HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Research Articles

213. Electronic Visit (E-visit) Use for Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Testing in a Large Integrated Healthcare System

Abstract Background To improve access to sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV prevention services, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated healthcare system, launched a sexual health electronic visit (E-visit) in February 2022. This E-visit allows users to self-order STI testing and other sexual health services through the healthcare patient portal. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to characterize E-visit use for STI testing among all persons who had STI testing within KPNC from February 13, 2022 to December 31, 2023. We compared demographic factors of persons requesting STI testing via the E-visit with those who accessed STI services via conventional pathways. We used log-binomial regression to assess factors associated with E-visit use and compared STI test positivity among persons who used the E-visit versus those who used conventional pathways. Results Of the 773,884 persons who underwent STI testing, 120,064 (16%) used the sexual health E-visit and 653,820 (84%) used conventional pathways. Younger persons were more likely to use the E-visit, with persons aged 18-24 years being the most likely to use the E-visit (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.61 [95% CI 1.58, 1.64] compared with persons aged 35-44 years) (Table 1). Compared with white persons, black persons were more likely to use the E-visit (aPR 1.48 [95% CI 1.45, 1.5]). Men were more likely than women to use the E-visit (aPR 1.12 [95% CI 1.11, 1.14). Use was similar across socioeconomic status. Persons with HIV were less likely to use the E-visit (aPR 0.51 [95% CI 0.48-0.55]), whereas those with prior or current HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use were more likely (aPRs 1.48 [95% CI 1.37, 1.6] and 2.0 [95% CI 1.94, 2.05], respectively). Test positivity was higher for E-visit testing compared with conventional pathways for urogenital chlamydia (4.6% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.0001), urogenital gonorrhea (0.9% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.0001), rectal chlamydia (5.6% vs 4.0% p < 0.0001), and pharyngeal chlamydia (2.0% vs 1.3%, p < 0.0001) (Table 2). Conclusion The KPNC sexual health E-visit is used by individuals at risk for STIs, including younger and black persons, with higher test positivity for urogenital gonorrhea and chlamydia, rectal chlamydia, and pharyngeal chlamydia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The Impacts of Substance Use and Depression on HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use and Adherence Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Young Adults in the Keeping it LITE Cohort.

Substance use and depression are prevalent in sexual and gender minorities (SGM), but evidence about their impacts on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is mixed. We assessed these impacts in a US-based cohort of 3,330 young SGM who tested negative for HIV and completed baseline and semiannual assessments on substance use (cocaine, methamphetamine, or heroin), depression, and PrEP use and adherence. We estimated prevalence differences (PDs) to compare baseline and 12-month PrEP use and adherence between participants with and without substance use and depression, separately and jointly. At baseline, 8% of participants reported substance use and depression, 7% reported substance use only, 38% reported depression only, and 47% reported neither. PrEP use was reported by 22%, with 78% reporting prior-day adherence. Compared to participants without depression or substance use, participants with substance use alone were more likely to report PrEP use at baseline (PD = 18.9; 95% CI: 7.6, 30.2) and 12 months (PD = 15.9, 95% CI: 5.1, 26.7), without adherence differences. Depression alone was associated with lower baseline PrEP use (PD=-3.6, 95% CI: -6.7, -0.4) and adherence (PD=-10.0, 95% CI: -18.4, -1.6), but associations attenuated over 12 months. Those with both substance use and depression (vs. neither) reported higher baseline PrEP use (PD = 6.5, 95% CI: -0.6, 13.5) and lower adherence (PD=-12.9, 95% CI: -26.2, 0.5), with associations weakening over 12 months. Substance use and depression had opposing relationships with PrEP use and adherence. In addition to its mental health benefits, depression treatment may improve PrEP uptake and adherence in young SGM.

The prevalence of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (HIV-PrEP) use and HIV-PrEP-to-need ratio in nine Canadian provinces, 2018-2021.

Measuring trends in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (HIV-PrEP) uptake is important to inform planning for prevention programs and policies. The HIV-PrEP-to-need ratio (PnR) is a construct used by public health organizations to explore disparities in the provision of HIV-PrEP across geographic areas and demographic categories (e.g., age, sex). This is a retrospective database review study using administrative pharmacy data, containing limited demographic information, from nine Canadian provinces. Annual estimates of persons taking HIV-PrEP and PnR were generated using data from the company IQVIA and the BC Centre for Excellence on HIV/AIDS. Data on new HIV diagnoses were obtained from the National HIV Surveillance System. The PnR was defined as the number of HIV-PrEP users divided by the number of new HIV diagnoses annually and is interpreted as the number of HIV-negative people using HIV-PrEP each year for every person newly diagnosed with HIV. In 2021, an estimated 23,644 individuals were prescribed HIV-PrEP, corresponding to an HIV-PrEP prevalence of 66.9 per 100,000 persons. This represents a 1.8-fold increase since 2018. The overall PnR was 16.8, meaning that for every person newly diagnosed with HIV, 17 HIV-negative individuals were taking HIV-PrEP. There were disparities between provinces (PnR range: 1.5/100,000-37.7/100,000) and between males and females (PnR 22.6 and 1.2, respectively). Females, individuals aged 0-19 years, and those in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Prince Edward Island, had lower levels of HIV-PrEP use relative to epidemic need. In Canada, the use of HIV-PrEP increased from 2018 to 2021 and uptake varied by age, sex and province. HIV-PrEP-to-need ratio is a useful measure to assess uptake of HIV-PrEP as a prevention strategy and could be used to explore disparities in provision across provinces and available demographic categories. However, PnR could be improved with more information on key populations and other attributes, such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and residence of city/rural area.

HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Men Experiencing Incarceration in the United States: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective approach to preventing HIV acquisition and recommended for populations over-represented in carceral systems, given the overlap with populations disproportionately impacted by HIV. However, few studies have focused on PrEP initiation outcomes in a carceral setting to maximize public health impact. This study was conducted in a unified jail/prison system within the state of Rhode Island located in the United States. A prospective observational cohort of men initiating PrEP within a jail setting was enrolled in this trial. Men were referred by providers, staff, or after self-presenting for HIV preventive care, these individuals were offered enrollment in the study that involved evaluation for clinical PrEP eligibility, PrEP initiation while incarcerated, continuation upon community re-entry, and linkage to a community PrEP provider after release. A total of 100 men in the jail facility (eg, "intake") were enrolled in the cohort. Of the 100 men enrolled, 83% were determined to be PrEP eligible through standard clinical evaluation, 37% were prescribed PrEP, and 26% initiated PrEP while incarcerated. In total, 5% of enrolled individuals were linked successfully to PrEP care in the community. Our findings suggest preliminary feasibility and acceptability of initiating PrEP within a jail setting. There were significant challenges across the PrEP care continuum that can be used to inform future studies and practice.

Factors driving decisions in the use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a real-world study in the United States

Background: Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States (US) remains below target, despite reported high efficacy in prevention of HIV infection and being considered as a strategy for ending new HIV transmissions. Here, we sought to investigate drivers for PrEP use and barriers to increased uptake using real-world data. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi PrEP Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of PrEP users and PrEP non-users at risk for HIV and their physicians in the US between August 2021 and March 2022. Physicians reported demographic data, clinical characteristics, and motivations for prescribing PrEP. PrEP users and non-users reported reasons for or against PrEP use, respectively. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare characteristics of users and non-users. Results: In total, 61 physicians reported data on 480 PrEP users and 121 non-users. Mean ± standard deviation of age of users and non-users was 35.3 ± 10.8 and 32.5 ± 10.8 years, respectively. Majority were male and men who have sex with men. Overall, 90.0% of users were taking PrEP daily and reported fear of contracting HIV (79.0%) and having at-risk behaviors as the main drivers of PrEP usage. About half of non-users (49.0%) were reported by physicians as choosing not to start PrEP due to not wanting long-term medication. PrEP stigma was a concern for both users (50.0%) and non-users (65.0%). More than half felt that remembering to take PrEP (57.0%) and the required level of monitoring (63.0%) were burdensome. Conclusions: Almost half of people at risk for HIV were not taking PrEP due to not wanting long-term daily medication and about half of current PrEP users were not completely adherent. The most common reason for suboptimal adherence was forgetting to take medication. This study highlighted drivers for PrEP uptake from physician, PrEP user, and non-user perspectives as well as the attributes needed in PrEP products to aid increased PrEP uptake.

Uptake and service preferences of human papillomavirus vaccination in men who have sex with men.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination could reduce HPV infection in men who have sex with men (MSM), but the published statistics on HPV vaccination uptake in MSM were scarce globally. This study estimated the uptake and profiled the service preferences of HPV vaccination of Chinese MSM in Hong Kong. Adult MSM were recruited through non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and online channels for completing an online baseline survey. Factors associated with self-reported history of HPV vaccination were identified using multivariable stepwise logistic regression model. Totally 701 Chinese MSM completed the online baseline survey, with the median age of 30 y (interquartile range [IQR] 26-35, range 18-67), and 23% of them had received HPV vaccination. More than half of vaccinated MSM (72%) rated convenient or very convenient for local HPV vaccination services. Among unvaccinated MSM, 50% considered high cost of HPV vaccine as the barrier of vaccination, 67% expressed willingness to pay below USD 128 per vaccine dose, and 65% preferred receiving vaccination in private clinics. MSM who had taken HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (p < .001), had been tested for HPV (p = .018), and had (p = .005) multiple regular sex partners in the past 6 months were more likely to be vaccinated. The HPV vaccination uptake of Chinese MSM in Hong Kong remains low (23%), and high HPV vaccine cost is the main barrier. Preventive behaviors (HIV PrEP use and HPV testing) and high-risk sexual behavior (multiple regular sex partners) are potential targets for intervention to increase the uptake of HPV vaccination in MSM.

Use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: low uptake and retention despite high-risk indications

ABSTRACT HIV PrEP is over 99% effective in preventing HIV when medication adherence is high. Despite this, uptake and retention in PrEP care remains less than optimal. We investigated whether gbMSM with objective risk factors for HIV who were automatically offered PrEP would have higher uptake and retention in PrEP care. For this, gbMSM with clinical evidence of HIV risk received a reflexive offer for PrEP from a nurse. The number of offers, referral acceptance, presentation to the first appointment, initiation and retention at 6 months were examined. Of 1181 gbMSM with objective HIV risk factors who were offered PrEP, only 50% accepted, 28% initiated and 16% remained on PrEP at 6 months. Loss across the cascade was more pronounced for youth. We found a notable disconnect between recent STI diagnosis and acceptance, initiation and retention in PrEP. This notwithstanding, 137 at-risk individuals were retained on PrEP because of an active offer. PrEP delivered by nurses was as effective as that delivered by infectious disease physicians. While active offer PrEP successfully brought at-risk individuals into care, more work is required to understand the perceptions of risk, the benefits and challenges of PrEP use, and how stigma and structural barriers affect retention among diverse groups affected by HIV.

Facilitators and barriers of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among four key populations in Iran

BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) significantly reduces HIV transmission, but it is not commonly prescribed in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to PrEP use among four key populations (KPs) in Iran.MethodsWe conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and sexual partners of people living with HIV (PLHIV) to obtain deep insights into the participants’ experiences, beliefs, and viewpoints. We included HIV experts, including staff from the HIV control department, healthcare providers with HIV experience, health policymakers, infectious disease specialists, and university professors. We performed a content analysis to identify facilitators and barriers to PrEP implementation among KPs.ResultsWe interviewed seven FSW, seven MSM, four PWID, four sexual partners of PLHIV, and 18 HIV experts. The facilitator’s theme emerged in four main categories, including eight different factors: 1) Individual and interpersonal factors (motivations, fear of testing positive for HIV, and safety nets and financial support), 2) Age and sex differences, 3) Organizational factors (appropriate PrEP distribution, information sharing, and receipt of high-quality services, 4) Efficacy of PrEP. The barrier’s theme emerged in three main categories, including four factors: 1) Individual factors (insufficient knowledge and awareness, and fragile trust), 2) Cultural barriers, and 3) Organizational factors (inadequate infrastructure and organizational barriers).ConclusionsWe identified key facilitators and barriers to successful PrEP implementation among KPs in Iran. By addressing these barriers, Iran has an opportunity to include PrEP programs in its HIV prevention efforts for KPs.

Increasing event-driven HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Australia: results from behavioural surveillance 2019-2023.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been publicly available since 2018 in Australia as a daily regimen. In 2019, clinical guidelines were updated to support guidance on event-driven PrEP (ED-PrEP) use. We assessed trends in the PrEP dosing regimen by comparing daily PrEP use to ED-PrEP among cisgender gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Data from repeated, cross-sectional, national behavioural surveillance surveys were analysed from 2019 to 2023 among participants not living with HIV. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess trends and compared ED-PrEP users to non-PrEP users and daily PrEP. Among 38,880 participants, overall PrEP use with any regimen increased from 27.6% in 2019 to 42.7% in 2023 (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.15-1.18, p < 0.001). Among 12,922 participants who reported PrEP use in the last 6months, the proportion reporting ED-PrEP use increased from 7.6% in 2019 to 27.8% in 2023 (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.37-1.46, p < 0.001) with those who reported daily PrEP decreasing from 92.4% to 63.3% (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.62-0.66, p < 0.001). In a cross-sectional sub-sample in 2022-2023 (n = 8840), compared to ED-PrEP users, non-PrEP users were less likely to have received three or more HIV tests in the last 12 months (aRRR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.22-0.31, p < 0.001), have 2-10 male sexual partners in the last 6months (aRRR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.14-0.41, p < 0.001) or 11 or more (aRRR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.15-0.45, p < 0.001) compared to none, or to report condomless anal intercourse with casual partners (aRRR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.32-0.46, p < 0.001). Compared to ED-PrEP users, daily PrEP users were more likely to have received three of more HIV tests in the last year (aRRR = 3.73, 95% CI = 3.15-4.40, p < 0.001) and less likely to be born overseas and lived in Australia for less than 5 years compared to being born in Australia (aRRR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.49-0.83, p = 0.001). While daily PrEP remains the most common PrEP dosing regimen among GBMSM in Australia, there has been a steep increase in the proportion of PrEP users who are taking ED-PrEP. Monitoring of PrEP use should continue to adapt to new dosing methods and future PrEP options. As ED-PrEP use increases, further work is needed to ensure those taking ED-PrEP are taking it effectively to prevent HIV.

Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use and resistance-associated mutations among men who have sex with men and transgender persons newly diagnosed with HIV in the Netherlands: results from the ATHENA cohort, 2018 to 2022.

BackgroundIn the Netherlands, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available since 2019. However, the extent of PrEP use prior to HIV diagnosis and development of PrEP-resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) is not known.AimWe assessed prior PrEP use and potential transmission of PrEP RAMs among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender persons (TGP) with a new HIV diagnosis in the Netherlands.MethodsData on prior PrEP use between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 were available from the Dutch national ATHENA cohort. We assessed proportion of prior PrEP use, detected PrEP associated RAMs and assessed potential onward transmission of RAMs between 2010 and 2022 using a maximum likelihood tree.ResultsData on prior PrEP use were available for 583/1,552 (36.3%) individuals, with 16% (94/583) reporting prior PrEP use. In 489 individuals reporting no prior PrEP use, 51.5% did not use PrEP due to: low HIV-risk perception (29%), no access (19.1%), personal preference (13.1%), and being unaware of PrEP (19.1%). For PrEP users, 13/94 (13.8%) harboured a M184V/I mutation, of whom two also harboured a K65R mutation. In people with a recent HIV infection, detection of PrEP RAMs increased from 0.23% (2/862) before 2019 to 4.11% (9/219) from 2019. We found no evidence of onward transmission of PrEP RAMs.ConclusionThe prevalence of PrEP-associated RAMs has increased since PrEP became available in the Netherlands. More widespread access to PrEP and retaining people in PrEP programmes when still at substantial risk is crucial to preventing new HIV infections.

Structural Racism and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use in the Nationwide US: A County-Level Analysis.

Structural racism contributes to geographical inequalities in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) coverage in the United States (US). This study aims to investigate county-level variability in PrEP utilization across diverse dimensions of structural racism. The 2013-2021 nationwide county-level PrEP rate and PrEP-to-need ratio (PNR) data were retrieved from AIDSVu. PrEP rate was defined as the number of PrEP users per 100,000 population, and PNR was defined as the ratio of PrEP users to new HIV diagnoses per calendar year. Linear mixed effect regression was employed to identify associations of county-level structural racism (e.g., structural racism in housing and socioeconomic status) with PrEP rate and PNR on a nationwide scale of the US. From 2013 to 2021, the mean PrEP rate and PNR increased from 3.62 to 71.10 and from 0.39 to 10.20, respectively. Counties with more structural racism in housing were more likely to have low PrEP rates (adjusted β = - 5.80, 95% CI [- 8.84, - 2.75]). Higher PNR was found in counties with lower structural racism in socioeconomic status (adjusted β = - 2.64, 95% CI [- 3.68, - 1.61]). Regionally, compared to the Midwest region, counties in the West region were more likely to have higher PrEP rate (adjusted β = 30.99, 95% CI [22.19, 39.80]), and counties in the South had lower PNR (adjusted β = - 1.87, 95% CI [- 2.57, - 1.17]). County-level structural racism plays a crucial role in understanding the challenges of scaling up PrEP coverage. The findings underscore the importance of tailored strategies across different regions and provide valuable insights for future interventions to optimize PrEP implementation.

Prevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B susceptibility among men who sex with men on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with susceptibility to hepatitis B virus (HBV) among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Northeastern Brazil.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, analytical study conducted between September 2021 and June 2023. Participants underwent structured interviews to collect sociodemographic and clinical information, including hepatitis B vaccination history, HIV PrEP use and sexual health history. Blood samples were collected for hepatitis B serologic testing: HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs), total and IgM HBV core antibody (anti-HBc). HBV susceptibility was defined as nonreactive results for all these serological markers.ResultsA total of 287 participants were enrolled into the study. The median age of the individuals was 31 years (interquartile range: 27; 36). HBV susceptibility was found in 58 out 286 individuals (20.3%; 95% CI: 15.9–25.2). Seventy-six percent of the participants reported completing the three-dose hepatitis B vaccine schedule. Susceptibility was significantly associated with a monthly income ≤ 5 minimum wages (PR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.01–4.05), lack of complete hepatitis B vaccination schedule (PR: 4.52; 95% CI: 2.89–7.06), initiation of HIV PrEP (PR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.21–3.94), duration of six months of HIV PrEP (PR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.19–3.91), absence of tattoos (PR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.00–2.40) and no history of sexually transmitted infections (PR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.07–2.54).ConclusionOur findings highlight the significant burden of HBV susceptibility among MSM on HIV PrEP in Northeastern Brazil. Socioeconomic factors, vaccination status, PrEP use and sexual health behaviors play critical roles in determining susceptibility to HBV. Integrating hepatitis B screening and vaccination into PrEP services is critical for identifying and addressing HBV susceptibility among MSM. Interventions aimed at increasing vaccination coverage and promoting safer sexual practices are essential for mitigating the burden of HBV infection in this population.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use during periods of unprotected sex among female sex workers in Tanga city, Tanzania: a control arm analysis of the pragmatic quasi-experimental trial.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevention-effective adherence is of critical importance but challenging particularly among key populations where periods of high HIV risk are frequent. We assessed the use of PrEP with reference to periods of unprotected sex among female sex workers in the city of Tanga. This was part of the pragmatic quasi-experimental trial for HIV PrEP rollout in Tanzania involving a control cohort of 313 female sex workers aged ≥18 years recruited by respondent-driven sampling and followed for 12 months. PrEP use and periods of condomless or unprotected sex were assessed at the 6th and 12th month of follow-up. Prevention-effective adherence was defined as PrEP use of ≥2 pills/week and ≥6 pills/week for anal and vaginal condomless sex. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was conducted to determine factors influencing PrEP use (≥2 pills/week). Overall, 59.2 and 45.9% of participants had unprotected anal and vaginal sex with a client, respectively. The prevention-effective adherence for anal sex ranged from 8.0% (months 6) to 10.0% (months 12) while that of vaginal sex was from 10.1% (month 6) to 3.8% (month 12). Participants who lived with friends were 25.5 times more likely to use ≥2 PrEP doses per week than those who lived alone (aPR = 25.5; 95%CI: 2.55-255.42, p = 0.006). Compared to self-reporting poor health status, self-reporting good health status significantly increased the use of ≥2 PrEP doses per week (aPR = 17.4; 95%CI: 3.01-101.02, p = 0.001). Refusing condomless sex with a steady partner increased the likelihood of using ≥2 PrEP doses per week than accepting condomless sex with a steady partner (aPR = 11.2; 95%CI: 1.55-80.48, p = 0.017). The prevalence of using ≥2 PrEP doses per week was less among participants accepting condomless sex at high pay than those who refused (aPR = 0.1; 95%CI: 0.03-0.26, p = 0.000). Use of PrEP during periods of unprotected sex was rare among female sex workers. Living with friends, self-reporting good health status, and refusing condomless sex with steady partners were associated with increased use of ≥2 PrEP doses per week. However, accepting condomless sex for increased payment was associated with reduced use of ≥2 PrEP doses per week. This calls for an in-depth study to understand the perspectives and circumstances shaping poor adherence during periods of unprotected sex among female sex workers.

Hepatitis E in men who have sex with men: a systematic review

BackgroundThe transmission dynamics of hepatitis E in men who have sex with men (MSM) are poorly understood. We aimed to explore any factors observed in MSM with hepatitis E by...

Blood safety markers in Dutch donors after relaxation of deferral for men who have sex with men: re-emergence of syphilis and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use.

Less discriminatory donor selection policies for men who have sex with men (MSM) may impact transfusion safety in terms of higher residual risks for known transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs), increased vulnerability toward new TTIs that are also transmitted via sex, and HIV infections masked by pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). TTI trends in Dutch donors were studied over a 13-year period (2011-2023), characterized by successive relaxations of MSM deferral criteria. Structured posttest counseling was performed to determine risk factors in TTI-positive donors. PrEP drug levels were measured in 9977 donations from male donors living in urban areas and in 67 donors with active or resolved syphilis. HIV incidence (from 5.8 to 1.5 per 1,000,000 donor years (DY)) and HBV incidence (from 12.4 to 4.5 per 1,000,000 DY) in Dutch donors decreased with less stringent MSM deferral criteria, while syphilis prevalence (from 26.4 to 44.1 per 100,000 new donors) and syphilis incidence (from 18.3 to 46.3 per 1,000,000 DY) increased over time. The proportion of MSM-related syphilis rose from 2% to 32% in new donors and from 12% to 27% in repeat donors. PrEP was detected in 2 of 9977 (0.02%) donations from male donors living in urban areas, and in 1 of 39 (2.6%) male donors with syphilis. To date, phasing out donor deferral for MSM had no significant impact on transfusion safety in the Netherlands. However, rising syphilis rates and (recent) PrEP use in the blood donor population, albeit rare, suggest an influx of donors with higher sexual risk profiles and requires intensified TTI surveillance in donors.

Sexually Transmitted Infection/Human Immunodeficiency Virus (STI/HIV) Testing, STIs, and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Men Who Have Sex With Men and Women in the United States, 2019–2022

Abstract Background Routine sexually transmitted infection and human immunodeficiency virus (STI/HIV) testing and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use are recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM) at increased risk of HIV. Methods Using HealthVerity, a large administrative dataset in the United States, we assessed STI/HIV testing, chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity by specimen type, and HIV PrEP use among MSM and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) at their first visits (index date) for those at increased risk of HIV and STIs from 2019 through 2022. Results Among 81 716 MSM and MSMW aged 15–64 years at their index date visit, STI testing rates were 57.9% for chlamydia, 58.1% for gonorrhea, and 52.2% for syphilis testing, respectively; 55.5%, 30.9%, and 18.1% had HIV testing, HIV PrEP use, and PrEP initiation, respectively, among the patients who did not have HIV. Of patients with chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, 48% were tested from the genital site only and 25% from 3 anatomic sites (rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital). Chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity was 9.8% for chlamydia rectal infection, 7.3% for gonorrhea rectal infection, and 5.3% for gonorrhea pharyngeal infection. Conclusions Our results present current medical services provided during initial clinic visits for MSM and MSMW in private outpatient settings. Our study suggests that the assessment of STI/HIV testing is periodically needed due to the high prevalence of infection, and efforts to promote HIV PrEP for MSM and MSMW in private settings are urgently needed.

Demographic, socioeconomic, and health structure factors associated with the use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Brazil: A nationwide ecological study.

Aims: To assess the cumulative rate of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) users in Brazil since its 2018 implementation and to analyze the association between PrEP usage and state-level structural factors. Methods: A nationwide ecological study from 2018 to 2022 was conducted, examining the 5-year cumulative rate of PrEP users in relation to demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare infrastructure variables. Multiple linear regression analysis identified significant predictors of PrEP utilization. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, 124,796 individuals used PrEP, with a cumulative rate of 61.5 per 100,000 population. The highest usage was in Minas Gerais, São Paulo, and Santa Catarina, while the lowest was in Distrito Federal, Maranhão, and Alagoas. Regression analysis showed that higher PrEP usage was associated with lower population density, a younger median age, a lower male to female ratio, and reduced social vulnerability. Additionally, PrEP usage was positively associated with the density of medical doctors and the number of dispensing units. Conclusions: The study reveals significant regional disparities in PrEP usage across Brazil, influenced by socioeconomic and healthcare factors. It highlights the need for targeted public health strategies to enhance PrEP access and uptake, especially in socially vulnerable regions.

Impact of simplified HCV diagnostic strategies on the HCV epidemic among men who have sex with men in the era of HIV oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in Taiwan: a modelling study.

Simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnostic strategies have the potential to improve HCV diagnoses and treatment. We aimed to investigate the impact of simplified HCV diagnostic strategies on HCV incidence and its effect on HCV diagnosis and treatment among men who have sex with men (MSM) regardless of HIV status and use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Taiwan. A compartmental deterministic model was developed to describe the natural history of HCV disease progression, the HCV care cascade and the HIV status and PrEP using among MSM. The model was calibrated to available data for HCV and HIV epidemiology and population demographics in Taiwan. We simulated the epidemic from 2004 and projected the impact of simplified testing strategies on the HCV epidemic among MSM over 2022-2030. Under the current testing approach in Taiwan, total HCV incidence would increase to 12.6 per 1000 person-years among MSM by 2030. Single-visit point-of-care RNA testing had the largest impact on reducing the number of new HCV infections over 2022-2030, with a 31.1% reduction (interquartile range: 24.9%-32.8%). By 2030, single-visit point-of-care HCV testing improved HCV diagnosis to 90.9%, HCV treatment to 87.7% and HCV cure to 81.5% among MSM living with HCV. Compared to status quo, prioritized simplified HCV testing for PrEP users and MSM living with diagnosed HIV had considerable impact on the broader HCV epidemic among MSM. A sensitivity analysis suggests that reinfection risk would have a large impact on the effectiveness of each point-of-care testing scenario. Simplified HCV diagnostic strategies could control the ongoing HCV epidemic and improve HCV testing and treatment among Taiwanese MSM. Single-visit point-of-care RNA testing would result in large reductions in HCV incidence and prevalence among MSM. Efficient risk-reduction strategies will need to be implemented alongside point-of-care testing to achieve HCV elimination among MSM in Taiwan.

Factors associated with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among Asian men who have sex with men in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia: a cross-sectional study

Asian-born MSM are a priority population as Australia aims to end HIV transmission, but they reported additional barriers to access PrEP and other HIV prevention methods. This study investigates factors associated with PrEP use among Asian MSM in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, to inform strategies to improve PrEP uptake in this population. This was a sub-analysis of a community-based cross-sectional survey conducted from March to June 2021. We recruited participants online in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with PrEP use in the last six months and lifetime. Latent class analyses were used to identify subgroups of Asian MSM sharing similar characteristics related to their risk practices for HIV. Overall, 870 Asian MSM were included: 288 Oceanian-born Asian MSM and 582 Asian-born MSM. Three latent classes were identified: 1) Asian-born MSM who recently arrived in Australia with limited English, were less likely to use PrEP and at higher risk of HIV infection (e.g., had condomless anal sex with a casual sex partner in the last six months) (4.6%); 2) Asian MSM who were at lower risk of HIV infection and less likely to use PrEP (69.3%) and; 3) Asian MSM who were at substantial risk of HIV infection and more likely to use PrEP (26.1%). Compared to Oceanian-born Asian MSM, those who were born in Southeast Asia (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.7) and South Asia (aOR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8) were less likely to ever use PrEP. Compared to Oceanian-born Asian MSM, those who were born in Southeast Asia (aOR=0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.7), Northeast Asia (aOR=0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8) and South Asia (aOR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) were less likely to use PrEP in the last six months. To end HIV transmission in Australia, it will be necessary to develop strategies to improve PrEP access for the significant minority of Asian-born MSM who are at substantial risk of HIV infection. EPFC and JJO are supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (EPFC: GNT1172873 and JJO: GNT1193955). CKF is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172900).

Barriers to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Women in the US: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction: The high acquisition rate of HIV infection among women in the United States is concerning. Despite the FDA approving the first pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug in 2012, PrEP utilization remains significantly lower among women. This literature review aims to analyze the current body of research concerning HIV PrEP usage among women in the US. Methods: A search of three medical databases was conducted. After the screening, 19 studies were selected for analysis. A risk of bias assessment was performed. Results: A final set of records meeting the inclusion criteria (n=19) was included in the review for data collection and analysis. The study methodology for these research articles included interview-based designs (semi-structured and brief formats) in 1-on-1 meetings, focus groups, surveys, and retrospective data analysis. Participants' HIV risk characteristics were reported by way of sexual behavior, drug use, combined sexual behavior and drug use, and living in a high HIV rate neighborhood. Nineteen themes were identified and organized into three categories: (1) Common medication administration barriers, (2) PrEP-specific barriers, and (3) Situational barriers. The three most common themes reported by participants included a concern about side effects, low perceived risks of HIV, and lack of PrEP information. The CASP Qualitative Checklist and risk assessment summary showed acceptable validity among studies. Discussion: This review identifies significant barriers hindering women's PrEP utilization, which would benefit from more prevalent stakeholder communication and education directed to at-risk populations. Inconsistently reported descriptive data on participants and the low patient populations make it difficult to generalize outcomes.