Home Health Admission Research Articles

Changes in skilled nursing and home health admissions associated with Medicare payment reforms and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Shortly after Medicare implemented post-acute care payment reforms, the COVID-19 pandemic began, but little is known about how these reforms and the pandemic impacted admissions to the most common post-acute settings-skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and home health agencies (HHAs)-for the full Medicare fee-for-service population. Using 100% of Medicare fee-for-service data, we conducted adjusted interrupted time series analyses of 31,730,994 hospital stays of all adult beneficiaries discharged alive from the hospital between 2018 and 2021 to examine whether payment reforms and the pandemic were associated with differences in admissions to SNFs and HHAs compared to pre-reform and pre-COVID (baseline) trends. At baseline, an average 18.0% of hospitalized beneficiaries were admitted to SNFs and 14.8% to HHAs. While SNF payment reform in October 2019 was associated with an immediate reduction in SNF admissions, a positive temporal trend reversed this decrease in admissions. HHA payment reform implemented in January 2020 was associated with increased HHA admissions compared to baseline. Post-COVID, admissions to SNF declined to 15.5% of patients being discharged from hospitals and HHA admissions increased to 19.2%. SNF and HHA payment reforms were associated with small increases in admissions to their respective settings, suggesting that Medicare reforms did not negatively impact access. However, the baseline trends of decreasing admissions to SNF and increasing HHA admissions were greatly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Results highlight changes in the demand for these settings, which must be recognized in policy efforts and research examining impacts on specific patient populations.

Central nervous system active medication use in Medicare enrollees receiving home health care: association with chronic pain and anxiety level.

No comparative effectiveness data exist on nonopioid analgesics and nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics to treat pain with anxiety. We examined the relationship between drug class and central nervous system (CNS) active drug polypharmacy on pain and anxiety levels in Medicare enrollees receiving home health (HH) care. This retrospective cohort study included enrollees with diagnoses and 2+ assessments of pain and anxiety between HH admission and discharge. Three sets of linear regression difference-in-reduction analyses assessed the association of pain or anxiety reduction with number of drugs; drug type; and drug combinations in those with daily pain and daily anxiety. Logistic regression analysis assessed the effect of medication number and class on less-than-daily pain or anxiety at HH discharge. A sensitivity analysis using multinomial regression was conducted with a three-level improvement to further determine clinical significance. Of 85,403 HH patients, 43% received opioids, 27% benzodiazepines, 26% gabapentinoids, 32% selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and 8% serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). Furthermore, 75% had depression, 40% had substance use disorder diagnoses, and 6.9% had PTSD diagnoses. At HH admission, 83%, 35%, and 30% of patients reported daily pain, daily anxiety, and both, respectively. Central nervous system polypharmacy was associated with worse pain control and had no significant effect on anxiety. For patients with daily pain plus anxiety, pain was best reduced with one medication or any drug combination without opioid/benzodiazepine; anxiety was best reduced with combinations other than opiate/benzodiazepine. Gabapentinoids or SNRI achieved clinically meaningful pain control. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors provided clinically meaningful anxiety relief.

Drivers of Community-Entry Home Health Care Utilization Among Older Adults

ObjectivesA growing proportion of Medicare home health (HH) patients are “community-entry,” meaning referred to HH without a preceding hospitalization. We sought to identify factors that predict community-entry HH use among older adults to provide foundational information regarding care needs and circumstances that may prompt community-entry HH referral. DesignNationally representative cohort study. Setting and ParticipantsHealth and Retirement Study (HRS) respondents who were aged ≥65 years, community-living, and enrolled in Medicare between 2012 and 2018 (n = 11,425 unique individuals providing 27,026 two-year observation periods). MethodsHRS data were linked with standardized HH patient assessments. Community-entry HH utilization was defined as incurring one or more HH episode with no preceding hospitalization or institutional post-acute care stay (determined via assessment item indicating institutional care within 14 days of HH admission) within 2 years of HRS interview. Weighted, multivariable logistic regression was used to model community-entry HH use as a function of individual, social support, and community characteristics. ResultsThe overall rate of community-entry HH utilization across observation periods was 13.4%. Older adults had higher odds of community-entry HH use if they were Medicaid enrolled [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.49, P = .001], had fair or poor overall health (aOR = 1.48, P < .001), 3+ activities of daily living limitations (aOR = 1.47, P = .007), and had fallen in the past 2 years (aOR = 1.43, P < .001). Compared with those receiving no caregiver help, individuals were more likely to use community-entry HH if they received family or unpaid help only (aOR = 1.81, P < .001), both family and paid help (aOR = 2.79, P < .001), or paid help only (aOR: 3.46, P < .001). Conclusions and ImplicationsFindings indicate that community-entry HH serves a population with long-term care needs and coexisting clinical complexity, making this an important setting to provide skilled care and prevent avoidable health care utilization. Results highlight the need for ongoing monitoring of community-entry HH accessibility as this service is a key component of home-based care for a high-need subpopulation.

Relationships of Pain Treatment With Dementia and Functional Outcome in Medicare Home Health Care

Adequate pain management is important to post-acute care functional recovery, yet persons with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) are often under-treated for pain. The objectives of this study were to examine in Medicare post-acute home health (HH) recipients with daily interfering pain 1) if analgesic use at home is related to functional outcome, and 2) if ADRD is related to the likelihood of analgesic use at home. We analyzed data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare claims, and electronic medical records of 6,039 Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years who received care from a large HH agency in New York in 2019 and reported daily interfering pain. Analgesic use was identified in medication reconciliation of HH visits and categorized into any analgesics or opioid(s). ADRD was identified from ICD-10 codes and significant cognitive impairment. Functional outcome was measured as change in the composite score of Activity of Daily Living (ADL) limitations from HH admission to HH discharge. Use of any analgesics at home was associated with greater ADL improvement from HH admission to HH discharge (β= -0.20 [greater improvement by 0.2 ADLs], 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -0.37, -0.04; p=0.017). Compared with patients without ADRD, those with ADRD were less likely to use any analgesics (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.90, p=0.008) or opioids (OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.62, p<0.001) at home. Adequate pain management is essential to functional improvement in post-acute HH care. Patients with ADRD may be under-treated for pain in post-acute HH care.

Poor Recovery of Activities-of-Daily-Living Function Is Associated With Higher Rates of Postsurgical Hospitalization After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Medicare beneficiaries are increasingly using home health (HH) as the first postacute care setting after hospital discharge following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Yet, prior research has shown that changes in payment models for TJA may negatively influence functional outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of poor functional outcomes during an HH episode of care on hospitalization risk for older recipients of TJA. For this study, 5822 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective TJA and subsequently participated in HH care following hospital discharge were identified using Medicare hospitalizations records and HH claims. Recovery of activities-of-daily-living (ADL) function was evaluated using patient assessment data completed at HH admission and discharge from the Medicare Outcomes and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). Hospitalization outcomes were captured from Medicare hospital claims. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the hazard ratio for hospitalization after HH discharge. The 5822 Medicare beneficiaries who received a TJA and subsequently were discharged to HH were evaluated (n = 3989 [68.6%] following total knee replacement, n = 1883 [31.4%]) following total hip replacement). Nearly 9% (n = 534) of patients did not improve their ability to perform ADLs during the HH episode; this lack of improvement was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in hospital readmission rate following HH discharge (2.3% vs 4.9%). In adjusted models, there was a significant 77% increase (hazard ratio = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.14-2.74) in hospitalization risk during the 90-day postsurgical period. Poor recovery of ADL function in HH settings following TJA is strongly associated with elevated risk of future hospitalizations. Medicare beneficiaries who fail to make substantive improvements in basic ADL function during HH care episodes following TJA may need intensive monitoring from interdisciplinary team members across the continuum of care, especially during transitions from home care to outpatient care. An increasing number of patients receive home health care after joint replacement surgery, but outcomes after home health are unclear. These findings suggest that improvements in basic tasks such as walking or bathing are associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization.

Care-Partner Support and Hospitalization in Assisted Living During Transitional Home Health Care.

Care-partner support affects outcomes among assisted living (AL) residents. Yet, little is known about care-partner support and its effects on hospitalization during post-acute care transitions. This study examined the variation in care-partner support and its impact on hospitalizations among AL residents receiving Medicare home health (HH) services. Analysis of national data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare claims, Area Health Resources File, and the Social Deprivation Index File. AL facilities and Medicare HH agencies in the United States. 741,926 Medicare HH admissions of AL residents in 2017. Care-partner support during the HH admission was measured based on the type and frequency of assistance from AL staff in seven domains (i.e., activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADLs, medication administration, treatment, medical equipment, home safety, and transportation). Care-partner support in each domain was measured as "assistance not needed" (reference group), "Care-partner currently provides assistance," "care-partner need additional training/support to provide assistance" (i.e., inadequate care-partner support), and "care-partner unavailable/unlikely to provide assistance" (i.e., unavailable care-partner support). Outcome was time-to-hospitalization during the HH admission. Among the 741,926 Medicare HH admissions of AL residents, inadequate care-partner support was identified for all seven domains that ranged from 13.1% (for transportation) to 49.8% (for treatment), and care-partner support was unavailable from 0.9% (for transportation) to 11.0% (for treatment). In Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for patient covariates and geography, compared with "assistance not needed", having inadequate and unavailable care-partner support was related to increased risk of hospitalization by 8.9% (treatment (hazard ratio (HR) =1.089, P < .001)) to 41.3% (medication administration (HR =1.413, P < .001)). For AL residents receiving HH services, having less care-partner support was related to increased risk of hospitalization, particularly regarding medication administration, medical equipment, and transportation/advocacy.

Utilization and Functional Outcomes Among Medicare Home Health Recipients Varied Across Living Situations.

Home health (HH) is a major type of home-based skilled care available to Medicare beneficiaries. We examined the association between living situation (home alone, home with others, and assisted living (AL) residence) and utilization and functional outcomes among Medicare HH recipients. Analysis of national data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, HH Compare, Medicare claims, and Area Health Resource Files. Medicare-certified HH agencies in the United States. National population of Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old who received HH care in CY 2017 (N = 6,637,496). Outcomes included time-to-event measures of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits, and improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) from the start to the end of the HH admission. AL residents (12%) and patients living alone at home (24%) had longer survival time without hospitalization and ED visits than patients living with others at home (64%). Adjusting for covariates and HH agency-level random effects, and compared with patients living with others, AL residents had lower risk of hospitalization (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, P < .001) and ED visit (HR = 0.92, P < .001); however, less ADL improvement (β = 0.29 (29% less of total independence in one ADL)); and patients living alone had lower risk of hospitalization (HR = 0.94, P < .001) and ED visit (HR = 0.93, P < .001), yet more ADL improvement (β = -0.15 (15% more of total independence in one ADL)). In the national population of Medicare HH recipients, patients living with others at home had the highest risk of hospitalization and ED visits, whereas AL residents had the lowest risk of hospitalization and patients living alone at home had the lowest risk of ED visits, meaning that combined support from HH and AL reduces acute care admissions. Evidence-based interventions are needed for HH patients living with others at home to avoid unnecessary acute care use.

Training Needs Among Family Caregivers Assisting During Home Health, as Identified by Home Health Clinicians

ObjectivesTo estimate the proportion of family caregivers assisting older adults during Medicare home health who have an identified need for activity-specific training and identify characteristics associated with caregiver training needs. DesignNationally representative retrospective cohort study. Setting and Participants1758 (weighted n = 8,477,990) Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) and received Medicare-funded home health care between 2011 and 2016. MeasuresOlder adult and caregiving network characteristics before home health (sociodemographic factors, caregiver assistance, older adult health and function) were drawn from NHATS; characteristics during home health (family caregiver training needs, older adult health and function) were drawn from home health patient assessments. Weighted proportions of family caregivers with an identified need for activity-specific training were estimated. Weighted, multivariable logistic regressions modeled associations between older adult/caregiving network characteristics and family caregivers’ identified activity-specific training needs during home health. ResultsMore than 1 in 3 (35.7%) family caregivers assisting older adults during Medicare home health had an identified training need with at least 1 caregiving activity. Rates of need for training varied widely, from 8.6% among caregivers helping with advocacy to 48.2% among caregivers helping with medical procedures. In weighted analyses that adjusted for older adults’ health and function, family caregivers were less likely to have identified training needs when assisting older adults with ongoing disability or who received caregiver assistance before home health admission. Conclusions and ImplicationsFindings highlight the pervasiveness of family caregivers' training needs, particularly with medically oriented activities, and indicate that escalations in older adults’ care needs are linked to caregiver training needs. Therefore, transitions of care may present critical opportunities to connect family caregivers with training resources.

Functional outcome in home health: Do racial and ethnic minority patients with dementia fare worse?

Evaluate the independent and interactive effects of dementia and racial/ethnic minority status on functional outcomes during a home health (HH) admission among Medicare beneficiaries. Secondary analysis of data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set [OASIS] and billing records in a non-profit HH agency in New York. Participants were adults ≥ 65 years old who received HH in CY 2017 with OASIS records at HH admission and HH discharge. Dementia was identified by diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) and cognitive impairment (OASIS: M1700, M1710, M1740). We used OASIS records to assess race/ethnicity (M0140) and functional status (M1800-M1870 on activities of daily living [ADL]). Functional outcome was measured as change in the composite ADL score from HH admission to HH discharge, where a negative score means improvement and a positive score means decline. The sample included 4,783 patients, among whom 93.9% improved in ADLs at HH discharge. In multivariable linear regression that adjusted for HH service use and covariates (R2 = 0.23), being African American (β = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 0.35, p = 0.005) and having dementia (β = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.62, p<0.001) were independently related to less ADL improvement at HH discharge, with significant interaction related to further decrease in ADL improvement. Relative to white patients without dementia, African American patients with dementia (β = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.35, p<0.001), Hispanics with dementia (β = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.38, 1.47, p = 0.001) and Asian Americans with dementia (β = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.81, 2.13, p<0.001) showed the least ADL improvement at HH discharge. Racial/ethnic minority status and dementia were associated with less ADL improvement in HH with independent and interactive effects. Policies should ensure that these patients have equitable access to appropriate, adequate community-based services to meet their needs in ADLs and disease management for improved outcomes.

THE RELEASE OF TECHNICAL QUALITY AND PATIENT EXPERIENCE STAR-RATINGS FOR HOME HEALTH AGENCIES AND AGENCY SELECTION

To facilitate informed Home Health Agency (HHA) selection for the 3.5 million annual Medicare home health (HH) users, CMS introduced technical quality and patient experience summary star-ratings on the Home Health Compare website in July 2015 and January 2016. There is no information about the relationship between the introduction of these two unique sets of star-ratings and HHA selection. We utilized a conditional logit, discrete choice model, which accounts for all HHAs that each patient could have selected (their “choice-set”) based on ZIP codes, to assess this relationship. We selected a random 5% sample (203,966 admissions) of new Medicare Fee-for-Service HH admissions that occurred in the year before, or the year after star-ratings were released. Star-ratings were obtained from the HH Compare website and categorized as low (=4 stars). We found the introduction of HHA star-ratings was associated with an increased likelihood of selecting an HHA with a high technical quality star-rating, and a decreased likelihood of selecting an HHA with a high patient experience star-rating. After controlling for each patient’s choice-set, patients had 19% increased odds (OR 1.19, 95% CI:1.16,2.23) of selecting a high technical quality HHA and a 12% decreased odds (OR 0.88, 95% CI:0.84,0.92) of selecting a high patient experience HHA, compared to low quality HHAs. Findings suggest patients and referring providers may prioritize technical quality over patient experience. Policy-makers should provide resources to enable HH patients to utilize and interpret the two different HHA star-ratings.

FUNCTIONAL STATUS ASSOCIATED WITH RISK OF READMISSION DURING HOME HEALTH CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA

Approximately 14.0% of Medicare beneficiaries are readmitted to a hospital within 30-days of home health admission. Individuals with dementia account for 30% of all home health care admissions and are at high-risk for rehospitalizations. Our primary objective was to determine the association between functional status and social support at admission to home health and 30-day potentially preventable readmissions (PPR) during home health care. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 124,119 Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health (7/2013 – 6/2015) and diagnosed with dementia (ICD-9 codes). Approximately 65% of participants were over the age of 81, 61% were female, and 80% were Caucasian. The primary outcome was 30-day PPR during home health. OASIS items were used to create mobility, self-care, social support, and cognition categories. The overall rate of 30-day PPR was 7.6% (95% CI: 7.4-7.7) but varied by patient and health care utilization characteristics. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the odds ratios (OR) for the most dependent score quartile versus the most independent was 1.68(1.56,1.80 95% CI) for mobility, 1.78 (95% CI: 1.66- 1.91) for self-care, and 1.10(95%CI: 1.03-1.17) for social support. The OR for impaired versus intact cognition was 1.12 (95% CI: 1.05-1.20). Impaired functional and cognitive status as well as limited social support at admission to home health care are associated with increased risk of PPR for individuals with dementia. Future research is needed to determine if strategies targeted at mobility and self-care can decrease PPR during home health for individuals with severe dementia.

GREATER DEMENTIA SEVERITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK OF POTENTIALLY PREVENTABLE READMISSIONS DURING HOME HEALTH CARE

Approximately 14.0% of Medicare beneficiaries are readmitted to a hospital within 30-days of home health admission. Individuals with dementia account for 30% of all home health care admissions and are at high-risk for rehospitalizations. Our primary objective was to determine the association between dementia severity at admission to home health and 30-day potentially preventable readmissions (PPR) during home health care. A secondary objective was to develop a dementia severity category from OASIS items based on the Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST). Retrospective cohort study of 124,119 Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health (7/2013 – 6/2015) and diagnosed with dementia (ICD-9 codes). The primary outcome was 30-day PPR during home health. The predictor variable of dementia severity was categorized into six levels (non-affected to severe). The overall rate of 30-day PPR was 7.6% (95% CI 7.4, 7.7) but varied by patient and health care utilization characteristics. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, patients classified as stage 6 and stage 7 had 1.36 (95% CI 1.28, 1.45) and 1.90 (95% CI 1.59, 2.26) times higher odds to experience a 30-day PPR compared to patients classified as stage 1-2. Dementia severity in the later stages is associated with increased risk for PPR. Development of a dementia severity category based on OASIS items and the FAST is feasible. Future research is needed to determine effective strategies for decreasing PPR during home health for individuals with severe dementia. Future research is needed to validate the proposed dementia severity categories used in this study.

Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries

Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment is increasing, with one-third of Medicare beneficiaries currently selecting MA. Despite this growth, it is difficult to assess the quality of the health care professionals and organizations that serve MA beneficiaries or to compare them with health care professionals and organizations serving traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries. Elderly individuals served by home health agencies (HHAs) may be particularly susceptible to the negative outcomes associated with low-quality care. To compare the quality of HHAs that serve TM and MA beneficiaries. This cross-sectional, admission-level analysis used data from 4 391 980 home health admissions identified using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (most commonly known as OASIS) admission assessments of Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 from Medicare-certified HHAs. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to assess whether an association existed between the Medicare plan type and HHA quality. The model was adjusted for patient demographics, acuity, and characteristics of the zip codes. Sensitivity analyses controlled for zip code fixed effects. The present analysis was conducted between October 2018 and March 2019. Home health users were classified as TM or MA beneficiaries using the Master Beneficiary Summary File. The MA beneficiaries were further classified as enrolled in a high- or low-quality MA plan on the basis of publicly reported MA star ratings. Quality of HHA derived from the publicly reported patient care star ratings: low quality (1.0-2.5 stars), average quality (3.0-3.5 stars), or high quality (≥4.0 stars). Of 4 391 980 admissions, most (75.5%) were for TM beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 76.1 [12.2] years), with 16.6% of beneficiaries enrolled in high-quality MA plans (mean [SD] age, 77.8 [10.0] years) and 7.9% in low-quality MA plans (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [11.4] years). Individuals enrolled in low-rated MA plans were most likely to be nonwhite (percentages of nonwhite individuals in TM, 14.3%; in high-quality MA, 19.8%; and in low-quality MA, 36.5%) and dual Medicare-Medicaid eligible (percentages for dual eligible in TM, 30.5%; in high-quality MA, 19.5%; and in low-quality MA, 43.3%). Among TM beneficiaries, 30.4% received care from high-quality HHAs, whereas 17.0% received care from low-quality HHAs. Compared with TM beneficiaries, those in a low-quality MA plan were 3.0 percentage points (95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%) more likely to be treated by a low-quality HHA and 4.9 percentage points (95% CI, -5.4% to -4.3%) less likely to be treated by a high-quality HHA. The MA beneficiaries in high-quality plans were also less likely to receive care from high-quality vs low-quality HHAs (-2.8% [95% CI, -3.1% to -2.2%] vs 1.0% [95% CI, 0.7%-1.3%]). Compared with TM beneficiaries, MA beneficiaries residing in the same zip code enrolled in either high- or low-quality MA plans may receive treatment from lower-quality HHAs. Policy makers may consider incentivizing MA plans to include higher-quality HHAs in their networks and improving patient education regarding HHA quality.

Heterogeneity in Medicare Home Health Patients by Admission Source

Unlike other post-acute care settings, a large and growing share of Medicare Fee-For-Service patients are admitted to home health without a prior hospitalization or facility-based post-acute stay. Differences in home health patients by admission source have implications for standardizing measurement, and potentially payment, across post-acute care settings. We examined home health patients’ demographic, health, and utilization patterns when stratified by their admission source. We found that community-admitted patients were more likely to be dually eligible, have multiple home health episodes, have Alzheimer disease, and have suffered from depression. Noncommunity admission sources were associated with higher 30-day post home health admission hospitalization rates. These differences should be accounted for in properly incentivizing agencies to care for all types of patients appropriate for home health.

The effect of entry regulation in the health care sector: The case of home health

The consequences of government regulation in the post-acute care sector are not well understood. We examine the effect of entry regulation on quality of care in home health care by analyzing the universe of hospital discharges during 2006 for publicly insured beneficiaries (about 4.5 million) and subsequent home health admissions to determine whether there is a significant difference in home health utilization, hospital readmission rates, and health care expenditures in states with and without Certificate of Need laws (CON) regulating entry. We identify these effects by looking across regulated and nonregulated states within Hospital Referral Regions, which characterize well-defined health care markets and frequently cross state boundaries. We find that CON states use home health less frequently, but system-wide rehospitalization rates, overall Medicare expenditures, and home health practice patterns are similar. Removing CON for home health would have negligible system-wide effects on health care costs and quality.

Home Health Admission and Care of a Pediatric Ventilator-Dependent Client

Home Health Admission and Care of a Pediatric Ventilator-Dependent Client

Rural‐Urban Home Health Care Differences Before the Balanced Budget Act of 1997

This study arose from concerns that home health care may be more difficult to provide to rural than urban elderly patients (because of geographic barriers, personnel shortages, and other factors) and may therefore be less effective in terms of patient outcomes. Case mix, home health care service use, and outcomes (primarily discharge status) were analyzed for a national random sample of 3,869 rural and urban elderly home health patients. Longitudinal data covered the period from home health admission to discharge or 120 days (whichever occurred first). Primary data collection instruments were designed to obtain longitudinal patient-level health status data; agency records and Medicare data provided service use information. (The study did not address access but focused on services and outcomes after admission to home health care.) Two-group statistical tests and multivariate analyses were employed to assess rural-urban differences. The major findings were that, after adjustment for rural-urban case mix and agency differences, rural compared to urban patients received fewer home health services and attained less favorable discharge outcomes. For example, the rural patients had a higher case mix adjusted hospitalization rate. Because the study data pertain to 1995 through 1996, the results provide a baseline for future analyses of possibly different rural compared to urban effects of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which resulted in major changes in Medicare payment for home health care.