Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance Research Articles

Epidemiological dynamics and molecular characterization of HIV drug resistance in eastern China from 2020 to 2023.

HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) has become a threat to the elimination of the AIDS epidemic due to the global scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-infected individuals. This study aims to investigate the epidemiological dynamics and molecular characterization of HIV pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR) in Hangzhou, a developed region in China. An epidemiological survey combined with a molecular transmission network and Bayesian analysis was conducted. A total of 3,596 individuals with newly confirmed HIV infections (from 2020 to 2023) and 164 individuals with ART failure (from 2021 to 2023) were included. The molecular transmission network was used to identify key drug-resistant transmission clusters, while the Bayesian analysis was utilized to trace the origins and spread of these clusters. The overall prevalence of PDR was found to be 8.4% (303/3596). Among these cases, PDR to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) accounted for 4.7% (170/3596), significantly higher than the resistance observed for protease inhibitors (PIs; 2.8%, p < 0.001) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs; 1.4%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significantly higher PDR value among individuals infected with the CRF07_BC subtype compared to those with the CRF08_BC subtype (aOR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.359-0.859, p = 0.008). The molecular transmission network analysis identified the transmission of the drug resistance mutation (DRM) Q58E within the clusters of the CRF07_BC subtype. The Bayesian analysis suggested that these clusters were introduced into Hangzhou from Shenzhen between 2005 and 2012. Furthermore, the study highlighted 50.6% (83/164) prevalence of ADR among individuals experiencing ART failure. The combined molecular network analysis of virological failure and newly confirmed HIV infections indicated the transmission of the K103N mutation between these groups. In conclusion, targeted interventions may be necessary for specific subtypes and transmission clusters to control the spread of drug-resistant HIV. Continuous monitoring of resistance patterns is critical to inform treatment strategies and optimize ART regimens.

Population dynamics of HIV drug resistance during treatment scale-up in Uganda: a population-based longitudinal study.

Clinical studies have reported rising pre-treatment HIV drug resistance during antiretroviral treatment (ART) scale-up in Africa, but representative data are limited. We estimated population-level drug resistance trends during ART expansion in Uganda. We analyzed data from the population-based open Rakai Community Cohort Study conducted at agrarian, trading, and fishing communities in southern Uganda between 2012 and 2019. Consenting participants aged 15-49 were HIV tested and completed questionnaires. Persons living with HIV (PLHIV) provided samples for viral load quantification and virus deep-sequencing. Sequence data were used to predict resistance. Population prevalence of class-specific resistance and resistance-conferring substitutions were estimated using robust log-Poisson regression. Data from 93,622 participant-visits, including 4,702 deep-sequencing measurements, showed that the prevalence of NNRTI resistance among pre-treatment viremic PLHIV doubled between 2012 and 2017 (PR:1.98, 95%CI:1.34-2.91), rising to 9.61% (7.27-12.7%). The overall population prevalence of pre-treatment viremic NNRTI and NRTI resistance among all participants decreased during the same period, reaching 0.25% (0.18% - 0.33%) and 0.05% (0.02% - 0.10%), respectively ( p- values for trend = 0.00015, 0.002), coincident with increasing treatment coverage and viral suppression. By the final survey, population prevalence of resistance contributed by treatment-experienced PLHIV exceeded that from pre-treatment PLHIV, with NNRTI resistance at 0.54% (0.44%-0.66%) and NRTI resistance at 0.42% (0.33% - 0.53%). Overall, NNRTI and NRTI resistance was predominantly attributable to rtK103N and rtM184V. While 10.52% (7.97%-13.87%) and 9.95% (6.41%-15.43%) of viremic pre-treatment and treatment-experienced PLHIV harbored the inT97A mutation, no major dolutegravir resistance mutations were observed. Despite rising NNRTI resistance among pre-treatment PLHIV, overall population prevalence of pre-treatment resistance decreased due to treatment uptake. Most NNRTI and NRTI resistance is now contributed by treatment-experienced PLHIV. The high prevalence of mutations conferring resistance to components of current first-line ART regimens among PLHIV with viremia is potentially concerning. National Institutes of Health and the Gates Foundation. Evidence before the study: We searched PubMed for studies matching the keywords "hiv" "resistance" "longitudinal" "cohort" "population" published since 2004 (the beginning of antiretroviral therapy (ART) availability in sub-Saharan Africa) and identified 50 studies. We excluded 34 studies not based in sub-Saharan Africa, five studies primarily concerned with infection with other pathogens (e.g. HBV, M. tuberculosis ), two studies concerned with insulin resistance, one sequencing-methods paper, and one paper concerned with host susceptibility to HIV infection. The remaining seven studies were not population-based meaning that the study population was not all persons but e.g. people living with HIV enrolled in care at a given clinic. Population-based cohort are essential for monitoring HIV drug resistance in both treated and untreated individuals, including those people who may go undetected in clinical settings, capturing evolutionary dynamics of resistance in real-world conditions. Added value of this study: We estimated the prevalence of drug resistance over five consecutive survey rounds of a population-based open-cohort study in southern Uganda between 2012 and 2019 during a period of intense treatment scale-up. We show that among the entire population regardless of HIV status, 0.8% and 0.5% of individuals harbor viremic resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and nucleoside-reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), respectively, of which the majority is dual-class NNRTI/NRTI resistance. Despite a two-fold increase in the prevalence of NNRTI resistance among pre-treatment viremic PLHIV, the overall prevalence of pre-treatment viremic resistance in the entire population decreased by more than 50% due to increased treatment initiation and population viral load suppression. The majority of resistance in recent survey rounds was contributed by treatment-experienced PLHIV. Among treatment-experienced viremic PLHIV, we observe a substantial burden of mutations that confer resistance to the NNRTI and NRTI components of dolutegravir and cabotegravir based regimens e.g. rtM184V (34%) rtY181C (15%), rtG190A (12%), rtK65R (12%), and rtK101E (9.5%). The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance mutation inT97A was observed in about a tenth of viremic PLHIV.These results provide the first longitudinal population-based estimates of temporal trends in the prevalence of drug resistance during ART program expansion in a high-burden setting. Further, they provide critical insight into the landscape of prevalent drug resistance substitutions circulating in this population.Implications of all the available evidence: Scale-up of HIV treatment has increased the prevalence of drug resistance mutations among viremic people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. The relatively high prevalence of NNRTI resistance has prompted a recent shift to first-line regimens including dolutegravir (an INSTI) in combination with NRTIs. The high prevalence of mutations conferring resistance to components of current first-line regimens in our population warrants continued monitoring of treatment failures and the prevalence of drug resistance in high burden settings.

Full-Spectrum Surveillance of Pre-Treatment HIV Drug Resistance in Southeastern China.

HIV drug resistance compromises the ability of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) to suppress viral replication, resulting in treatment failure. This study investigates the prevalence of pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) in newly diagnosed individuals in a prosperous city (Wenzhou) in Southeastern China. A cross-sectional investigation was carried out among 473 newly diagnosed ART-naive HIV-1-infected individuals between January and December 2022. The protease-reverse transcriptase (PR-RT) region and integrase (IN) region of HIV-1 were amplified by two separately nested PCRs, followed by sequencing. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and drug resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs) and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) were analyzed. The PDR prevalence was 6.5% [95% CI: 4.4-9.1] for any anti-retroviral drug, 0.9% [95% CI: 0.3-2.3] for NRTIs, 4.1% [95% CI: 2.5-6.5] for NNRTIs, 1.8% [95% CI: 0.8-3.6] for PIs and 0.5% [95% CI: 0.1-1.8] for INSTIs. According to the subtyping results of the PR-RT region, 11 different subtypes and 31 unique recombinant forms (URFs) were found. CRF07_BC was the dominant subtype (53.7%, 233/434), followed by CRF01_AE (25.3%, 110/434). V179D (1.6%) and K103N (1.4%) were the most predominant types of NNRTI DRMs. Q58E (1.2%) and M184V (0.7%) were the most frequent PI DRMs and NRTI DRMs, respectively. The INSTI-related DRMs Y143S (causes high-level resistance to RAL) and G163K (causes low-level resistance to EVG and RAL) were found in one patient each. Given the relatively high PDR prevalence of NNRTI (4.1%), non-NNRTI-based ART may be preferred in the future. It is recommended to include genotypic resistance testing before starting ART in regions where feasible.

The association between HIV pretreatment drug resistance and virological outcomes in children and adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) could occur in antiretroviral treatment (ART) naïve individuals, those previously exposed to ART, or individuals re-initiating ARV after a long period of interruption. Few studies have shown its association with virological outcomes, although inconsistent. The objective of this review was to provide a synthesis of the association between PDR and virological outcomes (virological failure or suppression). This report is presented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The method was subdivided into three main phases: record identification, screening, and report inclusion. Record identification consisted of an initial search with search term "HIV pretreatment drug resistance". Another search was done using terms "Pretreatment drug resistance OR pre-treatment drug resistance OR Pretreatment drug resist* OR pre-treatment drug resist* OR pretreatment antiretroviral resistance OR pretreatment medic* OR pretreatment medic* resist*" and a list of all the countries in sub-Saharan Africa. After the electronic search, studies were screened from full list based on their title and abstract and then full articles retrieved and studies were assessed based on set criteria. Inclusion criteria involved observational studies that report the association between PDR and virological failure. Data from trials that reported the association were also included. Published articles like modelling studies and reviews, and studies with data that had been previously included in the review were excluded. The Mantel Haenszel method with odds ratios was used for synthesis (meta-analyses) with the weights of each study which depends on the number of events and totals. A total of 733 records(studies) were obtained from all database search of which 74 reported on PDR, virological outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Out of the 74 articles, 11 were excluded and 26 did not explicitly report data needed, and 5 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 32 studies, 19 studies that had complete data on the number of participants with PDR and no PDR according to virological failure (VF) were included in the metanalyses. The pooled results from eleven (13) of these studies showed those with PDR had higher odds of virological failure compared to those without PDR OR 3.64[95% CI 2.93, 4.52]. The result was similar when stratified in adults and in children. In six (6) studies that had Virological suppression (VS) as outcome, there was a reduction in the odds of VS in those with PDR compared to those without PDR, OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.30, 0.58). In conclusion, this systematic review indicates that PDR increases the risk of virological failure in sub-Saharan Africa. The risk could be reduced by PDR monitoring for NNRTIs and INSTIs.

HIV-1 Drug Resistance Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing among ART-Naïve Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There are an increasing number of articles focused on the prevalence and clinical impact of pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) detected by Sanger sequencing (SGS). PDR may contribute to the increased likelihood of virologic failure and the emergence of new resistance mutations. As SGS is gradually replaced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), it is necessary to assess the levels of PDR using NGS in ART-naïve patients systematically. NGS can detect the viral variants (low-abundance drug-resistant HIV-1 variants (LA-DRVs)) of virus quasi-species at levels below 20% that SGS may fail to detect. NGS has the potential to optimize current HIV drug resistance surveillance methods and inform future research directions. As the NGS technique has high sensitivity, it is highly likely that the level of pretreatment resistance would be underestimated using conventional techniques. For the systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched for original studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase before 30 March 2023 that focused exclusively on the application of NGS in the detection of HIV drug resistance. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random effects model using the 'meta' package in R (version 4.2.3). We described drug resistance detected at five thresholds (>1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, and 20% of virus quasi-species). Chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences between the overall prevalence of PDR reported by SGS and NGS. A total of 39 eligible studies were selected. The studies included a total of 15,242 ART-naïve individuals living with HIV. The prevalence of PDR was inversely correlated with the mutation detection threshold. The overall prevalence of PDR was 29.74% at the 1% threshold, 22.43% at the 2% threshold, 15.47% at the 5% threshold, 12.95% at the 10% threshold, and 11.08% at the 20% threshold. The prevalence of PDR to INSTIs was 1.22% (95%CI: 0.58-2.57), which is the lowest among the values for all antiretroviral drugs. The prevalence of LA-DRVs was 9.45%. At the 2% and 20% detection threshold, the prevalence of PDR was 22.43% and 11.08%, respectively. Resistance to PIs and INSTIs increased 5.52-fold and 7.08-fold, respectively, in those with a PDR threshold of 2% compared with those with PDR at 20%. However, resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs increased 2.50-fold and 2.37-fold, respectively. There was a significant difference between the 2% and 5% threshold for detecting HIV drug resistance. There was no statistically significant difference between the results reported by SGS and NGS when using the 20% threshold for reporting resistance mutations. In this study, we found that next-generation sequencing facilitates a more sensitive detection of HIV-1 drug resistance than SGS. The high prevalence of PDR emphasizes the importance of baseline resistance and assessing the threshold for optimal clinical detection using NGS.

Prevalence of acquired and transmitted HIV drug resistance in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is no systematic review on the prevalence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in Iran. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of HIVDR among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Iran. We assessed HIVDR prevalence in antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve PLHIV (i.e., those without a history of ART) and PLHIV receiving ART. We systematically searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Iranian databases (Iranian Medical Research Information System, Magiran, and Scientific Information Database), the references of studies, and Google Scholar until March 2023. A random-effects model was used to calculate a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the prevalence of HIVDR in PLHIV. Among 461 potential publications, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of acquired HIVDR in PLHIV receiving ART was 34% (95% CI: 19, 50) for nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 27% (95% CI: 15, 41) for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and 9% (95% CI: 3, 18) for protease inhibitors (PIs). The pooled prevalence of acquired HIVDR in treatment failure PLHIV was 50% (95% CI: 31, 69) for NRTIs, 49% (95% CI: 29, 69) for NNRTIs, 11% (95% CI: 2, 24) for PIs, and 1% (95% CI: 0, 4) for integrase inhibitors (INIs). The pooled prevalence of transmitted HIVDR in ART-naïve people was 3% (95% CI; 1, 6) for NRTIs, 5% (95% CI: 2, 9) for NNRTIs, and 0 for PIs and INIs. The prevalence of HIVDR was relatively high in both ART-naïve PLHIV and those receiving ART. Without universal pretreatment HIVDR testing and more frequent routine HIV viral load testing among PLHIV who are on ART, the HIVDR prevalence might increase in PLHIV in Iran.

Pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance in Cuban patients with late presentation to health care: 2009-2020.

Background: The presence of antiretroviral-resistant HIV-1 genetic variants in patients with late presentation to health care may impact the success of antiretroviral therapy, costs of care, and potential HIV transmission. Aim: To determine the prevalence of pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance to antiretrovirals (PDR) in Cuban patients classified as late presenters (LP). Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 255 HIV-positive Cubans classified as LP (CD4+ T cell count ≤350 cells/mm3) and included in PDR surveillance studies in Cuba during the period 2009-2020. The viral subtype and the genotypic profile of antiretroviral resistance were analyzed. Some clinical and epidemiological variables were evaluated. Results: 83.2% of the patients were male and 65.9% were men who had sex with other men (MSM). The average age was 31 years. 40% of the individuals studied had advanced disease (CD4+ T cell count ≤200 cells/mm3). The predominant genetic variants were subtype B (29.4%); CRF20, 23, 24_BG (24.3%) and CRF19_cpx (22.4%). The prevalence of PDR was 21.2% (95%, CI 16.3-26.7). The prevalence was 8.2% (95%, CI 5.3-11.9) for any Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI), 15.1 % (95%, CI 11.2-19.7) for any Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI), 2.1 % (95%, CI 0.75-4.41) for any Protease Inhibitor (PI). 9.25% of the LPs with PDR died a year after diagnosis of the HIV infection. The most frequent mutations were K103N (6.7%), G190A (4.7%) and M184V (4.3%). The treatment will not be effective in 17.3 % of patients who start therapy with the NRTI+NNRTI combinations. Conclusion: The high PDR values in LPs show the need to enhance genotypic studies of HIV resistance in this population at the time of diagnosis of the infection, since the success of first-line antiretroviral therapy may be compromised and influence compliance with the global goals set forth by UNAIDS for the year 2030.

Temporal trends and transmission dynamics of pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance within and between risk groups in Kenya, 1986-2020.

Evidence on the distribution of pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) among risk groups is limited in Africa. We assessed the prevalence, trends and transmission dynamics of pre-treatment HIVDR within and between MSM, people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSWs), heterosexuals (HETs) and perinatally infected children in Kenya. HIV-1 partial pol sequences from antiretroviral-naive individuals collected from multiple sources between 1986 and 2020 were used. Pre-treatment reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI), PI and integrase inhibitor (INSTI) mutations were assessed using the Stanford HIVDR database. Phylogenetic methods were used to determine and date transmission clusters. Of 3567 sequences analysed, 550 (15.4%, 95% CI: 14.2-16.6) had at least one pre-treatment HIVDR mutation, which was most prevalent amongst children (41.3%), followed by PWID (31.0%), MSM (19.9%), FSWs (15.1%) and HETs (13.9%). Overall, pre-treatment HIVDR increased consistently, from 6.9% (before 2005) to 24.2% (2016-20). Among HETs, pre-treatment HIVDR increased from 6.6% (before 2005) to 20.2% (2011-15), but dropped to 6.5% (2016-20). Additionally, 32 clusters with shared pre-treatment HIVDR mutations were identified. The majority of clusters had R0 ≥ 1.0, indicating ongoing transmissions. The largest was a K103N cluster involving 16 MSM sequences sampled between 2010 and 2017, with an estimated time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) of 2005 [95% higher posterior density (HPD), 2000-08], indicating propagation over 12 years. Compared to HETs, children and key populations had higher levels of pre-treatment HIVDR. Introduction of INSTIs after 2017 may have abrogated the increase in pre-treatment RTI mutations, albeit in the HET population only. Taken together, our findings underscore the need for targeted efforts towards equitable access to ART for children and key populations in Kenya.

The Burden of Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance in Trinidad and Tobago.

Strategies to improve the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for patients with HIV in Trinidad and Tobago, including the adoption of the "Test and Treat All" policy, have accompanied an increase in the number of patients with pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) in the country. However, the scale of this public health problem is not well established. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PDR and evaluate its impact on viral suppression among patients with HIV receiving care at a large HIV treatment center in Trinidad and Tobago. We retrospectively analyzed data from the Medical Research Foundation of Trinidad and Tobago of patients newly diagnosed with HIV who had HIV genotyping performed. PDR was defined as having at least one drug-resistant mutation. We assessed the impact of PDR on achieving viral suppression within 12 months of ART initiation, using a Cox extended model. Among 99 patients, 31.3% had PDR to any drug, 29.3% to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), 3.0% to a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and 3.0% to a protease inhibitor. Overall, 67.1% of the patients who initiated ART (n = 82) and 66.7% (16/24) of patients with PDR achieved viral suppression within 12 months. We found no significant association between PDR status and achieving viral suppression within 12 months [adjusted hazard ratio: 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.57-2.04)]. There is a high prevalence of PDR in Trinidad and Tobago, specifically driven by NNRTI resistance. Although we found no difference in virologic suppression by PDR status, there is an urgent need for an effective HIV response to address the many drivers of virologic failure. Accelerating access to affordable, quality-assured generic dolutegravir and adopting it as the preferred first-line ART therapy are critical.

Pre-Treatment HIV Drug Resistance and Genetic Diversity in Cameroon: Implications for First-Line Regimens.

The efficacy of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) may be hampered by the presence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR). We described HIV-1 pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) patterns, effect of viral clades on PDR, and programmatic implications on first-line regimens in Cameroon. A sentinel surveillance of PDR was conducted from 2014 to 2019. Sequencing of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase was performed, and HIVDR was interpreted using Stanford HIVdb.v.9.4. In total, 379 sequences were obtained from participants (62% female, mean age 36 ± 10 years). The overall PDR rate was 15.0% [95% CI: 11.8-19.0] nationwide, with significant disparity between regions (p = 0.03). NNRTI PDR was highest (12.4%), of which 7.9% had DRMs to EFV/NVP. Two regions had EFV/NVP PDR above the 10% critical threshold, namely the Far North (15%) and East (10.9%). Eighteen viral strains were identified, predominated by CRF02_AG (65.4%), with no influence of genetic diversity PDR occurrence. TDF-3TC-DTG predictive efficacy was superior (98.4%) to TDF-3TC-EFV (92%), p < 0.0001. The overall high rate of PDR in Cameroon, not substantially affected by the wide HIV-1 genetic diversity, underscores the poor efficacy of EFV/NVP-based first-line ART nationwide, with major implications in two regions of the country. This supports the need for a rapid transition to NNRTI-sparing regimens, with TDF-3TC-DTG having optimal efficacy at the programmatic level.

HIV Drug Resistance among Pre-treatment Cases in Thailand: Four Rounds of Surveys during 2006-2013

In Thailand, antiretroviral therapy (ART) was initiated to treat human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) cases using the empirical regimen with no prior genotypic test to determine drug resistance. In order to assess prevalence rate of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) among pre-treatment cases, four rounds of survey were carried out in ART clinics, including six, eight, 33 and four ART clinics in each round during 2006-2013. For which, HIVDR testing results were available in 310, 350, 797, and 413 cases in four rounds. It was revealed that HIVDR rates among naive cases were 2.0%, 2.8%, 4.0% and 4.8%, while in experienced cases, the rates were 0, 3.3%, 11.4% and 13.9%. The rates among all cases were 1.9%, 2.9%, 4.4% and 5.6%. Resistant drugs with the highest rates among all cases in the survey round 4 were nevirapine (3.6%) and efavirenz (3.1%). The results indicated the need to continue surveillance for pre-treatment HIVDR, and posed challenges to implement activities for protecting efficacy and prolong the use of empirical first-line regimen. A strategy to apply genotyping test, in a cost-effective approach, should be considered to prepare for situation when HIVDR increases beyond a critical level.

Effects of pretreatment HIV drug resistance on the virological response of HIV-infected patients after 3-year antiretroviral therapy

Objective: To investigate the impact of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) on virological effect among HIV-infected patients having received antiretroviral therapy (ART) after three years. Methods: The baseline survey of PDR among HIV-infected patients was conducted in 2018, with a three-year follow up study. The clinic data and virological laboratory test variables were statistically analyzed. Results: Of the 2 433 participants, 41.6% (1 012/2 433) were aged between 18 and 34, 82.8% (2 015/2 433) were males, 46.9% (1 142/2 433) had education of high school or above, 22.4% (544/2 433) were farmers, 33.8% (823/2 433) were unmarried, 48.1% (1 169/2 433) were infected heterosexually and 41.3% (1 004/2 433) were with CRF07_BC. The prevalence of PDR was 4.5% (109/2 433). The prevalence of virological suppression failure (viral load ≥50 copies/ml) and drug resistance at three years follow up after ART was 8.1%(196/2 433) and 2.5%(60/2 433) respectively. The prevalence of virological suppression failure and drug resistance at three years follow up after ART were 18.3% (20/109) and 7.6% (176/2 324), and 4.6% (5/109) and 2.4% (55/2 324) among participants with PDR and non-PDR, respectively. The results of multivariate logistic regression model showed that illiteracy (aOR=3.26, 95%CI: 1.82-5.86), primary and junior high school education (aOR=1.54, 95%CI: 1.09-2.18), CD4+T lymphocyte count <200/μl (aOR=2.77, 95%CI: 1.75-4.37) and CD4+T lymphocyte count 200-499/μl (aOR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.10-2.18) at a three year follow up visit after ART, missed drugs in the past month (aOR=4.24, 95%CI: 2.92-6.17), and PDR (aOR=2.84, 95%CI: 1.67-4.85) were statistically significant with virological suppression failure on treatment. Conclusions: The prevalence of PDR in China at a low level currently, and the virological suppression failure rate is low after three years of ART. It is necessary to strengthen drug resistance monitoring of HIV-infected patients and pay attention to the influence of PDR on treatment effect.

Prevalence of Pretreatment HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Armenia in 2017-2018 and 2020-2021 following a WHO Survey.

The increased antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage of patients in the absence of routine genotyping tests and in the context of active labor migration highlight the importance of HIV-1 drug resistance (DR) surveillance in Armenia. We conducted a two-phase pretreatment DR (PDR) study in 2017-2018 (phase I; 120 patients) and 2020-2021 (phase II; 133 patients) according to the WHO-approved protocol. The analysis of HIV-1 genetic variants showed high degrees of viral diversity, with the predominance of A6. The prevalence of any PDR was 9.2% in phase I and 7.5% in phase II. PDR to protease inhibitors was found only in 0.8% in phase II. PDR to efavirenz and nevirapine was found among 5.0% and 6.7% of patients in phase I, and 6.0% and 6.8% of patients in phase II, respectively. The prevalence of PDR to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors decreased from 5.0% in phase I to 0.8% in phase II. In addition, we identified risk factors associated with the emergence of DR-male, MSM, subtype B, and residence in or around the capital of Armenia-and showed the active spread of HIV-1 among MSM in transmission clusters, i.e., harboring DR, which requires the immediate attention of public health policymakers for the prevention of HIV-1 DR spread in the country.

Pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance in antiretroviral therapy-naive adults in Eastern Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pre-treatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) may result in increased risk of virological failure and acquisition of new resistance mutations. With recently increasing ART coverage and periodic modifications of the guidelines for HIV treatment, there is a need for an updated systematic review to assess the levels of the PDR among adults newly initiating ART in Eastern Africa. We conducted a systematic search for studies published between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2022 in the MEDLINE Complete and CINAHL Complete, searched simultaneously using EBSCOhost, and Web of Science. To determine the overall PDR prevalence estimates, we extracted data from eligible articles and analysed prevalence estimates using Stata 14.2. A total of 22 eligible observation studies were selected. The studies included a total of 5852 ART-naive people living with HIV. The overall pooled prevalence of PDR was 10.0% (95% CI: 7.9%-12.0%, I2 = 88.9%) and 9.4% (95% CI: 7.0%-11.9%, I2 = 90.4%) for NNRTIs, 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8%-3.4%, I2 = 69.2%) for NRTIs and 0.7% (95% CI: 0.3%-1.2%, I2 = 29.0%) for PIs. No major integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI)-related mutations were identified. We observed a moderate overall PDR prevalence among new ART initiators in this study. PDR to NNRTIs is more prevalent, underscoring the importance of the current WHO recommendation for replacement of NNRTIs by INSTIs. PDR to NRTIs was low but notable, which warrants continuous surveillance of pre-existing resistance to the dolutegravir co-administered NRTI in Eastern Africa.

Epidemic Characteristics of HIV Drug Resistance in Hefei, Anhui Province.

To study the characteristics of HIV pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR) in Hefei, a cross-sectional survey was used to collect 816 samples from newly reported HIV infections from 2017 to 2020 and 127 samples from HIV infections with virological failure from 2018 to 2019 in Hefei. HIV drug resistance levels and drug resistance mutations were interpreted using the Stanford Drug Resistance Database. Molecular networks were constructed by HIV-TRACE. Among the newly reported infections in Hefei, the prevalence of PDR was 6.4% (52/816). The drug resistance mutations were mainly V179E/D/T (12.4%), K103N (1.3%), and V106I/M (1.3%). In addition, it was found that the CRF55_01B subtype had a higher drug resistance rate than other subtypes (p < 0.05). Molecular network analysis found that K103N and V179E may be transmitted in the cluster of the CRF55_01B subtype. The prevalence of ADR among HIV infections with virological failure was 38.6% (49/127), and the drug resistance mutations were mainly M184V (24.4%), K103N/S (15.7%), Y181C (11.0%), G190S/A/E (10.2%), and V106M/I (10.2%). The molecular network was constructed by combining HIV infections with virological failure and newly reported infections; M184V and Y181C may be transmitted between them. The chi-square trend test results indicated that the higher the viral load level, the greater the number of newly reported infections linked to the infections with virological failure in the molecular network. In conclusion, interventions should focus on infections of the CRF55_01B subtype to reduce the transmission of drug-resistant strains. However, improving the treatment effect of HIV infections is beneficial for reducing the second-generation transmission of HIV.

Characterization of HIV-1 molecular epidemiology and transmitted drug-resistance in newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients in Sichuan, China

BackgroundSichuan province is one of the highest AIDS epidemic provinces in China, with a large number of floating population. The annual number of cases of HIV/AIDS reported in Sichuan has been the highest province in China for several successive years. There is a lack of widespread and representative data on the distribution of HIV genotypes in Sichuan. We aim to investigate the characteristics of HIV-1 molecular epidemiology and transmitted drug-resistance in newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients in Sichuan, China.MethodArchived plasma samples (n = 1524) from HIV-1 newly-diagnosed individuals in April 2019 were selected by cross-sectional investigation from all 21 cities in Sichuan province. Phylogenetic relationship, transmission cluster, and genotypic drug resistance analyses were performed using HIV-1 polymerase (pol) gene sequences. We also analysed the association of demographic and virological factors with transmitted drug-resistance (TDR) and transmission clusters.ResultsPartial pol gene sequences were obtained from 1297 cases. HIV-1 epidemic strains in Sichuan province: the majority of genotypes were circulating recombinant form (CRF) 07_BC (675, 52.04%), CRF01_AE (343, 26.45%), CRF08_BC (115, 8.87%), CRF85_BC (67, 5.17%), subtype B (33, 2.54%), the other genotypes only accounted for 4.93%, and unique recombinant forms (URFs) (23, 1.77%) were observed in the study, and the difference of age, ethnicity, education, occupation, region and transmission pathway of different genotypes were statistically significant. According to WHO HIVDR surveillance threshold, the level of TDR has reached a medium level, with 72 of 1297 (5.55%) cases carrying drug-resistance mutation sites, TDR mutation frequency to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs, 3.85%) was much higher than nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs, 0.31%) and protease inhibitors (PIs, 1.70%), and CRF08_BC was a risk factor for TDR (odds ratio, 8.32; 95% CI 4.38–15.80 for CRF07_BC, P < 0.05). The most common drug resistance HIV-1 mutation pattern for NNRTI was V106 (1.31%, 17/1297) and E138 (1.16%, 15/1297), and for PI was M46 (0.69%, 9/1297). A total of 205 (15.8%) pol sequences were involved in the genetic transmission network clusters, CRF01_AE (odds ratio, 2.369; 95% CI 1.659–3.382; P < 0.05), subtype B (odds ratio, 13.723; 95% CI 6.338–29.71; P < 0.05), drug resistance (odds ratio, 0.306; 95% CI 0.106–0.881; P < 0.05) and different levels of education (P < 0.05) were significantly associated to be in clusters.ConclusionThe distribution of HIV-1 genotypes in Sichuan is more diverse and complex, and the Men who have sex with men (MSM) is underrated, arguing for behavior scaling up intervention in this specific population besides the elderly people with heterosexual transmission risk groups. The risk of TDR mutation frequency increased in newly diagnosed patients highlights the significance of genotypic drug resistance monitoring and molecular surveillance of pretreatment HIV-1 drug resistance. The regimen composed of TDF, 3TC and EFV was still currently the preferred solution used free first-line therapy.

Impact of HIV Pretreatment Drug Resistance on Virological Failure After One-Year Antiretroviral Therapy - China, 2018-2019.

What is already known about this topic?While antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been rapidly scaled-up among the population living with human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) patients since 2016, pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) has also increased.What is added by this report?PDR has an impact on ART outcomes. After one year of ART, the risk of virological failure in individuals with PDR was found to be 2.3 times higher than that of individuals without PDR. Moreover, patients with PDR to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) had an even higher risk of virological failure, with an odds ratio of 2.8 as compared with those without PDR.What are the implications for public health practice?PDR is associated with an increased risk of virological failure. It is recommended to regularly implement PDR monitoring in order to provide information to optimize ART regimens and to prevent HIV drug resistance.

High Levels of Pretreatment HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations Among South African Women Who Acquired HIV During a Prospective Study.

Pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) undermines individual treatment success and threatens the achievement of UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets. In many African countries, limited data are available on PDR as detection of recent HIV infection is uncommon and access to resistance testing is limited. We describe the prevalence of PDR among South African women with recent HIV infection from the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial. HIV-uninfected, sexually active women, aged 18-35 years, and seeking contraception were enrolled in the ECHO Trial at sites in South Africa, from 2015 to 2018. HIV testing was done at trial entry and repeated quarterly. We tested stored plasma samples collected at HIV diagnosis from women who seroconverted during follow-up and had a viral load >1000 copies/mL for antiretroviral resistant mutations using a validated laboratory-developed population genotyping assay, which sequences the full protease and reverse transcriptase regions. Mutation profiles were determined using the Stanford Drug Resistance Database. We sequenced 275 samples. The median age was 23 years, and majority (98.9%, n = 272) were infected with HIV-1 subtype C. The prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) was 13.5% (n = 37). Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations were found in 12.4% of women (n = 34). Few women had NRTI (1.8%, n = 5) and protease inhibitor (1.1%, n = 3) mutations. Five women had multiple NRTI and NNRTI SDRMs. The high levels of PDR, particularly to NNRTIs, strongly support the recent change to the South African national HIV treatment guidelines to transition to a first-line drug regimen that excludes NNRTIs.

High prevalence of pre-treatment HIV drug resistance in Papua New Guinea: findings from the first nationally representative pre-treatment HIV drug resistance study

Background Determining the prevalence of pre-treatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) is important to assess the effectiveness of first-line therapies. To determine PDR prevalence in Papua New Guinea (PNG), we conducted a nationally representative survey.MethodsWe used a two-stage cluster sampling method to recruit HIV treatment initiators with and without prior exposure to antiretroviral therapies (ART) in selected clinics. Dried blood spots were collected and tested for PDR.ResultsA total of 315 sequences were available for analysis. The overall PDR prevalence rate was 18.4% (95% CI 13.8–24.3%). The prevalence of PDR to non-nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) was 17.8% (95% CI 13.6–23.0%) and of PDR to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) was 6.3% (95% CI 1.6–17.1%). The PDR prevalence rate among people reinitiating ART was 42.4% (95% CI 29.1–56.4%).ConclusionsPNG has a high PDR prevalence rate, especially to NNRTI-based first-line therapies. Our findings suggest that removing NNRTIs as part of first-line treatment is warranted and will lead to improving viral suppression rates in PNG.

The prevalence of pre-treatment and acquired HIV drug resistance in Vietnam: a nationally representative survey, 2017-2018.

IntroductionMonitoring the population‐level emergence and transmission of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) is necessary for supporting public health programmes. This study provides a nationally representative prevalence estimate of HIVDR in people initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) and estimates of acquired HIVDR and viral load (VL) suppression in people who have received it for 12 or ≥48 months in Vietnam.MethodsThe study was conducted between September 2017 and March 2018 following World Health Organization guidance. Thirty ART clinics were randomly sampled using probability proportional to size sampling from a total of 367 ART clinics in the country.Results and DiscussionIn total, 409 patients initiating ART were enrolled into the survey of pre‐treatment HIVDR. The prevalence of any pre‐treatment HIVDR was 5.8% (95% CI 3.4–9.5%), and the prevalence of non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance was 3.4% (95% CI 1.8–6.2%). Four hundred twenty‐nine patients on ART for 12±3 months and 723 patients on ART for ≥48 months were enrolled into the surveys of acquired HIVDR. The prevalence of VL suppression (defined as <1000 copies/ml) in patients on ART for 12±3 and ≥48 months was 95.5% (95% CI 91.3–97.8%) and 96.1% (95% CI 93.2–97.8%), respectively. Among individuals with viral non‐suppression, any HIVDR was detected in 11/14 (weighted prevalence 74.3%) of those on ART for 12±3 months and in 24/27 (weighted prevalence 88.5%) of those receiving ART for ≥48 months.ConclusionsThis nationally representative study of HIVDR found high levels of VL suppression among those on ART for 12 and ≥48 months. Overall, high levels of VL suppression at both time points suggested good adherence among patients receiving ART and quality of treatment services in Vietnam.Clinical Trial NumberNot applicable