Thailand was the first Asian country to be affected by the AIDS epidemic in the late 1980s. It is one of the most hard-hit countries in the region and nearly one million people have been infected so far (World Bank, 2000). The epidemic first developed among intravenous drug users, and then among sex workers and their clients (Weniger et al., 1991). As the epidemic matured, heterosexual transmission became the major route of infection in the general population and the first cases of mother-to-child HIV transmission were reported in 1991 (World Bank, 2000). However, considerable efforts have been invested by the government to curtail the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The Royal Thai Government responded quickly and implemented a multi-sector AIDS programme in 1987. These efforts appear to have been successful in reducing not only the incidence of HIV in the general population but also the prevalence of other sexually transmitted diseases (Nelson et al., 1996; Hanenbert et al., 1994). The overall infection rate in pregnant women is now about 1.2% nationwide (Ministry of Public Health, 2004).Nevertheless, the number of AIDS cases will continue to increase for a number of years, reflecting earlier infection trends, while scaling up of antiretroviral treatment access will reduce the number of AIDS deaths. Although recent studies have shed light upon the epidemic's demographic, economic, public health and social impacts, the strategies adopted by the affected families and communities are still unknown (see Surasiengsunk et al., 1998; Knodel et al., 2001; VanLandingham et al., 2002; Knodel, Imem, 2002; Kespichayawattana, VanLandingham, 2003).HIV infection is closely linked to sexuality and reproductive health. It is a sexually transmitted infection, thus affecting both partners in a couple, and it is transmitted to their children, whose future is thereby placed in jeopardy. Although individual risk behaviours have been extensively studied in Thailand (Sittitrai et al., 1992; Nelson et al., 1993; Nagachinta, 1997; Beyrer et al., 1997) we still have very little knowledge of the circumstances or combination of circumstances which increase the risk of HIV infection (or protect against it) in an individual's life course.Almost all Thai women benefit during pregnancy from antenatal care which includes voluntary HIV counselling and testing. HIV screening is remarkably well-accepted, with a take-up rate of over 95% among pregnant women (Amornwichet, 2002; Koetsawang, 1999). Couple counselling and testing is also encouraged. In the event of a positive test result, the future mother receives free antiretroviral treatment to protect her child from infection via the national programme for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (Kanshana S, 2002). These young mothers are generally aware of their HIV status and they represent the closest available sample to the general population of reproductive age.To study the circumstances which increase the risk of HIV infection, we thought it would be useful to explore the notion of vulnerability, defined less in terms of epidemiological or risk factors than in relation to sociocultural, psychological and economic aspects. To identify vulnerable situations, we adopted a life event history perspective (Courgeau, Lelievre, 1992; Manton et al., 1992; Courgeau, Lelievre, 1996), through which individual life histories are considered as a continuum of events of different kinds relating to family, housing, occupation, health, etc., and affecting the dependent variable, i.e. vulnerability to HIV.In this short paper we assess the feasibility of a specific survey technique and sampling plan designed to serve these objectives, through a pilot survey conducted in Thailand in 2001(1).Different innovations were tested in the pilot survey: the collection of health histories combined with migration, family and occupational histories, the testing of case-control sampling more familiar to epidemiologists than demographers, and also the systematic interviewing of both partners within couples. …
Read full abstract