by TERJE I. LEIREN il American Press Opinion and Norwegian Independence, 1905* The portentous year 1905 events lacked either nothing for contemporaries in surprises and or portentous events either for contemporaries or for subsequent generations. The Russo-Japanese War and the resulting Russian Revolution which dominated the press served as the first acts of an even greater sequence of events in the next decade. Theodore Roosevelt, President of the United States, brought the warring nations to the peace table; for his role in concluding the Treaty of Portsmouth the wielder of the big stick was dubbed "Angel of Peace" by the press and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the following year. While the eyes of the world anxiously viewed events in Asia and eastern Europe, there occurred in the northwestern corner of the European continent an event with its own logic as the small country of Norway dissolved its union with Sweden and entered the family of nations as a fully independent country.1 *This article is an expanded version of a paper read at the Southwestern Social Science Convention in San Antonio, Texas, on March 27, 1975. The author wishes to thank Professors Irby C. Nichols, Jr., and Gordon D. Healey of North Texas State University for their helpful criticism and constant support . 1 Contemporary accounts carried a vast amount of information for any 224 NORWEGIAN INDEPENDENCE On June 7 the Norwegian Storting (Parliament) passed a resolution declaring the throne of Norway vacant. By this action Oscar II, King of Sweden-Norway and grandson of Napoleon's former Marshall Jean Baptiste Bernadotte, was deposed. It had been Bernadotte who had forced the union ninety-one years earlier. The dissolution , hailed by Norwegians with overwhelming enthusiasm , appeared as a leading story in newspapers across the United States.2 Fascination with events in Norway, however, was not limited to reporting the dissolution ; the American press also analyzed the significance American reader who wished to be informed about the disunion. See, for example, the following: Hjalmar Hjorth Boyesen II, "The Crisis in Scandinavia : Benefits Coming from the Split between Norway and Sweden," in Cosmopolitan Magazine , 39:629-630 (October, 1905); "Norway and Sweden ," in th e Outlook, 80:413-415 (June 17, 1905); "Why Norway and Sweden Are at Odds," in Review of Reviews , 3:208-209 (August, 1904); Harry Seaton Karr, "The Rupture between Norway and Sweden," in Nineteenth Century and After , 58:539-544 (October, 1905); H. L. Braekstad, "Norway's Right to Independence," in North American Review , 181:281-288 (August, 1905); "The Secession of Norway," in Everybody's Magazine , 13:420-421 (September , 1905); "The Case of Norway," in the Nation , 81:92-93 (August 3, 1905); Julius Moritzen, "The Rupture between Norway and Sweden," in the Forum , 37:141-152 (July, 1905); the New York Tribune , June 8, 1905; the Chicago Tribune , June 8, July 15, 1905. Fridtjof Nansen's Norway and the Union with Sweden (New York, 1905), a book published just prior to the dissolution, provides an invaluable source for understanding the Norwegian point of view. Several general histories help to place the events of 1905 in their historical perspective. See, for example: Karen Larsen, A History of Norway (Princeton, 1948); Raymond E. Lindgren, Norway-Sweden: Union , Disunion and Scandinavian Integration (Princeton, 1959); Folke Lindberg, Scandinavia in Great Power Politics 1905-1908 (Stockholm, 1957); John Midgaard, A Brief History of Norway (Oslo, 1963); and T. K. Derry, A History of Modern Norway 1814-1972 (New York, 1973). 2 New York Times , June 8, 1905; St. Louis Post-Dispatch , June 8, 1905; Chicago Tribune , June 8, 1905; San Francisco Examiner , June 8, 1905; Washington Post , June 8, 1905; New York Tribune , June 8, 1905; and Atlanta Constitution , June 8, 1905. 1 have examined these newspapers as representative of the regional distribution of opinion in the United States. However, I have avoided the inclusion of ethnic newspapers because their views can be taken for granted as supportive of Norway. The interested reader can consult Skandinaven (Chicago), Decorah-Posten (Decorah, Iowa), and Nordisk Tidende (Brooklyn). An excellent survey of the Norwegian- American press may be found in Leola Bergmann's Americans from Norway , 171-184 (Philadelphia, 1950...
Read full abstract