toward higher wages. It lowers the expense of housing for those who must be tenants and lowers the sale prices of homes for would-be home owners. It makes easier, because less expensive, the providing of children's playgrounds and public parks. Why do our teachers and textbook writers in economics, with relatively few exceptions, either attempt to discredit the theoretical case for this reform while ignoring the impressive supporting data from Australia,' or else completely ignore the theory, the data and the subject? In this connection it may be especially appropriate to examine an objection to the land-value-tax policy, which seems to have been the one most stressed by the textbooks. The objection in question to introducing additional taxes on land values or to increasing taxes on land values relatively to other taxes, is that to do so would be unjust. A common way of putting the thought, has been to say that for a state or community to retain the rent of land might have been right and proper if this had been done from the very beginning. It could have been right, in this view, only if the policy had been begun when there was no land rent and when no one had paid for any land a sum based on any future expectations which the introduction of such a tax would-or might-prevent him from realizing. But, it is said, when men have purchased land on the assumption-based on custom and perhaps on very long custom-that it will not be taxed more heavily in relation to other property values or incomes in the future than it has been in the past, then the introduction of a land value tax system or of any relative increase of taxation of land values is unjust and, therefore, inadmissible.
Read full abstract