History Of Virological Failure Research Articles

"I want to be healthy and move on": A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to antiretroviral treatment adherence among young adult survivors with perinatal HIV in Thailand.

We know that HIV treatment outcome depends on antiretroviral treatment (ART) adherence. Young adults with perinatal HIV (YPHIV) who survived have endured various adherence challenges in their adolescent years. While some of them could maintain perfect adherence with sustainable virologic suppression, many experienced one or more episodes of virologic failure. We explored factors affecting ART adherence from real-life experiences of YPHIV. A qualitative study was conducted between June and November 2022. Twenty YPHIV aged 21-29 years with a history of virologic failure and resumed virologic suppression during adolescent years were invited to share their experiences through individual in-depth interviews. Audio records were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. We divided excerpts into two themes: barriers and facilitators to ART adherence. The socio-ecological model was used to frame subthemes at personal, societal, and healthcare system levels. Most barriers to adherence were concentrated at the personal level, including work/study-related conditions, personal entertainment, medication issues, mental health problems, thought, and belief. At the societal level, social activities and fear of HIV disclosure were frequently mentioned as barriers. Medical care cost was the only identified barrier at the healthcare system level. The facilitators to adherence at the personal level included perceiving health deterioration, being afraid of hospitalization and medical procedures, and wishing to be healthy and move on. At the same time, perceived family support and determination to complete family without HIV transmission were identified as facilitators at the societal level. Service behaviors of healthcare providers were mentioned as facilitators to adherence at the healthcare system level. From this study, most factors associated with non-adherence in adolescents were at the personal level, and the fear of HIV disclosure was critical at the societal level. The key facilitator to adherence was the determination to be healthy and have a promising future. Our findings reinforce the importance of establishing youth-friendly services in the existing HIV care setting. More time allocation for tailored individual counseling, using other novel approaches like mHealth, online media, and involvement of social support from different sectors might be beneficial to maximize adherence self-efficacy during the transitional period of YPHIV.

Switch to long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine in virologically suppressed adults with HIV in Africa (CARES): week 48 results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Long-acting injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine is licensed for individualised treatment of HIV-1 infection in resource-rich settings. Additional evidence is required to support use in African treatment programmes where demographic factors, viral subtypes, previous treatment, and delivery and monitoring approaches differ. The aim of this study was to determine whether switching to long-acting therapy with injections every 8 weeks is non-inferior to daily oral therapy in Africa. CARES is a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial being conducted at eight sites in Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa. Participants with HIV viral load below 50 copies per mL on oral antiretroviral therapy and no history of virological failure were randomly assigned (1:1; web-based, permuted blocks) to receive cabotegravir (600 mg) and rilpivirine (900 mg) by intramuscular injection every 8 weeks, or to continue oral therapy. Viral load was monitored every 24 weeks. The primary outcome was week 48 viral load below 50 copies per mL, assessed with the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm (non-inferiority margin 10 percentage points) in the intention-to-treat exposed population. This trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (202104874490818) and is ongoing up to 96 weeks. Between Sept 1, 2021, and Aug 31, 2022, we enrolled 512 participants (295 [58%] female; 380 [74%] previous non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor exposure). Week 48 viral load was below 50 copies per mL in 246 (96%) of 255 participants in the long-acting therapy group and 250 (97%) of 257 in the oral therapy group (difference -0·8 percentage points; 95% CI -3·7 to 2·3), demonstrating non-inferiority (confirmed in per-protocol analysis). Two participants had virological failure in the long-acting therapy group, both with drug resistance; none had virological failure in the oral therapy group. Adverse events of grade 3 or greater severity occurred in 24 (9%) participants on long-acting therapy and ten (4%) on oral therapy; one participant discontinued long-acting therapy (for injection-site reaction). Long-acting therapy had non-inferior efficacy compared with oral therapy, with a good safety profile, and can be considered for African treatment programmes. Janssen.

Durable Efficacy of Switching From a 3- or 4-Drug Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based Regimen to the 2-Drug Regimen Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in the TANGO Study Through Week 196.

Switching to the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir/lamivudine demonstrated durable non-inferior efficacy vs continuing 3- or 4-drug tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens for maintaining virologic suppression in people with HIV-1 through Week 144 in TANGO. 134 centers, 10 countries. Adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months and no history of virologic failure were randomized to switch from stable tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens to dolutegravir/lamivudine on Day 1 (early-switch group) for 196 weeks. Those randomized to continue tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens on Day 1 who maintained virologic suppression at Week 144 switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine at Week 148 (late-switch group). Efficacy, safety, and tolerability (including weight and biomarker changes) of dolutegravir/lamivudine in early-switch and late-switch groups were assessed through Week 196. Overall, 369 participants switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine on Day 1 (early-switch) and 298 switched at Week 148 (late-switch). In the early-switch group, 83% (306/369) maintained virologic suppression through Year 4, and 3% (11/369) reported new adverse events between Weeks 144 and 196. The late-switch group at Week 196 and early-switch group at Week 48 had comparable proportions with virologic suppression (93% each) and similar safety profiles. No late-switch participants and 1 early-switch participant met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria through Week 196, with no resistance-associated mutations observed. Treatment continued to be well tolerated long-term. Switching from tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens to dolutegravir/lamivudine showed durable efficacy, high barrier to resistance, and good tolerability through 4 years. These results support dolutegravir/lamivudine as a robust treatment for maintaining virologic suppression.

HIV Drug Resistance Patterns and Characteristics Associated with Clinically Significant Drug Resistance among Children with Virologic Failure on Antiretroviral Treatment in Kenya: Findings from the Opt4Kids Randomized Controlled Trial.

Increasing HIV drug resistance (DR) among children with HIV (CHIV) on antiretroviral treatment (ART) is concerning. CHIV ages 1-14 years enrolled from March 2019 to December 2020 from five facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya, were included. Children were randomized 1:1 to control (standard-of-care) or intervention (point-of-care viral load (POC VL) testing every three months with targeted genotypic drug resistance testing (DRT) for virologic failure (VF) (≥1000 copies/mL)). A multidisciplinary committee reviewed CHIV with DRT results and offered treatment recommendations. We describe DR mutations and present logistic regression models to identify factors associated with clinically significant DR. We enrolled 704 children in the study; the median age was 9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 7, 12), 344 (49%) were female, and the median time on ART was 5 years (IQR 3, 8). During the study period, 106 (15%) children had DRT results (84 intervention and 22 control). DRT detected mutations associated with DR in all participants tested, with 93 (88%) having major mutations, including 51 (54%) with dual-class resistance. A history of VF in the prior 2 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 11.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3, 20.0) and less than 2 years on ART at enrollment (aOR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1, 4.4) were associated with increased odds of major DR. DR is highly prevalent among CHIV on ART with VF in Kenya. Factors associated with drug resistance may be used to determine which children should be prioritized for DRT.

The New Era of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy: When and Why to Make the Switch.

Despite the availability of safe and effective oral combination antiretroviral therapy, barriers to maintaining viral suppression remain a challenge to ending the HIV epidemic. Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy was developed as an alternative to daily oral therapy. This review summarizes the current literature on the efficacy of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV-1, reasons to switch to injectable therapy, and barriers to switching. Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is safe and effective in maintaining HIV-1 virologic suppression. Ideal candidates for switching to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine are virologically suppressed on oral regimens with good adherence and no history of virologic failure or baseline resistance. Indications to switch to injectable therapy include patient preference, the potential for improved adherence, and avoidance of adverse effects. Implementation research is needed to assess and overcome system barriers. Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is a novel alternative to oral antiretrovirals, with the potential to improve adherence and quality of life in people with HIV.

Can simplified antiretroviral drug combination therapies resist resistance?

Can simplified antiretroviral drug combination therapies resist resistance?

887. Implementation of Long-acting Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine for HIV-1 Treatment at a Ryan White-funded Clinic in the U.S. South

BackgroundIn January 2021, the first ever long-acting injectable (LAI) antiretroviral therapy (ART), cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV), was approved for maintenance HIV-1 treatment in select patients with virologic suppression. LAI-ART has the potential to improve ART adherence, reduce HIV stigma, and promote equity in care outcomes, however, implementation in real-world settings has yet to be evaluated.MethodsWe launched a pilot LAI-ART program at the largest Ryan White-funded HIV clinic in the Southeast. From 4/14/21 to 5/14/21, providers referred patients interested and willing to switch to LAI-CAB/RPV who met screening criteria. Our interdisciplinary LAI team (Clinician-Pharmacy-Nursing) verified clinical eligibility (HIV-1 < 200 c/ml ≥6 months and no history of virologic failure, resistance to either drug, or chronic HBV infection) and pursued medication access for 28-day oral lead-in and monthly injectable CAB/RPV. We describe demographic and clinical variables of referred PWH and early outcomes in accessing LAI-ART. ResultsAmong 42 referrals, median age was 40.5 (Q1-Q3, 32-52) years, 83% were men, and 76% Black. Payor source distribution was 26% Private, 19% Medicare, 10% Medicaid, and 45% ADAP. At the time of referral, median CD4 count was 583 (Q1-Q3, 422-742) cells/mm3 and median sustained HIV-1 RNA < 200 c/ml was 1427 (Q1-Q3, 961-2534) days. A total of 35 patients (74%) met clinical eligibility for LAI-CAB/RPV, including 4 patients who required a transition off proton pump inhibitor therapy to accommodate oral RPV. Ineligible PWH were excluded due to evidence of RPV resistance (n=5), possible RPV hypersensitivity (n=1), and HIV non-suppression (n=1). The table summarizes the process of pursuing LAI-ART access for the initial 10 enrollees by insurance status. ConclusionOur experience implementing LAI-ART at a Ryan White-funded HIV clinic in the Southern U.S. has been challenged by substantial human resource capital to attain drug, delayed therapy initiation due to insurance denials, and patient ineligibility primarily due to concern for potential RPV resistance. These barriers may perpetuate disparities in ART access and virologic suppression among PWH and need to be urgently addressed so that LAI-ART can be offered equitably.Disclosures Lauren F. Collins, MD, MSc, Nothing to disclose Bradley L. Smith, Pharm.D., AAHIVP, Gilead Sciences, Inc (Advisor or Review Panel member) Wendy Armstrong, MD, Nothing to disclose Jonathan Colasanti, MD, Integritas CME (Consultant, develop and deliver CME content around Rapid Entry/Rapid ART)

Impact of archived M184V/I mutation on the effectiveness of switch to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide among virally suppressed people living with HIV.

Real-world experience regarding the effectiveness of co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (EVG/C/FTC/TAF) as a switch regimen is sparse among people living with HIV (PLWH) harbouring the M184V/I mutation with or without thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAMs). In this retrospective multicentre study, PLWH who were switched to EVG/C/FTC/TAF after having achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/mL) for 6 months or longer were included. Patients with archived M184V/I mutation (case patients) were matched to controls without M184V/I mutation at a 1:4 ratio. Patients with a history of virological failure or resistance to elvitegravir were excluded. The primary endpoint was virological non-success (plasma HIV RNA ≥50 copies/mL) at Week 48 of switch using a modified FDA snapshot analysis. Overall, 100 case patients with the M184V/I mutation were identified, including 6 (6.0%) with K65R and 13 (13.0%) with at least one TAM, and were matched to 400 controls in terms of gender, age (mean = 40.3 versus 39.7 years) and cumulative exposure duration to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (median = 146 versus 143 weeks). At Week 48, the rate of virological non-success for the case patients and controls was 5.0% (5/100) and 3.3% (13/400), respectively (difference = 1.7%; 95% CI = -2.9%-6.3%), while the rate of virological success was 88.0% and 89.5% for the case patients and controls, respectively. The presence of the K65R mutation or TAMs was not associated with virological non-response. Among virally suppressed PLWH, EVG/C/FTC/TAF is effective in maintaining viral suppression at Week 48 despite archived M184V/I mutation with or without TAMs.

HBcAb seropositivity is correlated with poor HIV viremia control in an Italian cohort of HIV/HBV-coinfected patients on first-line therapy

The morbidity and mortality rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection are higher than that of either infection alone. Outcomes and the virological response to antiretrovirals (combination antiretroviral therapy, cART) were explored in HIV/HBV subjects in a cohort of Italian patients treated with cART. A single-center retrospective analysis of patients enrolled from January 2007 to June 2018 was conducted by grouping patients by HBV status and recording baseline viro-immunological features, the history of virological failure, the efficacy of cART in achieving HIV viral undetectability, viral blip detection and viral rebound on follow up. Among 231 enrolled patients, 10 (4.3%) were HBV surface (s) antigen (HBsAg)-positive, 85 (36.8%) were positive for antibodies to HBV c antigen (HBcAb) and with or without antibodies to HBV s antigen (HBsAb), and 136 were (58.9%) HBV-negative. At baseline, HBcAb/HBsAb+/−-positive patients had lower CD4+ cell counts and CD4+ nadirs (188 cell/mmc, IQR 78–334, p = 0.02 and 176 cell/mmc, IQR 52–284, p = 0,001, respectively). There were significantly higher numbers of AIDS and non-AIDS events in the HBcAb+/HBsAb+/−-positive subjects than in the HBV-negative patients (41.1% vs 19.1%, p = 0.002 and 56.5% vs 28.7%, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001); additionally, HIV viremia undetectability was achieved a significantly longer time after cART was begun in the former than in the latter population (6 vs 4 months, p = 0.0001). Cox multivariable analysis confirmed that after starting cART, an HBcAb+/HBsAb+/−-positive status is a risk factor for a lower odds of achieving virological success and a higher risk of experiencing virological rebound (AHR 0.63, CI 95% 0.46–0.87, p = 0.004 and AHR 2.52, CI 95% 1.09–5.80, p = 0.030). HBcAb-positive status resulted in a delay in achieving HIV < 50 copies/mL and the appearance of viral rebound in course of cART, hence it is related to a poor control of HIV infection in a population of coinfected patients.

Impact of the M184V/I Mutation on the Efficacy of Abacavir/Lamivudine/Dolutegravir Therapy in HIV Treatment-Experienced Patients

ObjectiveThe impact of the M184V/I mutation on the virological failure (VF) rate in HIV-positive patients with suppressed viremia switching to an abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir regimen has been poorly evaluated.MethodThis is an observational study from 5 European HIV cohorts among treatment-experienced adults with ≤50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA who switched to abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir. Primary outcome was the time to first VF (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL or single HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL accompanied by change in antiretroviral therapy [ART]). We also analyzed a composite outcome considering the presence of VF and/or virological blips. We report also the results of an inverse probability weighting analysis on a restricted population with a prior history of VF on any ART regimen to calculate statistics standardized to the disparate sampling population.ResultsWe included 1626 patients (median follow-up, 288.5 days; interquartile range, 154–441). Patients with a genotypically documented M184V/I mutation (n = 137) had a lower CD4 nadir and a longer history of antiviral treatment. The incidence of VF was 29.8 cases (11.2–79.4) per 1000 person-years in those with a previously documented M184V/I, and 13.6 cases (8.4–21.8) in patients without documented M184V/I. Propensity score weighting in a restricted population (n = 580) showed that M184V/I was not associated with VF or the composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–4.59 and HR 1.66; 95% CI, 0.81–3.43, respectively).ConclusionsIn ART-experienced patients switching to an abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir treatment, we observed few VFs and found no evidence for an impact of previously-acquired M184V/I mutation on this outcome. Additional analyses are required to demonstrate whether these findings will remain robust during a longer follow-up.

Effectiveness of Once/Day Dolutegravir Plus Boosted Darunavir as a Switch Strategy in Heavily Treated Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Dual therapy with once/day dolutegravir (DTG) plus boosted darunavir (DRV/b) may be a suitable and effective strategy with a high genetic barrier to resistance in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of DTG plus DRV/b (DTG+DRV/b) as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients, irrespective of their history of virologic failure (VF). Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Human immunodeficiency outpatient treatment clinics at three university hospitals in Spain. Fifty HIV-infected adults who had a stable antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimen and an undetectable viral load for at least 6months, and whose ART was switched to once/day DTG+DRV/b between January 2015 and January 2018 were included in the analysis. Historical genotype at the time of VF was available in 44 patients. Patients were followed until VF or treatment discontinuation for any reason. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with a viral load of 50 copies/mL or lower at the last follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included changes in CD4+ cell count, lipid profile, and renal function. Of the 50 patients included, median time of viral suppression was 52 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-103 mo) and nadir CD4+ 89 cells/mm3 (IQR 37-241 cells/mm3 ). Patients had a history of a median of 8 ART combinations (IQR 4-11 combinations) and 3 VFs (IQR 2-8 VFs). The historical genotypes from 44 patients showed 41 patients (93.2%) with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), 32 (72.7%) with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) RAMs, and 12 (27.3%) with primary protease inhibitor (PI) RAMs; 7 (15.9%) had darunavir RAMs, and no patients had baseline integrase strand transfer inhibitor RAMs. Thirty-seven patients (84.1%) had resistance to at least two antiretroviral classes. After a median of 25 months (IQR 17-28 mo) of follow-up, 49 patients (98%) maintained a viral load of 50 copies/mL or lower, and 1 patient (2%) had VF. No new RAMs emerged at VF. At week 4, serum creatinine concentration increased a median of 0.12 mg/dl (0.03-0.23 mg/dl). At last visit, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased by a median of 9 mg/dl (IQR -18 to 40 mg/dl) and 16 mg/dl (IQR -9 to 40 mg/dl), respectively, whereas CD4+ cell count remained stable (median +13 cell/mm3 ). In this cohort of heavily treated HIV-infected patients with virologic suppression, switching to the combination of DTG+DRV/b was a convenient regimen that was highly effective and had good tolerability.

Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with rilpivirine and boosted darunavir in treatment-experienced patients with advanced HIV infection: a preliminary 24\u2009week analysis (RIDAR study)

BackgroundThe objective was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with rilpivirine plus boosted-darunavir (RPV + bDRV) in real-life patients.MethodsObservational, retrospective, multi-center study in HIV+ patients who had received RPV + bDRV for 24 weeks to optimize/simplify their previous antiretroviral treatment. We determined the percentage of patients without virologic failure (2 consecutive viral loads > 50 copies/mL) at 24 weeks of treatment.ResultsThe study included 161 patients from 15 hospitals with median age of 49 years; 29.3% had previous AIDS stage and median CD4+ lymphocyte nadir of 170 cells/uL. They had been diagnosed with HIV for a median of 17 years and had received 14 years of ART, with five previous treatment combinations, and 36.6% had a history of virological failure. The reasons for the switch were simplification/optimization (49.7%), toxicity/intolerance (17.4%), or inadequate effectiveness of previous ART (10.6%).Baseline VL of 50–1000 copies/mL was recorded in 25.5% of the patients. In the“intention-to-treat” analysis at 24 weeks, 87.6% of 161 patients continued the study treatment without virologic failure criteria.In the “on treatment” analysis (excluding patients who discontinued treatment with dual therapy for any reason other than virologic failure) the efficacy was 94.6% (141/149 patients).ConclusionsDual therapy with RPV + DRVb proved to be effective and safe in patients with advanced HIV infection, long exposure to ART, low CD4 nadir, previous virologic failure, and/or history of ineffective ART.

LB2. Switch to Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) Maintains Virologic Suppression Through 48 Weeks: Results of the DRIVE-SHIFT Trial

BackgroundDoravirine is a novel, non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that has demonstrated efficacy in two Phase 3 trials in treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1.MethodsThis open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority (NI) trial evaluated a once-daily single-tablet regimen of doravirine 100 mg, lamivudine 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) vs. continuation of current therapy in adults with HIV-1 virologically suppressed for ≥6 months on a stable regimen of two NRTIs plus a boosted protease inhibitor (PI), boosted elvitegravir, or NNRTI. Participants with screening HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL, no history of virologic failure on any regimen, and no resistance to DOR/3TC/TDF were randomized (2:1) to start DOR/3TC/TDF on Day 1 (immediate switch group, ISG) or after 24 weeks (delayed switch group, DSG). The primary endpoint was the proportion (%) of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (FDA snapshot approach), with the primary comparison between ISG at Week 48 and DSG at Week 24 and a secondary comparison between the groups at Week 24; the NI margin was -8%. The % of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL was also analyzed (FDA snapshot approach; NI margin 4%).ResultsA total of 670 participants (447 ISG, 223 DSG) were treated and included in the analyses; 84.5% were male, 76.4% were white, and mean age was 43.3 years. At Week 24, 93.7% (419/447) of ISG vs. 94.6% (211/223) of DSG had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference −0.9% [−4.7, 3.0]), and 1.8% of each group had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL. At Week 48, 90.8% (406/447) of ISG maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (vs. 94.6% of DSG at Week 24; difference −3.8%, 95% CI [−7.9%, 0.3%]), and 1.6% of ISG had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL. In the ritonavir-boosted PI stratum, mean changes in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C at Week 24 were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in ISG vs. DSG (table). Rates of any AE and of drug-related AEs at Week 24 were higher in ISG vs. DSG. AEs were mild in most ISG participants (64% of those with any AE; 80% of those with drug-related AEs).ConclusionA once-daily single-tablet regimen of DOR/3TC/TDF demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and acceptable safety compared with continuing therapy, and is an option for maintaining viral suppression in patients considering a change in therapy.Disclosures P. Kumar, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen,: Grant Investigator and Shareholder, Research grant. GSK, Gilead, Teratechnologies, TaiMed,: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Research grant. J. M. Molina, Merck GIlead ViiV Janssen Teva: Ad Board and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee. Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator, Research support. G. Rizzardini, ViiV, Gilead Science, MSD, Angelini, and Abbvie: Board Member and Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. Gliead, ViiV, and MSD: Research Contractor, Research grant. P. Cahn, Abbvie: Grant, Research grant. Merck: Grant, Advisory Board. ViiV Healthcare: Grant, Advisory Board. M. Bickel, Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Contractor, Research grant. Y. Zhou, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, Salary. C. Morais, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary. S. Kumar, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. P. Sklar, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. J. Hanna, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company. and Salary. C. Hwang, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. W. Greaves, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, May hold stock/stock options within the company.

Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine: A Review in HIV-1 Infection.

Dolutegravir/rilpivirine (Juluca®) is the first two-drug single-tablet regimen (STR) to be approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults. The fixed-dose STR combines the integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor rilpivirine. In two phaseIII non-inferiority trials (SWORD-1 and SWORD-2) in treatment-experienced patients already virologically suppressed on their current antiretroviral (ART) regimen, switching to once-daily dolutegravir plus rilpivirine maintained virological suppression over 48weeks. Switching to a two-drug regimen of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine was also associated with high rates of virological suppression in real-world observational studies. Switching to once-daily dolutegravir plus rilpivirine was generally well tolerated and associated with more favourable renal and bone parameters than remaining on the current ART regimen. Longer-term, dolutegravir plus rilpivirine demonstrated durable maintenance of virological suppression and remained generally well tolerated for up to 100weeks. Thus, dolutegravir/rilpivirine provides a convenient alternative treatment option for some adults with HIV-1 infection and no history of virological failure who are already virologically suppressed on (and wish to switch from) their current ART regimen.

Dolutegravir as maintenance monotherapy for HIV (DOMONO): a phase 2, randomised non-inferiority trial

The high genetic barrier to resistance of dolutegravir might allow for its use as maintenance monotherapy in patients with HIV. We investigated whether dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for maintaining virological suppression in patients with HIV-1 infection successfully treated with combination ART. We did this open-label, phase 2, randomised non-inferiority trial at two medical centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) were on combination ART, had been virologically suppressed (HIV RNA <50 copies per mL) for at least 6 months, and had CD4 nadirs of 200 cells per μL or higher, HIV RNA zeniths of 100 000 copies per mL or less, and no history of virological failure. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based block randomisation method (variable block sizes of 4 and 6), to switch to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg once a day) either immediately or after a delay of 24 weeks of continued combination ART. Randomisation was stratified by HIV RNA zenith (<50 000 copies per mL vs 50 000-99 999 copies per mL). Investigators and patients were not masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL at week 24, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. We did analyses in the on-treatment and intention-to-treat populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02401828. Between March 10, 2015, and Feb 4, 2016, we randomly assigned 51 patients to the immediate switch group and 53 patients to the delayed switch group. One patient who received immediate monotherapy discontinued treatment at week 12 because of disturbed sleep. At week 24, dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination ART, with plasma HIV RNA loads of 200 copies per mL or higher observed in 2% (1/50) of patients in the immediate switch group and in no patients in the delayed switch group (difference 2%, 95% CI -5 to 12). Of patients assigned to the delayed switch group, 47 (89%) switched to dolutegravir monotherapy at week 24, two (4%) of whom subsequently discontinued monotherapy because of headache (n=1) and disturbed sleep (n=1). Eight (8%) of the 95 patients who remained on dolutegravir monotherapy had virological failure; all had therapeutic plasma concentrations of dolutegravir. In three (38%) of the eight patients, mutations associated with resistance were detected in the integrase gene. According to a predefined stopping rule, detection of these mutations led to premature study discontinuation. Dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination ART at 24 weeks. However, virological failure continued to occur thereafter and led to dolutegravir resistance. Dolutegravir should not be used as maintenance monotherapy. Erasmus Trustfonds.

Interest of proviral HIV-1 DNA genotypic resistance testing in virologically suppressed patients candidate for maintenance therapy

Switch of antiretroviral therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients is frequent, to prevent toxicities, for simplification or convenience reasons. Pretherapeutic genotypic resistance testing on RNA can be lacking in some patients, which could enhance the risk of virologic failure, if resistance-associated mutations of the new regimen are not taken into account. Proviral DNA resistance testing in 69 virologically suppressed patients on antiretroviral treatment with no history of virological failure were pair-wised compared with pre-ART plasma RNA resistance testing. The median time between plasma (RNA testing) and whole blood (proviral DNA testing) was 47 months (IQR 29–63). A stop codon was evidenced in 23% (16/69) of proviral DNA sequences; these strains were considered as defective, non-replicative, and not taken into consideration. Within the non defective strains, concordance rate between plasma RNA and non-defective proviral DNA was high both on protease (194/220 concordant resistance-associated mutations=88%) and reverse transcriptase (28/37 concordant resistance-associated mutations=76%) genes. This study supports that proviral DNA testing might be an informative tool before switching antiretrovirals in virologically suppressed patients with no history of virological failure, but the interpretation should be restricted to non-defective viruses.

Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted protease inhibitors plus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimens to single-tablet darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at 48 weeks in adults with virologically suppressed HIV-1 (EMERALD): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial

Simplified regimens with reduced pill burden and fewer side-effects are desirable for people living with HIV. We investigated the efficacy and safety of switching to a single-tablet regimen of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus continuing a regimen of boosted protease inhibitor, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. EMERALD was a phase-3, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, international, multicentre trial, done at 106 sites across nine countries in North America and Europe. HIV-1-infected adults were eligible to participate if they were treatment-experienced and virologically suppressed (viral load <50 copies per mL for ≥2 months; one viral load of 50-200 copies per mL was allowed within 12 months before screening), and patients with a history of virological failure on non-darunavir regimens were allowed. Randomisation was by computer-generated interactive web-response system and stratified by boosted protease inhibitor use at baseline. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to switch to the open-label study regimen or continue the control regimen. The study regimen consisted of a fixed-dose tablet containing darunavir 800 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg, which was taken once per day for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with virological rebound (confirmed viral load ≥50 copies per mL or premature discontinuations, with last viral load ≥50 copies per mL) cumulative through week 48; we tested non-inferiority (4% margin) of the study regimen versus the control regimen in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02269917. The study began on April 1, 2015, and the cutoff date for the week 48 primary analysis was Feb 24, 2017. Of 1141 patients (763 in the study group and 378 in the control group), 664 (58%) had previously received five or more antiretrovirals, including screening antiretrovirals, and 169 (15%) had previous virological failure on a non-darunavir regimen. The study regimen was non-inferior to the control for virological rebound cumulative through week 48 (19 [2·5%] of 763 patients in the study group vs eight (2·1%) of 378 patients in the control group; difference 0·4%, 95% CI -1·5 to 2·2; p<0·0001). No resistance to any study drug was observed. Numbers of discontinuations related to adverse events (11 [1%] of 763 patients in the study group vs four [1%] of 378 patients in the control group) and grade 3-4 adverse events (52 [7%] patients vs 31 [8%] patients) were similar between the two groups. There was a small non-clinically relevant but statistically significant (0·2 [SD 1·1] vs 0·1 [1·1], p=0.010) difference between the two groups in change from baseline in total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol ratio. Only one serious adverse event (pancreatitis in the study group) was deemed as possibly related to the study regimen. Our findings show the safety and efficacy of single-tablet darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a potential switch option for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults with viral suppression. Janssen.

Simplification to single-tablet regimen of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir DF from multi-tablet ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus coformulated emtricitabine and tenofovir DF regimens: week 96 results of STRATEGY-PI

Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) simplification to a single-tablet regimen can benefit HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed, individuals on ART composed of multiple pills.Objective: We assessed long-term efficacy and safety of switching to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) from multi-tablet ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI + RTV) plus F/TDF (TVD) regimens.Methods: STRATEGY-PI was a 96-week, phase 3b, randomized (2:1), open-label, non-inferiority study examining the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to E/C/F/TDF from PI + RTV + TVD regimens in virologically suppressed individuals (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL). Participants were randomized to switch to E/C/F/TDF (switch group) or to continue their PI + RTV + TVD regimens (no-switch group). Eligibility criteria included no resistance to F/TDF or history of virologic failure, and estimated creatinine clearance ≥70 mL/min.Results: At week 96, 87% (252/290) of switch and 70% (97/139) of no-switch participants maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference: 17%, 95% CI 8.7–26.0%, p < 0.001). Superiority of the switch to E/C/F/TDF vs. no-switch was due to a smaller proportion of both virologic failures (switch, 1% [3/290]; no-switch, 6% [8/139]) and discontinuations for non-virologic reasons (switch, 11% [31/290]; no-switch, 24% [33/139]). No treatment-emergent resistance was observed in switch subjects with virologic failure. Discontinuation rates from adverse events were 3% in both groups (9/293, switch; 4/140, no-switch). Switching from PI + RTV + TVD to E/C/F/TDF was associated with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes related to gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea and bloating).Conclusion: E/C/F/TDF is a safe, effective long-term alternative to multi-tablet PI + RTV + TVD-based regimens in virologically suppressed, HIV-1-infected adults, and improves patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms.

Refining criteria for selecting candidates for a safe lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy in HIV-infected virologically suppressed patients.

ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of treatment failure (TF) to protease inhibitor monotherapies (PI/r-MT) with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r).DesignA multicenter cohort of HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) ≤50 copies/mL, who underwent a switch from any triple combination therapy to PI/r-MT with either LPV/r or DRV/r.MethodsVL was assessed in each center according to local procedures. Residual viremia was defined by any HIV-RNA value detectable below 50 copies/mL by a Real-Time PCR method. Standard survival analysis was used to estimate the rate of TF (defined by virological failure or interruption of monotherapy or reintroduction of combination therapy). A multivariable Cox regression analysis with automatic stepwise procedures was used to identify factors independently associated with TF among nadir and baseline CD4+ counts, residual viremia, time spent with <50 HIV-RNA copies/mL before switch, history of virological failure, HCV co-infection, being on a PI/r and hemoglobin concentrations at baseline.ResultsSix hundred ninety patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Their median follow-up was 20 (10–37) months. By month 36, TF occurred in 176 (30.2%; 95% CI:25.9–34.5) patients. Only CD4+ nadir counts (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.03 [95% CI: 1.35, 3.07] for counts ≤100 vs. >100 cells/μL) and residual viremia (aHR = 1.48 [95% CI: 1.01–2.17] vs. undetectable VL) were independently associated to TF.ConclusionsResidual viremia and nadir CD4+ counts <100 cells/μL should be regarded as the main factors to be taken into account before considering switching to a PI/r-MT.

Modifying Antiretroviral Therapy in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1-Infected Patients.

HIV-1-infected patients with suppressed plasma viral loads often require changes to their antiretroviral (ARV) therapy to manage drug toxicity and intolerance, to improve adherence, and to avoid drug interactions. In patients who have never experienced virologic failure while receiving ARV therapy and who have no evidence of drug resistance, switching to any of the acceptable US Department of Health and Human Services first-line therapies is expected to maintain virologic suppression. However, in virologically suppressed patients with a history of virologic failure or drug resistance, it can be more challenging to change therapy while still maintaining virologic suppression. In these patients, it may be difficult to know whether the discontinuation of one of the ARVs in a suppressive regimen constitutes the removal of a key regimen component that will not be adequately supplanted by one or more substituted ARVs. In this article, we review many of the clinical scenarios requiring ARV therapy modification in patients with stable virologic suppression and outline the strategies for modifying therapy while maintaining long-term virologic suppression.