T'ang Studies 10-11 (1992-93) Sui-T'ang Studies in Japan in 1991 * FURUHATA TORU il1mfrrt Translated by John Lee ST. MARY'S UNIVERSITY, HAliFAX, NOVA SCOTIA About sixty studies were reviewed for this summary. This is somewhat fewer than normal, but I felt as though it was even fewer than it was. One reason is that nearly a third of the studies published last year were on literature. Another reason is the relative absence of work by established scholars who have led the way in Sui-T'ang history in recent years. This absence was, to be sure, accidental, owing to a lack of publication of joint research projects or Festschriften . On the other hand, it is the case that a significant number of scholars were devoting their time last year to writing contributions for various Festschriften. In light of this, the popular trend in publishing Festschriften perhaps needs to be restrained, especially in the field of East Asian history, where there are far fewer practitioners than, say, in Japanese history. The time may have come for us to rethink accustomed practices. The decline in the number of published studies may also have something to do with university reforms, which are currently underway on many campuses. Again, a significant number of scholars are being forced to devote their time to administrative concerns because of this. At any rate, 1991 was a year dominated by so-called "younger scholars," and thanks to this fact, recent research trends were perhaps also more clearly manifested . I should like to elaborate briefly on this point at the end of my survey of the achievements in various areas. Law, Institutions. We must first mention in this area the two publications of Nakamura Hiroichi: Studies on T'ang Edicts (T6dai seichoku kenkya) and Studies on T'ang Official Documents (T6dai kanmonjo kenkyii). Both books consist of revised versions of papers on the topic of T'ang official documents, which the author has pub- ""Originally published in Shigaku zasshi 101.5 (1992), 206-12. Furuhata Toru teaches at Kanazawa University. 185 Lee: S2 Summary 1991 lished over more than ten years. Parts of both books, including the introductions, were newly written for the occasion. As Nakamura himself admits in the introductions, the significance of research on T' ang official documents, which he has pioneered, does not lie in providing historians with another form of aid. It is, instead, an achievement in political-institutional history, through which we can approach the entire institutional framework of the T'ang. Since many of the original papers appeared in rather obscure journals, the significance of these two volumes cannot be exaggerated. I shall leave detailed description of their contents to separate reviews, but here I will point out that at least the introductions, where the purpose of the research is explained, along with the descriptions of the types of documents and of research history, deserve to be read by every student of T'ang history. Let us move on now to individual articles. The following were published on the Iii-ling ~~ system: Yuasa Yukihiko, "The T'ang Administrative Code and the Yoro Code" (Torei to Yororyo), Chiigoku : shakai to bunka tp !i'l : U it C )( 1t. 6; Sakagami Yasutoshi, "The T'ang Statutes and the Edicts Outside the Statutes of the T'ang Quoted in the Ryono shiigei ~~~¥" (Ryono shiigei ni in'yosareta To no kaku, kakugochoku ni tsuite), Shien §E l~ 128; Nakamura Hiroichi, "Mistaken Characters and Omitted Characters in the Fragments of the Articles on Official Forms of the T'ang Administrative Code Discovered at Tun-huang" (Tonka hakken no To kOshkireizankan no goji to datsuji ni tsuite), Kyiiko m ti 19. Yuasa's article attempts to prove that, unlike its Japanese counterpart , the T' ang administrative code lacked articles on officials' furlough and on schools; the author points out the mistakes and misunderstandings in Niida Noboru's Collected Fragments of the T'ang Administrative Code (Torei shui n!f ~ ~ m). In doing so, Yuasa challenges us to reconsider what has been the common wisdom since Niida. His conclusions are still difficult to accept, however. For example, Yuasa claims that the sectional titles of the...
Read full abstract