The Mississippi River is the largest and economically most important river in North America. It drains 40% of the conterminous United States, and like most of the world’s major rivers, it has been substantially altered by centuries of wholesale land-use conversion, urbanization, and hydrological modification. Those changes are manifest in seriously impaired water quality along many of its reaches and an everwidening zone of bottom-water hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico, where it discharges to the ocean (Rabalais et al. 2002). At the other end of the Mississippi drainage system, some 850 river-kilometers from its headwaters in northern Minnesota, lies the confluence of two contrasting tributaries that in many ways epitomize the changes that the Mississippi has undergone (Fig. 1). One is the main-stem of the Mississippi itself, an often turbid and nutrient-rich waterway draining nearly half of the state of Minnesota (100,000 km) including the large urban centers of Minneapolis and St. Paul, as well as 28,000 km of row-crop agriculture in the southern half of the state. The other is the St. Croix River, a major tributary draining 22,000 km of eastern Minnesota and northwestern Wisconsin, renowned for its high water quality and biological diversity, and one of the eight original US waterways included under the 1968 National Wild and Scenic River Act. While the St. Croix is often cited as a pristine example of what the conjoining Mississippi and other north-temperate rivers may have looked like prior to Euro-American settlement, the truth is that water quality in both rivers is impaired, though the Mississippi clearly more so than the St. Croix. Both rivers suffer from an apparent excess of phosphorus and the Mississippi from high levels of suspended solids (turbidity). Major efforts are now underway to identify the various sources of impairment and to create longterm plans for reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the rivers. Such plans are technically known in the US as TMDLs (Total Maximum Daily Load). While such reduction goals are based largely on eco-region water-quality standards (as well as achievability), they require at their core an understanding of natural (background) loads such as might have occurred prior to Euro-American settlement. For most major rivers, an assessment of background conditions would be based on some type of watershed-runoff model or comparison to so-called ‘‘reference’’ systems thought to be minimally altered by human activity (e.g. Smith et al. 2003)––with all the uncertainty associated with such approaches. However, by fortunate ‘‘accident’’ This editorial is the introduction to a series of eight papers dedicated to the ‘‘Recent Environmental History of the Upper Mississippi River’’ published in this special issue of the Journal of Paleolimnology. D.R. Engstrom served as guest editor of the special issue.
Read full abstract