HIV Primary Care Clinic Research Articles

Impact of financial incentives on viral suppression among adults initiating HIV treatment in Tanzania: a hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial

Small incentives could improve engagement in HIV care. We evaluated the short-term and longer-term effects of financial incentives for visit attendance on viral suppression among adults initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Tanzania. In a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, we randomised (1:1) 32 primary care HIV clinics in four Tanzanian regions to usual care (control group) or the intervention (usual care plus ≤6 monthly incentives [22 500 Tanzanian Shillings, about US$10, each], conditional on visit attendance). Adults (aged ≥18 years) initiating ART (<30 days) who owned a mobile phone and had no plans to transfer to another facility were eligible. The primary outcome was retention on ART with viral suppression (<1000 copies per mL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included retention on ART with viral suppression at 6 months and viral suppression at 6 months and 12 months using a lower threshold (<50 copies per mL). Intent-to-treat analysis and a cluster-based permutation test were used to evaluate the effect of financial incentives on outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04201353, and is completed. Between May 28, 2021, and March 8, 2022, 1990 participants (805 male and 1185 female) were enrolled in the study. 1059 participants were assigned to the intervention group and 931 participants were assigned to the control group. Overall, 1536 (88%) participants at 6 months and 1575 (83%) at 12 months were on ART with viral suppression. At 12 months, 6 months after the intervention ended, 866 (85%) participants in the intervention group compared with 709 (81%) in the control group had viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL (adjusted risk difference [aRD] 4·4 percentage points, 95% CI -1·4 to 10·1, permutation test p=0·35). At 6 months, 858 participants (90%) in the intervention group were on ART with viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL compared with 678 (86%) in the control group (aRD 5·1 percentage points, 95% CI 1·1 to 9·1, permutation test p=0·06). Effects were larger at 6 months and 12 months with the lower threshold for viral suppression, and there was significant effect heterogeneity by region. Adverse events included 106 deaths (56 in the control group and 50 in the intervention group), none related to study participation. Short-term incentives for visit attendance had modest, short term benefits on viral suppression and did not harm retention or viral suppression after discontinuation. These findings suggest the need to understand subgroups who would most benefit from incentives to support HIV care. National Institute of Mental Health. For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Substance use and mental health factors associated with self-reported higher risk cannabis use among people with HIV screened in primary care.

While cannabis use is prevalent among people with HIV (PWH), factors associated with higher-risk use require further study. We examined factors associated with indicators risk for cannabis use disorder (CUD) among PWH who used cannabis. Participants included adult (≥18 years old) PWH from 3 HIV primary care clinics in Kaiser Permanente Northern California who reported past three-month cannabis use through the computerized Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) screening. Primary outcome was TAPS cannabis score (range 1-3), categorized as any use (1) and higher risk for CUD (≥2). Measures included sociodemographics (age, sex, race, neighborhood deprivation index [NDI]), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), HIV RNA, CD4 cell counts, higher risk tobacco use (TAPS tobacco score≥2), depression, and anxiety symptoms. Unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression examined factors associated with higher risk for CUD. Of the complete sample (N=978; 94.1% Male; 58.3% White; Age Mode=51-60), 35.8% reported higher risk for CUD. Unadjusted models indicated younger age, Black race, higher CCI, depression, anxiety, and higher risk tobacco use were associated with higher risk, while only Black race (OR=1.84, 95% CI[1.29, 2.63]), anxiety (OR=1.91, 95% CI[1.22, 2.98]), and higher risk tobacco use (OR=2.27, 95% CI[1.47, 3.51]) remained significant in the multivariable model. Black race, anxiety and tobacco use, but not HIV clinical markers, were associated with higher risk for CUD among PWH. Clinical efforts to screen and provide interventions for preventing CUD alongside anxiety and tobacco use among PWH should be evaluated.

Adaptation of a Tailored Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid for People With HIV

BackgroundPeople with HIV (PWH) are both at elevated risk of lung cancer and high risk of multimorbidity, which makes shared decision-making (SDM) for lung cancer screening (LCS) in PWH complex. There are currently no tools adapted for SDM in PWH. Research QuestionCan a SDM decision aid be adapted to include HIV-specific measures with input from both PWH and their providers? Study Design and MethodsThis study utilized qualitative methods including focus groups with PWH and interviews with HIV-care providers to adapt and iterate an SDM tool for PWH. Eligible participants were PWH enrolled in an HIV primary care clinic who met age and smoking eligibility criteria for LCS and HIV care providers at the clinic. Both the focus groups and interviews included semi-structured discussions of SDM and decision aid elements for PWH. We used a framework-guided thematic analysis, mapping themes onto the Health Equity Implementation framework. ResultsForty-three PWH participated in 8 focus groups; 10 providers were interviewed. Key themes from patients included broad interest in adapting LCS SDM specifically for PWH, a preference for clear LCS recommendations, and the need for positive framing emphasizing survival. Providers were enthusiastic about personalized LCS risk assessments and point-of-care tools. Both patients and providers had mixed views on the utility of HIV-specific risk measures in patient-facing tools. Themes were utilized to adapt a personalized and flexible SDM tool for LCS in PWH. InterpretationPWH and providers were enthusiastic about specific tools for SDM which are personalized and tailored for PWH, make recommendations, and that inform LCS decision-making. Divergent views on presenting patient-facing quantitative risk assessments suggests these elements could be optional but available for review. This tool may have utility in complex decision-making for LCS in this population and is currently being evaluated in a pilot prospective trial.

BRINGING GERIATRIC CARE INTO THE HIV PRIMARY CARE CLINIC: A COMBINED HIV/GERIATRIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLINIC MODEL

Abstract Persons living with HIV (PLWH) experience accelerated and accentuated aging, developing co-morbidities at earlier ages and with higher frequencies than those without HIV. Older persons with HIV (OPWH) also experience geriatric syndromes. In 2020 we developed a combined HIV/geriatrics multidisciplinary clinic at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York where a geriatrician and multidisciplinary team including a nurse, pharmacist, and social worker are embedded in an HIV primary care clinic. Patients are referred for comprehensive geriatric assessments. We conducted a retrospective chart review after the first 15 months of the program to describe this population of OPWH living in NYC who are referred to a geriatrician. From 9/2020-11/2021, there were 183 appointments scheduled of which 112 (61%) were new patient visits. Sixty-two percent of patients came to their appointment. The average age of patients was 67 years. Fifty-seven percent identified as male. The majority of referrals (50%) were for cognitive assessment followed by mobility assessment (25%), polypharmacy (14%), multimorbidity (8%), advance care planning (1%), and other (2%). Based on this data, we identified a need to improve the show rate to our clinic and implement cognitive screening in OPWH. We have incorporated a community health worker into our interdisciplinary team to assist in this goal and continue to educate patients and providers on geriatric syndromes. A geriatric approach to care is crucial to incorporate into existing HIV clinical practices and we hope to optimize this integration based on the needs of patients and providers.

1172. Compliance with Human Papillomavirus Vaccination At The HIV Outpatient Program in New Orleans, Louisiana

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for all adults through age 26, shared clinical decision-making for those aged 27 through 45 years who are inadequately vaccinated, and for all people with HIV up to age 45 years. The intent of this study is to evaluate HPV vaccination rates at the HIV Outpatient Program (HOP) at University Medical Center in New Orleans. Methods Immunization records from patients aged 18 through 45 years attending a physician visit in the LSU Infectious Diseases fellows’ HIV primary care clinic at HOP in 2022 were reviewed. The purpose of this project was to assess compliance with HPV vaccination recommendations among the infectious diseases fellows. Results Among patients under age 27, 15 of 21 visits (71%) had completed HPV vaccines series. 4 visits (19%) had incomplete status and 2 visits (10%) did not have any HPV vaccines record. Among patients aged 27 through 45 years, 73 of 194 visits (38%) had completed HPV vaccines series. 34 visits (18%) had partial vaccination records and 87 visits (45%) had no records. Conclusion Vaccination compliance among the LSU ID fellows was less than ideal, only 71% of visits for patient aged up to 27 years attending LSU ID fellows’ clinic had completed HPV vaccine series, compared to the Health People 2020 recommendation of 80%. Only 38% of visits for patients aged 27 through 45 years are fully vaccinated with HPV vaccines. Patients in this age group are often labeled “aged out” for HPV vaccines by health maintenance reminders however, due to having HIV, they are still eligible and should be vaccinated. These results led to the institution of quality improvement project to address HPV vaccinations. This intervention will focus on educating all HOP providers about the vaccination recommendations and updating the health maintenance care gaps reminder in the electronic medical record. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Does the Quality of Behavior Change Counseling in Routine HIV Care Vary According to Topic and Demand?

HIV clinicians face increasing time constraints. Our objective was to describe the prevalence and quality of behavior change counseling within routine HIV visits and to explore whether clinicians may provide lower quality counseling when facing increased counseling demands. We audio-recorded and transcribed encounters between 205 patients and 12 clinicians at an urban HIV primary care clinic. We identified and coded episodes of behavior change counseling to determine clinicians' consistency with motivational interviewing (MI) and used multi-level regression to evaluate counseling quality changes with each additional topic. Clinician counseling for at least one behavior was indicated in 92% of visits (mean 2.5/visit). Behavioral topics included antiretroviral medication adherence (80%, n = 163), appointment adherence (54%, n = 110), drug use (46%, n = 95), tobacco use (45%, n = 93), unsafe sex (43%, n = 89), weight management (39%, n = 80), and alcohol use (35%, n = 71). Clinician counseling was most MI-consistent when discussing drug and tobacco use and least consistent for medication and appointment adherence, unsafe sex, and alcohol use. In multilevel analyses, clinician counseling was significantly less MI-consistent (β = -0.14, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.001) with each additional behavior change counseling need. This suggests that HIV ambulatory care be restructured to allocate increased time for patients with greater need for behavior change.

Hepatitis B infection or reactivation after switch to two-drug antiretroviral therapy: A case series, literature review, and management discussion.

Two-drug antiretroviral therapy (ART) without hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity is prescribed for persons with HIV as simplified or salvage therapy. While two-drug regimens are not recommended for persons with chronic HBV infection, guidelines do not address use in those with HBV susceptibility and/or core antibody reactivity. We present a case series of individuals with HBV infection or reactivation following switch to two-drug, non-HBV-active ART. HIV primary care clinics of an academic medical center in New York, NY. Case surveillance was conducted to identify persons with HBV surface antigenemia and viremia following two-drug ART switch. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were ascertained through chart review. Four individuals with HBV infection or reactivation after ART switch were identified. Two had HBV susceptibility, one had core antibody reactivity, and one had surface antigen reactivity pre-switch. All eligible persons had received HBV vaccination, two with low-level antibody response and one with persistent nonresponse. Two presented with fulminant hepatitis, one requiring liver transplantation. Two-drug ART switch may pose risk of HBV infection or reactivation. We propose careful patient selection and monitoring through the following: 1) Assessment of HBV serologies before switch and periodically thereafter, 2) Vaccination and confirmation of immunity before switch, 3) Risk stratification and counseling about HBV reactivation for those with core antibody, 4) Preemptive HBV DNA monitoring for those at risk of reactivation, 5) Continuation of HBV-active prophylaxis when above measures are not feasible, 6) Continuation of HBV-active therapy and surveillance for chronic HBV infection.

Measuring time in buprenorphine treatment stages among people with HIV and opioid use disorder by retention definition and its association with cocaine and hazardous alcohol use

BackgroundWe use a novel, longitudinal approach to describe average time spent in opioid use disorder (OUD) cascade of care stages for people with HIV (PWH) and with OUD, incorporating four definitions of treatment retention. Using this approach, we describe the impact of cocaine or hazardous alcohol use on time spent retained on buprenorphine.MethodsWe followed PWH with OUD enrolled in the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort from their first buprenorphine treatment episode between 2013 and 2020. We estimated 4-year restricted mean time spent on buprenorphine below buprenorphine retention threshold, on buprenorphine above retention threshold, off buprenorphine and in HIV care, loss to follow-up, and death. Retention definitions were based on retention threshold (180 vs 90 days) and allowable treatment gap (7 vs 30 days). Differences in 2-year restricted mean time spent retained on buprenorphine were estimated for patients with and without cocaine or hazardous alcohol use.ResultsThe study sample (N = 179) was 63% male, 82% non-Hispanic Black, and mean age was 53 (SD 8) years. Patients spent on average 13.9 months (95% CI 11.4, 16.4) on buprenorphine over 4 years. There were differences in time spent retained on buprenorphine based on the retention definition, ranging from 6.5 months (95% CI 4.6, 8.5) to 9.6 months (95% CI 7.4, 11.8). Patients with cocaine use spent fewer months retained on buprenorphine. There were no differences for patients with hazardous alcohol use.ConclusionsPWH with OUD spend relatively little time receiving buprenorphine in their HIV primary care clinic. Concurrent cocaine use at buprenorphine initiation negatively impact time on buprenorphine.

Perspectives on contingency management for alcohol use and alcohol-associated conditions among people in care with HIV.

Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based approach for reducing alcohol use; however, its implementation into routine HIV primary care-based settings has been limited. We evaluated perspectives on implementing CM to address unhealthy alcohol use and associated conditions for people with HIV in primary care settings. From May 2021 to August 2021, we conducted two focus groups with staff involved in delivering the intervention (n = 5 Social Workers and n = 4 Research Coordinators) and individual interviews (n = 13) with a subset of participants involved in the multi-site Financial Incentives, Randomization, and Stepped Treatment (FIRST) trial. Qualitative data collection and analyses were informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Service (PARIHS) implementation science framework, including evidence (perception of CM), context (HIV primary care clinic and CM procedures), and facilitation (feasibility outside the research setting). Several major themes were identified. Regarding the evidence, participants lacked prior experience with CM, but the intervention was well received and, by some, perceived to lead to lasting behavior change. Regarding the clinical context for the reward schedule, the use of biochemical testing, specifically fingerstick phosphatidylethanol testing, and the reward process were perceived to be engaging and gratifying for both staff and patients. Participants indicated that the intervention was enhanced by its co-location within the HIV clinic. Regarding facilitation, participants suggested addressing the intervention's feasibility for non-research use, simplifying the reward structure, and rewarding non-abstinence in alcohol use. Among patients and staff involved in a clinical trial, CM was viewed as a helpful, positive, and feasible approach to addressing unhealthy alcohol use and related conditions. To enhance implementation, future efforts may consider simplified approaches to the reward structure and expanding rewards to non-abstinent reductions in alcohol consumption.

Health System Responsiveness for Persons with HIV and Disability in South Western Uganda.

Inequitable access to Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) Treatment and Care Services (HATCS) for People With Disabilities (PWD) is a hurdle to ending the pandemic by 2030. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Health System's Responsiveness (HSR) and associated factors for PWD attending HATCS at health facilities in South Western Uganda. Between February and April 2022, we enrolled a total of 106 people with disabilities for a quantitative study and 14 key informants from selected primary care HIV clinics. The World Health Organization Multi-country study's disability assessment schedules 2.0 and Health system responsiveness (HSR) questionnaire were adopted to measure the level of disabilities and responsiveness, respectively. The level of HSR was evaluated using descriptive analysis. The association between socio-demographics, level of disabilities and HSR was evaluated through binary and multivariable logistic regression. The qualitative data were collected from 14 key informants using interview guide and analyzed according to thematic areas (deductive approaches). Overall, Health system responsiveness (HSR) was at 47.62% being acceptable to people living with HIV and Disabilities in south western Uganda. Across different domains, the best performance was reported in social consideration (68.57%) and autonomy (67.62%). The least performance was registered in dignity (2.83%), confidentiality (2.91%), prompt Attention (17.35%) and Choices (30.48%). Whereas performance in communications (53.92%) and quality of basic amenities (42.27%) were average. There were no socio-demographics or disability variables that were predictive of HATCS responsiveness. PWDs experienced lack of social support, poor communication, stigma and discrimination during the HATCs services. On the other hand, the health-care providers felt frustrated by their inability to communicate effectively with PWDs and meet their need for social support. HSR was comparatively low, with dignity, confidentiality, prompt attention, and choice ranking worst. To address the universal and legitimate requirements of PWDs in accessing care, urgent initiatives are required to create awareness among all stakeholders.

The Rapid interaction: a qualitative study of provider approaches to implementing Rapid ART

BackgroundOffering antiretroviral therapy (ART) to patients directly following an HIV diagnosis (“Rapid ART”) improves clinical outcomes and is feasible and acceptable for patients and providers. Despite this, implementation of Rapid ART is not yet standard practice in the USA. Structural-level implementation guidance is available, but research at the individual provider level that explores the patient-provider interaction itself remains scarce. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) provides a nuanced guide to investigating the less visible, more social elements of implementation like the knowledge and feelings of people, and the influences of culture and resources on individual approaches.MethodsWe conducted a multi-site qualitative study, exploring intervention commonalities across three HIV clinic environments: an HIV primary care clinic; an HIV/STI testing, treatment, and prevention clinic; and a large federally qualified health center (FQHC). Qualitative data were gathered from 27 provider informants—Rapid ART program staff and clinicians—using an interview guide developed using the CFIR. An experienced qualitative team conducted a comprehensive thematic analysis and identified cross-cutting themes in how providers approach and engage in the Rapid interaction, as well as longer-form narratives from providers that describe more fully what this interaction looks like for them.ResultsThree main themes represent the range and content of individual provider approaches to the Rapid interaction: (1) patient-centeredness; (2) emotional support and partnership; and (3) correcting misperceptions about HIV. Each theme encompassed both conceptual approaches to offering Rapid ART and concrete examples of messaging to the patient that providers used in the Rapid interaction. We describe and show examples of these themes, offer key take-aways for implementation, and provide expanded narratives of providers’ personal approaches to the Rapid interaction.ConclusionsExploration of provider-level approaches to Rapid ART implementation, as carried out in the patient-provider Rapid interaction, contributes a critical layer of evidence for wider implementation. It is our hope that, together with existing research showing positive outcomes and core components of systems-level implementation, these findings add to an instructive body of findings that facilitates the implementation of Rapid ART as an enhanced model of HIV care.

Characterizing Persons With HIV/HCV Coinfection Who Remain Untreated for Hepatitis C at Four HIV Clinics in Connecticut (CT): Role of Multiple Overlapping Barriers at the Individual and Clinic System Levels.

Introduction. Direct-acting antiviral medications have made hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure possible for >95% of persons with chronic HCV infection, including those coinfected with HIV. Achieving strategic HCV elimination targets requires an understanding of system, provider, and patient-level barriers to treatment. We explored such barriers among persons with HIV/HCV coinfection who remained untreated for HCV. Methods. Among four primary care HIV clinics in CT with high rates of HCV cure, 25 patients with HIV/HCV coinfection were eligible (no HCV treatment as of March 31, 2021). We conducted retrospective chart reviews of demographics, clinical practice patterns, patient-specific issues such as housing, transportation, food security, and presence of mental health and substance use problems. Results. Among untreated patients, 13 (51%) were female; 17 (68%) were Black; median age was 62 years old. The majority (84%) had injecting drug use (IDU) as HIV transmission risk factor; 14 (56%) were prescribed medication-assisted treatment. Median time since HIV and HCV diagnosis was 25 and 19 years, respectively. Clinic-level barriers were noted in 19 (76%) and included lack of evaluation, treatment not recommended or implemented. Concomitant structural barriers included unstable housing for 11 (44%) and lack of transportation for eight (32%). Most patients had history of illicit substance use (84%) and mental health issues (68%). Many (76%) had multiple potential barriers. Conclusions. Multiple overlapping barriers spanning clinic and patient level domains including social determinants of health were the norm in persons with long-standing HIV/HCV coinfection who have not received HCV treatment. Interventions will require innovative, multi-disciplinary and personalized approaches.

Comparison of patient exit interviews with unannounced standardised patients for assessing HIV service delivery in Zambia: a study nested within a cluster randomised trial

ObjectivesTo compare unannounced standardised patient approach (eg, mystery clients) with typical exit interviews for assessing patient experiences in HIV care (eg, unfriendly providers, long waiting times). We hypothesise standardised patients...

Predictors of PrEP retention in at risk patients seen at a HIV primary care clinic in San Diego.

Adherence to medication and retention in care are key contributors to the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for prevention of HIV. Therefore, it is important to understand factors that may impact retention in various settings that prescribe PrEP. We evaluated factors associated with retention in care 3 and 12months after PrEP initiation at a primary care HIV clinic in San Diego. Retention was defined as having an office/virtual visit within 1month from the 3- or 12-months time point or interacting with the clinic leading to medication being refilled. A total of 199 patients were included. Retention rates were 74.4% and 52.8% at 3 and 12 months respectively. In the multivariate analysis, reporting depression or anxiety was associated with being retained in care (p = 0.004) and identifying as cisgender female was associated with lack of retention (p = 0.04) at 3months. Testing positive for a sexually transmitted infection was associated with 12-months retention (p = 0.004); however, this was likely influenced by difference in the frequency of testing in those retained versus not retained. Ongoing efforts to determine the optimal method for provision of PrEP care that supports retention for different populations at risk for HIV, are needed.

Mental health and substance use screening in HIV primary care before and during the early COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundMental health and substance use disorders disproportionately affect people with HIV (PWH), and may have been exacerbated during COVID-19. The Promoting Access to Care Engagement (PACE) trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of electronic screening for mental health and substance use in HIV primary care and enrolled PWH from October 2018 to July 2020. Our objective here was to compare screening rates and results for PWH before (October 2018 – February 2020) and early in the COVID-19 pandemic (March-July 2020).MethodsAdult (≥ 18 years) PWH from 3 large HIV primary care clinics in a US-based integrated healthcare system were offered electronic screening online or via in-clinic tablet computer every 6 months. Screening completion and results (for depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety, and substance use) were analyzed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) before and after the start of the regional COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders on March 17, 2020. Models adjusted for demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), HIV risk factors (men who have sex with men, injection drug use, heterosexual, other), medical center, and modality of screening completion (online or tablet). We conducted qualitative interviews with providers participating in the intervention to evaluate how the pandemic impacted patient care.ResultsOf 8,954 eligible visits, 3,904 completed screenings (420 during COVID, 3,484 pre-COVID), with lower overall completion rates during COVID (38% vs. 44%). Patients completing screening during COVID were more likely to be White (63% vs. 55%), male (94% vs. 90%), and MSM (80% vs., 75%). Adjusted PRs comparing COVID and pre-COVID (reference) were 0.70 (95% CI), 0.92 (95% CI), and 0.54 (95% CI) for tobacco use, any substance use, and suicidal ideation, respectively. No significant differences were found by era for depression, anxiety, alcohol, or cannabis use. These results were in contrast to provider-reported impressions of increases in substance use and mental health symptoms.ConclusionFindings suggest PWH had modest declines in screening rates early in the COVID-19 pandemic which may have been affected by the shift to telemedicine. There was no evidence that mental health problems and substance use increased for PWH in primary care.Trial registrationNCT03217058 (First registration date: 7/13/2017); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03217058

Between empathy and anger: healthcare workers’ perspectives on patient disengagement from antiretroviral treatment in Khayelitsha, South Africa - a qualitative study

Background & objectivesThe benefits of long-term adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) are countered by interruptions in care or disengagement from care. Healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in patient engagement and negative or authoritarian attitudes can drive patients to disengage. However, little is known about HCWs’ perspectives on disengagement. We explored HCWs’ perspectives on ART disengagement in Khayelitsha, a peri-urban area in South Africa with a high HIV burden.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 HCWs in a primary care HIV clinic to explore their perspectives of patients who disengage from ART. HCWs interviewed included clinical (doctors and nurses) and support staff (counsellors, social workers, data clerks, security guards, and occupational therapists). The interview guide asked HCWs about their experience working with patients who interrupt treatment and return to care. Transcripts were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.ResultsMost participants were knowledgeable about the complexities of disengagement and barriers to sustaining engagement with ART, raising their concerns that disengagement poses a significant public health problem. Participants expressed empathy for patients who interrupted treatment, particularly when the challenges that led to their disengagement were considered reasonable by the HCWs. However, many also expressed feelings of anger and frustration towards these patients, partly because they reported an increase in workload as a result. Some staff, mainly those taking chronic medication themselves, perceived patients who disengage from ART as not taking adequate responsibility for their own health.ConclusionLifelong engagement with HIV care is influenced by many factors including disclosure, family support, and HCW interactions. Findings from this study show that HCWs had contradictory feelings towards disengaged patients, experiencing both empathy and anger. Understanding this could contribute to the development of more nuanced interventions to support staff and encourage true person-centred care, to improve patient outcomes.

1768. Characteristics and Impact of Penicillin Allergy Mislabeling Among People with HIV

Abstract Background Rates of penicillin allergy mislabeling (PAM) are prevalent and lead to suboptimal antibiotic selection. However, data regarding PAM are lacking for people with HIV (PWH). We aimed to characterize the penicillin allergy labels for PWH at the University of California, San Diego’s (UCSD) HIV primary care clinic, evaluate the impact of penicillin allergy labels on treatment choice for syphilis and gonorrhea, and implement a quality improvement project to address PAM. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of PWH with a penicillin allergy label in their medical record who were seen in our clinic between 2018 and 2022. We collected demographic information, type of allergic reaction listed, whether patients tolerated other beta-lactam antibiotics, whether patients were referred for formal Allergy consultation, and, where relevant, what treatment they received for syphilis and/or gonorrhea. Results Among the 4,702 people with HIV receiving care in our clinic between 2018 and 2022, 427 (9.1%) had a penicillin allergy label in the medical record. This cohort reflected the demographics of the general clinic population (Table 1). Even though the majority of allergic reactions (327, 77%) were labeled as IgE-mediated, 282 (66%) patients tolerated another beta-lactam antibiotic (Table 2). Referrals to Allergy Clinic were rare (52, 12%). The majority of patients with syphilis (91/140, 65%) received 2nd line therapy with doxycycline. However, most patients with gonorrhea (65/88, 74%) were treated with a preferred ceftriaxone-based regimen. When relevant, we updated penicillin labels for 209/268 (77.9%) patients to indicate that they had tolerated other beta-lactam antibiotics and created a tiered referral process to prioritize the highest-risk patients for Allergy Clinic referral (Figure 1). Conclusion Penicillin allergy labels were prevalent in our cohort of PWH and often resulted in receiving 2nd line therapy for treatment of syphilis. We updated allergy labels for a substantial number of patients and created a triage system to refer patients to Allergy clinic for further testing based on risk in order to decrease PAM. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care: a Qualitative Assessment of Implementation in Two Studies.

The TOPCARE and TEACH randomized controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy of a multi-faceted intervention to promote guideline-adherent long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in primary care settings. Intervention components included a full-time Nurse Care Manager (NCM), an electronic registry, and academic detailing sessions. This study sought to identify barriers, facilitators, and other issues germane to the wider implementation of this intervention. We conducted a nested, qualitative study at 4 primary care clinics (TOPCARE) and 2 HIV primary care clinics (TEACH), where the trials had been conducted. We purposively sampled primary care physicians and advanced practice providers (hereafter: PCPs) who had received the intervention. Semi-structured interviews explored perceptions of the intervention to identify unanticipated barriers to and facilitators of implementation. Interview transcripts were analyzed through iterative deductive and inductive coding exercises. We interviewed 32 intervention participants, 30 physicians and 2 advanced practice providers, who were majority White (66%) and female (63%). Acceptability of the intervention was high, with most PCPs valuing didactic and team-based intervention elements, especially co-management of LTOT patients with the NCM. Adoption of new prescribing practices was facilitated by proximity to expertise, available behavioral health care, and the NCM's support. Most participants were enthusiastic about the intervention, though a minority voiced concerns about the appropriateness in their particular clinical environments, threats to the patient-provider relationship, or long-term sustainability. TOPCARE/TEACH participants found the intervention generally acceptable, appropriate, and easy to adopt in a variety of primary care environments, though some challenges were identified. Careful attention to the practical challenges of implementation and the professional relationships affected by the intervention may facilitate implementation and sustainability.

Evidence-Based Interventions Implemented into HIV Primary Care Clinics to Make Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening and Testing Routine: Outcomes of a Multi-Site Study.

In response to rising rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States, this evaluative study of the implementation of four evidence-based interventions was developed and implemented. In three STI and HIV high-incidence jurisdictions of the United States, nine federally funded Health Resources and Services Administration Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program clinical demonstration sites implemented (1) audio computer-assisted self-interview sexual history taking, (2) patient self-collection of urogenital and extragenital site chlamydia/gonorrhea nucleic acid amplification test specimens, (3) sexual and gender minority welcoming indicators, and (4) provider training, to make STI screening, testing, and treatment routine in their HIV primary care clinics. The priority populations of young adults, men who have sex with men, and sexual and gender minority patients were found to have risk behaviors identified in the self-interview sexual history, to prefer to self-collect urogenital and extragenital site specimens for STI testing, and to notice and like the sexual and gender minority welcoming indicators. Testing positive for a bacterial STI was significantly associated with using alcohol or recreational drugs before sex, being younger than 50 years, and having two or more sexual partners with other concurrent sexual partners. Of 255 cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections, only 13.73% of patients reported related symptoms when screened and tested.

Implementing screening for hypertension in archetypal HIV primary care: a mixed-methods assessment

BackgroundHigh prevalence of HIV and hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa puts adults living with HIV (ALWH) at high risk of end-organ complications. Both World Health Organization (WHO) and national guidelines recommend screening and treatment of hypertension among ALWH on antiretroviral therapy (ART). We evaluated the implementation of hypertension screening among adults on ART at three Uganda Cares Primary care facilities.MethodsUsing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, we reviewed patient records, and interviewed both patients and providers during 2018 and 2019. We obtained demographics, clinical and blood pressure (BP) measurements via records review. We estimate the period prevalence of screening and use adjusted modified Poisson regression models to evaluate predictors of screening. In-depth interviews were analysed using a thematic approach to explain the observed prevalence and predictors of BP screening.ResultsRecords for 1426 ALWH were reviewed. Patients had a median age of 35 years and 65% of them were female. Most were on ART (89% on first-line) with a median duration of 4 years. Only 262 (18%) were overweight or obese with a body mass index (BMI) > 25 Kg/M2. In 2017 or 2018 patients made a median of 3 visits and 783 patients had a BP recorded, hence a period prevalence 55%. Older age, male sex, more clinic visits, and clinic site were associated with screening in the adjusted analyses. Erratic BP screening was corroborated by patients’ and providers’ interviews. Challenges included; high patient numbers, low staffing, provider apathy, no access to treatment, and lack of functioning of BP equipment.ConclusionAlmost half of regular HIV clinic attendees at these prototypical primary care HIV clinics were not screened for hypertension for a whole year. Improving BP screening requires attention to address modifiable challenges and ensure local buy-in beyond just providing equipment.