Evaluate the feasibility of a homeward stroke recovery (HSR) program by measuring functional outcomes, intervention fidelity, and Profit & Loss. A retrospective observational analysis of 23 stroke survivors discharged to a home healthcare (HHC) program offering early and intensive rehabilitative therapy within 24 hours of index hospitalization. Functional outcomes include timed up-and-go, transfer functional independent measures, and Barthel Index. Clinical outcomes are mortality, all-cause 30-day hospital readmission, and fall rates. Process measures consist of time-to-first HHC visit, number of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) visits from initial evaluation, and total number of visits by clinician type. Financial outcomes include average daily gross HSR revenue compared with an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) stay and average daily net HSR profit. Functional outcomes significantly improved across all measures ( p < .001) without reported falls, deaths, and only one unrelated readmission. On average, HSR began within 1.6 days from hospital discharge including 4.2 PT and 3.7 OT visits within 5 days of respective initial evaluation. Patients received an average of 9.4 nursing, 9.2 PT, 6.4 OT, and 2.2 speech therapy visits. Exploratory analyses demonstrated similar functional recovery despite longer hospitalization (rs = 0.43; p = .039). Revenue per day was lower for HSR than IRF services but costs exceeded the reimbursement rates for this program. The HSR program is feasible given that patients realized significant functional improvement with negligible consequences. Reimbursement reform is necessary to sustain and scale the program. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.
Read full abstract